Freedom from porn

[Hammock Parties]

Not surprisingly, this was written by a woman.

http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/emaf.nsf/Popup?ReadForm&db=stltoday/news/columnists.nsf&docid=FC47256991F19EA48625772F007B702C

It started out innocuously enough. Apple CEO Steve Jobs was responding to a
late-night e-mail from a blogger critical of his company's tight control over
which applications, or "apps," are sold for use with its iPads and iPhones.
Jobs answered that Apple's standards are meant to liberate consumers, giving
them "freedom from programs that steal your private data," "freedom from
programs that trash your battery" and "freedom from porn."

Those first two freedoms might be welcome in today's tech jungle. But judging
from the shock and outrage that erupted in response to Jobs' offhand swipe at
pornography, that last one apparently is not.

Beginning with the response from Jobs' interlocutor — who objected that "Porn
is just fine!" — the Apple CEO has found himself on the receiving end of a
tidal wave of fury from online peeping toms offended by his refusal to enable
their habit. They have denounced him as a puritanical zealot and iron-fisted
censor who is "imposing his morality" on America by opting out of the virtual
skin trade.

Never mind that today's online pornography enthusiasts are free to take Jobs'
advice and buy other products that make their vice easier to indulge. Or that
anyone with an Internet browser on his iPhone or iPad can access pornography
online anyway.

The backlash against Jobs is not about access. It's about indignation at anyone
who dares to criticize America's addiction to online smut.

Panning or banning pornography once was considered good business. Today, it's
increasingly seen as commercial suicide. Even the most anodyne comments — like
Jobs' response to the blogger that "you might care more about porn when you
have kids" — are treated as toxic in our consumer culture, which thrives on
convincing us that our dirty little habits don't hurt anyone else.

A growing body of research is springing up to refute that feel-good claim.
Reports such as the Witherspoon Institute's recently published dossier on "The
Social Costs of Pornography," compiled by Mary Anne Layden and Mary Eberstadt,
marshal scholarly research across disciplines to show how America's
$13-billion-a-year pornography habit impacts everyone involved.

Pornography's costs range from the psychological damage and health risks
incurred by "performers" trapped in the skin trade to the broken marriages and
sexual dysfunctions suffered by adults who participate in it vicariously, and
the general coarsening of a society that treats sex as a spectator sport and
women's bodies as just another consumer item.

Most alarming is the harm Jobs mentioned, to children for whom once
difficult-to-find X-rated images now are only a click away. A 2009 study of
children's online activity by Symantec Corporation found that "sex" and "porn"
were among the top five most popular search terms used by children under 18,
with "porn" as the fourth most-popular search term used by children age 7 and
younger.

A good Internet filter can thwart some of those searches. But outside the home,
where the ranks of pornography addicts are growing, other porn-related threats
to child welfare loom.

One is the well-documented tendency of habitual pornography users to move from
soft-core images to more deviant and hard-core material including, in some
cases, child pornography. That's troubling, given that a 2007 Federal Bureau of
Prisons study of men convicted of using child pornography found that 85 percent
of them said they had committed acts of sexual abuse against minors. Those
numbers suggest a stronger link between seeing and doing than pornography's
defenders care to admit.

In a society where pornography is so pervasive, it's intimidating to face the
truth about how it endangers our children, destabilizes our families and
distorts our views of sex and one another. It's easier to shout down the
occasional unexpected criticism of pornography than to ponder its validity and
change behavior accordingly.

Aficionados of online smut can holler all they want about the alleged
Puritanism and moral authoritarianism of pornography critics like Jobs. The
more they bellow, the more they sound like petulant schoolchildren trying to
drown out the one voice that bothers them most: the whisper of a conscience
that suggests their harmless little habit is not so harmless after all.

Looks like a real biatch, too.

http://www.colleen-campbell.com/

http://www.colleen-campbell.com/images/ColleenatChristendomCrop1.jpg

[milkman]

I'd hit it.

(Obligatory)

[Mecca]

I enjoy how she spun it into child porn like that has anything to do with the general person that watches porn.

