The 49ers exected their gameplan [Archive]

Hootie

10-01-2006, 03:31 PM

Contained Larry Johnson. Let's not kid ourselves, his numbers were inflated, he didn't have a Larry Johnson game...not his fault, the 49ers focused on shutting down the run and Huard looked like Joe friggin' Montana...

So props to the 49ers!

Hootie

10-01-2006, 03:32 PM

You can always find positives in a loss 49ers fans!!

Hootie

10-01-2006, 03:33 PM

I forgot a "u" in "executed", I know...

Eleazar

10-01-2006, 03:34 PM

150 yards and 2 touchdowns, that's not really what I call containment.

Hootie

10-01-2006, 03:36 PM

I know his stats, buddy...

but to say the 49ers didn't contain him is false. Come on...

Easy 6

10-01-2006, 03:36 PM

He didnt have an LJ game in the 1ST HALF Hootie. A $01 and 2TD's kills this thread.

Adept Havelock

10-01-2006, 03:37 PM

150 yards and 2 touchdowns, that's not really what I call containment.

Oh, it qualifies as containment. In a Chernobyl/China Syndrome kind of way.....

KcMizzou

10-01-2006, 03:39 PM

LJ's on my FF team. I'm anxious to see what he does when someone doesn't contain him.

Hootie

10-01-2006, 03:39 PM

Guys...

do you honestly think LJ had a LJ type game? Seriously?

If so...wow.

Hootie

10-01-2006, 03:40 PM

sometimes I don't know what you people watch.

On paper, he had a GREAT game...but if you actually watched the fuggin' game, he had more 1, 2 and negative yard runs than I've ever seen from him. The 49ers did a good job in that respect.

penchief

10-01-2006, 03:40 PM

I think props go to Huard, the O-line, and Johnson. Our conservative offense scored 34 points today. Huard stepped up knowing that LJ was a marked man. The o-line pass-blocked well for Huard. And LJ was a warrior. He earned every yard he gained today. His hard running was one of the keys to our offensive gameplan.

Mostly, props to the defense. The 49ers have done pretty well on offense so far this year. The defense looks like it might finally be for real.

Wa-Z

10-01-2006, 03:40 PM

What more could you ask for?

KcMizzou

10-01-2006, 03:41 PM

Guys...

do you honestly think LJ had a LJ type game? Seriously?

If so...wow.He started slow and improved as the game wore on. Pretty common for LJ, and most backs.

On the radio they said he fell akwardly, and didn't quite look the same afterward. I think he was a little dinged up, and played through it.

Hootie

10-01-2006, 03:42 PM

I think the LJ factor was the reason Huard played so well. In that respect, LJ had a great game. 34 touches is awesome...however, running the ball, he had an average game, at best...mainly because the 49ers guessed run every friggin' time.

Wile_E_Coyote

10-01-2006, 03:42 PM

historic day for the 9ers

the worst loss in 9er history

Hootie

10-01-2006, 03:42 PM

how is that common for LJ!? He had 100 rushing yards at 3 friggin' times IN THE FIRST HALF of games last year. That's starting slow? God damn people...

Easy 6

10-01-2006, 03:43 PM

sometimes I don't know what you people watch.

On paper, he had a GREAT game...but if you actually watched the fuggin' game, he had more 1, 2 and negative yard runs than I've ever seen from him. The 49ers did a good job in that respect.
I didnt even have to see the game to see that as much as Whiners WHOLE PLAN centered on stopping Superman , he stillgoes for 101 and 2 touches.

Hootie

10-01-2006, 03:45 PM

hey everyone...

thanks for telling me his stats, honestly, before starting this thread I didn't realize he had 142 total yards and 2 TD's.

Oh actually, I did. THAT DOESN'T ****ING MEAN ANYTHING IF YOU WATCHED THE GAME.

Shit, Brees had 400 yards passing and a TD and he had a shitty game.

Easy 6

10-01-2006, 03:46 PM

hey everyone...

thanks for telling me his stats, honestly, before starting this thread I didn't realize he had 142 total yards and 2 TD's.

