Chiefs KC is arguably the worst team in the league. [Archive]

OctoberFart

12-30-2007, 07:45 PM

Other than Miami, KC is easily the worst team in the league with a 9 game losing streak. Even Miami could be argued to be better because they have even forced a somewhat competitive game. Discuss.

jjchieffan

12-30-2007, 07:47 PM

go away troll

kstater

12-30-2007, 07:48 PM

Thank you Captain Obvious. Now go away.

PriestMVP31

12-30-2007, 07:48 PM

says the raider fan...

MTG#10

12-30-2007, 07:49 PM

Yes. Yes we are. I think we would beat Miami at home in OT if we won the coin toss. We would lose to the Phins in Miami though, probably by at least 10.

RedThat

12-30-2007, 07:49 PM

I think the Chiefs are the worst. At least Miami strives to make improvements in the FO?

Chiefs on the other hand...Bah...I don't even want to go there...I am just depressed. Nothing but darkness in the Chiefs organization, nothing but darkness in every sense.

blueballs

12-30-2007, 07:51 PM

the tag team you and your brother
put on your granddad was pretty sad

FringeNC

12-30-2007, 07:51 PM

I've been saying the Chiefs are the worst team in the league for most of the season. You look at the fundamentals -- yards per play gained vs. allowed, and we are right down there at the bottom tied for last.

HolmeZz

12-30-2007, 07:52 PM

AW is mad because his bold prediction that the Raiders wouldn't finish in last place fell through.

TEX

12-30-2007, 07:52 PM

Yep. We are the worst. We are the "new Raiders", but Herm is NOT responsible for any of it. It's ALL DV's fault... :rolleyes:

OctoberFart

12-30-2007, 07:53 PM

AW is mad because his bold prediction that the Raiders wouldn't finish in last place fell through.

Wrong! Try again.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/standings

kcfanXIII

12-30-2007, 07:54 PM

yes the chiefs suck. i heard they even lost to the raiders.

Simplex3

12-30-2007, 07:55 PM

Holy hell. NE scored more than TWICE as many points as the Chiefs this season.

:shake:

kcfanintitanhell

12-30-2007, 07:55 PM

The only reason I'm looking forward to the draft this year is the fact that it's the last week in April, and it will be warm, and hopefully I'll be playing golf.

RedThat

12-30-2007, 07:56 PM

The Chiefs can't do anything?

NOTHING! And it angers me!!!

Seriously? What can they do?

-they can't score

-they can't run the football

-they can't pass protect

-they can't pass the ball

-they can't stop the run

-special teams sucks

-coaching sucks

-FO sucks

-Can't draft if there lives depended on it

*Only thing they can do pretty decently is pressure the QB.

This team sucks in every sense of the word

HolmeZz

12-30-2007, 07:57 PM

Wrong! Try again.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/standings

Nope. You said the Raiders wouldn't finish in last place. They did, along with the Chiefs. You were wrong and your team has failed to win more than 5 games for a 5th straight year.

blueballs

12-30-2007, 07:59 PM

5 years with under 5 wins
Matt Millen is jealous

TN_Chief

12-30-2007, 08:03 PM

Nope. You said the Raiders wouldn't finish in last place. They did, along with the Chiefs. You were wrong and your team has failed to win more than 5 games for a 5th straight year.They didn't finish last. While they have the same record they (Raiders) won 1 more conference game...which means they finish above the Chiefs. That's the tiebreaker.

Braincase

12-30-2007, 08:06 PM

They didn't finish last. While they have the same record they (Raiders) won 1 more conference game...which means they finish above the Chiefs. That's the tiebreaker.

Pffft. We had a road win against the division champ. Trump card played.

OctoberFart

12-30-2007, 08:08 PM

Nope. You said the Raiders wouldn't finish in last place. They did, along with the Chiefs. You were wrong and your team has failed to win more than 5 games for a 5th straight year.

Let me ask you then who finished 2nd in the AFC W last year?

Hammock Parties

12-30-2007, 08:09 PM

This season is finished. Next year we will sweep your asses again.

King_Chief_Fan

12-30-2007, 08:09 PM

Raiders have 5 straight years of being on the bottom of the AFCW and a couple of being worst in NFL. You can run along now since KC has a long way to go to be as bad as the Raiders.

BigRock

12-30-2007, 08:12 PM

They didn't finish last. While they have the same record they (Raiders) won 1 more conference game...which means they finish above the Chiefs. That's the tiebreaker.
Comparing 2 teams in the same division, conference record isn't applied until after the record against common opponents.