[Hammock Parties]

Ahahahahaha....her archive (http://www.colleen-campbell.com/archive.htm) is comedy gold.

http://www.colleen-campbell.com/P-D_Columns/PD100408Boomerang.htm

Although many young adults see living together as a harmless way to "test
drive" partners before opting for marriage, an analysis of studies on the topic
published this year in the Journal of Marriage and Family found that
cohabitation before marriage has "a significant negative association with both
marital stability and marital quality."

Marrying young is not the answer for everyone, of course. But neither is it the
foolhardy move that our popular culture portrays it to be. For young adults who
have found the person they want to spend their lives with — and for women who
hope to bear several children before advanced age and declining fertility
hinder their chances — marrying sooner rather than later can be a wise choice.

[BillSelfsTrophycase]

http://www.colleen-campbell.com/images/ColleenatChristendomCrop1.jpg


I'd knock the dust off that pussay


http://dangerousandbeautiful.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Friday.jpg

[Ugly Duck]

I'm sure we all know plenty of men yearning to be free from porn.... FREEDOM!!! FREEDOM!!

<object style="height: 344px; width: 425px"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/fA51wyl-9IE"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/fA51wyl-9IE" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></object>

[Fritz88]

Did she ever consider that porn might be a reason for keeping most horny men at bay. Instead of them going out there and unleashing their dicks into the streets?

[WildTurkey]

I'd knock the dust off that pussay


http://dangerousandbeautiful.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Friday.jpg


I'd free her from more than just porn :evil:

[Hammock Parties]

Wow, you could really shove a lump of coal up her ass and produce diamonds.

http://www.colleen-campbell.com/P-D_Columns/PD080605SexandCity.htm

The trouble with "Sex and the City's" fairy tale ending
By Colleen Carroll Campbell

The blockbuster box-office debut last weekend of the "Sex and the City" movie —
a follow-up to the TV series of the same name — reinforced the show's
reputation as a cultural phenomenon. After a six-year run on HBO, the series'
rebirth on the air in syndication continues to attract die-hard fans. They
pattern everything from their footwear choices to their cocktail orders on the
show and ask themselves "What would Carrie do?" when confronted with romantic
dilemmas.

Critics often note that "Sex and the City" is little more than soft-core
pornography for women, with its ubiquitous nude scenes, profanity-laced
discussions of sexual experimentation and exaltation of promiscuity. If a
recent survey from engage.com is any measure, their concerns about the show's
coarsening effect are well-founded: Forty-three percent of the singles who
responded said the show made it more acceptable for women to be unfaithful in
romantic relationships. Fifty-five percent of single women said it influenced
them to date "more like men date," and 50 percent of single adults said women
who follow the show are more likely to have sex on a first date.

The show's emphasis on satisfying carnal appetites extends well beyond sex. Its
characters live to consume — lusting after men, babies, cocktails and stilettos
with equal intensity. Given that the series' lead character once identified a
brand of shoes as her soulmate, it is unsurprising that producers reserved the
most soaring music in the film for the moment Carrie glimpses her new, walk-in
closet. The scene's manufactured poignancy is matched only by a later scene in
which Carrie gives her assistant a designer purse for Christmas. "You brought
me back to life," Carrie tells the assistant. "And you," the assistant answers,
solemnly and without a trace of irony, "gave me Louis Vuitton."

Fans of "Sex and the City" often say they love the show less for its hedonism
and materialism than for its focus on relationship issues. Supporters point to
the movie's ending as proof that "Sex and the City" is not so subversive: Three
of the four lead characters wind up happily married, even as narrator Carrie
assures the audience that the movie's lesson is to "make our own rules," ignore
"labels" like "bride and groom" and stop pining for "fairy tale" endings.

For all their pretensions to envelope-pushing, the movie's producers apparently
could not improve on the age-old answer to a woman's romantic yearnings: the
very ideal of traditional marriage so often disparaged by the series. Even the
promiscuous, materialistic fashion plates of "Sex and the City" ultimately
succumb to the desire to direct their erotic energies into something more
enduring than one-night stands and shopping sprees. They want, as most women
do, the kind of lifelong love that can survive wrinkles and stretch marks and
the dowdier duds of old age.

