View Full Version : Over/Under on Royals Win Total
Brianfo
03-27-2006, 03:47 PM
Does anyone have a website that gives Vegas lines on the over/under win totals for major league baseball for the upcoming season. I would like to throw down some coin on the Royals, but don't know what their expected win total is pegged at. TIA
GO ROYALS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Logical
03-27-2006, 03:49 PM
Take the under and 62 wins
JBucc
03-27-2006, 03:49 PM
77 wins
Brianfo
03-27-2006, 03:51 PM
Take the under and 62 wins
You are pretty optimistic aren't you? Just kidding. I strongly believe the Royals will push 70-75 wins this season.
RockChalk
03-27-2006, 03:54 PM
Sportbook.com lists the Royals over/under at 63.5 (http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&STORY=/www/story/02-22-2006/0004287201&EDATE=)
RockChalk
03-27-2006, 03:54 PM
I may put 100 on the over
Saulbadguy
03-27-2006, 03:55 PM
Take over 63.5. I feel this group could be special!
Iowanian
03-27-2006, 03:55 PM
29
Bowser
03-27-2006, 04:03 PM
Take over 63.5. I feel this group could be special!
ROFL
RockChalk
03-27-2006, 04:05 PM
Take over 63.5. I feel this group could be special!
Special enough to get 64 wins
vckcchiefs04
03-27-2006, 04:17 PM
70 wins! We are gonna make a run at the Motor City Kittys! WE WANT 4TH!! WE WANT 4TH!!! WE WANT 4TH!!!
Eleazar
03-27-2006, 04:18 PM
Definitely the over on 63.5 games.
I would guess we'll land around 70.
Crush
03-27-2006, 04:23 PM
75 - 80 wins
sedated
03-27-2006, 04:30 PM
we're gonna contend for longer than usual
which ain't sayin much.
but we won't be a laughing stock.
we meet our goal - 81 wins
kcfanXIII
03-27-2006, 04:32 PM
sedated, i'm with you, i'm gonna say 80-85 wins. i like bell as the mgr of this team.
I really like pickin up Grudlielanek or however you spell it. meinkavecz too. Pick over. I say 80+ dangitt!!
HA this is why i dont gamble.
chiefqueen
03-27-2006, 04:37 PM
we're gonna contend for longer than usual
Translation - we'll still be in contention on Tax Day (4/17)
RockChalk
03-27-2006, 04:38 PM
Translation - we'll still be in contention on Tax Day (4/17) ROFL
Hammock Parties
03-27-2006, 04:40 PM
25 fewer than the Rangers.
Hammock Parties
03-27-2006, 04:41 PM
25 fewer than the Rangers.
By the way, your Texas Rangers are penciled in for about 90 wins.
By the way, your Texas Rangers are penciled in for about 90 wins.
under
Eleazar
03-27-2006, 04:51 PM
25 fewer than the Rangers.
Like last year, when there was no way the Rangers were going to fade and finish in third I guess...
Still the third best in the west.
I'd take the under on 90 wins for the Rangers. They might be the 3rd or 4th best team in their division.
Logical
03-27-2006, 05:19 PM
Sportbook.com lists the Royals over/under at 63.5 (http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&STORY=/www/story/02-22-2006/0004287201&EDATE=)
I told you! I am not a professional but I came pretty damn close to the pros.
oldandslow
03-27-2006, 05:20 PM
Royals will win 62 games. They will lose 100.
All that changes is the date.
beavis
03-27-2006, 06:14 PM
I'm going to go with 70. Could be up to 10 games better or worse, depending on how the pitching holds up.
Coach
03-27-2006, 06:18 PM
I'd take the under on 90 wins for the Rangers. They might be the 3rd or 4th best team in their division.
The Angels being first and the A's at 2nd?
Hammock Parties
03-27-2006, 06:18 PM
I'd take the under on 90 wins for the Rangers. They might be the 3rd or 4th best team in their division.
That's crap. No one else in the division did as much as we did to improve in the offseason.
The Angels being first and the A's at 2nd?
Or vice versa. The A's pitching staff is ridiculously loaded.
That's crap. No one else in the division did as much as we did to improve in the offseason.
That's because they can improve from within. The A's and Angels farm systems are loaded. They don't have to sign a bunch of free agents.
Coach
03-27-2006, 06:25 PM
Or vice versa. The A's pitching staff is ridiculously loaded.
That's reasonable, and I agree with the A's being 2nd with the Angels at 1st.
Hammock Parties
03-27-2006, 06:33 PM
That's because they can improve from within. The A's and Angels farm systems are loaded. They don't have to sign a bunch of free agents.
Just wait til you see our new second basemen. He's the next Hank Blalock. And he can play defense unlike Soriano.
Our entire infield and most of the outfield is the product of our farm system. We just needed some pitching help and we got it.
Hammock Parties
03-27-2006, 06:34 PM
That's reasonable, and I agree with the A's being 2nd with the Angels at 1st.
The A's have been declining steadily since the turn of the millenium. I expect them to finish .500.
That's reasonable, and I agree with the A's being 2nd with the Angels at 1st.
I just read Moneyball a couple weeks ago, so don't mind me.
Just wait til you see our new second basemen. He's the next Hank Blalock. And he can play defense unlike Soriano.
Our entire infield and most of the outfield is the product of our farm system. We just needed some pitching help and we got it.
Kinsler should be a good player. I'm looking forward to seeing him. Your farm system isn't as loaded as the A's or Angels though. I think the A's are on the way back up... last year was the year I thought they'd have trouble because they were turning the roster over. Now they've done that, still almost won the division, and can climb back upward.
Coogs
05-03-2006, 03:33 PM
Just curious to how you are all feeling about your bets after 24 games?
Royals have to go 59-79 the rest of the way for a .428 winning percentage over the last 138 games.
vBulletin® v3.8.8, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.