TO BREAK A TIE WITHIN A DIVISION

Two Clubs
1. Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games between the clubs).
2. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the division.
3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games.
4. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference.

We win the 3rd tiebreaker.

CHIEFS 3RD
RAIDERS 4TH

WE RULE
THEY DROOL

TN_Chief

12-30-2007, 08:12 PM

Pffft. We had a road win against the division champ. Trump card played.Which means absolutely nothing in a tiebreaker. If (by some miracle) both we and the Raiders had finished at 12-4 and the Raiders had one more division win than we did...they'd be the division winner. The same rule applies when both teams are in the basement.

***

Alright, I may stand corrected. I'm off to look up the tiebreaker formula.

HolmeZz

12-30-2007, 08:14 PM

Which means absolutely nothing in a tiebreaker. If (by some miracle) both we and the Raiders had finished at 12-4 and the Raiders had one more division win than we did...they'd be the division winner. The same rule applies when both teams are in the basement.

***

Alright, I may stand corrected. I'm off to look up the tiebreaker formula.

The Raiders didn't win one more division game. We had the same divisional record.

OctoberFart

12-30-2007, 08:21 PM

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/standings

OnTheWarpath15

12-30-2007, 08:27 PM

We finished 3rd in the division.

Mitch mentioned in in the postgame, and announced the 2008 opponents as well.

We play Cincinnati and Tennessee again by virtue of their 3rd place finish in their respective divisions.

Argument over.

HolmeZz

12-30-2007, 08:30 PM

And AW with a thorough pwning. 5 years in a row in last place?

Easy 6

12-30-2007, 08:32 PM

We'll give you a World Class drubbing in 08, just wait.

Kurt Russell is in troublezzz.

:arrow:

bogey

12-30-2007, 08:35 PM

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/standings

Don't you have a house to rob or an old lady to attack?

StcChief

12-30-2007, 08:37 PM

having another 4-12 year and Faiders are so much better than Chiefs :rolleyes:

orange

12-30-2007, 08:45 PM

http://www.nfl.com/standings?category=div&season=2007-REG&split=Overall

HolmeZz

12-30-2007, 08:47 PM

http://www.nfl.com/standings?category=div&season=2007-REG&split=Overall

We already broke the tie. It's common opponents. It's why the Chiefs have the 3rd place schedule next year.

Pitt Gorilla

12-30-2007, 08:48 PM

San Diego lost to the worst team in the league?

orange

12-30-2007, 08:49 PM

We already broke the tie. It's common opponents. It's why the Chiefs have the 3rd place schedule next year.

Tell the NFL they don't know their own rules, then.

The OFFICIAL WEBSITE OF THE NFL shows KC in last place.

Maybe they'll send you a t-shirt.

a1na2

12-30-2007, 08:49 PM

You are not going to get an argument out of me!

I have a little Arrowhead on a base in my office, it has a paper sack over it for the time being.

Braincase

12-30-2007, 08:50 PM

Don't you have a house to rob or an old lady to attack?

He can't leave the house with that thing on his ankle.

OnTheWarpath15

12-30-2007, 08:52 PM

Tell the NFL they don't know their own rules, then.

The OFFICIAL WEBSITE OF THE NFL shows KC in last place.

Maybe they'll send you a t-shirt.

Read the tiebreakers, and it's obvious that they haven't been applied yet.

http://www.nfl.com/standings/tiebreakingprocedures

OctoberFart

12-30-2007, 08:52 PM

We already broke the tie. It's common opponents. It's why the Chiefs have the 3rd place schedule next year.

Proof or link? You are using playoff scenrios not bottom of the barrel scenerios. It goes off of SOS and Oakland played a tougher schedule according to that.

Chiefspants

12-30-2007, 08:54 PM

When was the last time the raiders had a winning season? or more than 4 wins?

OnTheWarpath15

12-30-2007, 08:54 PM

Proof or link? You are using playoff scenrios not bottom of the barrel scenerios. It goes off of SOS and Oakland played a tougher schedule according to that.

SOS is used for draft order only.

Playoff tiebreakers are used in determining division order.

Two different sets of tiebreakers for two different situations.

We have a 3rd place schedule next year, because we had a better record against common opponents.

orange

12-30-2007, 08:56 PM

...

We have a 3rd place schedule next year, because we had a better record against common opponents.

Have those schedules already been posted somewhere?

StcChief

12-30-2007, 08:57 PM

SOS is used for draft order only.

Playoff tiebreakers are used in determining division order.

Two different sets of tiebreakers for two different situations.