Of course, such happy endings may prove more elusive for viewers. Decades of
bed-hopping and gold-digging look glamorous on television, but in real life, a
woman who sleeps with scores of men is more likely to wind up with a sexually
transmitted disease and an attachment disorder than a doting husband and
storybook marriage. And in real life, a woman who postpones motherhood until
well into her forties faces the very real chance that she never will conceive.

The popularity of "Sex and the City" suggests that many women accept the show's
premise that a woman can spend decades treating people like things and things
like people without compromising her future prospects for marriage and
motherhood. That one TV show could sell that canard to so many women indicates
that "Sex and the City" is more subversive than either its fans or its fiercest
critics imagine.

[CosmicPal]

Anyone have any naked pics of her?

[OnTheWarpath15]

I guess I don't see what the big deal is, other than Apple haters having more fuel to throw on the fire.

I have no desire to watch porn on my iPhone. And even if I did, all I'd have to do is open Safari and browse. BFD.

Tell me, techies, what am I missing here?

[Hammock Parties]

Wheeeeeeeee!

http://www.colleen-campbell.com/P-D_Columns/PD081211HookUp.htm


The long-term consequences of the hook-up culture
By Colleen Carroll Campbell

Once confined to dorm-room gossip sessions, salacious details about the hook-up
culture on today's college campuses have become fodder for serious sociological
analysis.

No fewer than four books on the topic have been published this year alone.
Among them are sociologist Kathleen Bogle's unflinching investigation of campus
sexual norms in "Hooking Up: Sex, Dating and Relationships on Campus" and
Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Laura Sessions Stepp's alarming analysis of
promiscuity's emotional costs in "Unhooked: How Young Women Pursue Sex, Delay
Love and Lose at Both."

In another — "Sex and the Soul" — Boston University religion professor Donna
Freitas probes the disturbing disconnect between students' religious
convictions and sexual choices. And in "Hooked: New Science on How Casual Sex
is Affecting Our Children," obstetrician/gynecologists Joe McIlhaney and Freda
McKissic Bush survey the scientific evidence for psychological scars linked to
supposedly strings-free sex.

These authors often differ in their analyses of the hook-up culture's root
causes and costs. Yet the proliferation of similar studies in recent years
suggests an emerging consensus among experts that today's anything-goes campus
sexual mores carry lasting consequences we only have begun to understand. And
those consequences extend well beyond unwanted pregnancies and sexually
transmitted diseases.

While campus safe-sex advocates carefully instruct college students in the art
of applying condoms and quizzing prospective partners about their sexual
histories, most avoid grappling with the emotional, spiritual and moral
consequences of casual sex. University-sponsored "Sex Week" festivities — a new
staple on many campuses that typically blends provocative lectures from
pornographers and "sexperts" with condom giveaways — rarely feature discussions
of how hooking up in college may hinder the search for lasting love after
graduation.
The transitory, transactional and often anonymous sexual encounters that have
replaced dating on most campuses give young adults the illusion of intimacy
without the hassle of relationships. But those flings may exact a high toll
when today's swinging singles try to become tomorrow's committed spouses.

A new study suggests that the hook-up generation already is showing signs of
marital strain. David Atkins, a research associate professor of psychiatry and
behavioral sciences at the University of Washington, recently analyzed 15 years
of data from the General Social Survey and found a rise in reported infidelity
among young couples. In 1991, about 15 percent of men and 12 percent of women
younger than 35 said they had been unfaithful in their marriages. In 2006, 20
percent of men and 15 percent of women said they had.

There are many possible explanations for that shift, but the habits of heart
cultivated by today's hook-up culture qualify as a leading culprit. It's hard
to imagine better preparation for adultery than years of emotionally detached,
random sexual couplings. And the "marriage-lite" solution embraced by growing
numbers of cohabiting young couples — many of whom are refugees from the
hook-up culture and too skittish for marriage — may exacerbate the problem, as
the temporary mindset they learn in their live-in romances transfers to their
marriages.

