RedThat
01-07-2007, 03:10 PM
Isn't it amazing how a football team like Indianapolis can reveal the true colours of our football team?
After that game, I think it's clear that there are several key areas of weaknesses on this team that need to be addressed in the off-season.
Ok I'll start off and Identify a few positions of need:
-DT most definate need
-MLB Mitchell aint the answer to a building a great defense
-OT we can use one bigtime
-WR it amazes me how this franchise never had a big play WR for a while
*And a few others like QB possibly, CB? Um Surtain and Law are solid, but getting up there in age. But it wouldn't hurt if this team were to draft a CB.
*So if your the Chiefs, what do you do in the draft? Do you take a DT? MLB? OT? WR? Personally I think, since we draft at 23, you gotta take the best player available that suits our position of needs. Basically what Im saying is, it wouldn't make sense to draft a DT, when lets say the top 3 are taken by the time we pick. But lets say we stuck with the 4th best DT, and the best WR is still on the board? You gotta go with the WR. Just using that as an example.
Or even better, get rid of Carl Peterson?
After that game, I think it's clear that there are several key areas of weaknesses on this team that need to be addressed in the off-season.
Ok I'll start off and Identify a few positions of need:
-DT most definate need
-MLB Mitchell aint the answer to a building a great defense
-OT we can use one bigtime
-WR it amazes me how this franchise never had a big play WR for a while
*And a few others like QB possibly, CB? Um Surtain and Law are solid, but getting up there in age. But it wouldn't hurt if this team were to draft a CB.
*So if your the Chiefs, what do you do in the draft? Do you take a DT? MLB? OT? WR? Personally I think, since we draft at 23, you gotta take the best player available that suits our position of needs. Basically what Im saying is, it wouldn't make sense to draft a DT, when lets say the top 3 are taken by the time we pick. But lets say we stuck with the 4th best DT, and the best WR is still on the board? You gotta go with the WR. Just using that as an example.
Or even better, get rid of Carl Peterson?