PDA

View Full Version : Chiefs Best Chiefs article of the offseason


Hammock Parties
06-27-2008, 04:00 PM
http://kan.scout.com/2/765300.html

One long month remains between Chiefs fans and training camp. It’s the light at the end of the tunnel. So what do we do until then? Why, get to know our new Kansas City Chiefs, of course!

The Chiefs have completely updated their roster page with photographs and number assignments for all of the new free agents, rookies and un-drafted free agents. This is exciting stuff!

Any one of these names could be up on the Ring of Fame in 20 years! Any one of these numbers could be retired in 20 years! How can you not get excited about something so trivial that may or may not happen in 20 years? Someone strap me down!

They say a picture is worth 1,000 words. In that case, I’m about to short you readers by several thousand words. Sorry. Enjoy the second edition of Names, Numbers and New Guys, now an annual Warpaint Illustrated.com tradition after it's initial appearance in May of 2007. (http://kan.scout.com/2/647516.html)

#81 – TE Michael Allan (http://www.kcchiefs.com/player/michael_allan/)

OK, so he’s not new, but it’s worth noting that Allan’s jersey number has been changed from 47 to 81 this year. I can only imagine he felt the same way about his former number as I did – any offensive skill position player wearing something in the 40’s makes them look slow.

I’m not quite sure why the Chiefs would give away Kevin Lockett’s number, because I know all you K-State fans have been anticipating its retirement any day now. Obviously Allan has a bright future if he’s wearing that baby.

But all is not well. What’s up with Allan’s mugshot? Are you telling me the guy staring back at me from my computer screen is a football player? He honestly resembles my mailman. Nothing personal, Michael – everyone needs a career after football.

#76 – LT Branden Albert (http://www.kcchiefs.com/player/branden_albert/)

It’s honestly horrifying that Albert has chosen to wear 76. There is no more cursed number in recent Chiefs history.

First, there was the John Tait (http://kan.scout.com/a.z?s=115&p=8&c=1&nid=3630273) fiasco. Tait wore 76, was the weak link on the greatest offensive line in recent football memory, and left after tumultuous negotiations with the franchise. The Chiefs still haven’t found a competent right tackle to replace him.

Then we have the departed John Welbourn (http://kan.scout.com/a.z?s=115&p=8&c=1&nid=2980186), who also wore 76. I don’t need to remind everyone of his steroid-related suspension and flat-out awful play a year ago.

Let’s hope Albert can restore the tradition of stellar offensive line play from those wearing #76, last seen in the form of the great John Alt.

#29 – HB Jamaal Charles (http://www.kcchiefs.com/player/jamaal_charles/)

There’s not much to note here. Charles looks like a football player, and it’s pretty tough to mess up a running back’s number. Here’s what I like – his hair!

With all the talk of safety Greg Wesley (http://kan.scout.com/a.z?s=115&p=8&c=1&nid=3698882) leaving Kansas City this offseason, the Chiefs need someone to carry on that tradition of great dreadlocks. Charles fills that role nicely. Just tuck those dreads under your helmet, Charles, lest Larry Johnson give them a good tug.

And speaking of helmets, check out the lid on Charles! He’s wearing one of those funky “revolution” helmets, complete with one of the weirdest facemasks I’ve ever seen. Safety first, Jamaal?

#14 – WR Kevin Robinson (http://www.kcchiefs.com/player/kevin_robinson/)

Here we go again – another wide receiver wearing a number in the teens. Last year I lamented Brad Ekwerekwu’s #14, and this year Robinson has deemed fit to take it. Why not take #84? Sure, John Paul Foschi is wearing it, but other players are sharing numbers right now.

Even worse, it appears Robinson, a leading candidate to win the Chiefs’ kick-return job, may be the lone wide receiver wearing a number in the teens this year, assuming Kevin McMahan and Maurice Price get cut. Yes, the Chiefs could have had an entire wide receiver corps decked out in spectacular-looking jerseys bearing 80-numbers. But no, my dreams are dashed.

#66 – LB LeRue Rumph (http://www.kcchiefs.com/player/lerue_rumph/)

Seriously? LeRue? Is that any kind of name for a football player? I’m shocked to learn this name even exists. Rumph joins Claude “Turk” McBride and DeMarcus “Tank” Tyler as Chiefs defenders with unfortunate first names – note that the two defensive linemen now appear online as Tank and Turk.

In fact, “LeRue” is such an obscure name, I can’t even find it in any etymology directories. The closest thing is “LaRue,” which means ,“The red-haired one,” and clearly Rumph doesn’t have red hair, so I’m just completely baffled.

#75 – OG L.J. Anderson (http://www.kcchiefs.com/player/lj_anderson/)

Anderson’s resemblance to actor Gary Coleman is striking. Maybe it’s just the angle of the photo the Chiefs have used, but I can easily picture Anderson as Coleman’s illegitimate son.

Or, wait – what if Anderson is secretly Coleman himself? His birth date is listed as 1986, the same year Diff’rent Strokes went off the air. Is it possible Gary Coleman quit his role as Arnold Jackson (http://kan.scout.com/a.z?s=115&p=8&c=1&nid=1176207), found a cure for the disease that inhibited his growth, located a convincing doppelganger to convince the public he was still short, and eventually became a 6-foot-3, 292-pound offensive lineman? The truth is out there.