Such long-term consequences rarely occur to a college student fixated on final
exams and Friday night plans. But some students are making the connection
between sexual behavior now and prospects for a successful marriage later.

On such campuses as Princeton and Harvard, students are rebelling against the
culture of promiscuity by launching social clubs that promote chastity and
sexual self-restraint as the keys to finding faithful, lifelong love. Cassandra
DeBenedetto, a founder of Princeton's pro-chastity Anscombe Society, recently
launched the Love and Fidelity Network to help students at other universities
foment their own grassroots rebellions.

Theirs is a decidedly countercultural movement. It also is urgently needed, not
only for the physical health of students today but for the health of their
marriages and families decades down the road.

[Rain Man]

Porn is America's largest industry. If the porn industry ever shut down, it would have a ripple effect throughout every sector of the American economy. The gates of factories from Caribou, Maine, to Kauai, Hawaii would close forever and the nation would never be the same. It's bad enough that we're having to compete against low-cost third-world countries like China and the Philippines, and against industry juggernauts like Sweden and Japan, without having regulatory hurdles to clear as well. American innovation in pornography is the only thing that's keeping this country afloat right now.

[Bugeater]

FIRST IT'S YOUR PORN, THEN IT'S YOUR GUNS! /moonbats

[Dylan]

what's all this tomfoolery about? http://planetsmilies.net/not-tagged-smiley-3587.gif










j/k :D

[jrowe]

You realize that your reaction to her point is helping to validate it.

[Rain Man]

You realize that your reaction to her point is helping to validate it.

That has to be incredibly frustrating for her.

[WildTurkey]

You realize that your reaction to her point is helping to validate it.

well I'd like to let her know that she's free to validate my point anytime :evil:

[Al Bundy]

I'd give her a facial.

[Frazod]

Go bake something, bitch.

[Bugeater]

what's all this tomfoolery about? http://planetsmilies.net/not-tagged-smiley-3587.gif
http://i48.tinypic.com/2yv3r7p.jpg

[Pasta Little Brioni]

She needs a good lay.

[Dylan]

Sorry!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[CrazyPhuD]

I bet she watches lesbo porn.

[RedNFeisty]

I don't need porn on my phone. I'm not going to play with myself on a park bench so why do I need porn sitting there??

This woman on the other hand, needs to take a ride on the Sybian!!:D

[Dylan]

Sorry

[Rain Man]

I bet it's like those anti-gay senators' secret lives. This woman probably goes home and changes into a leather catsuit and heads down into the basement where her Japanese college exchange student and Brazilian au pair await fearfully in their stockades, their blindfolded heads turning in their bonds at the click-click of her thigh-high boots on the stairs.

Paypal me $10 and I'll pm you the rest of this story. Ask for "Colleen's Captives", and if you include the code A1487 I'll also include "Colleen's Finnish Spa Visit" at no extra cost.

[Pasta Little Brioni]

Hush

who's she?

http://www.prophecyfellowship.org/images/smilies/sheep3.gif

let me go watch my race!

The chick in the article of course :thumb:

[RedNFeisty]

I bet it's like those anti-gay senators' secret lives. This woman probably goes home and changes into a leather catsuit and heads down into the basement where her Japanese college exchange student and Brazilian au pair await fearfully in their stockades, their blindfolded heads turning in their bonds at the click-click of her thigh-high boots on the stairs.

Paypal me $10 and I'll pm you the rest of this story. Ask for "Colleen's Captives", and if you include the code A1487 I'll also include "Colleen's Finnish Spa Visit" at no extra cost.

How about we just swap stories off the board?? ROFLROFLROFL

[OnTheWarpath15]

I bet it's like those anti-gay senators' secret lives. This woman probably goes home and changes into a leather catsuit and heads down into the basement where her Japanese college exchange student and Brazilian au pair await fearfully in their stockades, their blindfolded heads turning in their bonds at the click-click of her thigh-high boots on the stairs.