We have a 3rd place schedule next year, because we had a better record against common opponents.

correct. NFL.com won't be updated until after tonights game.

GoHuge

12-30-2007, 09:00 PM

Oakland drafts before the Chiefs so they suck harder!

Braincase

12-30-2007, 09:07 PM

Proof or link? You are using playoff scenrios not bottom of the barrel scenerios. It goes off of SOS and Oakland played a tougher schedule according to that.

Oakland played a tougher schedule? Let's see... we went to the playoffs last year, and you had to play us twice... we had to play the worst team over the last four years, twice... yep. I guess that could be one interpretation.

Simply Red

12-30-2007, 09:15 PM

All Dumb.

chagrin

12-30-2007, 09:17 PM

I don't think anyone's going to argue that KC blows this year, but worse than Oakland? I don't think so.

Pablo

12-30-2007, 09:23 PM

My turds are much more attractive than AW's avatar.

Come back and post some more bullsh*t when you guys run off 9 in a row against us. Just because we suck, and you've managed to beat us 10% of the time in the last 5 years, doesn't mean you've made any significant strides.

|Zach|

12-30-2007, 09:25 PM

No. KC isn't.

Valiant

12-30-2007, 09:44 PM

And they still split with Oakland..YOu seriously suck as a troll..

Mr. Flopnuts

12-30-2007, 09:49 PM

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/standings

If the Raiders pick ahead of the Chiefs in the draft, it's because they finished lower in tiebreakers. Whoever picks first of these two teams in the draft, finished in last place in the division. Sorry. I don't care what ESPN says. The draft order will sort it all out.

GoHuge

12-30-2007, 09:51 PM

If they Raiders pick ahead of the Chiefs in the draft, it's because they finished lower in tiebreakers. Whoever picks first of these two teams in the draft, finished in last place in the division. Sorry. I don't care what ESPN says. The draft order will sort it all out.And Oakland drafts before we do so they still suck harder!!

OnTheWarpath15

12-30-2007, 11:26 PM

Tell the NFL they don't know their own rules, then.

The OFFICIAL WEBSITE OF THE NFL shows KC in last place.

Maybe they'll send you a t-shirt.

Here you go, fuqtard.

http://www.nfl.com/standings?category=div&season=2007-REG&split=Overall

Pablo

12-30-2007, 11:28 PM

Here you go, fuqtard.

http://www.nfl.com/standings?category=div&season=2007-REG&split=OverallAh, it feels great to always be better than somebody. Especially when that somebody is the Raiders.

Bowser

12-31-2007, 12:31 AM

Other than Miami, KC is easily the worst team in the league with a 9 game losing streak. Even Miami could be argued to be better because they have even forced a somewhat competitive game. Discuss.

You're a dumbass and and a piss poor shit stirrer. Discuss.

And they still split with Oakland..YOu seriously suck as a troll.

Kerberos

12-31-2007, 07:30 AM

It just kills me that the Chiefs have had thier FIRST really crappy year (under 6 wins) in a LONG ASSED TIME and some duchebag Raider fan comes in and makes fun of us.

POT MEET KETTLE

:shake:

Pushead2

12-31-2007, 07:38 AM

Misery loves company, and this is a first for a raider fan to have someone else this bad with them.....give them credit for trying...

TN_Chief

12-31-2007, 07:38 AM

I can't believe we're arguing about which 4-12 team is worse. We're all ****ing retarded simply for doing that. Both teams should have their headquarters firebombed.

2112

12-31-2007, 07:57 AM

:spock: This is one of the dumbest threads I've ever seen.

The Chiefs suck, yes.

The Raiders suck, yes.

The Jets suck, yes.

What is there to discuss? is there some kind of measuring stick on how much you suck? I'm not familiar with that, to be honest.

Iowanian

12-31-2007, 09:54 AM

There is no doubt the Chiefs suck this year.

As to which team is worse....well, How many top 10 picks have the Raiders had in the last decade?

Shuddap. Your mother eats the pudding from Al Da vis' collostomy bag and spits it in your mouth to Indian banjo music.

Bob Dole

12-31-2007, 01:10 PM

Arguably? Who is arguing about it?

Braincase

12-31-2007, 03:38 PM

Proof or link? You are using playoff scenrios not bottom of the barrel scenerios. It goes off of SOS and Oakland played a tougher schedule according to that.

Dumbassery must be brought to light. Congrats on sucking worse than the Chiefs and failing to draft later than third... again...

WilliamTheIrish

12-31-2007, 03:42 PM

What a horrible poster.

TEX

12-31-2007, 04:08 PM