PDA

View Full Version : Chiefs Cassel or Croyle


LaChapelle
10-10-2010, 02:00 PM
Your Choice
To start against the Texans

RealSNR
10-10-2010, 02:00 PM
Put Croyle out there until he breaks.

Titty Meat
10-10-2010, 02:01 PM
I vote Palko.

Fritz88
10-10-2010, 02:01 PM
Cassel is probably the worst QB in the league. I'd probably take any one over him at this moment.

007
10-10-2010, 02:01 PM
fuck cassel. I don't give a shit anymore.

Chiefs Pantalones
10-10-2010, 02:02 PM
OMG they are the same player. One is just injury prone. Lose-lose.

Pioli Zombie
10-10-2010, 02:02 PM
Its time for Croyle. Cassel has played himself out of the job and out of his bonus next spring.

ChiTown
10-10-2010, 02:02 PM
Put Croyle out there until he breaks.

I'd take Tyler Pigpen over this mentally masturbated piece of crap.

jjchieffan
10-10-2010, 02:03 PM
Croyle. Please Croyle. Cassel is just awful. Now we have to root for the faiders to beat the Chargers today so that KC can maintain their lead.

PRIEST
10-10-2010, 02:03 PM
Croyle all the way the only problem with Croyle is staying healthy not playing the position

eazyb81
10-10-2010, 02:03 PM
Neither, they're both awful.

We need to get a QB in free agency or the draft. That is the only answer.

RustShack
10-10-2010, 02:04 PM
OMG they are the same player. One is just injury prone. Lose-lose.

Your joking right? They are nothing a like. Do you even watch football fucktard?

kc rush
10-10-2010, 02:04 PM
fuck cassel. its bad when i kind of wish he would get dinged out there.

Chiefs Pantalones
10-10-2010, 02:05 PM
Your joking right? They are nothing a like. Do you even watch football ****tard?

Both are shit. You should shoot yourself.

Titty Meat
10-10-2010, 02:05 PM
Brodie Croyle 0-9 as a starter. Nuff said.

007
10-10-2010, 02:05 PM
Go with Croyle until he breaks. This line is so much better that might be awhile.

KC kid
10-10-2010, 02:07 PM
Croyle? come on guys! emotional of you to want the back up qb

jjjayb
10-10-2010, 02:09 PM
Brodie Croyle 0-9 as a starter. Nuff said.

And with this defense? Without having Herm as the coach? Without LJ? He'd do a hell of a lot better than Cassel. My 12 year old neice would probably look better than Cassel.

All season I've been hearing "but we're winning". Guess what? Now we lost. And Cassel is a huge reason why we lost. He couldn't fight his way out of a wet paper bag.

Titty Meat
10-10-2010, 02:10 PM
And with this defense? Without having Herm as the coach? Without LJ? He'd do a hell of a lot better than Cassel. My 12 year old neice would probably look better than Cassel.

All season I've been hearing "but we're winning". Guess what? Now we lost. And Cassel is a huge reason why we lost. He couldn't fight his way out of a wet paper bag.

Have u seen Croyle play?

RustShack
10-10-2010, 02:12 PM
Both are shit. You should shoot yourself.

Like I said, do you even watch football? In his one game last year he had 2 TD's, completed 66.7% of his passes, and had a 116.1 QB rating. Oh and that game was against the RAVENS. Has Cassel even touched that as a Chief? That was last year with no weapons and OC.

Your a fucking idiot. Don't judge him on Herm and complete lack of talent around him.

Jerm
10-10-2010, 02:12 PM
Where is the "None of the Above" option?

They all suck.

Jerm
10-10-2010, 02:13 PM
Where is the "None of the Above" option?

They all suck.

Titty Meat
10-10-2010, 02:13 PM
I like how Croyle has became the Joesph Smith of this board.

RustShack
10-10-2010, 02:13 PM
Have u seen Croyle play?

You obviously haven't. Young QB's don't carry teams. Manning at that age in that situation would have the same record.

Shag
10-10-2010, 02:15 PM
Croyle, because there's not a better option. Not going to happen, though...

jjjayb
10-10-2010, 02:15 PM
Have u seen Croyle play?

Yeah. He actuall scans the field and sees more than one receiver. He doesn't stare down the recevier he's throwing to. He's more accurate than Cassel. He has a stronger arm than Cassel. Any more questions?

Bwana
10-10-2010, 02:17 PM
No question.....Croyle. No way Poli lets that happen though.

Thig Lyfe
10-10-2010, 02:18 PM
Thigpen.