#79 – OT Anthony Alabi (http://www.kcchiefs.com/player/anthony_alabi/)

Either someone improperly cropped Alabi’s headshot, or he’s a Vulcan from Star Trek. Look at those pointy ears! Maybe Alabi can recruit Mr. Spock to run the Chiefs after Carl Peterson retires. Every move the front office made would naturally be completely logical, and you know Spock could keep his emotions in check during contract negotiations.

kstater
06-27-2008, 04:15 PM
Bannable Offense's
False News or Thread Title
Many people come here for their Chiefs news, so we don't tolerate false news stories, even if done as a joke. Misleading thread titles can fall into this category.
.

OnTheWarpath15
06-27-2008, 04:17 PM
:LOL:

WhitiE
06-27-2008, 04:18 PM
i was bored at 75 and 79..... stupid stuff

Stewie
06-27-2008, 04:38 PM
I thought you were done with that bird cage liner.

2112
06-27-2008, 04:43 PM
You should practice plagiarism, it couldn't hurt.

CoMoChief
06-27-2008, 04:50 PM
Was this written by a 4th grader?

bogey
06-27-2008, 04:56 PM
I read the 5 responses before I read the article. I was about to jump on the negative responses because they seem to trash the article just for the sake of trashing the author. But, I went back and read the article before responding. Pretty weak my friend.

WhitiE
06-27-2008, 05:08 PM
just wanted to clarify 75 and 79 were the only ones that bored me. the other ones were ok.

SBK
06-27-2008, 05:12 PM
Impressive quality, content and a mind boggling attention to detail. Pulitzer prize material here.

booger
06-27-2008, 05:19 PM
Allan has had 81 since he was cut during the final cuts before week 1 and added to the practice squad. So that was stoopid.

Robinson taking 84 when a TE has it? If players share the same # it is one on D and the other on O.

It might be a good time waister for a BB thread but as an article it reads as: print, poop, wipe, flush.

Extra Point
06-27-2008, 05:21 PM
Anthony Alibi: Black Spock=BLOCK

I think this guy has the best shot at making a diff.

Buehler445
06-27-2008, 05:24 PM
Uhhh OK.

CrazyPhuD
06-27-2008, 05:54 PM
Mods can someone change the thread title to "worst chiefs article of the offseason" If there ever was a case to fyp this is it.

FAX
06-27-2008, 05:55 PM
Great article, Mr. GoChiefs. Reads like a Velvet Mirkin.

FAX

Skip Towne
06-27-2008, 05:57 PM
Great article, Mr. GoChiefs. Reads like a Velvet Mirkin.

FAX

I think it is merkin.

FAX
06-27-2008, 05:58 PM
I think it is merkin.

Merkin?

FAX

Smed1065
06-27-2008, 06:02 PM
This must be the same way you do crunches!

Edit:

I went to check the author because I felt like it was Nickie and not you. Gave you to much credit.

Guess you posted something stupid about the number 86?

(TheZou wrote: #86 is Buck Buchanan's retired number, so I don't think it was available.

GoChiefs81: "Oh ****...thanks for that.)


I guess a dog and its owner become one after so long.

Rausch
06-27-2008, 06:28 PM
Great article, Mr. GoChiefs. Reads like a Velvet Mirkin.

FAX

Smells like a Bigfoot merkin anyway...

BigMeatballDave
06-27-2008, 06:51 PM
Craptastic

Hammock Parties
06-27-2008, 08:37 PM
the other ones were ok.

Another successful edition of our annual WPI tradition. I'll bring it back next offseason.

Smed1065
06-27-2008, 11:33 PM
Another successful edition of our annual WPI tradition.

Nice tradition of writing BS and knowing the facts after a poster brings it to your attention.

I know you are professional (LOL) but think you and Nick live in PA now.

Now the site does not know the Chiefs history or can not compose a sentence for a 99.95 charge?

But that site can tell us who is going to make a difference? If you can read between the spelling errors? For 99.95

I forgot you are the editor and it improved, Now it is 1 spelling or grammatical error per paragraph.



ROFLMAO!

:drool:

Smed1065
06-28-2008, 02:07 AM
Guess it fell off the front after QC came here all night ?

StcChief
06-28-2008, 09:26 AM
keep your day job... awful just awful.

milkman
06-28-2008, 09:40 AM
keep your day job... awful just awful.

When did he get a day job?

StcChief
06-28-2008, 09:46 AM
TinkyWinkyWhen did he get a day job?:whackit

Phobia
06-28-2008, 11:13 AM
I think it's hilarious how much jersey numbers mean to little kids. It's a jersey number.

I didn't get past the whole #76 paragraph because I'm thinking any one of us would have been proud to be the "weak link" on a Chiefs offensive line anytime before 2006. Obviously Tait was so pathetic he went and got a blockbuster contract and a SuperBowl ring.

Honestly, I think Chiefs fans should stop talking trash on John Tait. That's just stupid.

milkman
06-28-2008, 01:20 PM
When you look at that O-Line, Tait or Weigman were the weak links, which speaks to how outstanding that O-Line was.

CupidStunt
06-28-2008, 01:41 PM
Obviously Tait was so pathetic he went and got a blockbuster contract and a SuperBowl ring.


When did Tait steal a Super Bowl ring?

milkman
06-28-2008, 01:47 PM
When did Tait steal a Super Bowl ring?

He has a loser's ring.

R&GHomer
06-28-2008, 01:48 PM
Ok... that's 5 minutes of my life I'll never get back. Worthless man