Oh actually, I did. THAT DOESN'T ****ING MEAN ANYTHING IF YOU WATCHED THE GAME.

Shit, Brees had 400 yards passing and a TD and he had a shitty game.
O - kee - doke

Eleazar

10-01-2006, 03:49 PM

We were lighting them up through the air. What should the Chiefs have done, gone away from what was working?

Hootie

10-01-2006, 03:50 PM

Christ dudes. This thread was more of a mocking towards the 49ers gameplan...

Otter

10-01-2006, 03:50 PM

historic day for the 9ers

the worst loss in 9er history

I may be wrong but I think the last "worst defeat in 49ers history" was the 44-9 stomping the Chiefs gave them back in the '97 at Arrowhead.

runnercyclist

10-01-2006, 03:50 PM

He looked sluggish in the first half and an Animal in the second. Perhaps a little halftime "encouragement"?

Hootie

10-01-2006, 03:50 PM

Their plan was to stop LJ...

They forgot about Huard.

Huard plays amazingly.

Chiefs win by 41.

Hootie

10-01-2006, 03:51 PM

He looked sluggish in the first half and an Animal in the second. Perhaps a little halftime "encouragement"?
he looked good at the very end of the 3rd quarter, and the few series he played in the 4th...

Other than that, the 49ers totally shut him down.

Hootie

10-01-2006, 03:52 PM

and by the time LJ started gaining yards, the game was already long over.

I'm LJ's biggest fan, all I'm saying is the 49ers did do a good job against him. Probably the best I've seen in all honesty (of course LJ has really never had a bad game when he has started)...

JBucc

10-01-2006, 03:53 PM

So, who cares?

Hootie

10-01-2006, 03:55 PM

So, who cares?
I don't, one bit. THIS WAS SARCASM. Christ.

Hootie

10-01-2006, 03:56 PM

Here's the irony...

Usually, if you execute your gameplan, you win the game.

The 49ers 'executed', and lost by 41...

I made a thread to mock the 49ers...but a lot of you are to dense to understand, apparently.

Eleazar

10-01-2006, 03:59 PM

and by the time LJ started gaining yards, the game was already long over.

34 touches, 142 yd, 2 TD

3.4 yards per carry

4.2 yards per touch

54 yards in the first half

87 yards in the second half

54 yards at halftime blows I guess?

3.5 ypc is nothing too special, but if you get his normal 25 carries per game that still puts you right around 100 rushing yards.

chiefqueen

10-01-2006, 04:00 PM

On offense the gameplan of the 41-0'ers was to have the OL hold Tamba, I think they did that well.

Hammock Parties

10-01-2006, 04:32 PM

We executed the 49ers.

milkman

10-01-2006, 04:41 PM

Hootie is right.

The 9ers gameplan on defense was to contain LJ, and they did that.

He had a couple of big plays on pass receptions in the first half, and a couple of good runs in the second half, but overall, he was bottled up pretty good by the 9ers defense.

The Chiefs did today what they should have done last week.
They ran the play action pass on first and second down plays, and took advantage of a defense stacked to stopp LJ.

It was an outstanding game plan by the Chiefs, and executed nearly flawlessly by Huard.

In executing that game plan, they also took the pressure off of the OTs, and Huard rarely was pressured by the 9ers, who didn't get a sack.

JBucc

10-01-2006, 04:43 PM

I made a thread to mock the 49ers...but a lot of you are to dense to understand, apparently.Just seemed like a normal dumbass Hootie post. You should add a /sarcasm so we can tell the difference.

ChiefaRoo

10-01-2006, 04:58 PM

hey everyone...

thanks for telling me his stats, honestly, before starting this thread I didn't realize he had 142 total yards and 2 TD's.

Oh actually, I did. THAT DOESN'T ****ING MEAN ANYTHING IF YOU WATCHED THE GAME.

Shit, Brees had 400 yards passing and a TD and he had a shitty game.

Your a moron and a fool who is arguing a point that has no meaning.

ChiefaRoo

10-01-2006, 05:00 PM

Here's the irony...

Usually, if you execute your gameplan, you win the game.

The 49ers 'executed', and lost by 41...

