PDA

View Full Version : Broncos | Stokley signed


recxjake
03-20-2007, 01:18 PM
Broncos | Stokley signed
Tue, 20 Mar 2007 11:28:56 -0700

ESPNews reports the Denver Broncos have signed unrestricted free-agent WR Brandon Stokley (Colts) to a one-year contract. Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed.

Reerun_KC
03-20-2007, 01:18 PM
Ouch that hurts...

He always seem to kick our ass when we played him...

Mr. Laz
03-20-2007, 01:19 PM
great signing imo

noa
03-20-2007, 01:22 PM
The new Ed McCaffrey.

Mr. Laz
03-20-2007, 01:27 PM
The new Ed McCaffrey.
except for Stokley is half the size and twice as fast


but hey ...... you got the skin color right.

Sure-Oz
03-20-2007, 01:27 PM
The new Ed McCaffrey.
But can he act?!

Crush
03-20-2007, 01:28 PM
Ugh, this is going to bite us in the ass at some point in the season.

CoMoChief
03-20-2007, 01:28 PM
Can he play Dline, lol. Nice pickup for WR though. How bad was he injured?

UL Washington
03-20-2007, 01:29 PM
He has to prove he can come back from a major injury first.

Iowanian
03-20-2007, 01:34 PM
He'll definitely be an improvement. Its an unfortunately nice signing, and at 1 year, its of very little risk if he's not the same after the injury.

DaKCMan AP
03-20-2007, 01:41 PM
Injury prone and we'll see how good he is without Marvin Harrison, Reggie Wayne and Peyton Manning.

noa
03-20-2007, 01:42 PM
except for Stokley is half the size and twice as fast


but hey ...... you got the skin color right.


That was pretty much the joke. I know they aren't at all the same player. McCaffrey was 6'5" and was great at going across the middle, while Stokley is a 5'11" deep threat.

Eleazar
03-20-2007, 01:47 PM
we'll see how good he is without Marvin Harrison, Reggie Wayne and Peyton Manning.

My sentiments exactly

vailpass
03-20-2007, 01:55 PM
It's worth the risk IMO, if he comes back from the injury that little fugger can be sneaky when opposing Ds are keying on the TEs.

kcxiv
03-20-2007, 01:58 PM
With Walker on the other side, and 2 solid tight ends. I am sure He will do just fine.

JBucc
03-20-2007, 02:02 PM
For just a one year deal that's a pretty good signing. Bad for us though.

KurtCobain
03-20-2007, 02:04 PM
I would have preferred to see Chiefs | Stokley signed as the topic title.

morphius
03-20-2007, 02:07 PM
He was less then impressive last year, but a one year deal isn't going to hurt them if they have to cut him.

Mile High Mania
03-20-2007, 02:48 PM
Nice for depth if he can recover from the injury, I suppose...

Micjones
03-20-2007, 03:04 PM
Who's afraid of the big bad wolf?

Stokley's talented, but he's not exactly Steve Largent. We face better receivers regularly.

Amnorix
03-20-2007, 03:30 PM
Not a bad signing. I think his teammates inflated his perceived abilities, but he won't hurt them, to be sure.

Only a 1 year deal, due to hte injury I guess.

chop
03-20-2007, 03:31 PM
On paper, the Broncos have made some decent moves. We'll have to wait and see if it plays out on the field.

Mile High Mania
03-20-2007, 03:39 PM
Enh, this is a roster fodder signing... the guy is entering his 9th season and through 8 years, he has played more than 9 games three times. Stokely has skill and for the price... it's a good deal if he returns from the '06 injury.

Again - it's a depth move, should Rod Smith recover well from hip surgery, the depth chart will be Walker / Marshall / Smith / Stokley.

Add in Henry, Graham and Scheffler and our young QB has a nice array of weapons to work with in 2007.

CupidStunt
03-20-2007, 03:44 PM
System receiver if ever there was one. Doubt he'll make the roster.

Mile High Mania
03-20-2007, 03:48 PM
It's a 1 year deal and aside from 2004 when Peyton went wild ... the guy has been average. Again, low risk deal here.

Mr. Laz
03-20-2007, 04:07 PM
That was pretty much the joke. I know they aren't at all the same player. McCaffrey was 6'5" and was great at going across the middle, while Stokley is a 5'11" deep threat.
sorry ... my sarcas-o-meter has never worked worth a dam.

Hammock Parties
03-20-2007, 04:09 PM
Dude is just another receiver made to look good because of Manning.

Extra Point
03-20-2007, 04:13 PM
Dude is just another receiver made to look good because of Manning.

Agreed.