View Full Version : Stallworth...
Chiefs Pantalones
03-05-2007, 07:16 PM
I heard on ESPN that the guy is getting no looks at all.
Do you think the Chiefs should, or just draft one high?
Crashride
03-05-2007, 07:18 PM
I say go for it. Hes proven
unothadeal
03-05-2007, 07:18 PM
If we signed him we could focus on DT in the draft. Possibly trade up for Okoye
milmil13
03-05-2007, 07:19 PM
The guy is injury prone, and can never put a set of good performances together. I'm not saying he isn't worth a look though.
Crashride
03-05-2007, 07:21 PM
If we signed him we could focus on DT in the draft. Possibly trade up for Okoye
Does he really have a chance to fall to us? Out of curiosity
unothadeal
03-05-2007, 07:23 PM
Does he really have a chance to fall to us? Out of curiosity
No. That's why we trade up.
Bill Lundberg
03-05-2007, 07:24 PM
He will be an Eagle, a Patriot, or a Titan. He wants to re up with Philly, but has a visit scheduled with New England then one with Tennessee. Per Sirius NFL Radio
Archie Bunker
03-05-2007, 07:25 PM
Right now I would draft one. He has some negatives. He is injury prone, wants alot of money, and is in the substance abuse program.
With that being said, if the market dries up and Carl could get him to sign a reasonable deal I wouldn't throw a fit. His playmaking ability is too much to pass up.
siberian khatru
03-05-2007, 07:27 PM
We can't pass up the chance to sign a Hall of Fame receiver. But still, isn't John Stallworth kind of old by now?
Dark Horse
03-05-2007, 08:20 PM
We can't pass up the chance to sign a Hall of Fame receiver. But still, isn't John Stallworth kind of old by now?
Yeah I'd rather have lynn Swann anyway.
milkman
03-05-2007, 08:26 PM
No. That's why we trade up.
When your team has as many holes as the Chiefs do, you don't trade up in the draft to plug one hole.
unothadeal
03-05-2007, 08:39 PM
When your team has as many holes as the Chiefs do, you don't trade up in the draft to plug one hole.
But if this situation were to occur, we've already plugged two holes(LT, WR)
Mecca
03-05-2007, 08:40 PM
But if this situation were to occur, we've already plugged two holes(LT, WR)
Yea and we have about 10 more......and McIntosh at LT is like sticking your finger in a hole the size of your leg.
unothadeal
03-05-2007, 08:45 PM
Yea and we have about 10 more......and McIntosh at LT is like sticking your finger in a hole the size of your leg.
It's not like we would be giving up 10 draft picks. Do you really think we're going to get quality starters for all those positions in one offseason?
Mecca
03-05-2007, 08:46 PM
It's not like we would be giving up 10 draft picks. Do you really think we're going to get quality starters for all those positions in one offseason?
Uh what WR you talking the only one worth moving for is Calvin Johnson is moving up to get him would pretty much take tons of shit.
unothadeal
03-05-2007, 08:47 PM
Uh what WR you talking the only one worth moving for is Calvin Johnson is moving up to get him would pretty much take tons of shit.I think you missed something. What I'm saying is if we signed Stallworth, we should move up for Okoye.
Mecca
03-05-2007, 08:51 PM
Once again moving from 23 to top 10....takes ALOT.
milkman
03-05-2007, 08:51 PM
I think you missed something. What I'm saying is if we signed Stallworth, we should move up for Okoye.
To get Okoye, we'd have to move up at least 8 spots.
That would take at least our first and third, and probably one more later pick.
unothadeal
03-05-2007, 08:52 PM
Once again moving from 23 to top 10....takes ALOT.
Yeah, but what team can resist and Sims Hicks Bell Wesley combo?
anyone up there need a running back?
HC_Chief
03-05-2007, 09:47 PM
Stallworth was the guy we should have drafted instead of Sims. He's way better than any of the wideouts we have... only problem is he has been injury-prone.
He's unsigned for one of two reasons: 1) He's injured, 2) He's demanding too much money
Stallworth was the guy we should have drafted instead of Sims. He's way better than any of the wideouts we have... only problem is he has been injury-prone.
He's unsigned for one of two reasons: 1) He's injured, 2) He's demanding too much money
No, thats one reason. He's demanding too much money. the injury is naturally a consideration when calculating his worth. He would get a deal at the minimum.
Rausch
03-05-2007, 10:03 PM
How would he ever beat out guys like Parker and Webb?...
Mecca
03-05-2007, 10:08 PM
Stallworth was the guy we should have drafted instead of Sims. He's way better than any of the wideouts we have... only problem is he has been injury-prone.
He's unsigned for one of two reasons: 1) He's injured, 2) He's demanding too much money
He's unsigned because he's in the substance abuse program.......he tests positive again he's suspended for a year.
Iowanian
03-05-2007, 10:43 PM
Sounds like he should be a Bengal or a donkey.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2788146&campaign=rss&source=NFLHeadlines
Mile High Mania
03-05-2007, 10:51 PM
Crezzy...
<A name=378995>Patriots | Team will host Stallworth
Mon, 5 Mar 2007 20:38:05 -0800Adam Schefter, of the NFL (http://www.kffl.com/team/77/nfl) Network, reports free agent WR Donte' Stallworth (http://www.kffl.com/player/1261/nfl) (Eagles) is scheduled to visit with the New England Patriots (http://www.kffl.com/team/24/nfl).
Sure-Oz
03-06-2007, 01:23 AM
Stallworth is def. worth a look and should be a solid WR if he can stay healthy.
Logical
03-06-2007, 01:26 AM
If we signed him we could focus on DT in the draft. Possibly trade up for OkoyeROFL
People are moving him into the 10 to 15 slot. What do we have to offer that is going to move us up that high in the draft. Come on be realistic.
ROFL
What do we have to offer that is going to move us up that high in the draft. Come on be realistic.
Wait, this is a trick question.
NJ Chief Fan
03-06-2007, 03:19 AM
Stallworth is a No.2 WR, he would be a great compliment to Jarrett! But that being said, we still have Eddie, and I like Eddie. So Eddie will be our No.2 for another season.
vBulletin® v3.8.8, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.