PDA

View Full Version : News Autism vaccine researcher faked data


veist
02-09-2009, 11:54 AM
From The Sunday Times
February 8, 2009
MMR doctor Andrew Wakefield fixed data on autism (http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683671.ece)


THE doctor who sparked the scare over the safety of the MMR vaccine for children changed and misreported results in his research, creating the appearance of a possible link with autism, a Sunday Times investigation has found.

Confidential medical documents and interviews with witnesses have established that Andrew Wakefield manipulated patients’ data, which triggered fears that the MMR triple vaccine to protect against measles, mumps and rubella was linked to the condition.

The research was published in February 1998 in an article in The Lancet medical journal. It claimed that the families of eight out of 12 children attending a routine clinic at the hospital had blamed MMR for their autism, and said that problems came on within days of the jab. The team also claimed to have discovered a new inflammatory bowel disease underlying the children’s conditions.

However, our investigation, confirmed by evidence presented to the General Medical Council (GMC), reveals that: In most of the 12 cases, the children’s ailments as described in The Lancet were different from their hospital and GP records. Although the research paper claimed that problems came on within days of the jab, in only one case did medical records suggest this was true, and in many of the cases medical concerns had been raised before the children were vaccinated. Hospital pathologists, looking for inflammatory bowel disease, reported in the majority of cases that the gut was normal. This was then reviewed and the Lancet paper showed them as abnormal.

Despite involving just a dozen children, the 1998 paper’s impact was extraordinary. After its publication, rates of inoculation fell from 92% to below 80%. Populations acquire “herd immunity” from measles when more than 95% of people have been vaccinated.

Last week official figures showed that 1,348 confirmed cases of measles in England and Wales were reported last year, compared with 56 in 1998. Two children have died of the disease.

With two professors, John Walker-Smith and Simon Murch, Wakefield is defending himself against allegations of serious professional misconduct brought by the GMC. The charges relate to ethical aspects of the project, not its findings. All three men deny any misconduct.

Through his lawyers, Wakefield this weekend denied the issues raised by our investigation, but declined to comment further. This is just low, regardless of how you feel on the subject. The fact that he was faking data is simply disgusting.

Ebolapox
02-09-2009, 11:58 AM
repost.

bluehawkdoc
02-09-2009, 12:17 PM
Repost or not, I appreciate the heads up. Nothing like creating hysteria. Nuthooks for this guy if true. I hope they throw the book at him.

Saulbadguy
02-09-2009, 01:48 PM
Too bad BIG_DUMBASS won't be here for 9 months to comment on this.

Ebolapox
02-09-2009, 01:48 PM
and I agree, it's important information. it would've been buried in the other thread, fwiw.

kstater
02-09-2009, 01:52 PM
Big Daddy will be relieved.

kstater
02-09-2009, 01:54 PM
But more seriously. This guy faked his results has put millions of people at risk. All the "free thinkers" that bought into his BS and didn't have their kids vaccinated might ruin the effectiveness of the reponsible ones who did vaccinate their kids.

RodInCanton
02-09-2009, 03:19 PM
If a kid got sick and died from not having the shot would that make him liable in at least an involuntary manslaughter way? Just wondering but it seems that would be appropriate here...

Amnorix
02-09-2009, 03:59 PM
Too bad BIG_DUMBASS won't be here for 9 months to comment on this.

Where is BD anyway??

Amnorix
02-09-2009, 04:00 PM
If a kid got sick and died from not having the shot would that make him liable in at least an involuntary manslaughter way? Just wondering but it seems that would be appropriate here...

I'm not a criminal attorney, but I"m thinking probably not. The cause/effect are likely too attenuated.

Might be a civil claim for negligence, at least.

Pitt Gorilla
02-09-2009, 04:02 PM
Eh, I had my kids vaccinated anyway. The preponderance of evidence suggested vaccination was the right move. I don't think this fooled too many people.

Mosbonian
02-09-2009, 04:20 PM
As a parent of a child affected by Aspergers I am appalled and angry..but let me first state that I never believed in the authenticity of the facts to begin with. To say that the disorder that affects my child is brought about by a vaccine always irked me....and always stood in the way of Dr's acknowledging that Autism is inherent from birth.

What's worse is that so much money and time was wasted on supporting this theory that true efforts to find solutions and support mechanisms for parents and children with Autism Spectrum Disorder were ignored.

I wonder if we will hear from Senator Joseph Kennedy now?

mmaddog
*******

FAX
02-09-2009, 04:38 PM
This is pure speculation on my part, as I have absolutely no way of knowing if it is true, however, I'm convinced that the public would be aghast to learn how much medical research data is "fudged".

There is simply too much money at stake. Merely adjusting the data by a percentage here or there could mean the difference between receiving or being denied a grant. Combine those potentially enormous sums with the fact that most research data is completely unaudited, and you have excellent ingredients for fraud.

FAX

Adept Havelock
02-09-2009, 05:00 PM
Where is BD anyway??

He had an election bet with someone. He's limited to the Casino for 1 year, IIRC.

FAX
02-09-2009, 05:03 PM
I think I'll go visit him over there.

I'll bring him a cake with a file baked in it.

FAX