PDA

View Full Version : Chiefs Williamson: Why hiring Romeo Crennel makes sense


Tribal Warfare
12-23-2011, 04:13 PM
Why hiring Romeo Crennel makes sense (http://espn.go.com/blog/afcwest/post/_/id/37374/why-hiring-romeo-crennel-makes-sense)
By Bill Williamson

When the Kansas City Chiefs fired coach Todd Haley earlier this month, names such as Iowa coach Kirk Ferentz, former Titans coach Jeff Fisher and Rams offensive cordinator Josh McDaniels emerged as possible replacements. .

All are high-profile coaches who would evoke emotions and excitement of varied degrees. Buried below the bigger names, though, was the candidacy of Kansas City defensive coordinator Romeo Crennel, who was named the interim coach immediately after Haley was fired and considered a candidate, but perhaps not a leading candidate

However, that all changed last Sunday when Crennel’s Chiefs beat previously-perfect Green Bay in his first game as coach. Now, Crennel is considered by many as the top candidate. If the Chiefs -- who still have a heartbeat in the AFC West division race -- play well in their final two games against visiting Oakland and at Denver, Crennel, 64, could all but wrap up the job. He is already being endorsed by key figures in the organization.

The following is a look at why the Chiefs’ brass may decide to make Crennel the permanent head coach:

He’d get along with Scott Pioli: This is a paramount. Haley wasn’t fired because his injury-ravaged team was 5-8. He was fired primarily because he butted heads with Pioli, the general manager. This is a critical hire for Pioli. If he blows this one, his time in Kansas City could end.

Pioli must hire someone he is sure he can trust and someone he could work with. Pioli goes way back with Crennel, back to the Patriots' success in the early 2000s, and he is a big reason Crennel is in Kansas City. There would not be any coach-GM friction.

Check out current playoff seedings and figure scenarios through the end of the season. Playoff Machine »
He just wants to coach: One of the reasons there wouldn’t be any friction is because Crennel is the good-soldier type. He is a lifer coach who is focused on teaching his players. He is not a new-school coach who wants his fingerprints on the playbook and everything else.

“Romeo trusts Scott Pioli and his ability to build a roster that can go to the Super Bowl. All Romeo would be interested in doing is coaching the team,” his agent, Joe Linta, said.

He’d bring stability to the program: The Chiefs are an interesting team. They are a building, young program that has already tasted success. This group won 10 games and the AFC West division title last year. The Chiefs, though, have been decimated by injuries this season and played virtually the entire year without young stars Jamaal Charles, Eric Berry and Tony Moeaki, and they have gone a long period without quarterback Matt Cassel. All of these players are expected to be healthy next year. This is not a depleted franchise.

Retaining Crennel would prevent the Chiefs from having to adjust to a new coaching philosophy. The learning curve would be essentially wiped out and the Chiefs could go to training camp next year raring to go.

Players like him: Interim coaches don’t get Gatorade baths -- as Crennel did after the Green Bay shocker -- unless they are respected by the players.

There is no doubt Kansas City’s players like the affable, fair and above-board Crennel. The players chanted his name in the locker room after Sunday's win. Fullback Le'Ron McClain said after the game that Crennel had an instant impact on the team and he has players' support for the full-time job.

“That was a head-coach thing. We got that from Romeo,” McClain said. “What a statement we made. It’s great for him, for his future here. I know a lot of guys hope so. I know he had us ready to play this week and we showed it, from the first drive on out.”

He’s a calming force: Haley clashed with a lot of players. That is not Crennel’s nature. Teams usually look for polar opposites when they look to replace a coach, and that would be the case here. Crennel is different than Haley because he is not a screamer. Haley was volatile and would often blow up. Crennel is more of a listener. He is firm and he is not a pushover, but screaming is not Crennel’s first approach. That could be refreshing for the locker room, and I bet Pioli would welcome that tact as well.

He knows the Patriot Way: Pioli has modeled his teams after the Patriots, where he had great success as an executive with New England and was part of three Super Bowl championship teams last decade.

Crennel was the defensive coordinator on all three teams. Pioli and Crennel share the same vision. I think Pioli would be very interested in moving forward with a head coach who shared the New England experience with him.

He has head-coaching experience: Crennel showed his head-coaching experience in the Green Bay game. It was his 65th NFL games a head coach. That type of experience is always appealing to a team. Crennel was 24-40 in four seasons (2005-08) as the head coach in Cleveland. The record in Cleveland wasn’t great, but there were some front-office and talent issues there that made it a difficult situation.

“He is smart and could be one of those guys that does well with his second opportunity,” said Matt Williamson of Scouts Inc., who worked in Cleveland with Crennel for a short period. “He did get a ton out of a Derek Anderson-led Browns team a few years ago and the players love and respect him.“

He could build a good staff: Hiring McDaniels as head coach may be a difficult sale considering he flamed out in Denver and he is part of a failing staff in St. Louis. However, if Crennel is hired as the head coach, McDaniels could be a terrific option as offensive coordinator if the Rams’ staff is sent packing. McDaniels has worked with both Cassel and current Chiefs quarterback Kyle Orton (a pending free agent). A staff headed by Crennel with an offense led by McDaniels could be appealing. Plus, Jacksonville interim coach Mel Tucker was on Crennel’s staff in Cleveland. He’d be an attractive defensive coordinator candidate.