BillSelfsTrophycase
10-10-2010, 02:20 PM
OMG they are the same player. One is just injury prone. Lose-lose.

One has a little bit better arm


Run Croyle out there till he breaks; Worst case scenario is we'll be back where we are now

Psyko Tek
10-10-2010, 02:24 PM
Cassel is probably the worst QB in the league. I'd probably take any one over him at this moment.

btu at oner point today he had a better qb rating than the manning

LaChapelle
10-10-2010, 02:29 PM
The Texans is a loss
I don't see the harm in trotting out Croyle

Chiefs Rool
10-10-2010, 02:30 PM
Go with Croyle. Because, why not? Even if he goes down. So what if Cassel gets butt-hurt over it, he's gonna suck regardless.

MadMax
10-10-2010, 02:32 PM
Mark Castle is the absolute WORST QB in the NFL please argue that point ....He is crap!!!!!!

Messier
10-10-2010, 02:32 PM
Go with Croyle. Because, why not? Even if he goes down. So what if Cassel gets butt-hurt over it, he's gonna suck regardless.

That's what 3-1 teams do, bench the QB.

Chiefs Rool
10-10-2010, 02:35 PM
That's what 3-1 teams do, bench the QB.

when you feel the urge to talk out of your ass, try to resist it.

beach tribe
10-10-2010, 02:35 PM
BWAAAHAAAA

50-5. Bring on my man Croyle.

Rain Man
10-10-2010, 02:36 PM
cassel can't salvage a play to save his life and only about 15 percent of his passes aren't horribly overthrown. it's croyle time.
Posted via Mobile Device

beach tribe
10-10-2010, 02:37 PM
Damn, I want to see Croyle so bad. Dude has the tools. Just can't stay healthy.

Who gives a shit though. Cassel is worthless.

Thig Lyfe
10-10-2010, 02:40 PM
That's what 3-1 teams do, bench the QB.

We're 3-1 despite Cassel, not because of him.

Bench the shit out of that motherfucker.

Chiefs Rool
10-10-2010, 02:40 PM
Damn, I want to see Croyle so bad. Dude has the tools. Just can't stay healthy.

Who gives a shit though. Cassel is worthless.

that's what I'm saying. Some might argue that "well when Croyle goes down, Cassel's feelings will be so hurt that he will play bad"

well, he's gonna suck ass regardless of how his feelings are. Bench him for as long as we can. If Croyle goes down, go ahead and sign Jeff Garcia and keep Cassel on the bench.

MadMax
10-10-2010, 02:41 PM
Croyle? come on guys! emotional of you to want the back up qb




No No NO We want more of Castle he be da man por dis team...I must say in 40 years of watching NFL football I don't know if I've EVER seen a worst QB. :shake::shake:

Marcellus
10-10-2010, 02:41 PM
Your joking right? They are nothing a like. Do you even watch football ****tard?

You have seen Croyle go 0-8 right?

Marcellus
10-10-2010, 02:43 PM
Damn, I want to see Croyle so bad. Dude has the tools. Just can't stay healthy.

Who gives a shit though. Cassel is worthless.

As stated earlier you saw Croyle go 0-8 right?


You Croyle homers are just as dumb as the Cassel homers.

dirk digler
10-10-2010, 02:43 PM
Obviously Croyle

ArrowheadMagic
10-10-2010, 02:43 PM
Since Cassel would finish any game started by Croyle? why isnt wildcat an option?

Mama Hip Rockets
10-10-2010, 02:43 PM
Brodie Croyle 0-9 as a starter. Nuff said.

No, that is not enough said. Cassel is 3-1 as a starter this year. Does that mean he is good? No, it means he is on a good team. Croyle was on very very bad teams when he was playing.

Chiefs Rool
10-10-2010, 02:44 PM
As stated earlier you saw Croyle go 0-8 right?


You Croyle homers are just as dumb as the Cassel homers.

completely different teams then vs now though.

I'm not saying that Croyle is the answer, but he's a better answer than Cassel.

Thig Lyfe
10-10-2010, 02:44 PM
You have seen Croyle go 0-8 right?

You must be one of those guys who thinks the pitcher with the most wins should get the Cy Young.

Baby Lee
10-10-2010, 02:45 PM
That's what 3-1 teams do, bench the QB.

Mr. Banks, would you please hand the ball to Mr. Dilfer?

evolve27
10-10-2010, 02:48 PM
I don't give a fuck about Cassel anymore.

