PDA

View Full Version : How bad would Croyle have to be

blueballs
10-09-2007, 12:52 AM
for them to go back to Huard

is dead and rotting the correct answer
Hootie
10-09-2007, 01:27 AM
luckily, Huard's injury happened right as the team with the worse secondary in the NFL comes to town!
Simplex3
10-09-2007, 05:01 AM
It won't have much to do with Croyle's success or lack thereof as much as it will ticket sales.
runnercyclist
10-09-2007, 05:12 AM
It won't have much to do with Croyle's success or lack thereof as much as it will our OL's ability (or lack there of) to keep him alive.

Fixed your post.
Simplex3
10-09-2007, 05:14 AM
Fixed your post.
That too.
Pushead2
10-09-2007, 05:56 AM
Let's go Croyle!
Easy 6
10-09-2007, 06:08 AM
Somebody is going to have to rip his head clean off of his body & toss it into the stands before before they bench him.
thehead
10-09-2007, 06:16 AM
P Manning, Aikman E Manning all sucked it up the first couple years, if KC is gonna lose I would rather lose with Croyle then Huard .The future of KC starts now :clap:
DaKCMan AP
10-09-2007, 06:17 AM
Huard will start again once Hootie kidnaps Brodie.
CoMoChief
10-09-2007, 06:29 AM
P Manning, Aikman E Manning all sucked it up the first couple years, if KC is gonna lose I would rather lose with Croyle then Huard .The future of KC starts now :clap:
Eli Manning still sucks.
beach tribe
10-09-2007, 06:44 AM
Croyle hit the jackpot with Cincy, I hope he doesnt come back out, and dont think he will, but unlike Belichick(?) Herm prolly wont let people lose position to injury.
Kerberos
10-09-2007, 07:01 AM
IMO ...Huard isn't dogshit as a QB but the Chiefs really need to start playing Croyle to see if this is going to pan out for next season. If he can sustain a .500 OR SO record from here on out then I will be happy.

If he fails miserably then we draft another QB, bring in another one or two in FA and Huard gets another chance to complete for starting position again next season.
Chiefnj2
10-09-2007, 07:08 AM
Why do you say "go back" to Huard. Herm hasn't even declared Croyle the starter yet.
beach tribe
10-09-2007, 07:10 AM
Why do you say "go back" to Huard. Herm hasn't even declared Croyle the starter yet.
I thought they said it on Monday, which would indicate a strong desire to see him play.
R&GHomer
10-09-2007, 07:42 AM
P Manning, Aikman E Manning all sucked it up the first couple years, if KC is gonna lose I would rather lose with Croyle then Huard .The future of KC starts now :clap:

:clap: Bring it on
Chiefnj2
10-09-2007, 07:46 AM
I thought they said it on Monday, which would indicate a strong desire to see him play.

KCStar today:

“No doubt,” Edwards said. “If he’s going to have the opportunity to play, and we won’t know that until later this week..."

Publicly, Edwards held out the possibility Monday that Huard would play against the Bengals. He said he would receive results today of an MRI taken on Huard’s injured right shoulder.

“I’ll know more probably (today) or Wednesday whether he can throw or not,” Edwards said.

None of that seemed to bother Croyle, who said the coaches haven’t told him whether he will start against Cincinnati.
runnercyclist
10-09-2007, 07:48 AM
Somebody is going to have to rip his head clean off of his body & toss it into the stands before before they bench him.


Let's just hope that is not foreshadowing :banghead: