If we get a replacement players and the Chiefs win the Superbowl

[Valiant]

Does it count? and would you talk shit to rival fans about?





If it happens and we get replacement players, would you be proud that KC finally got a championship..

[007]

At least they'll have miles and miles of heart.

[mnchiefsguy]

Yes it counts. Everyone will have replacement players, so the playing field will have been equal.

[WebGem]

Why wouldn't it count? And why wouldn't the winning teams fans have bragging rights?

[CoMoChief]

First one in with "Bring Shane Falco in for a look"

http://themixtapemonster.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/shane-falco.jpg

[Hammock Parties]

That would be amazing.

[ChiefsCountry]

Shit we try every year at QB position already.

[RustShack]

I think it would be sweet as shit if there was a replacements year.

[Bane]

Yes and yes.Those who don't like it can fuck off.
Posted via Mobile Device

[Marcellus]

53 guys off the street......

[Quesadilla Joe]

With the Chiefs luck the lockout would end after they went 16-0 and then they would lose at home in the playoffs to the Steelers. LMAO

[Buck]

Why would there be replacement players in a lockout?
Posted via Mobile Device

[teedubya]

Why would there be replacement players in a lockout?
Posted via Mobile Device

It happened in 1987.

[Discuss Thrower]

Eddie Martel = 7. Matt Cassel = 7...

[Buck]

It happened in 1987.

Wasn't that a Player's Strike?
Posted via Mobile Device

[Mr. Laz]

it counts but it's not the same

[Psyko Tek]

oh hell no
I will be singing the praises of our genius coach to take 53 off the street and beat everybody else's 53 scrubs

just proves superstars can beat a great coach
with a level playing field the golfer wins

[Spott]

Maybe a strike wouldn't be that bad after all. A year with replacement players might be the only chance I"ll get to see the Chiefs in the Super Bowl, although that team we had in '87 was probably the worst of all the replacement teams.

[Rasputin]

Give Uncle Rico his shot, he should have gone pro any ways.

[Over-Head]

Yes and yes.Those who don't like it can **** off.
Posted via Mobile Device
And the million dollar bitches can sit back and look at the people they call "scabs" wearing THEIR rings....:evil:ROFL

[crazycoffey]

Can I be the crazy cop Linebacker?

[Bump]

I would be ok if the lockout happens and there is replacement players. I think that would be pretty interesting. Hell, bring on some local ex college players that we used to love.

Todd Reising for QB!!!!!

[DaFace]

Confusing poll, but yes, it counts and no, I wouldn't talk shit to people about it.

[Extra Point]

With the Chiefs luck the lockout would end after they went 16-0 and then they would lose at home in the playoffs to the Steelers. LMAO

THIS

Or, Cassel would be the first to cross the line.

[KurtCobain]

Todd Reising for QB!!!!!

That's pretty gross.

[Bugeater]

2 of the Redskins' Super Bowl wins were in strike-shortened seasons, does anyone think any less of them?

[KurtCobain]

2 of the Redskins' Super Bowl wins were in strike-shortened seasons, does anyone think any less of them?

The who?

[Bugeater]

The who?
Best halftime show ever.

[Ebolapox]

I'd be fucking insufferable if the chiefs ever won the super bowl. seriously, I'd be a huge dickbag (replacement players or not)

[Pioli Zombie]

I loved the games in 1987 with the replacements. Its proved it was about the uniform not the players.

[Pioli Zombie]

The Chiefs wouldn't have a problem replacing Cassel. All they need to do is go to any outhouse, scoop out all the that blue and brown crap mixture, and pour it into a uniform.

[SDChiefs]

With the Chiefs luck the lockout would end after they went 16-0 and then they would lose at home in the playoffs to the Steelers. LMAO

Now this is funny. And sadly, probably true.

[kysirsoze]

Can anyone explain how on Earth it wouldn't count? When you think about it, it's already kind of absurd to get wrapped up in the accomplishments of other people (The Chiefs players). Does it make less sense to take pride and excitement from the accomplishments of a replacement batch?

If they're players hired by the Chiefs to play football then they would be every bit the Superbowl champions as any other year. What's the difference?

[kcfanXIII]

I don't think it would count, not professional players. We could say we won the replacement bowl. It wouldn't be a super bowl though.

[milkman]

I don't think it would count, not professional players. We could say we won the replacement bowl. It wouldn't be a super bowl though.

The moment they get paid to play, they become professional.

But most of them will be players that have already played professionally on some level elsewhere.

[Pioli Zombie]

I wonder how that would effect fantasy football? I can just see the addicts studying up on all the replacements. "Oh man, I only got 22 pts from McGillicutty!!!!!!!"

[Slainte]

2 of the Redskins' Super Bowl wins were in strike-shortened seasons, does anyone think any less of them?

No...but then again, it's fucking impossible for me to think less of the Redskins than I already do.

[vailpass]

LMAO at some of you

[BigMeatballDave]

I couldnt really get into 'replacement football'.

[The_Doctor10]

Well imagine if a team was so devastated by injuries that they had to sign a ton of FA's off the street; like, Rohan Davey was playing QB, throwing to Kevin Curtis and Freddie Mitchell, handing the ball off to a recently paroled Maurice Clarett. If THEY won the Super Bowl, it'd still count. In fact, it'd be more impressive.