PDA

View Full Version : Eric Warfield?

madshaw16
10-21-2005, 06:20 PM
I did not get to see the beginning of the game, I was wondering if Eric Warfield started the game, and is Dexter hurt?
DaKCMan AP
10-21-2005, 06:23 PM
dex is inactive
ArrowheadHawk
10-21-2005, 06:38 PM
warfield started
JBucc
10-21-2005, 06:47 PM
We held them to 6, who do you think started
Iowanian
10-21-2005, 07:06 PM
how has warfield looked?
Deberg_1990
10-21-2005, 07:12 PM
Dnnt worry, IM sure Dex will be starting again for DV when he gets healthy.
Anyong Bluth
10-21-2005, 07:15 PM
I'm recording the game so I'll go back and see but it doesn't seem like we're as lame duck on pass D - but that may just be b/c its Miami we're playing
Pitt Gorilla
10-21-2005, 07:47 PM
DV is senile and doesn't want the Chiefs to win, or something. We will never win another game...
htismaqe
10-21-2005, 08:07 PM
Dnnt worry, IM sure Dex will be starting again for DV when he gets healthy.

Yeah, if only Vermeil would just stay out of it and let Gunther make the decisions.

After all, that 78-yard TD we just gave up was against Warfield.
carlos3652
10-21-2005, 08:52 PM
Yeah, if only Vermeil would just stay out of it and let Gunther make the decisions.

After all, that 78-yard TD we just gave up was against Warfield.

Ht... Chiefs were in a cover 4... Warfield got burnt, (Surtain as well??) and Knight missed the tackle...

That was not just Warfields fault...
KcMizzou
10-21-2005, 08:56 PM
Warfield played a good game, IMO. I'm glad to have him back.
Anyong Bluth
10-21-2005, 08:59 PM
yeah- i don't faults Warfield on the long play - he went after the ball and knew he had help over the top - Knights the one that whiffed on the tackle....
carlos3652
10-21-2005, 09:01 PM
Well... From what I saw (which wasnt much...) and I did not tivo it...

I can remember 44 getting burned twice:

1. In the endzone (Ferotte overthrow because of the pressure)
2. On the 77 yard TD

But the Pass D was much better tonight... I think we were more agressive, Surtain was on Chambers 80% of the time... no more soft zone (other than at the end of the 1st and 2nd half - thats where the fins did the most damage)
Anyong Bluth
10-21-2005, 09:04 PM
I tivo'd it and watched it a few times - in slow mo too
tommykat
10-21-2005, 09:10 PM
Warfield played a good game, IMO. I'm glad to have him back.

As I couldn't watch it :cuss: but from listening sounds like Warfield is more than ready to go...:thumb:
Pants
10-21-2005, 09:25 PM
Well... From what I saw (which wasnt much...) and I did not tivo it...

I can remember 44 getting burned twice:

1. In the endzone (Ferotte overthrow because of the pressure)
2. On the 77 yard TD

But the Pass D was much better tonight... I think we were more agressive, Surtain was on Chambers 80% of the time... no more soft zone (other than at the end of the 1st and 2nd half - thats where the fins did the most damage)

He got schooled on that endzone play, that receiver broke his f*cking ankles, lol. Thank god Gus was throwing the ball.
jspchief
10-21-2005, 10:06 PM
Okay, so let's just say Warfield sucked tonight, for the sake of argument.

He has to suck for another year and a half before he's been given the same chance to suck like McCleon has.

htis, I know you want another chance to say "I told you so", but so far I think Warfield has done enough to deserve another shot. It's not about you being right or driving home some point. It's about improving the defense.
Pants
10-21-2005, 10:07 PM
Okay, so let's just say Warfield sucked tonight, for the sake of argument.

He has to suck for another year and a half before he's been given the same chance to suck like McCleon has.

htis, I know you want another chance to say "I told you so", but so far I think Warfield has done enough to deserve another shot. It's not about you being right or driving home some point. It's about improving the defense.

I thought you guys were the same person??
tk13
10-21-2005, 10:11 PM
I thought you guys were the same person??
They are, don't fall into his trap! :)

No surprise that Warfield jumps in and we play better, although it'll be a much tougher test next weekend...
jspchief
10-21-2005, 10:11 PM
I thought you guys were the same person??Heh, we may agree on a lot of things, but I don't really get where he's going with his defense of McCleon.
Chris Meck
10-22-2005, 12:51 PM
the nicest thing was, that 10 yard cushion crap was nowhere to be found.
Anyong Bluth
10-22-2005, 02:17 PM
there was still plays where they were playing 5 yards off - but we we're up big so keeping it in front was understandable - especially since we were blowing up their running game sans the long run. Overall I thought the CB's played above avg and the safety help was a little weak - letting defenders get deeper than them, missing tackles and not getting Brown out on his long run when it was very possible to