2A: Williams, Clausen, Cody, Tate, Trade Up NOW!!, ???

[KcKing]

Alot of Talent left... Do we move up now, or pick one of these or someone else at 2A?

Choices, choices....

[petegz28]

I'll take Clausen or Cody. Either would be fine with me. I cannot believe Teebow went ahead of him.

[KevB]

A bunch of good players out there....just hang loose and take BPA. I personally like Hughes. Adds speed and playmaking ability to go along with Berry.

[Bane]

I think we stay where we are with our 2's.Should be lots of talent left for us.Especially with the way Dungver is picking!

[DaneMcCloud]

Absolutely no reason to trade up. There is going to be some serious talent at 36 & 50.

[petegz28]

Williams just went to the Cards

[Reerun_KC]

Absolutely no reason to trade up. There is going to be some serious talent at 36 & 50.

This...

We need playmakers! Badly... I am neutral on Clausen, we need people that can play and have football talent.. I sure would hate to pick Clausen when he is going to be on the bench for 1 year or longer, IF we can have an immediate impact player...

Tough choice, glad I dont have to make it.

[KcKing]

We can scratch Williams...


Absolutely no reason to trade up. There is going to be some serious talent at 36 & 50.

I agree with this 100%, I just remember seeing alot of TRADE BACK into the 20's to grab Jimmy... And noticed a ton of other really good players left... Thought i'd see about where everyone stood but i'm too n00b'ish to make a poll...

[petegz28]

This...

We need playmakers! Badly... I am neutral on Clausen, we need people that can play and have football talent.. I sure would hate to pick Clausen when he is going to be on the bench for 1 year or longer, IF we can have an immediate impact player...

Tough choice, glad I dont have to make it.

Clausen vs. Cody, who do you take?

[Hammock Parties]

We're going to get a great pick. That much is obvious.

[OmahaChief]

A lot of value to be had in the second. I am stoked with the way things are lining up.

[Reerun_KC]

Clausen vs. Cody, who do you take?

OH WOW..

Again that is why I am glad its not me making those choices...

Cody would be an immediate starter and contributor to the team.. Clausen not for at a min 1 year and could be up to 2-3 years before he starts paying off...

We need talent....

So I would go with Mays, Tate or Cody or anyone else...

[DaneMcCloud]

OH WOW..

Again that is why I am glad its not me making those choices...

Cody would be an immediate starter and contributor to the team.. Clausen not for at a min 1 year and could be up to 2-3 years before he starts paying off...

We need talent....

So I would go with Mays, Tate or Cody or anyone else...

I think it has to be Cody, Mays, Tate in that order.

If they miss on Tate, Gilyard should be there in the 3rd.

[Reerun_KC]

I think it has to be Cody, Mays, Tate in that order.

If they miss on Tate, Gilyard should be there in the 3rd.

Mays would shore up the secondary with berry and the Brandons for along time though....

[BIG K]

Clausen vs. Cody, who do you take?

Cody

[Braincase]

Absolutely no reason to trade up. There is going to be some serious talent at 36 & 50.

Agreed. If the pool is what it might be, trade that 50 up to 37.

[DaneMcCloud]

Mays would shore up the secondary with berry and the Brandons for along time though....

It could be like the 80's with Albert Lewis, Lloyd Burress, Deron Cherry and Kevin Ross.

[CHENZ A!]

It could be like the 80's with Albert Lewis, Lloyd Burress, Deron Cherry and Kevin Ross.

or Tongue, Woods, Carter, Hasty

[Micjones]

Terrence Cody please. Then LB help at 50.

[Frankie]

The Vikes will take Clausen. I want two of the following in the 2nd:

Golden Tate (WR)
Terrence "Manboobs" Cody (DT)
Sergio Kindle (OLB)
Bruce Campbell (OT)
Rodger Saffold (OT)

[Frankie]

Absolutely no reason to trade up. There is going to be some serious talent at 36 & 50.

Yep, we can agree every once in a blue moon.

[Frankie]

We can scratch Williams...

You do it. He's too big and scary.

[Frankie]

Clausen vs. Cody, who do you take?

Manboobs.