PDA

View Full Version : Broncos Get Brandon Stokely


Scalper
03-21-2007, 10:29 AM
Broncos are busy this year. I can see him being like Ed Mccaffery. I don't care they still suck.

Crush
03-21-2007, 10:30 AM
http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=160033

sedated
03-21-2007, 10:32 AM
WE'VE LANDED ON THE MOON

Reerun_KC
03-21-2007, 10:32 AM
Germans bombed Pearl Harbor!

listopencil
03-21-2007, 10:34 AM
Nah, Stokely is nothing like Ed. Stokely is supposed to have great hands like Ed did and they are both white but Stokely is a speedster. He's a slot/#3 guy.

siberian khatru
03-21-2007, 10:35 AM
Ed McCaffrey: 6-5, 215
Brandon Stokely: 5-11, 197

Mile High Mania
03-21-2007, 10:39 AM
Stokely on his best day couldn't do what Ed could do.

siberian khatru
03-21-2007, 10:41 AM
Ed: Stanford
Brandon: Louisiana-Lafayette

Ed: Man's name
Brandon: Boy band member's name

Sure-Oz
03-21-2007, 10:44 AM
Stokely on his best day couldn't do what Ed could do.
Ed's acting skills are superb.

listopencil
03-21-2007, 10:46 AM
Ed's acting skills are superb.



It helps when you can hold on to the ball even when your leg is being broken.

manchambo
03-21-2007, 10:49 AM
I love these insightful comments: "Broncos sign a white receiver. He will likley be quite similar to their last good white receiver."

Mile High Mania
03-21-2007, 10:49 AM
Ed's acting skills are superb.

There were times he acted a bit for a call, but it's incredibly overblown by many on this board. Ed was a great receiver, ran great routes... made clutch plays. McCaffery was greatness.

L.A. Chieffan
03-21-2007, 10:50 AM
Yawn....can we please stroke McCaffery somewhere else?

Mile High Mania
03-21-2007, 10:53 AM
Yawn....can we please stroke McCaffery somewhere else?

gross

StcChief
03-21-2007, 10:55 AM
There were times he acted a bit for a call, but it's incredibly overblown by many on this board. Ed was a great receiver, ran great routes... made clutch plays. McCaffery was greatness.

Can you pass it down here :bong:

listopencil
03-21-2007, 10:57 AM
I love these insightful comments: "Broncos sign a white receiver. He will likley be quite similar to their last good white receiver."





You should check this out:


http://www.aolsportsblog.com/2007/03/15/stokley-looks-to-rebuild-tradition-of-white-wide-receivers-in-de/

L.A. Chieffan
03-21-2007, 10:57 AM
McCaffery was greatness.
Hey dude if you wanna come out of the closet....I'm sure donk fans will welcome you with open arms.

Mile High Mania
03-21-2007, 10:58 AM
Can you pass it down here :bong:

I'm not going to bag on ya... I understand why KC fans don't recognize greatness at WR.

Mile High Mania
03-21-2007, 10:59 AM
Hey dude if you wanna come out of the closet....I'm sure donk fans will welcome you with open arms.

Interesting.

L.A. Chieffan
03-21-2007, 11:03 AM
Maybe I missing something and you already did come out of the closet :shrug:
It took me a while to pick up on that with DenverChief (who intrestingly enough ALSO lives in Denver :hmmm: )
Anyways my gaydars not very good.

StcChief
03-21-2007, 11:04 AM
I'm not going to bag on ya... I understand why KC fans don't recognize greatness at WR.
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/McCaEd00.htm
detail data looks like he had a few good years.... but not among top 50 in anything....

| Rushing | Receiving |
+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+
| Year TM | G | Att Yards Y/A TD | Rec Yards Y/R TD |
+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+
| 1991 nyg | 16 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 16 146 9.1 0 |
| 1992 nyg | 16 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 49 610 12.4 5 |
| 1993 nyg | 16 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 27 335 12.4 2 |
| 1994 sfo | 16 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 11 131 11.9 2 |
| 1995 den | 16 | 1 -1 -1.0 0 | 39 477 12.2 2 |
| 1996 den | 15 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 48 553 11.5 7 |
| 1997 den | 15 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 45 590 13.1 8 |
| 1998 den | 15 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 64 1053 16.5 10 |
| 1999 den | 15 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 71 1018 14.3 7 |
| 2000 den | 16 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 101 1317 13.0 9 |
| 2001 den | 1 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 6 94 15.7 1 |
| 2002 den | 16 | 2 22 11.0 0 | 69 903 13.1 2 |
| 2003 den | 12 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 19 195 10.3 0 |
+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+
| TOTAL | 185 | 3 21 7.0 0 | 565 7422 13.1 55 |
+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+

Seasons among the league's top 10
Receptions: 2000-3
Receiving yards: 2000-10
Receiving TDs: 1997-9t, 1998-6t, 2000-6t

Ed McCaffrey is NOT in the all-time top 50 in any major category. so greatness is defined how??? Donxs fans consider maybe if he's in top 100.???

L.A. Chieffan
03-21-2007, 11:07 AM
McCaffrey was GREATNESS!!!!!!!!!!!! He was white and he did all the little things that your stupid little stat book isn't gonna tell ya! Open your eyes blind Chief fans, when a Bronco fan says somebody is great they are GREEEEAAAT!

vailpass
03-21-2007, 11:16 AM
Maybe I missing something and you already did come out of the closet :shrug:
It took me a while to pick up on that with DenverChief (who intrestingly enough ALSO lives in Denver :hmmm: )
Anyways my gaydars not very good.

He lives in L.A. and makes gay jokes about other cities.
Priceless.
What's next, air quality smack?

Mile High Mania
03-21-2007, 12:09 PM
I define greatness with Ed for his production. You can see the stats yourself. I never said Ed was the greatest ever or that he was among the top 10.

Ed was greatness in Denver.

Sure-Oz
03-21-2007, 12:15 PM
I define greatness with Ed for his production. You can see the stats yourself. I never said Ed was the greatest ever or that he was among the top 10.

Ed was greatness in Denver.
He was great at going over the middle and getting decked and and always hanging onto the ball, ill give him that. I still remember him as a backup WR in SF.

Mile High Mania
03-21-2007, 12:28 PM
He was great at going over the middle and getting decked and and always hanging onto the ball, ill give him that. I still remember him as a backup WR in SF.

Well, that's your issue... he went on to have a great career in Denver. And, I honestly doubt you recall his days in SanFran.