PDA

View Full Version : Chiefs 20(car)-143 yards/7(rec)-38

LaChapelle
12-14-2009, 12:56 PM
Isn't that enough work for Charles, bum shoulder and all?
RippedmyFlesh
12-14-2009, 01:05 PM
Over a season thats 320 carries and 112 receptions.
In 2003 Priest had 320 rushing att and 74 rec.
So I would say even for a healthy Charles that's all I could ask from him.
sedated
12-14-2009, 01:06 PM
not enough for my fantasy team
DaWolf
12-14-2009, 01:17 PM
Charles is doing his best to not make that JA trade look so lopsided.

Hopefully he can keep it up and we can get some better people around him. We'll see...
Sure-Oz
12-14-2009, 01:22 PM
Charles is our offensive MVP, other guys could learn from him
Hammock Parties
12-14-2009, 01:24 PM
He's probably been the most consistent player on my fantasy team besides Drew Brees over the last 5 or 6 weeks.
Mecca
12-14-2009, 01:25 PM
Charles is a really nice player but the Chiefs have to get another back, he'll never make it through a season touching it 20+ times a game.
bowener
12-14-2009, 01:31 PM
Do you think Charles gets close to 1,000 rushing yards on the season?

He currently needs just under 133 yards in each of the next 3 games (CLE, CIN, DEN).

Seems rather difficult, but it would be nice to see him get it. Hell, maybe that should just be the goal for our fucking offense, to try and get him 1000 yards on as few as carries as possible.
OnTheWarpath15
12-14-2009, 01:32 PM
Charles is a really nice player but the Chiefs have to get another back, he'll never make it through a season touching it 20+ times a game.

And we'll never get through a season throwing 45 times.
OnTheWarpath15
12-14-2009, 01:34 PM
Do you think Charles gets close to 1,000 rushing yards on the season?

He currently needs just under 133 yards in each of the next 3 games (CLE, CIN, DEN).

Seems rather difficult, but it would be nice to see him get it. Hell, maybe that should just be the goal for our fucking offense, to try and get him 1000 yards on as few as carries as possible.

He's gonna have to have a monster against Cleveland, who just shut down Mendenhall to have a chance.

The Bengals and Broncos are pretty stout in the run defense department.

Plus, he actually has to play the last 3 games. Not sure if his shoulder will hold up.
BWillie
12-14-2009, 01:35 PM
He's gonna have to have a monster against Cleveland, who just shut down Mendenhall to have a chance.

The Bengals and Broncos are pretty stout in the run defense department.

Plus, he actually has to play the last 3 games. Not sure if his shoulder will hold up.

He claims that the shoulder thing has been happening to him since high school and it's no big deal.
Mecca
12-14-2009, 01:37 PM
Oh great we play the Bengals, so we can watch Maualuga a player we don't have because of our dumbass QB.
Pablo
12-14-2009, 07:06 PM
Oh great we play the Bengals, so we can watch Maualuga a player we don't have because of our dumbass QB.Because even if we hadn't picked up Cassel, we would have most definitely drated Maualuga specifically?
Sure-Oz
12-14-2009, 07:10 PM
Oh great we play the Bengals, so we can watch Maualuga a player we don't have because of our dumbass QB.

I heard him taunting erin andrews took him off our draft board anyway
TheGuardian
12-14-2009, 07:41 PM
Charles is a really nice player but the Chiefs have to get another back, he'll never make it through a season touching it 20+ times a game.

Based on what?