Paypal me $10 and I'll pm you the rest of this story. Ask for "Colleen's Captives", and if you include the code A1487 I'll also include "Colleen's Finnish Spa Visit" at no extra cost.

The opposite of RentBoy.com?

Who was that Anti-gay jackass that got caught with a male prostitute from that site?

They have to have something similar for women. Equal rights and all.

[Psyko Tek]

I always love this kind of shit

knowin' with in the year something on her is gonna turn up

I'm guess lesbian in college
and cheats on her husband now

[Rain Man]

The opposite of RentBoy.com?



The only thing I know about rentboy.com is that I'm not going to visit the site.

[jidar]

You realize that your reaction to her point is helping to validate it.

I know! Every time someone disagrees with a point, they're really proving it correct!

Or do you disagree?

[jidar]

I guess I don't see what the big deal is, other than Apple haters having more fuel to throw on the fire.

I have no desire to watch porn on my iPhone. And even if I did, all I'd have to do is open Safari and browse. BFD.

Tell me, techies, what am I missing here?

The thread is about this lady, so yeah I'd say you did miss the point, by a fair margin.

But you want to talk about the iphone... well I'd like to think I can decide better than Apple what media I have on my phone.

[CosmicPal]

Go bake something, bitch.

Maybe she'd like some of those famous Schwetty balls? :shrug:

http://s1.hubimg.com/u/308372_f520.jpg

[Iowanian]

http://bigspace.celerity.co.uk/moviedeaths/grabs/braveheart-wallace-2.jpg

[OnTheWarpath15]

The only thing I know about rentboy.com is that I'm not going to visit the site.

It's been in the news as of late.

http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/05/08/1619272/rentboy-escort-i-gave-sexual-massages.html


entire life. Of course, he is an adult and he did make those choices," Besen told The Herald. "It's easy to dismiss him as a loser seeking his 15 minutes of attention. But he never sought attention by exploiting the situation."

[Dylan]

The chick in the article of course :thumb:

Thanks, precious... Sorry -- Rep coming your way -- And more to follow ..





oh hell, JimiJo hit the wall awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww , I gotta go

[Mecca]

Some of that stuff GoChiefs posted from her is hilarious.

Hooking up in college is going to hurt your chance at having a relationship some 5 years later really?

[teedubya]

The iTouch Senior Citizen Joke, is fucking stupid, Kyle. Not even remotely funny or true.

[Alphaman]

:clap:

I applaud Steve Jobs' stance and Colleen Campbell's stance as well.

[QuikSsurfer]

I'd make my outsides her insides.

[Phobia]

So, because a woman has an opinion on virtues it makes her an uptight bitch?

Okay. I would submit that your intolerance for her opinion probably makes you a lot more uptight than she.

[Hammock Parties]

So, because a woman has an opinion on virtues it makes her an uptight bitch?

Okay. I would submit that your intolerance for her opinion probably makes you a lot more uptight than she.

Haven't watched porn in awhile, huh Phil?

[listopencil]

. I'm not going to play with myself on a park bench...

Aww...what if I asked you very nicely and offered to help?

[Saccopoo]

Looks like a real biatch, too.

http://www.colleen-campbell.com/

http://www.colleen-campbell.com/images/ColleenatChristendomCrop1.jpg

Are you kidding me? That's one of the hottest broads ever posted on this site. I love chicks in well designed feminine power suits.

And I'm with Phobia - taking a virtuous stand on morals isn't necessarily a bad thing. From a global culture perspective, they are going down the crapper fast, so any type support for building a more ethical and chaste society is okay in my book.

[Hammock Parties]

She defends the Catholic Church at all costs, she's an idiot raised by idiots and probably comes from a long line of uber conservative repressed idiots.

[Stewie]

She defends the Catholic Church at all costs, she's an idiot raised by idiots and probably comes from a long line of uber conservative repressed idiots.

