PDA

View Full Version : A completely new way of wearing a bathing suit...


DaFace
08-21-2006, 10:42 PM
http://www.patentlysilly.com/patent.php?patID=6832983

Article of Clothing with a Novel Attachment Means
patent#: US 6832983
view the full patent (http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=6832983)
posted on 12/21/2004, patent issued on 12/21/2004

Don't put your clothes on, put them IN! (In your anus, your vagina, whatever you've got to work with).

Inventor John Mott Goodman has patented an entirely new way to hang clothing--snap them into your genitals. Tired of that thong creeping up your bum? Your best solution might be to jam it in further. This invention holds your clothes in place by snapping them onto a bulb that is inserted into your vagina and/or rectum. Don't just cover your orifices, fill them in as well!

Goodman lays the case for his role in the evolution of fashion:

"The purposes for holding garments on one's body are to protect one from the environment, for modesty, and to conform to the dictates of fashion. And, of course, to avoid losing them altogether."

"Modesty or decency are terms that vary by culture. But in almost all cultures the minimum requirements include covering the external genitalia [penis and testicles for men, and vaginal lips for women], plus the anus. In many cultures women are also required to cover their breasts (at least the nipples and areolae). Some cultures require more coverage than this minimum, but for swimwear and underwear in particular, any such additional coverage is fast becoming optional. "

The female versions come in three sizes--Lolita, Regular, and M.I.L.F.:

"A young woman or girl might need a very small extension, whereas a woman who is sexually active might need a larger one, and a woman who has had several children might need a still larger one."

No word on the mens' sizes.

The inventor claims that his swimsuits may be safer than currently existing options. The garment can be put on "without having to lift either leg, thus allowing one to minimize the risk of falling over"

Vibrating bulbs are optional.


http://www.patentlysilly.com/images/patents/large/US06832983-20041221-D00000.gif

Bugeater
08-21-2006, 11:15 PM
:spock:

Ultra Peanut
08-22-2006, 12:20 AM
Safety first!

TinyEvel
08-22-2006, 01:24 AM
This gives me an idea for a new iPod holder...

Rain Man
08-22-2006, 02:03 PM
Hence the nickname, "Orifice of a thousand uses".

ROYC75
08-22-2006, 02:10 PM
:shake: That's very revealing to say the least ! :eek:

ck_IN
08-22-2006, 02:12 PM
I thought the pron industry had already came up with this.

BucEyedPea
08-22-2006, 02:18 PM
This is what I'd call Men's English. ROFL

DMAC
08-22-2006, 02:21 PM
Would you wear one to the beach for a few hours if it meant the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

In other words, would you stick a doorknob up your ass so the can Chiefs win a Super Bowl?

Robo-Chachi
08-22-2006, 02:22 PM
http://www.borat.tv/ms_blog/cannes.jpg

morphius
08-22-2006, 02:24 PM
The garment can be put on "without having to lift either leg, thus allowing one to minimize the risk of falling over"

Is this really an issue for anyone other then maybe a great grandma, and if that thought doesn't ruin this, nothing well...

DMAC
08-22-2006, 02:25 PM
http://www.borat.tv/ms_blog/cannes.jpgToo bad he can't enjoy this moment because he has a doorknob stuck in his arse.

Rain Man
08-22-2006, 02:43 PM
This would bring a new meaning to the term "wardrobe gap".

BucEyedPea
08-22-2006, 03:55 PM
This would bring a new meaning to the term "wardrobe gap".

Are you still thinking about fashion? :p

Rain Man
08-22-2006, 03:57 PM
Are you still thinking about fashion? :p

If I weighed 30 pounds less and was 20 years younger and had hair and was handsome, I would be in great demand as a male model.

Ebolapox
08-22-2006, 04:04 PM
ROFL

the thread starter is comedic gold

StcChief
08-22-2006, 06:00 PM
Less wardrobe malfunctions. :p