HolyHandgernade
07-30-2006, 01:22 PM
After the initial shock of the Roaf retirement, I started thinking we might not be as bad off as I initially thought. I was away this weekend, so I apologize if this has already been brought up.
Wouldn't it make sense to alter our offensive scheme around more two tightend sets so that Dunn could help chip at the LT side? Since we were already moving in the direction of LJ as the centerpiece, it seems we were going to move away from the FB anyway. It cuts down on the three wide receiver sets, but TG is our main pass catching threat anyway. We end up with more play faking to set up the throws and possibly throwing a little caution into fast charging d-linemen if LJ continues his torrid pace.
I know it would help if we had WR who could make their own plays better if they stack the box, but someone still has to release with TG, right?
Like I said, I was away this weekend, so is this just another Captain Obvious post?
-HH
Wouldn't it make sense to alter our offensive scheme around more two tightend sets so that Dunn could help chip at the LT side? Since we were already moving in the direction of LJ as the centerpiece, it seems we were going to move away from the FB anyway. It cuts down on the three wide receiver sets, but TG is our main pass catching threat anyway. We end up with more play faking to set up the throws and possibly throwing a little caution into fast charging d-linemen if LJ continues his torrid pace.
I know it would help if we had WR who could make their own plays better if they stack the box, but someone still has to release with TG, right?
Like I said, I was away this weekend, so is this just another Captain Obvious post?
-HH