PDA

View Full Version : NFL.com's Vic Carucci says we're ready to win today and Denver will lose.


4th and Long
10-30-2005, 07:05 AM
Burning questions for Week 8
http://images.nfl.com/images/author/4648.jpg
By Vic Carucci
National Editor, NFL.com

Oct. 28, 2005 -- Four burning questions for Week 8:

Which of the emerging quarterbacks from the NFC East, Eli Manning or Mark Brunell, will come out on top during the big showdown between Manning's New York Giants and Brunell's Washington Redskins?

I'll go with Brunell, who so far is the runaway choice for NFL Comeback Player of the Year. He has found a rhythm with a passing attack that can strike at will, whether the game is close or turns into a shootout.

The guess here is Mark Brunell's resurgence will continue Oct. 30 in the Meadowlands.

Manning continues to rapidly develop into a first-rate starter, and has shown he is capable of making big plays in pressure-packed situations. But I think the difference in the outcome will be the help Brunell receives from his running game. Look for the Redskins to make considerable use of Clinton Portis to exploit the Giants rushing defense, which has allowed 4.3 yards per carry.

Expect Washington offensive coordinator Bill Musgrave to do quite a bit of pulling with his linemen to allow Portis to run outside and have the blockers ready to neutralize rangy Giants middle linebacker Antonio Pierce, a former Redskin.

Portis also should have success running inside because of his tremendous patience in allowing holes to open and his exceptional vision, which helps him find running lanes.

Are the Kansas City Chiefs ready to continue their offensive roll against the San Diego Chargers?

Yes.

Although the Chargers have the second-ranked run defense in the league, the Chiefs will wisely have Priest Holmes and Larry Johnson hammer the ball on the ground early and often because that will allow them to help set up Trent Green's effective play-action passing.

And Green should have a good deal of success against the league's 29th-ranked pass defense. As usual, the Chiefs will line up in a variety of multiple-receiver sets. Few quarterbacks in the league are better than Green at making use of all of the pass-catching options at his disposal.

Green's best option continues to be tight end Tony Gonzalez, who finally had a larger role in the offense in the Chiefs' Week 7 victory at Miami. The Chargers' aggressive defense is likely to bite hard on play fakes and leave Gonzalez plenty of room to operate underneath.

When the Chargers adjust their coverage to account for Gonzalez, look for Holmes and Johnson to begin finding more running room and being open on screen passes that can turn into long gains.

Can the Philadelphia Eagles continue to win without attempting to run the ball?

There is no denying that the Eagles' pass-crazy approach goes against every basic principle of what it takes to succeed in football.

Donovan McNabb likely will keep on throwing against a defense that's stout against the run.

Yet, it is hard to argue with the success or assume, even for an instant, that coach Andy Reid or offensive coordinator Brad Childress don't know what they are doing when it comes to assembling a game plan.

Therefore, reluctantly, I will accept the notion the Eagles can make the formula work in Denver once again, even against the second-best rushing team in the league. The Eagles likely will again find themselves in a close game that won't be decided until the final moments, but they have demonstrated the ability to handle such pressure-filled circumstances.

They also have demonstrated that nothing -- including a persistent run game -- discourages their defensive coordinator, Jim Johnson, from blitzing constantly. The same defense that kept LaDainian Tomlinson smothered in Week 7 should keep the Broncos running game in check. And that should force quarterback Jake Plummer to find himself in less favorable down-and-distance situations than usual.

Plummer hasn't been intercepted since Week 2, but with the Eagles defense coming at him constantly and from all directions, he is bound to make some bad throws that could wind up in the hands of the many talented playmakers in Philadelphia's secondary.

Is Jake Delhomme ready to eliminate any doubts he should be Carolina's starting quarterback, while helping the Panthers eliminate any doubts they are an elite team with a victory against the struggling Minnesota Vikings?

He should.

I think Delhomme is too good a player to be on shaky ground, which was where he found himself after being knocked woozy in a Week 6 game against Detroit. Then he watched Chris Weinke come off the bench to lead the Panthers on a 1

scoring drive capped by his winning throw. It didn't help that Delhomme had been intercepted three times before then, and he certainly must cut down on his mistakes.

But he is the same quarterback who led the Panthers to a near-victory in the Super Bowl. He also should be a steadier, more reliable starter than the largely untested Weinke, who was 1-15 in his only season as the Panthers' No. 1 quarterback (2001), over the long haul.

The Vikings still have major issues on and off the field, but they did receive a significant boost of confidence with their last-second victory against the Green Bay Packers in Week 7. They will present a challenge, although the Panthers should be able to have their share of success moving the ball against the NFL's 25th-ranked defense.

