PDA

View Full Version : Chiefs Derrick Brooks

Hog's Gone Fishin
03-12-2009, 06:48 PM
Why is he still out there ?? He's got something left . Imagine Brooks ,Vrabel, Johnson.

Draft Curry and we're set at linebacker and will have a solid defense for years to come. Our defense will be a force.
rad
03-12-2009, 06:51 PM
Why is he still out there ?? He's got something left . Imagine Brooks ,Vrabel, Johnson.

Draft Curry and we're set at linebacker and will have a solid defense for the year to come. Our defense will be a force.

That's what you meant.
Hog's Gone Fishin
03-12-2009, 06:54 PM
That's what you meant.

No, curry will fall in to Brooks / Vrabels spot after the first year and we'll be strong!
Buck
03-12-2009, 06:55 PM
Here you guys go, I just made this. I know you guys will use it often.
Huffman83
03-12-2009, 07:11 PM
No need for another aging 4-3 linebacker. The Chiefs just got rid of a very (formerly.) good aging LB in a 3-4 and 4-3.

Thread done.
C-Mac
03-12-2009, 07:14 PM
I thought Brooks was already signed.....Bills?
Hog's Gone Fishin
03-12-2009, 09:24 PM
I thought Brooks was already signed.....Bills?

I don't think so , he was listed on NFL network tonight as stilll available.
KCrockaholic
03-12-2009, 11:37 PM
eh, doesnt matter if we pick him up or not IMO. Drafting Curry should be our main focus.
dj56dt58
03-13-2009, 12:53 AM
eh, doesnt matter if we pick him up or not IMO. Drafting Curry should be our main focus.

not at #3 it shouldnt
MahiMike
03-13-2009, 06:53 AM
I think the Bucs re-signed him.
Hog's Gone Fishin
03-14-2009, 09:26 AM
I think the Bucs re-signed him.


Nope. He's still available.

he just seems like he would be a good fit with Pioli.
Al Bundy
03-14-2009, 09:45 AM
Brooks has very little left in the tank.
wild1
03-14-2009, 10:33 AM
didn't know he was still in the league
acasas4
03-14-2009, 12:27 PM
Here you guys go, I just made this. I know you guys will use it often.

Thanks, I just saw this and will use it...:)
milkman
03-14-2009, 12:40 PM
The Chiefs just got rid of a very (formerly.) good aging LB in a 3-4 and 4-3.

Thread done.

Who?

And don't say Donnie Edwards.

He was ok, but not "very" good, ever.
Dr. Johnny Fever
03-14-2009, 12:48 PM
Who?

And don't say Donnie Edwards.

He was ok, but not "very" good, ever.

He did make the 2003 Pro-Bowl and needs only 4 interceptions to have the most ever by a LB'er.
milkman
03-14-2009, 02:04 PM
He did make the 2003 Pro-Bowl and needs only 4 interceptions to have the most ever by a LB'er.

I'm pretty sure he only made it into that pro bowl as an alternate.

And it's great that Donnie has the hands to make the catches when he has the opportunity to make an interception, but the fact is, as I've said before, and interception is rarely the result of any great effort by the interceptor, but rather usually the result of pressure by the D-Line (or blitzer), or simply a bad throw by the QB.

Donnie had the speed to be a great LB, but he never had the physicality.

As I said, he was an OK player, but not anything special.