PDA

View Full Version : Chiefs Chiefs' O-line ranked #25


T-post Tom
07-25-2009, 01:50 AM
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/9848856/Positional-Power-Rankings:-OL-packages

Not much news here except that the o-line is ranked at #25 by this writer.

Starters:
LT Branden Albert
LG Brian Waters
C Rudy Niswanger
RG Mike Goff
RT Damion McIntosh
Backups:
Colin Brown
Brian De La Puente
Eric Ghiaciuc
Cameron Goldberg
Darryl Harris
Edwin Harrison
Barry Richardson
Wade Smith
Herb Taylor

Waters spent the offseason angry and upset with the new Chiefs regime, attending only the mandatory minicamp. When he did show up, he admitted he had a great deal of conditioning to do before the start of training camp. New coach Todd Haley wants his blockers lean and mobile, as guys like Albert and McIntosh have lost a considerable amount of weight and mid-section. Goff was signed as a UFA and was the line's leader during the offseason program. Ghiaciuc and Smith give the Chiefs experienced depth inside, but they lack playing experience on the bench at tackle. Draft pick Brown is strictly a right tackle, as is last year's pick Richardson.

Jethopper
07-25-2009, 02:41 AM
Ship!

Quesadilla Joe
07-25-2009, 03:01 AM
Denver should be somewhere in the top 5. :shake:

acesn8s
07-25-2009, 03:07 AM
How in the hell did they get THAT high?

Pablo
07-25-2009, 06:34 AM
So, the Rams spent the #2 pick in the draft on a RT, eh?

Gonzo
07-25-2009, 06:46 AM
Ship!
I would the whole thing.
Posted via Mobile Device

milkman
07-25-2009, 06:46 AM
So, the Rams spent the #2 pick in the draft on a RT, eh?

I imagine thier plan is to work into the LT position over the course of the season.

Stupid on two levels.

First, he does have the talent to play the position from the first day, and second, Barron sucks as and is going to get Bulger killed.

Rausch
07-25-2009, 06:50 AM
So, the Rams spent the #2 pick in the draft on a RT, eh?

It's a combover...

Chiefnj2
07-25-2009, 08:40 AM
Browns at #31?

OnTheWarpath15
07-25-2009, 08:47 AM
Browns at #31?

Yeah, I thought that, and the Rams at #26 were ridiculous.

The questions regarding the Rams line is staying healthy, not talent, IMO.

If they stay healthy, and Steven Jackson can stay healthy, he'll have a monster season.

milkman
07-25-2009, 08:52 AM
Yeah, I thought that, and the Rams at #26 were ridiculous.

The questions regarding the Rams line is staying healthy, not talent, IMO.

If they stay healthy, and Steven Jackson can stay healthy, he'll have a monster season.

#26 may be low for the Rams, but Alex Barron at LT is a disaster waiting to happen.

OnTheWarpath15
07-25-2009, 08:54 AM
#26 may be low for the Rams, but Alex Barron at LT is a disaster waiting to happen.

Agreed.

I seriously can't imagine that Spagnuolo thinks it's a good idea to swap Barron and Jason Smith.

Smith-Bell-Brown-Incognito-Barron has some serious potential.

cabletech94
07-25-2009, 09:32 AM
YES. Not the worst (yet).

POND_OF_RED
07-25-2009, 09:44 AM
Denver should be somewhere in the top 5. :shake:

They must not factor in your ability to get away with chop blocking. Even having a top 5 line wouldn't help you this year. No one really needs to rush the QB if the QB can't throw for shit...

Frosty
07-25-2009, 10:45 AM
Browns at #31?

I don't know about #31 but the Browns line was terrible last year.

Mecca
07-25-2009, 10:51 AM
The Browns line has names but hasn't really translated into good play...and that right side is very questionable.