PDA

View Full Version : GM posts $891-million profit


recxjake
07-31-2007, 08:00 AM
GM posts $891-million profit


July 31, 2007

BY KATIE MERX

FREE PRESS BUSINESS WRITER

General Motors Corp., the largest U.S. automaker, reported an $891-million profit for the second quarter of the year, driven by strong sales in emerging global markets and reduced costs from its restructuring efforts.

"We again saw improved results in sales, income and cash flow this quarter, driven by the continued successful implementation of our business strategies," said Rick Wagoner, GM chairman and chief executive officer.

"In particular, our heavy commitment to key growth markets around the world really paid off in strong growth and earnings. In North America we continue to make progress with our focus on great new products, a disciplined sales and marketing strategy, and structural cost reduction, although profitability remains close to breakeven."

GM’s quarterly profit of $891 million, or $1.56 per diluted share, is an improvement of $4.3 billion compared with a reported net loss of $3.4 billion, or $5.98 per diluted share, in the year-ago quarter.

The positive results boosted GM’s stock 7% in pre-market trading this morning, with shares of the automaker trading up $2.29 a share to $34.90 about 7:50 a.m.

The earnings results for the second quarter 2007 included $520 million, or 92 cents per diluted share, in special charges associated with GM's support of the bankruptcy and reorganization of its former parts arm Delphi Corp. and various North America restructuring charges.

Excluding those charges, GM said it earned $1.4 billion, or $2.48 per diluted share, compared with $1.1 billion, or $2.03 per diluted share, in the year-ago quarter.

GM’s North American operations reported a net loss of $39 million, compared with a net loss of $3.95 billion in the same quarter last year. When it excludes Allison Transmission, which it is in the process of selling, the North American operations reported a slight profit of $78 million for the quarter, compared with an adjusted loss of $94 million from continuing operations in the year-ago quarter.

Overall, Credit Suisse analyst Chris Cerasco said in a note Tuesday morning that GM’s earnings — at $2.48 per share — had “a big upside,” coming in significantly higher than the consensus analyst estimate of $1.13 per share. But, he said, North America again fell “short of expectations,” with 80 cents of its earnings improvement coming from tax-related gains.

GM said that its North American results reflect reduced fixed costs and that a high percentage of its vehicle sales last quarter were of profitable large trucks and well-equipped vehicles. Those positives, however, were offset by lower volumes of sales and unfavorable foreign exchange rates, the company said.

“It’s true that our North America team has made huge improvements, and we appreciate everyone’s hard work,” Wagoner said. “But our current earnings clearly demonstrate we’ve got more to do.”

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070731/BUSINESS01/70731014

recxjake
07-31-2007, 08:05 AM
USA, USA, USA !!!!!!

petegz28
07-31-2007, 08:05 AM
Ford reported a profit the other day too.

ChiefsfaninPA
07-31-2007, 08:26 AM
Hopefully this is a trend that will continue. Eventually(hopefully) the American car companies will finally get it.

StcChief
07-31-2007, 08:29 AM
Why did it take them so long to restructure and cut their losses and fix stuff?

recxjake
07-31-2007, 08:31 AM
Why did it take them so long to restructure and cut their losses and fix stuff?

This is there third straight profitable Q.

cdcox
07-31-2007, 08:32 AM
I hate big auto.

StcChief
07-31-2007, 08:36 AM
This is there third straight profitable Q.
BFD where were they in the 70s pumping out sh1t products and not changing their tune. 80s / 90s more glamour less quality.

now at least they are getting the quality dumping unprofitable things.

less cars/trucks variety = better quality.

recxjake
07-31-2007, 08:37 AM
BFD where were they in the 70s pumping out sh1t products and not changing their tune. 80s / 90s more glamour less quality.

now at least they are getting the quality dumping unprofitable things.

less cars/trucks variety = better quality.

Toyota changed GM's way of thinking... and they needed it.

El Jefe
07-31-2007, 08:40 AM
I like GM, good to see.

StcChief
07-31-2007, 08:41 AM
Toyota changed GM's way of thinking... and they needed it.
I've been saying that since I was burned by GM/Crysler crap in 1978.
Japanese every since.

May consider GM/Ford again.

Sanka
07-31-2007, 08:42 AM
Honda Civic > GM

recxjake
07-31-2007, 09:11 AM
Honda Civic > GM

Acutally,

Saturn Aura > Toyota Camry and Honda Civic

2007 Car of the year... Saturn Aura
2007 Truck of the year... Chevrolet Silverado

Chief Henry
07-31-2007, 09:11 AM
Good for GM and USA made stuff. Consumer confidence is also sky high. What a great country we live in. We have freedoms and an abundance of food and entertainment.


