penchief
11-04-2007, 03:50 PM
Obviously, the offensive line sucks.
We have playmakers at running back, tight end, and wide reciever.
IMO, the most expedient solution at this point in time is to have a playmaker at QB.
Obviously, Huard is not a playmaker. Our defense has shown the ability to overcome Huard's inability to score. Why wouldn't the same defense be able to compensate for mistakes when the flip-side is a more potent offense?
IMO, it's time to give Croyle his chance, I think he's a playmaker. I believe he will compound the playmaking ability of our other playmakers. If Huard's inability to move the chains and score touchdowns can be buffered by our defense, it is my opinion that Croyle's learning curve can be buffered, as well.
It's Brodie time, IMO.
We have playmakers at running back, tight end, and wide reciever.
IMO, the most expedient solution at this point in time is to have a playmaker at QB.
Obviously, Huard is not a playmaker. Our defense has shown the ability to overcome Huard's inability to score. Why wouldn't the same defense be able to compensate for mistakes when the flip-side is a more potent offense?
IMO, it's time to give Croyle his chance, I think he's a playmaker. I believe he will compound the playmaking ability of our other playmakers. If Huard's inability to move the chains and score touchdowns can be buffered by our defense, it is my opinion that Croyle's learning curve can be buffered, as well.
It's Brodie time, IMO.