Poll: Would you want to take a chance on T.O. next year?

[CHIEF4EVER]

If he was willing to sign a contract with conduct and "mouthing off" provisions and promised to play at a high level, would you take a chance on T.O.?

[Hammock Parties]

We don't need T.O.

We need a defense.

[SCTrojan]

Nope. I'm sure the Eagles thought they could change him when they signed him.

[CHIEF4EVER]

We need a defense.

That is obvious. We still need an upgrade at WR. HYPOTHETICALLY: If he signed a contract with guarantees that protect the organization financially in the event of bad conduct, would you take the chance?

[007]

Need to put an option up there that says "Oh, HELL NO!!!"

[CHIEF4EVER]

Need to put an option up there that says "Oh, HELL NO!!!"

ROFL

[Frazod]

I don't want him, but I sure as hell don't want to see him end up in Denver or San Diego.

[SCTrojan]

That is obvious. We still need an upgrade at WR. HYPOTHETICALLY: If he signed a contract with guarantees that protect the organization financially in the event of bad conduct, would you take the chance?

Still going with no. Financial issues are the least of the problems he'd cause if he were here. For him, unless he's the highest paid player in the game, he's not getting the proper respect.

[steelyeyed57]

he would never come to kansas city -- we're to small market for a big market guy. Just ask LJ.

[007]

Hey, if he continues on his current path of destruction, Denver can have him.

[sedated]

He's a great WR, for the first year.

But we'll be rebuilding by 2007.


Why not give it a shot?


With Roaf back next year, and LJ, and TO, we could return to being an unstoppable offense.


(But we do need sign a D-Lineman and cut Bell)

[jynni]

I don't want him, but I sure as hell don't want to see him end up in Denver or San Diego.
Yeah - if there was a chance he'd go there - I might consider it.

Now if he went to the Raiders, I pull up a seat and get popcorn.

[007]

Now if he went to the Raiders, I pull up a seat and get popcorn.

ROFLROFL

[Hammock Parties]

That is obvious. We still need an upgrade at WR. HYPOTHETICALLY: If he signed a contract with guarantees that protect the organization financially in the event of bad conduct, would you take the chance?

Sure.

[CHIEF4EVER]

Still going with no. Financial issues are the least of the problems he'd cause if he were here. For him, unless he's the highest paid player in the game, he's not getting the proper respect.

The emboldened has been true in the past (and it is really the only info one can reliably go on at this point). That being said, he DOES have an obvious love for playing the game. Maybe after being canned by the Iggles and getting a heapin' helpin' of good ole humble pie he may have a changed attitude? Just a question for discussion.

[FRCDFED]

We need a top caliber WR. Yes......we have gotten by without one but having one would be that much better. Plus, TO is the type of physical WR that would run the tough routes across the middle. We need a WR that will go across the middle and get yards after the catch because Trent cannot throw the deep ball.

Sign him to a one or two year deal and pay the man for being the most talented WR in the NFL. If he will accept a clause penalizing him for mouthing off then so be it. Otherwise just sign his azz and put up with it. He will be out to prove the Eagles made a mistake for not paying up!

[FRCDFED]

He's a great WR, for the first year.

But we'll be rebuilding by 2007.


Why not give it a shot?


With Roaf back next year, and LJ, and TO, we could return to being an unstoppable offense.


(But we do need sign a D-Lineman and cut Bell)Bell was babied in camp and the preseason. Give him a second year before jumping on that bandwagon!

[007]

50/50 Talk about being torn. Good post CHIEFS4EVER

[Dr. Johnny Fever]

T.O. can kiss my lilly white ass.

[KcMizzou]

If he was willing to sign a contract with conduct and "mouthing off" provisions and promised to play at a high level, would you take a chance on T.O.? Is that possible? If so... yeah, I think I'd take him.

Pound the hell out of them w/ LJ.. and play-action to T.O.? I'd probably go for that.