RustShack
10-10-2010, 02:48 PM
You have seen Croyle go 0-8 right?

You seen the team he played on right? A young Manning, Marino, Montanta, or anyone would lose in that situation. Tell me fuckface, how many completely shit horrible teams have had a rookie QB carry them to multiple victories?

Rudy tossed tigger's salad
10-10-2010, 02:49 PM
Croyle. Cassel shouldn't be here next year. Croyle's gotta show he can stay healthy/be a capable stop-gap for a year or two while developing a QBOTF

HBKChiefs
10-10-2010, 02:49 PM
Croyle. Nothing more needs to be said. But guess what, there is no chance in hell it will happen.

RustShack
10-10-2010, 02:49 PM
You must be one of those guys who thinks the pitcher with the most wins should get the Cy Young.

Hes just an idiot that doesn't understand football.

alnorth
10-10-2010, 02:50 PM
Croyle. Now. For the love of God, someone make it happen. He won't be all that much better, but he is better, and this O line just might protect him through week 17.

morphius
10-10-2010, 02:50 PM
Yeah. He actuall scans the field and sees more than one receiver. He doesn't stare down the recevier he's throwing to. He's more accurate than Cassel. He has a stronger arm than Cassel. Any more questions?
I don't think you have watched him enough...

Croyle has no touch on the ball, and is hence just worthless.

Titty Meat
10-10-2010, 02:51 PM
No, that is not enough said. Cassel is 3-1 as a starter this year. Does that mean he is good? No, it means he is on a good team. Croyle was on very very bad teams when he was playing.

Wait a minute.... So now talent matters? I was told it didn't matter than the o-line sucked because guys like Big Ben and Rodgers were still good. So lets just admit the posters on this board have different standards for Cassel and Croyle therefore debating is a waste of time.

Kraus
10-10-2010, 02:52 PM
Croyle. He at least gives us a downfield option. Does any Croyle critic realize who Croyle had on his team when we were winless? NOBODY.

Jesus... Croyle needs to start ASAP. I've been saying this for awhile now.

prhom
10-10-2010, 02:55 PM
We're 3-1 despite Cassel, not because of him.



This is an excellent summary of the season. We're like the bears a few years ago, somehow they won games with good D that scores points, special teams, and turnovers. Cassel's game against SF was much like Huard's game against Denver in his last season. We got ahead early, and just kept on rolling. If you take Cassel's play in the the second half of the SF game out of the stats it's amazing that we're 3-1.

Gary
10-10-2010, 02:56 PM
Where are the Trent Dilfer, Trent Green, & Kurt Warner options?
Some stats to chew on for Cassel going into this game:

QB Rating - 75.4 (21st in league)
Comp % - 54.5 (28th in league)
Passing yds - 494 (29th in league)
Sacks - 2 (2nd lowest in league)

Mama Hip Rockets
10-10-2010, 02:58 PM
Wait a minute.... So now talent matters? I was told it didn't matter than the o-line sucked because guys like Big Ben and Rodgers were still good. So lets just admit the posters on this board have different standards for Cassel and Croyle therefore debating is a waste of time.

Of course talent matters, dummy. I don't know what Rodgers and Roethlisberger and offensive lines have to do with this discussion. The Chiefs' o-line is not the problem here.

alnorth
10-10-2010, 02:59 PM
Where are the Trent Dilfer, Trent Green, & Kurt Warner options?
Some stats to chew on for Cassel going into this game:

QB Rating - 75.4 (21st in league)
Comp % - 54.5 (28th in league)
Passing yds - 494 (29th in league)
Sacks - 2 (2nd lowest in league)

Those last 3 are hilarious. We provide a nice comfy pocket for him to play with and he cant do a damned thing with it. I'm guessing that #29 through 32 in completion % have a sieve for a line.

Titty Meat
10-10-2010, 03:00 PM
Of course talent matters, dummy. I don't know what Rodgers and Roethlisberger and offensive lines have to do with this discussion. The Chiefs' o-line is not the problem here.

What? It has been stated clearly that many on here expect the QB to make players better. Who did Croyle make better when he played?

Thig Lyfe
10-10-2010, 03:12 PM
Remember this game?

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/I16dLEr_dF0?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/I16dLEr_dF0?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

Croyle finished that one. Now add a legit defense, a killer running game and an offensive line that has given up two sacks in four games, and you've got a win.

Croyle can make throws Cassel can only dream of. He's 0-8 because he's never had any talent around him. He's constantly injured because he's never had an offensive line there to protect his brittle bones. Now we have both, and he's sitting on the bench while Cassel takes a big greasy shit on the field.