Beyond Steve Smith, Carolina doesn't have much in the way of big-play passing targets. The Panthers likely are to use three-receiver sets to get Smith one-on-one with a cornerback as often as possible. Another receiver, Keary Colbert, is hobbled with a sore ankle. If he is ineffective or unable to play, steady Ricky Proehl should make an impact by finding holes in Minnesota's secondary, especially on third down.

HemiEd
10-30-2005, 07:10 AM
For once, Vic Carucci and I agree.
http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=127619

CoMoChief
10-30-2005, 07:32 AM
Vic Carucci is the biggest Chiefs homer, which I have no problem in that whatsoever. He's practically the only one out there in the national media that gives us any attention.

Ugly Duck
10-30-2005, 08:10 AM
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/football/nfl/picks.htm

Click the link above: All six of the USA Today pundits unamimously pick the Chiefs to lose. Interesting though, on the same site, the Sagarin Ratings rate the Chiefs at #5 in the NFL....

#2 Denver Broncos
#5 Kansas City Chiefs
#7 San Diego Chargers
#16 Oakland Raiders

Mecca
10-30-2005, 08:14 AM
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/football/nfl/picks.htm

Click the link above: All six of the USA Today pundits unamimously pick the Chiefs to lose. Interesting though, on the same site, the Sagarin Ratings rate the Chiefs at #5 in the NFL....

#2 Denver Broncos
#5 Kansas City Chiefs
#7 San Diego Chargers
#16 Oakland Raiders

Everyone has the Chiefs losing this week, go to espn.com. Every one of their so called "experts" also has the Chiefs losing.

You'd think San Diego was a 7-0 team the way the media is acting about this.

RealSNR
10-30-2005, 08:25 AM
Is it any surprise we're picked to lose? We have to go to their place. We meet a Charger team with an explosive offense, one that WILL put a few points on the scoreboard against this D. Finally, they've got their backs against a wall. Lose this game and they receive their 5th loss... especially in a competitive AFC this year, that's no good. They'll basically need to run the board after that while facing teams like the Chiefs at Arrowhead, NY Giants, and the Colts. There's at least two more losses right there.

4th and Long
10-30-2005, 08:31 AM
Everyone has the Chiefs losing this week, go to espn.com. Every one of their so called "experts" also has the Chiefs losing.

You'd think San Diego was a 7-0 team the way the media is acting about this.
Let's not kid ourselves folks. We have a hard time winning in San Diego. Over the last 10 years, we are 4-6 when playing San Diego in their house.

1995
@ San Diego Chargers W 22-7

1996
@ San Diego Chargers L 19-22

1997
@ San Diego Chargers W 29-7

1998
@ San Diego Chargers L 37-38

1999
@ San Diego Chargers L 14-21

2000
@ San Diego Chargers L 16-17

2001
@ San Diego Chargers W 25-20

2002
@ San Diego Chargers L 34-35

2003
@ San Diego Chargers W 28-24

2004
@ San Diego Chargers L 17-24

All time against this team, we do have a winning record, but not by much.

47-42-1.
Regular Season: 47-41-1
Postseason: 0-1
Home: 27-18-0
Away: 20-24-1

We don't own a winning record in their house and at Qualcomm Stadium, we are 18-20-0 (.474)

This is not going to be an easy game for numerous reasons. I am however, hopefully optimistic. :)

HC_Chief
10-30-2005, 08:36 AM
KC will lose. This team is not good... they are mediocre. If Marty gets his guys fired up, it could be ugly.

stevieray
10-30-2005, 08:41 AM
I think we'll win, if for no other reason that everyone expects us to lose.

That's how football is. It can't be predicted with any certainty.

Mecca
10-30-2005, 08:41 AM
I can just feel the positivity coming from this thread..........

stevieray
10-30-2005, 08:43 AM
I can just feel the positivity coming from this thread..........

hey, we might even blow them out, though I'd take another last second win.

ROYC75
10-30-2005, 09:14 AM
As much as I'm pulling for a win, I won't feel it until the final gun goes off and the scoreboard shows it.

Katie
10-30-2005, 09:25 AM
We can't lose, it's my anniversary!

ROYC75
10-30-2005, 09:33 AM
We can't lose, it's my anniversary!


Former or later ?


OK, stupid question, I hope it is a happy one .

Deberg_1990
10-30-2005, 09:51 AM
The Chargers are playing for their season. I fully expect them to come out strong today. I'l predict a 27-24 Bolts win today. Should be a great game.

RINGLEADER
10-30-2005, 09:52 AM
Did he say we'd win or just that our offense would continue to produce? I think we win this game if we're effective at stopping the Chargers offense.

Then again, I'm still half asleep...

Wile_E_Coyote
10-30-2005, 10:43 AM
Mort & Jaws pick the Chiefs. Jaws' pick is no surprise, him picking Denver over the Eagles though...