Oakland only has 3 active WR's

[recxjake]

1

[Bane]

Damn!!! Maybe there is a god....

[Mr. Laz]

4-4-3

[SPchief]

Stack the box

[kstater]

They wern't going to need them anyway. Every team's gameplan will be pound the rock up the middle. And it will work.

[DeezNutz]

Is their TE inactive, too?

['Hamas' Jenkins]

You don't need WRs to beat the Chiefs in the passing game. You need RBs who can catch the ball in the flat and a good TE

[Lonewolf Ed]

As far as I am concerned, Fargas being inactive is the best news of the morning!

[redfan]

They way they run the ball, they prolly only need TE and 1 wideout.

[Reerun_KC]

You don't need WRs to beat the Chiefs in the passing game. You need RBs who can catch the ball in the flat and a good TE

This...

[old_geezer]

It's no secret even to the Raiders. To beat the Chiefs they are going to have to pound the ball down our throats. If they need a passing game they're screwed anyway and they know it.

[MMXcalibur]

Only 3 active WRs?
Wonder what Oakland plans on doing today...hmmmm....:spock:

[Mr. Laz]

Only 3 active WRs?
Wonder what Oakland plans on doing today...hmmmm....:spock:
No hindsight excuse, if Haley and Co don't have a plan in place for dealing with the Faider running game then they should be kicked in their collective daddy bags.

[KC kid]

How about all you offensive line lovers that were craving the Khalif Barnes?

[Garcia Bronco]

That means they'll run the ball. And they can. Should be interesting