By the way, his statline in that game?

16/24 for 177 yards and two touchdowns. No interceptions. Larry Johnson ran for 20 yards on 11 carries and Mark Bradley was his #2 WR. Mark Fucking Bradley.

The fact that there is even a debate in this thread is bullshit.

Dave Lane
10-10-2010, 05:27 PM
I start Cassel but he is on the shortest of leashes. If he has a bad series he gets the hook and Croyle comes in.

Bane
10-10-2010, 05:29 PM
I want to say Croyle but that just means Cassel comes in later,and WTF is this Palko?:cuss:

Dayze
10-10-2010, 05:40 PM
Put Croyle out there until he breaks.


that.

Dayze
10-10-2010, 05:44 PM
Croyle might nto be the best, but Cassel is a floatign turd.

not even close. Croyle is better than the shit we have trotting out there at QB currently.

Not saying Croyle is good...just better than Cassel.

Marcellus
10-10-2010, 05:47 PM
You seen the team he played on right? A young Manning, Marino, Montanta, or anyone would lose in that situation. Tell me ****face, how many completely shit horrible teams have had a rookie QB carry them to multiple victories?

Fuck face? Very original and creative.

Croyle wasnt a rookie in 1 of those 8 losses, but you already knew that didn't you genious.

Rain Man
10-10-2010, 06:09 PM
It kills me to see our offense come onto the field and know that any progress through the air will be a fluke. I've lost all confidence in Cassel right now. I honestly can't see any part of the game where he's playing acceptably right now.

Marcellus
10-10-2010, 06:11 PM
It kills me to see our offense come onto the field and know that any progress through the air will be a fluke. I've lost all confidence in Cassel right now. I honestly can't see any part of the game where he's playing acceptably right now.

You know Rain Man, I have to agree. While I don't put the loss on Cassel, meaning he didn't go out and lose the game, thing is he didn't win the game for us and really, that's what we all want. A QB who can win the game when needed.

OnTheWarpath15
10-10-2010, 06:15 PM
Pointless debate.

The only way Cassel sees the bench is due to injury.

I don't see this regime pulling him.

CrazyPhuD
10-10-2010, 06:16 PM
I pick mccluster...run the wildcat all day everyday....

ROYC75
10-10-2010, 07:12 PM
Cassell just had a good group around him in N.E.

In KC, we are not there yet...... Cassell now is no better than I would be or half of the people on the BB could be if given 2 weeks to prepare a game with the receivers we have.

We need receivers that can separate and catch the ball and a QB that can get the ball to them. Period.

Right now, even though Brodie is 0-9 as a starter, Brodie has not had a KC team this good ( play makers, defense, ST's, etc. ) to play with. Brodie is more accurate, stronger arm and can stretch the field to open up the offense.

The front office has their hands and heads tied up in Cassell, they will play him until he breaks.

johnny961
10-10-2010, 07:18 PM
Pointless debate.

The only way Cassel sees the bench is due to injury.

I don't see this regime pulling him.

I agree. I don't understand it though. It's obvious the Cassel Experiment isn't working.

007
10-10-2010, 07:24 PM
I agree. I don't understand it though. It's obvious the Cassel Experiment isn't working.

GMs don't admit their mistakes.

kcpasco
10-10-2010, 07:26 PM
Give Croyle a chance behind this o-line.

Cassel is garbage

Macroach
10-10-2010, 07:29 PM
Cassell just had a good group around him in N.E.

In KC, we are not there yet...... Cassell now is no better than I would be or half of the people on the BB could be if given 2 weeks to prepare a game with the receivers we have.

We need receivers that can separate and catch the ball and a QB that can get the ball to them. Period.

Right now, even though Brodie is 0-9 as a starter, Brodie has not had a KC team this good ( play makers, defense, ST's, etc. ) to play with. Brodie is more accurate, stronger arm and can stretch the field to open up the offense.

The front office has their hands and heads tied up in Cassell, they will play him until he breaks.

Well, he's probably a LITTLE bit better than most of the people on this board would be, BUT as a starting NFL quarterback, that's just not enough.

You can't draw parallels to Dilfer managing the Ravens because while he couldn't make all of the throws and he limited their offense, his accuracy was Joe Montana-esque compared to Cassell. The problem with Cassell is that he can NOT make the same throw consistently, he misses long and short, and he's going to get someone killed out there hunting one of his ducks.