It's been my experience that kids reared in that environment usually rebel and don't hold those same extreme views. She could be different, but I would bet she developed her views on her own for whatever reason. It's kind of an addictive personality trait. Whatever idea they latch onto is taken to the extreme and completely justifiable in their minds.

[Saccopoo]

She defends the Catholic Church at all costs, she's an idiot raised by idiots and probably comes from a long line of uber conservative repressed idiots.

Generalize and project much?

[|Zach|]

Pretty gal.

John Van Dyke: If our children can buy pornography on any street corner for five dollars, isn't that too high a price to pay for free speech?
President Josiah Bartlet: No.
John Van Dyke: Really?
President Josiah Bartlet: On the other hand, I think that five dollars is too high a price to pay for pornography.

http://westwing.bewarne.com/fourth/images/1WESam02pres2.jpg

[notorious]

She can preach all that she wants to, just don't try to force her will upon me.



She makes some pretty far-fetched reaches. A lot of her views are based on emotion instead of analytical evidence, so I will throw this article onto the pile of "Who gives a Fuck?".

[CosmicPal]

She defends the Catholic Church at all costs, she's an idiot raised by idiots and probably comes from a long line of uber conservative repressed idiots.

God, are you ever fuggen ignorant. :shake:

Also, she's Christian and she defends the Christian principals...not Catholic.

[Hammock Parties]

God, are you ever fuggen ignorant. :shake:

Also, she's Christian and she defends the Christian principals...not Catholic.

Go read her garbage about the Pope and the evils of condoms.

[|Zach|]

She can preach all that she wants to, just don't try to force her will upon me.



She makes some pretty far-fetched reaches. A lot of her views are based on emotion instead of analytical evidence, so I will throw this article onto the pile of "Who gives a ****?".

It is interesting though, some of the research on porn is well....troubling.

[CosmicPal]

Go read her garbage about the Pope and the evils of condoms.

Talking about the Pope doesn't make her a Catholic. The first fuggen paragraph on her site is this: An international television and radio interview show, "Faith & Culture" helps viewers move beyond the day’s headlines, consider contentious debates from a Christian perspective, and learn to explain and defend Christian principles in the public square.

That makes her a Christian far more than talking about the Pope makes her a Catholic.

[notorious]

It is interesting though, some of the research on porn is well....troubling.

It is, and she does quote quite a bit of analytical information that is very interesting. However, the way she ties it together is what troubles me.


I had to work my ass off to sneak a Playboy or even the rare Hustler away from my older brother's room. Battling for Porn is a right of passage for any growing kid.

To have any kind of porn at my fingertips at that age would probably have ****ed me up a little. Kids have it too easy now days.



Once again, don't try to change the entire system when the Parents should just do their job.

[Rain Man]

If we would allow - even require - public nudity and sexual acts upon request, pornography wouldn't be an issue any more.

I'm here with a solution. I don't see Colleen offering a viable solution.

[notorious]

If we would allow - even require - public nudity and sexual acts upon request, pornography wouldn't be an issue any more.

I am in. What shall we call this new frontier?

[Hammock Parties]

Talking about the Pope doesn't make her a Catholic. The first fuggen paragraph on her site is this: An international television and radio interview show, "Faith & Culture" helps viewers move beyond the day’s headlines, consider contentious debates from a Christian perspective, and learn to explain and defend Christian principles in the public square.

That makes her a Christian far more than talking about the Pope makes her a Catholic.

Did I say she was a Catholic?

It's honestly irrelevant.

[CosmicPal]

If we would allow - even require - public nudity and sexual acts upon request, pornography wouldn't be an issue any more.

I'm here with a solution. I don't see Colleen offering a viable solution.

Your stickman isn't wearing any clothes. :D

[Rain Man]

I am in. What shall we call this new frontier?

We shall call it....Nudetopia.

[CosmicPal]

Did I say she was a Catholic?

It's honestly irrelevant.

Dude- you said she defended the Catholic Church AT ALL COSTS! This is YOU insinuating that she is Catholic because only a Catholic would defend their own religion AT ALL COSTS! A Catholic is not going to defend the Mormon principals at all cost, nor would a Mormon defend a Protestant's religion at all costs.

