View Full Version : complete offseason
chiefbowe82
05-05-2007, 04:55 PM
Heres what I remember about the offseason please fill in anything else. What about he decisions made and what is left undone?
Dante Hall to Rams for a 5th and 3rd round picks swapped
Will Shields retires
Chiefs approve Green to seek a trade opportunity with another team
Chiefs resign Gonzalez
Chiefs resign Edwards
Chiefs fire strength and conditioning coach.
Dick Curl replaces Terry Shea
Chiefs trade Sims to Tampa for future pick
Chiefs release Hicks
Chiefs sign Boone
Chiefs release Mitchell
Chiefs sign McIntosh
Chiefs sign Harris
Chiefs sign Edwards
Chiefs give Huard new contract
Chiefs bring in kicking competiton
Chiefs release Gammon and sign Darche
Chiefs release Black
Chiefs refuse to workout a deal with Allen this upcoming season
Chiefs release Sammy Knight
Chiefs bring in kicking competition
Chiefs select Dwayne Bowe
Chiefs select Turk McBride
Chiefs select Tank Tyler
Chiefs select Kolby Smith
Chiefs select Justin Medlock
Chiefs select Herbert Taylor
Chiefs select Micheal Allen
OctoberFart
05-05-2007, 04:58 PM
Chiefs still don't have a QB or much of an OLINE. Sounds a lot like Oakland.
sedated
05-05-2007, 05:01 PM
Chiefs still don't have a QB or much of an OLINE. Sounds a lot like Oakland.
oakland had nothing, at least we got TonyG and LJ
Chiefs still don't have a QB.
We don't?
Delano
05-05-2007, 05:03 PM
That doesn't appear to be in chronological order. You left out signing McIntosh.
OctoberFart
05-05-2007, 05:05 PM
We don't?
If Green refuses to play for KC like he is claiming then no. Huard has proven he is a good backup but not a starter and Croyle is an unknown just like Russell. So no KC doesn't have a good QB.
chiefbowe82
05-05-2007, 05:06 PM
That doesn't appear to be in chronological order. You left out signing McIntosh.
I have added McIntosh now, and it's in no sort of order, just what came to mind.
Delano
05-05-2007, 05:10 PM
If Green refuses to play for KC like he is claiming then no. Huard has proven he is a good backup but not a starter and Croyle is an unknown just like Russell. So no KC doesn't have a good QB.
You didn't type a good QB, you said a QB. KC has plenty of QBs.
keg in kc
05-05-2007, 05:11 PM
There's a big thread called Chiefs' Free Agency Moves and Draft Repository (http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=159257) stickied to the forum that probably has everything you're looking for in the very first post.
Don't forget about Dick Curl replacing Terry Shea.
OctoberFart
05-05-2007, 05:13 PM
You didn't type a good QB, you said a QB. KC has plenty of QBs.
You knew what I mean but keep them coming if that is the best you got.
If Green refuses to play for KC like he is claiming then no. Huard has proven he is a good backup but not a starter and Croyle is an unknown just like Russell. So no KC doesn't have a good QB.
Unknown = Not good?
OctoberFart
05-05-2007, 05:18 PM
Unknown = Not good?
Yes Croyle will have a lot of improving to be considered good as in his short time last year almost completed more passes to the other team vs his own. If KC is hoping Croyle is the guy they will be lucky to win 7 games. QB is worst position to rely on a guy who is basically a rookie.
Delano
05-05-2007, 05:31 PM
Yes Croyle will have a lot of improving to be considered good as in his short time last year almost completed more passes to the other team vs his own. If KC is hoping Croyle is the guy they will be lucky to win 7 games. QB is worst position to rely on a guy who is basically a rookie.
Who will win more games in their first full season, Croyle or Russell? My guess is Brodie.
RealSNR
05-05-2007, 05:41 PM
If Green refuses to play for KC like he is claiming then no. Huard has proven he is a good backup but not a starter and Croyle is an unknown just like Russell. So no KC doesn't have a good QB.Would you please define "good backup"? Does that mean Huard is good at holding the clipboard and telling funny jokes on the sideline?
Wouldn't a "good backup" be someone who steps in for the starter when there's an injury and is able to rally the team to several victories as long as he needs to? If he does it for as long as Huard did last season, wouldn't it be alright to say that you could put that guy in for an entire season and he'd play at the same high level for those six games?
That's the whole point of being a back up. You're required to step in on a 5 minutes notice during the game and make sure the offense doesn't skip a beat. If you can do that for a few games, why not as a starter?
Dr. Johnny Fever
05-05-2007, 05:44 PM
The new kicker needs to get into a bar fight again this off season so Tynes won't pick on him. I hope he smokes cigarettes on the field too like the dude in The Replacements.
RealSNR
05-05-2007, 05:49 PM
The new kicker needs to get into a bar fight again this off season so Tynes won't pick on him. I hope he smokes cigarettes on the field too like the dude in The Replacements.He IS a black kicker... :hmmm:
OctoberFart
05-06-2007, 10:27 AM
Would you please define "good backup"? Does that mean Huard is good at holding the clipboard and telling funny jokes on the sideline?
Wouldn't a "good backup" be someone who steps in for the starter when there's an injury and is able to rally the team to several victories as long as he needs to? If he does it for as long as Huard did last season, wouldn't it be alright to say that you could put that guy in for an entire season and he'd play at the same high level for those six games?
That's the whole point of being a back up. You're required to step in on a 5 minutes notice during the game and make sure the offense doesn't skip a beat. If you can do that for a few games, why not as a starter?
You just answered your own questions. Sure Huard put up decent number against scrub teams and played well with not a lot of pressure since he was the backup. If he does become the starter it's a different type of pressure, he will be hearing the whispers from the fans to start Croyle, etc. He has been tried as a starter before and it didn't work out.
OctoberFart
05-06-2007, 10:28 AM
He IS a black kicker... :hmmm:
at least LJ can relate to him.
Messier
05-06-2007, 10:46 AM
You just answered your own questions. Sure Huard put up decent number against scrub teams and played well with not a lot of pressure since he was the backup. If he does become the starter it's a different type of pressure, he will be hearing the whispers from the fans to start Croyle, etc. He has been tried as a starter before and it didn't work out.
Well, he beat San Diego, Seattle, and St. Louis in St. Louis. Those were hard games and he played well in all of them.
Mecca
05-06-2007, 10:56 AM
Who will win more games in their first full season, Croyle or Russell? My guess is Brodie.
EWW that's actually not an easy call, could be pretty close.....4-7 range.
OnTheWarpath15
05-06-2007, 11:03 AM
Well, he beat San Diego, Seattle, and St. Louis in St. Louis. Those were hard games and he played well in all of them.
Let's not get carried away.
The defense staked him a 17 point lead in the SD game, and we still needed a bomb from Tynes to win it.
Seattle was playing without Hasselbeck AND Alexander
St Louis has one of the worst defenses in recent memory.
2 of 3 games at Arrowhead.
Messier
05-06-2007, 11:26 AM
Let's not get carried away.
The defense staked him a 17 point lead in the SD game, and we still needed a bomb from Tynes to win it.
Seattle was playing without Hasselbeck AND Alexander
St Louis has one of the worst defenses in recent memory.
2 of 3 games at Arrowhead.
My point was he played well in those games. You agree? In fact he played well in every game but the last start against Miami.
Messier
05-06-2007, 11:27 AM
Oh and the D didn't "stake" him a lead they got the ball sure but the offense scored those tds.
patteeu
05-06-2007, 11:33 AM
What is left undone is finding a nickle cornerback.
vBulletin® v3.8.8, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.