[Bugeater]

Only if we can sign him and then trade him for any other team's entire defense.

[Matt Helm]

Oh HELL NO!

[Logical]

Bell was babied in camp and the preseason. Give him a second year before jumping on that bandwagon!

Don't forget a defensive coordinator that does not use players in ways they are ill equipped to play. That would probably help Bell as well.

[Kerberos]

Do you think he would sign for league minimum? :hmmm:

:D


.

[SCTrojan]

It would be the ultimate deal with the devil. I think what you are truly asking is what we'd put up with for the Chiefs to get to a Super Bowl.

I'd put up with T.O., Randy Moss, Keyshawn, Warren Sapp and anyone else for that. Probably.

[Dr. Johnny Fever]

Do you think he would sign for league minimum? :hmmm:

:D


.
To play in one of the smallest markets in the league....????..... definately.

[007]

Do you think he would sign for league minimum? :hmmm:

:D


.

ROFLROFL Sure. If we give him a signing bonus of oooohhhh saaaayyy about 20 million.

NO T.O. NO T.O.

[KcMizzou]

It would be the ultimate deal with the devil. I think what you are truly asking is what we'd put up with for the Chiefs to get to a Super Bowl.

I'd put up with T.O., Randy Moss, Keyshawn, Warren Sapp and anyone else for that. Probably.ROFL

I admit, it's a combover.

[Matt Helm]

It would be the ultimate deal with the devil. I think what you are truly asking is what we'd put up with for the Chiefs to get to a Super Bowl.

I'd put up with T.O., Randy Moss, Keyshawn, Warren Sapp and anyone else for that. Probably.

There are deals and then there are deals. I'd say no to all of them. Sapp is past his prime and ineffective. Moss is a crybaby, T.O. is a carcinogen, and I'm just not too sure about Keyshawn.

[Kerberos]

ROFLROFL Sure. If we give him a signing bonus of oooohhhh saaaayyy about 20 million.

NO T.O. NO T.O.


BUt ... But ....

If we had T.O. then he could dog on Trent and tell the media we would have a better chance at winning with a quarterback like Jake Plummer.

:D

j/k

sorry man I couldn't resist! :evil:


.

[sedated]

If Vermeil were still the coach next year, he could pull that sentimental sh!t and tug on TO's heartstrings

But the first time Grandpa screwed up a 2-minute drill, TO would be running to Tom Jackson and Friends

[milkman]

Bell was babied in camp and the preseason. Give him a second year before jumping on that bandwagon!

His contract was cap friendly for this season.

If we give him another year, his contract becomes a problem.

[Eleazar]

Sorry, Chris Horn's already got his number.

[CHIEF4EVER]

On an unrelated side note, that awesome Vikings D is making Kyle Boller look like Joe Montana.

[4th and Long]

Worse thread EVAR!

[huskerdooz]

If he was willing to sign a contract with conduct and "mouthing off" provisions and promised to play at a high level, would you take a chance on T.O.?

Nope, I would have rather taken a chance on Koren Robinson this year.

[greg63]

Too big a headache.

[kcxiv]

yep, i sure would. He will be a good team mate for the first year. I would welcome it.

[htismaqe]

I don't want him, but I sure as hell don't want to see him end up in Denver or San Diego.

If TO was down on McNabb's abilities, what's he gonna say about Brees?

Or Plummer? ROFL

[JBucc]

Only if he signs contracts game by game so we can dump his ass easily at the first sign of dumbassery

[ChiefsKing]

only if he would play DE, DT or OL

[StcChief]

NFW. The rest of the NFL should treat him like the locker room cancer he is too.

[Cntrygal]

Oh HELL NO!

Ditto.

[Skip Towne]

Nope

[chiefsfaninNC]

As badly as we need a receiver, the answer is no.

[Dartgod]

Where's the option for "No F*cking Way"?

[Bwana]

Not only no, but HELL NO!

[the Talking Can]

um, no...