PDA

View Full Version : Ian Scott in talks with Chiefs, Broncos and Vikings

Bill Lundberg
03-19-2007, 01:10 PM
Bears may re-sign DT Scott
Written by: ¦ 3/19/2007
Source: chicagosports.chicagotribune.com
Sources say the Bears, in the wake of the Tank Johnson sentencing, quietly expressed interest in re-signing defensive tackle Ian Scott. He is testing free agency after four seasons in Chicago and has been in talks with the Chiefs, Broncos and Vikings.
http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com
Eric
03-19-2007, 01:13 PM
YES! Smacks Bill. :clap: :)
Mile High Mania
03-19-2007, 01:14 PM
Enh, he's young and might improve the pass rush... Denver will likely pass.
TRR
03-19-2007, 01:15 PM
Ian Scott is a lot younger than Alphonso Boone, and received more playing time in the rotation. Most Bears fans believe Ian Scott to be a better DT than Boone. However, Boone had better stats than Scott at the position. Figure that one out...

It would be nice to tandum Ian Scott and Alphonso Boone at DT. They have played with each other for the last couple of seasons.
Pitt Gorilla
03-19-2007, 01:15 PM
Ian, Scott owned with Anthrax.
Archie Bunker
03-19-2007, 01:16 PM
I wouldn't turn down any able bodied DT at the moment. Sign him up.
noa
03-19-2007, 01:18 PM
Do Eet Now!
Lzen
03-19-2007, 01:19 PM
Ian, Scott owned with Anthrax.
:LOL:
CoMoChief
03-19-2007, 01:20 PM
Cmon Carl!!!!! This would complete our FA period.
StcChief
03-19-2007, 01:22 PM
To Solid DTs would be a wow.
we could turn our attention to WR etc.

do it Carl The Bearifcation of the Chiefs begins.
teedubya
03-19-2007, 01:25 PM
Ian, Scott owned with Anthrax.


thunder stealer. :banghead:

http://www.mtv.com/shared/media/news/images/a/Anthrax/sq_anthrax_scott_ian.jpg

:p
DaKCMan AP
03-19-2007, 01:46 PM
We need a Gator on the team. :thumb:
CupidStunt
03-19-2007, 01:54 PM
I really don't understand why Carl won't push to get this done, especially given Denver's interest.
Mecca
03-19-2007, 01:58 PM
Why exactly would he sign with the Vikings........he'd be a backup.
noa
03-19-2007, 02:00 PM
Why would he sign with the Chiefs? He'd be in for some one-on-one spanking sessions with Krumrie. Unless he's into that sort of thing. NTTAWWT
go bo
03-19-2007, 02:02 PM
We need a Gator on the team. :thumb:eh, i would prefer a crocodile...

but if we're really want to spend $$$ on a dt, let's see if we can sign a leopard and then a skunk...

the leopard could play any position, while the skunk is limited to playing defensive tackle...

signing either one or both of them would be a bargain for us...

but i'd take the gator if that was the only choice available...
Mecca
03-19-2007, 02:03 PM
We need a Gator on the team. :thumb:

Maybe we can draft Marcus Thomas too, then the whole position will look different.
Direckshun
03-19-2007, 02:04 PM
GO GET 'IM, CARL.
Adept Havelock
03-19-2007, 02:05 PM
We need a Gator on the team. :thumb:


As long as it's deep-fried.

Mmmmmm....fried Gator strips. :drool:
Micjones
03-19-2007, 02:09 PM
Randy Starks anyone?

He's a better option for getting that interior push we so desperately need. And I hear he can be had for a third-round pick.

Though I'd certainly settle for Ian Scott.
They say the Chiefs have been in talks with him.
I wonder why he hasn't been scheduled for a visit?

AND... What happened with Alvin McKinley?
Seems like that situation stalled out entirely.
BigVE
03-19-2007, 02:20 PM
Heck, if we get Scott I would be MORE than happy with this offseasons signings. That would also enable us to work on other key positions in the draft or just pick the best available at that spot. I like it.
Direckshun
03-19-2007, 02:22 PM
AND... What happened with Alvin McKinley?
Seems like that situation stalled out entirely.
I bet that's what happened.

We've only signed people this offseason when they've come in for a visit.

McKinley had to have left KC a week ago. We're probably not getting the guy.
Micjones
03-19-2007, 02:42 PM
Scott would be a nice addition.
I'm hopeful that we get that sewn up before much longer so we can focus on the draft.
J Diddy
03-19-2007, 03:09 PM
eh, i would prefer a crocodile...

but if we're really want to spend $$$ on a dt, let's see if we can sign a leopard and then a skunk...

the leopard could play any position, while the skunk is limited to playing defensive tackle...

signing either one or both of them would be a bargain for us...

but i'd take the gator if that was the only choice available...


I think you're too narrow minded your leaving out the dodo bird.
Crush
03-19-2007, 05:08 PM
Sign him up and then draft a WR.
Dark Horse
03-19-2007, 06:02 PM
Ian, Scott owned with Anthrax.
Yeah but he looks a little small for a DT