Hammock Parties
10-10-2010, 07:44 PM
2010 Cassel: today's shitbag performance, 19-9 loss.

2007 Croyle: 19-27, 169 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT, 13-10 loss to Colts.

Food for thought.

ChiefsCountry
10-10-2010, 07:45 PM
2010 Cassel: today's shitbag performance, 19-9 loss.

2007 Croyle: 19-27, 169 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT, 13-10 loss to Colts.

Food for thought.

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/JTsLcV4clVs?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/JTsLcV4clVs?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

notorious
10-10-2010, 07:46 PM
2010 Cassel: today's shitbag performance, 19-9 loss.

2007 Croyle: 19-27, 169 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT, 13-10 loss to Colts.

Food for thought.

That 07' team was a huge heaping pile of shit, too.

johnny961
10-10-2010, 07:47 PM
GMs don't admit their mistakes.

I was hoping Pioli would be different than King Carl in that regard.

FRCDFED
10-10-2010, 07:49 PM
Brodie Croyle 0-9 as a starter. Nuff said.Need I remind you of the coaching staff he played for? Nuff said.

notorious
10-10-2010, 07:51 PM
Need I remind you of the coaching staff he played for? Nuff said.

This.


The 0-9 argument is retarded.

johnny961
10-10-2010, 07:52 PM
Need I remind you of the coaching staff he played for? Nuff said.

X3

luv
10-10-2010, 07:52 PM
Brodie Croyle 0-9 as a starter. Nuff said.

Total weaksauce. He's a better QB than Cassel. Cassel just survives hits.

BillSelfsTrophycase
10-10-2010, 07:55 PM
Croyle. He at least gives us a downfield option. Does any Croyle critic realize who Croyle had on his team when we were winless? NOBODY

Or the coaching staff at the time

notorious
10-10-2010, 07:59 PM
It is nearly impossible to find anything that 9 out of 10 agree on.


JFC It's a no-brainer. :facepalm:

Marcellus
10-10-2010, 08:00 PM
This.


The 0-9 argument is retarded.


Fine but pick a game Croyle played exceptional they didn't win?

Fucking Thigpen won a couple games with the same team.

Marcellus
10-10-2010, 08:01 PM
Total weaksauce. He's a better QB than Cassel. Cassel just survives hits.

There is nothing in existence the proves this. I wish there was.

RealSNR
10-10-2010, 08:03 PM
People, look at the clips Sportsracer and Chiefscounty posted.

Has Cassel ever made any throws that look like those? No, he has not.

It's obvious that Croyle is a better QB than Cassel.

RealSNR
10-10-2010, 08:03 PM
There is nothing in existence the proves this. I wish there was.Look at the footage.

notorious
10-10-2010, 08:03 PM
Croyle throws a pretty, but shitty deep ball, but at least the threat is there.

BigMeatballDave
10-10-2010, 08:04 PM
The 0-9 argument is retarded.Just like billay :)

Marcellus
10-10-2010, 08:07 PM
Look at the footage.

I can post throws Cassel has made that are clutch. Against the Raiders and Cowboys last year. I am sure there are many from 2008 in NE as well.

If your highlight reel includes 1 or 2 games. That's not good.

Marcellus
10-10-2010, 08:08 PM
Croyle throws a pretty, but shitty deep ball, but at least the threat is there.

I have said it before, Croyle's incompletions and INT's are way prettier looking than Cassel's. The only difference.

BigMeatballDave
10-10-2010, 08:15 PM
Wait a minute.... So now talent matters? I was told it didn't matter than the o-line sucked because guys like Big Ben and Rodgers were still good. So lets just admit the posters on this board have different standards for Cassel and Croyle therefore debating is a waste of time.JFC you are a moron. Kill yourself already...

LaChapelle
10-11-2010, 11:48 AM
five
five more
five more polling days

FAX
10-11-2010, 11:59 AM
Thanks, Mr. SportsRacer.

I have to admit that watching a Chiefs quarterback wing it to the receivers deep with some accuracy and power is kinda ... weird ... at this point.

FAX

Sure-Oz
10-11-2010, 12:00 PM
Ill start

ElGringo
10-11-2010, 12:08 PM
I do not believe Cassell lost the game for us. I believe he threw a touchdown, right in Bowe's hands and who gets credit for the incomplete, cassell. As of right now, Cassell seems mediocre enough to not lose games, so I will stick with him until we get a real second option or he does start losing games.

