PDA

View Full Version : Offensive Juggernauts

yeti
07-05-2006, 01:11 PM
http://fantasysports.yahoo.com/analysis/news?slug=ch-juggernautindex06&prov=yhoo&type=lgns&league=fantasy/nfl


Ranking our offense at #4 is a little low don't you think? Denver at #2 wtf? I know rankings don't mean jack but where is the respect.
MOhillbilly
07-05-2006, 01:15 PM
its because the redzone td% was low-er last year and everything else is high.
DaKCMan AP
07-05-2006, 01:16 PM
I can understand Indy. They should slip some with the loss of Edge, although I think Addai is perfect for their system.

Denver and Cincy I don't get. Probably overhype about Javon Walker. Cincy I don't know. They didn't make any key additions and Palmer is an injury concern.
MOhillbilly
07-05-2006, 01:22 PM
because there REDZONE TD % is high.

EDIT-after looking it over seattle should be ranked higher.
yeti
07-05-2006, 02:13 PM
We need to get Tony G. freed up more cuz our redzone was mildy frustrating last year.
MOhillbilly
07-05-2006, 02:17 PM
We need to get Tony G. freed up more cuz our redzone was mildy frustrating last year.


he had to stay home and help protect cause LJ wasnt gettin it done and Roaf was hurt.
FAX
07-05-2006, 02:18 PM
he had to stay home and help protect cause LJ wasnt gettin it done and Roaf was hurt.

And, AS was calling plays out of his AS.

FAX
MOhillbilly
07-05-2006, 02:24 PM
And, AS was calling plays out of his AS.

FAX

i didnt think so. IMO w/ what he had to work w/ i thought he called a pretty good year.
bobbything
07-05-2006, 02:38 PM
Fine by me. I'll take being the 4th best offense in the league.

However, his assessment was off on a lot of things. Namely, the "disappointing" Jordan Black isn't automatically the starter. And I still don't really understand why Eddie Kennison isn't considered a #1 receiver. IIRC, he's had back-to-back 1000 yard seasons; going over 1100 in 2005 for his best year ever.

Sure, I'd like to have the Owens/Moss type of receiver. But so would 25 other teams in the NFL.