[Hammock Parties]

Dude- you said she defended the Catholic Church AT ALL COSTS! This is YOU insinuating that she is Catholic because only a Catholic would defend their own religion AT ALL COSTS! A Catholic is not going to defend the Mormon principals at all cost, nor would a Mormon defend a Protestant's religion at all costs.

Nope, you're reading too much into it.

It's just another example of her idiocy, though.

[CosmicPal]

Nope, you're reading too much into it.



:rolleyes:

Yeah, that must be it.

[RJ]

When I was a kid we didn't have internet porn. We had to make our own porn from sock puppets and dad's old magazines, like Popular Mechanics. And we used a little something called imagination. Yeah, that's right, we used our minds. But it won't be long until these liberals will make some kind of law against pornagination.

[BigRichard]

Go read her garbage about the Pope and the evils of condoms.

I am all for people having different views but if this part is true this bitch can go die in a fire for all I care. I blame the pope for thousands of deaths because he denounces condom use and tells all Catholics not to use them. In places like Africa that can pretty much be a death sentence. Fucking scum, the whole lot of them.

[RJ]

I am all for people having different views but if this part is true this bitch can go die in a fire for all I care. I blame the pope for thousands of deaths because he denounces condom use and tells all Catholics not to use them. In places like Africa that can pretty much be a death sentence. ****ing scum, the whole lot of them.


BigRichard, I can't help but notice that your post doesn't sound like you're really "all for people having different views".

I could be wrong. Maybe you just have a funny way of showing your support.

[Rain Man]

When I was a kid we didn't have internet porn. We had to make our own porn from sock puppets and dad's old magazines, like Popular Mechanics. And we used a little something called imagination. Yeah, that's right, we used our minds. But it won't be long until these liberals will make some kind of law against pornagination.

The brain is the body's largest sexual organ, other than women with very large breasts and small heads.

[Ugly Duck]

The brain is the body's largest sexual organ, other than women with very large breasts and small heads.

Women with small heads are hot! Is there a website of small-headed women?

[Rain Man]

Women with small heads are hot! Is there a website of small-headed women?

I'm willing to bet there is. That's the beauty of the internet.

Sorry about that, Colleen.

[BigRichard]

BigRichard, I can't help but notice that your post doesn't sound like you're really "all for people having different views".

I could be wrong. Maybe you just have a funny way of showing your support.

So is someone killing someone a different view? I guess if you think killing someone is a different view then I stand corrected.

[Pioli Zombie]

I just saw this thread now. I was too busy looking up porn.

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

Did she ever consider that porn might be a reason for keeping most horny men at bay. Instead of them going out there and unleashing their dicks into the streets?

This.

And, this woman is exactly the kind of woman I want nothing to do with.

[RJ]

This.

And, this woman is exactly the kind of woman I want nothing to do with.


You mean the kind who won't swallow?

[ChiTown]

You mean the kind who won't swallow?

ROFL

[kysirsoze]

Even though I disagree with her, that's not what's wrong with this article. She just makes a shitty argument. The point is that Jobs is selling someone a device and telling them how they can use it.

And I agree with Mecca about the child porn thing. No one is proposing allowing child porn on iPhones. That's why it's illegal. Bringing it up is sensationalist garbage.

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

You mean the kind who won't swallow?

Fuckin'-a, Jack. :thumb:

[Simply Red]

It's 'beeyotch' - n00b!

[bevischief]

So they have a new sex toy...

[Jenson71]

Did I say she was a Catholic?

It's honestly irrelevant.

It's pretty clear she's a (very good) Roman Catholic.

[Hammock Parties]

It's pretty clear she's a (very good) Roman Catholic.

Is she? Well, fuck her double.

[L.A. Chieffan]

she needs to get hammered. hard.

i wonder if she does anal

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

she needs to get hammered. hard.

i wonder if she does anal

And if so, does she "douche the chute" beforehand?