Chiefnj2
10-11-2010, 12:12 PM
Cassel and Croyle both suck. Croyle has better arm strength so in some minds that equates to a better chance of winning.

boogblaster
10-11-2010, 12:19 PM
Croyle has the better arm .. also he reads the defense better .. but he's made of glass .....

LaChapelle
10-11-2010, 12:28 PM
I think some of the thinking is
the better arm strength would help the running game
taking the wall of human bodies and stretching it out

FAX
10-11-2010, 12:38 PM
Just the "threat" of a passing game would help ... just as the "threat" of an on-side kick can.

I don't see what we have to lose, unfortunately. So far as I can tell, Mitch Casscap has become more of a liability as time has gone on. Hell, he may even be getting worse. We were 1 for 10 on third downs yesterday and, this year, we have been relying on defense and special teams for scores. It's a recipe for ultimate failure and the time to make a move at that position is rapidly approaching. Otherwise, we could well have problems in the locker room ... and I couldn't blame the defense if they strung the guy up in the shower by his penis and took turns beating him like a goofy-looking pinata.

FAX

Rasputin
10-11-2010, 12:49 PM
Brodie Croyle 0-9 as a starter. Nuff said.

He was on the shittiest team I ever have seen! No blocking enept coach, WTF yea he didn't win but damn that team was just horific to say the least.


Now that we have a few weapons and an O-line that can block, I'm willing to bet that Croyle can find success with this offense. He may get hurt again, we all agree, but the risk reward would out way this imo. Croyle has the ability to move the sticks in rythm & march down the field, that's what Cassel just doesn't do. This is an entirely new team than what Croyle had when he was declared starter. The other thing is that yes Croyle gets hurt, but give him credit for comming back for more lumpings and not give up. He hasn't quit he can play ball.

ElGringo
10-11-2010, 12:55 PM
He was on the shittiest team I ever have seen! No blocking enept coach, WTF yea he didn't win but damn that team was just horific to say the least.


Now that we have a few weapons and an O-line that can block, I'm willing to bet that Croyle can find success with this offense. He may get hurt again, we all agree, but the risk reward would out way this imo. Croyle has the ability to move the sticks in rythm & march down the field, that's what Cassel just doesn't do. This is an entirely new team than what Croyle had when he was declared starter. The other thing is that yes Croyle gets hurt, but give him credit for comming back for more lumpings and not give up. He hasn't quit he can play ball.

This I agree with, I have been against dumping Cassell for Croyle because of his loss record (even though I was very happy we drafted Croyle). With this pointed out, I would like to see Croyle have a chance with a team that knows how to play. I guess I would probably change my vote if I could.

Inspector
10-11-2010, 01:00 PM
How difficult would it be to train Warpaint?

Grabbing at straws here fellas.....

Pants
10-11-2010, 01:01 PM
I don't give a fuck who they start there as long as it's not Cassel. They can drag Len Dawson from the broadcast booth and suit him up for all I care. GET. RID. OF. CASSEL.

4th and Long
10-11-2010, 01:01 PM
I really don't see anyone taking 36 million dollars and setting it on a bench.

Earn your bone, son.

Brokie Croyle is not the answer. He's the "Glass Joe" of NFL QBs.

Mecca
10-11-2010, 01:35 PM
Most everyone has had enough of Cassel, he is what he is. But this team is not going to spur on QB controversy when Cassel is the GM's guy, the first shot we'll have to be rid of him is after the year.

Simply Red
10-11-2010, 01:42 PM
http://i55.tinypic.com/r6zi4m.gif

Simply Red
10-11-2010, 01:43 PM
I really don't see anyone taking 36 million dollars and setting it on a bench.

Earn your bone, son.

Brokie Croyle is not the answer. He's the "Glass Joe" of NFL QBs.

that's an insult to even the 'animated' Glass Joe.

BigMeatballDave
10-11-2010, 01:59 PM
I do not believe Cassell lost the game for us. I believe he threw a touchdown, right in Bowe's hands and who gets credit for the incomplete, cassell. As of right now, Cassell seems mediocre enough to not lose games, so I will stick with him until we get a real second option or he does start losing games.Ok, what about his complete ineffectiveness the rest of this game?

Rooster
10-13-2010, 09:58 AM
This poll is too close to call at this point.

CHENZ A!
10-13-2010, 10:18 AM
This is the one poll where the gaz option wouldve been a runaway winner.
Posted via Mobile Device

InChiefsHeaven
10-13-2010, 10:24 AM
I said Cassell, I don't want to do that to Brodie. Keep him ready for when Cassel shits the bed, some time before half time...