I drive a 2005 Chevy Siverado and I love it. The last 5 vehicles we've bought have been Chevy's...


GOD BLESS THE USA...

Donger
07-31-2007, 09:13 AM
Acutally,

Saturn Aura > Toyota Camry and Honda Civic

2007 Car of the year... Saturn Aura
2007 Truck of the year... Chevrolet Silverado

ROFL

recxjake
07-31-2007, 09:20 AM
ROFL

umm,

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16279422/

http://www.thecarconnection.com/Car_Shows_and_Concept_Cars/Detroit_Auto_Show/Silverado_Aura_Win_Truck_Car_of_the_Year.S286.A11684.html

nychief
07-31-2007, 09:23 AM
Do you think our nation needs a cheerleader?

Donger
07-31-2007, 09:29 AM
umm,

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16279422/

http://www.thecarconnection.com/Car_Shows_and_Concept_Cars/Detroit_Auto_Show/Silverado_Aura_Win_Truck_Car_of_the_Year.S286.A11684.html

And just think how much better GM's profit would have been without paying for those 'awards.'

Anyway, I only care about resale value.

ChiefsfaninPA
07-31-2007, 09:31 AM
Anyway, I only care about resale value.

Exactly why I bought the new Generation of the Camry and my Civic.

recxjake
07-31-2007, 09:31 AM
And just think how much better GM's profit would have been without paying for those 'awards.'

Anyway, I only care about resale value.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117081813602200459.html?mod=yahoo_hs&ru=yahoo

Next.....

Donger
07-31-2007, 09:33 AM
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117081813602200459.html?mod=yahoo_hs&ru=yahoo

Next.....

Exactly.

"Toyota Motor Corp. offers consumers the best selection of vehicles that retain their value over time and feature other ownership cost benefits, according to awards that will be announced today at the Chicago Auto Show."

jeffery
07-31-2007, 09:35 AM
Toyota sales more vehicles in north america than chevy and ford. there more reliable. they have a way better resale value. and i love my x-runner

recxjake
07-31-2007, 09:37 AM
Toyota sales more vehicles in north america than chevy and ford. there more reliable. they have a way better resale value. and i love my x-runner

1. sells
2. No... GM sells more then Toyota in N. America....
3. The link I just posted has GM and Toyota at a near tie for resale value
4. X-runner?

StcChief
07-31-2007, 09:39 AM
Do you think our nation needs a cheerleader?
might as well we have plenty of "Americans" that want the USA to fail or merge into the Global Nation of crap.

Donger
07-31-2007, 09:47 AM
After three years, Toyota's models retain 52 percent of their value, versus 43 percent for GM, according to the Automotive Lease Guide. That's a big reason the Toyota Camry has been America's favorite car for the past five years, outselling GM's No. 1 car, the Chevy Impala, by 35 percent in 2006.

Deberg_1990
07-31-2007, 09:54 AM
Acutally,

Saturn Aura > Toyota Camry and Honda Civic

2007 Car of the year... Saturn Aura
2007 Truck of the year... Chevrolet Silverado


hahaha....keep dreamin...

Whatever helps you sleep better at night..

recxjake
07-31-2007, 10:01 AM
hahaha....keep dreamin...

Whatever helps you sleep better at night..

ROFL...

I'm not dreaming... Automotive journalists voted on it!

Donger
07-31-2007, 10:10 AM
ROFL...

I'm not dreaming... Automotive journalists voted on it!

Cold, hard facts versus opinions of journalists, and you choose opinions?

Kerberos
07-31-2007, 11:52 AM
And just think how much better GM's profit would have been without paying for those 'awards.'


Just think about HOW MUCH profit GM could record if $1300.00 out of EVERY CAR SOLD wasn't going to retirement/pension funding.

Toyota has $100 for each auto sold going to fund the same type of plans.

Spicy McHaggis
07-31-2007, 12:09 PM
Acutally,

Saturn Aura > Toyota Camry and Honda Civic

2007 Car of the year... Saturn Aura
2007 Truck of the year... Chevrolet Silverado


I dispute that (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15833397)

Eleazar
07-31-2007, 12:13 PM
I for one think there needs to be some kind of investigation into these obscene profits. I think that GM is gouging us, I mean, $891 million in a quarter? It's just not fair. There needs to be some kind of regulation here, Big Cars must be taken to task on all this profiteering.

Silock
07-31-2007, 02:01 PM
GM still sucks.