I made a thread to mock the 49ers...but a lot of you are to dense to understand, apparently.

Hey dummy, you can't use sarcasm in the printed word. No one can read your non-verbal ques. Are you tarded?

Hootie

10-01-2006, 05:20 PM

Hey dummy, you can't use sarcasm in the printed word. No one can read your non-verbal ques. Are you tarded?
Next time I won't give this board that much credit...

Hootie

10-01-2006, 05:20 PM

Hootie is right.

The 9ers gameplan on defense was to contain LJ, and they did that.

He had a couple of big plays on pass receptions in the first half, and a couple of good runs in the second half, but overall, he was bottled up pretty good by the 9ers defense.

The Chiefs did today what they should have done last week.
They ran the play action pass on first and second down plays, and took advantage of a defense stacked to stopp LJ.

It was an outstanding game plan by the Chiefs, and executed nearly flawlessly by Huard.

In executing that game plan, they also took the pressure off of the OTs, and Huard rarely was pressured by the 9ers, who didn't get a sack.
ding ding ding

blueballs

10-01-2006, 05:23 PM

there were games were Priest HOlmes
didn't do squat until the 3rd or 4th quarter

Hootie

10-01-2006, 05:25 PM

there were games were Priest HOlmes
didn't do squat until the 3rd or 4th quarter
and I think LJ is 10 times better than Priest EVER was...

Hootie

10-01-2006, 05:25 PM

besides, Priest has nothing to do with this thread.

We're a different team this year than we were when Priest was running the show.

leothedog69

10-01-2006, 05:26 PM

I think props go to Huard, the O-line, and Johnson. Our conservative offense scored 34 points today. Huard stepped up knowing that LJ was a marked man. The o-line pass-blocked well for Huard. And LJ was a warrior. He earned every yard he gained today. His hard running was one of the keys to our offensive gameplan.

Mostly, props to the defense. The 49ers have done pretty well on offense so far this year. The defense looks like it might finally be for real.

Very accurate post.

blueballs

10-01-2006, 05:28 PM

you like to argue
don't you

Valiant

10-01-2006, 06:21 PM

historic day for the 9ers

the worst loss in 9er history

Didnt we beat them 49-0 last time they were here???

Easy 6

10-01-2006, 06:24 PM

Didnt we beat them 49-0 last time they were here???
I remember that beautifully ironic and symbolic game. Thats how they script it in Hollywood. :D

LaBamba

10-01-2006, 06:25 PM

sone sone sone

Hammock Parties

10-01-2006, 06:26 PM

We beat them 44-9 last time.

milkman

10-01-2006, 06:26 PM

Didnt we beat them 49-0 last time they were here???

44-9, I believe.

Easy 6

10-01-2006, 06:30 PM

Yep, i had the rose colored glasses on that time, i seem to remember wishing that had been the outcome anyway.

plbrdude

10-01-2006, 06:30 PM

Christ dudes. This thread was more of a mocking towards the 49ers gameplan...

forest

trees

Mosbonian

10-01-2006, 06:31 PM

Here's the irony...

Usually, if you execute your gameplan, you win the game.

The 49ers 'executed', and lost by 41...

I made a thread to mock the 49ers...but a lot of you are to dense to understand, apparently.

Next time I won't give this board that much credit....

Dude.....you could use some valium and a Dale Carnegie course.

You ever have trouble playing well with other people?

mmaddog
*******

ChiefsFanatic

10-01-2006, 06:56 PM

Contained Larry Johnson. Let's not kid ourselves, his numbers were inflated, he didn't have a Larry Johnson game...not his fault, the 49ers focused on shutting down the run and Huard looked like Joe friggin' Montana...

So props to the 49ers!

He hurt himself on the first series, and didn't run with power until the second half. Maybe they did something for the pain at half-time.

I have not heard or watched any post-game coverage, though. maybe I was just seeing things.

ChiefsFanatic

10-01-2006, 07:29 PM

He hurt himself on the first series, and didn't run with power until the second half. Maybe they did something for the pain at half-time.

I have not heard or watched any post-game coverage, though. maybe I was just seeing things.

It was the play that came at 12:15 in the first quarter.