He won’t break the bank: Unlike Fisher and Ferentz (and other big hitters such as Bill Cowher and Jon Gruden), Crennel would be reasonably priced. That would appeal to ownership. Combining Crennel’s numerous positive attributes and his relatively low price tag, this could be a perfect pairing that may have begun with the Chiefs’ derailment of the Packers’ pursuit of perfection.

Titty Meat
12-23-2011, 04:24 PM
No it doesn't.

el borracho
12-23-2011, 04:58 PM
Won't matter who we bring in; if the Chiefs don't bring in a legit QB and a legit offensive coordinator, they will never win anything meaningful. At least with Crennel, it will be easier to wipe the slate completely clean in two years.

Brock
12-23-2011, 05:15 PM
It only makes sense if the team shows that the game against GB wasn't just an aberration.

Marcellus
12-23-2011, 05:17 PM
It only makes sense if the team shows that the game against GB wasn't just an aberration.

I have been thinking that all along. They have to win out and play like a contender and then I will think so.

Hell he is in consideration because there really isn't shit out there.

whoman69
12-23-2011, 05:18 PM
No it doesn't.

Your logic is irrefutable. :rolleyes:

TheGuardian
12-23-2011, 05:38 PM
No it doesn't.

Don't you have some Jeff Fischer balls you're supposed to be playing with?

CaliforniaChief
12-23-2011, 05:52 PM
If Pioli truly takes the Haley era as a repudiation of the Patriot Way, then yeah there are probably better hires out there.

But more than likely he's going to double down on it, and if that's the case I'm not sure there's a better choice than Romeo at this point.

Extra Point
12-23-2011, 06:41 PM
If RAC wants the job, then, fine. (This, of course, is predicated on a win-out season.)

If history isn't going to be repeated, then, great. Based on the coaching staff, then, Chuckie or Dungy should be HC. Don't know that either would want to put in the long hours.

The Bad Guy
12-23-2011, 07:01 PM
It only makes sense to me if Muir is gone. They can't run out a 72 year old OC next year.

If Romeo does well the last 2 weeks, he's going to get the job. McDaniels is going to be out in St. Louis. I could be OK with the hiring as long as Cassel isn't here.

McDaniels had Orton playing the best football of his life 2 years ago. He could be a good stop gap.

Romeo is going to want to pluck a d-coordinator from the BB tree as well. Romeo has a really good relationship with Mangini and that could work if Pioli buries the ax.

wazu
12-23-2011, 07:19 PM
It only makes sense to me if Muir is gone. They can't run out a 72 year old OC next year.

If Romeo does well the last 2 weeks, he's going to get the job. McDaniels is going to be out in St. Louis. I could be OK with the hiring as long as Cassel isn't here.

McDaniels had Orton playing the best football of his life 2 years ago. He could be a good stop gap.

Romeo is going to want to pluck a d-coordinator from the BB tree as well. Romeo has a really good relationship with Mangini and that could work if Pioli buries the ax.

I'd rather see Muir than McDaniels. I don't want McDaniels anywhere near this team.

threebag
12-23-2011, 08:13 PM
I'd rather see Muir than McDaniels. I don't want McDaniels anywhere near this team.

This. The bad thing is the Orton haters want McDaniels so he can fix Cassel. Then they can throw out the 'ol told you so.

DTLB58
12-23-2011, 08:28 PM
Won't matter who we bring in; if the Chiefs don't bring in a legit QB and a legit offensive coordinator, they will never win anything meaningful. At least with Crennel, it will be easier to wipe the slate completely clean in two years.

Bingo! :clap:

Told my boss the same thing last week already when he asked me who I wanted as the new HC.

All these articles are being written 2 weeks to early. Wait till the end of the season. If Romeo and the team craps out against these last 2. I don't think he will be considered.

whoman69
12-23-2011, 08:30 PM
This. The bad thing is the Orton haters want McDaniels so he can fix Cassel. Then they can throw out the 'ol told you so.

Cassel is totalled. Can't be fixed.

Hammock Parties
12-23-2011, 08:31 PM
The whole "hiring a new coach means we are set back!" thing is so 1995.

Look at what Harbaugh did in San Francisco this year, or what Fox did in Denver.

It's just an excuse for scared pussies.

DTLB58
12-23-2011, 08:31 PM
Won't matter who we bring in; if the Chiefs don't bring in a legit QB and a legit offensive coordinator, they will never win anything meaningful. At least with Crennel, it will be easier to wipe the slate completely clean in two years.


Muir can go back to being OL coach, or retire. I don't want him calling plays next season.

bricks
12-23-2011, 09:09 PM
I do agree that Romeo, McDaniels, and Mel Tucker would come at a reasonable cost for ownership. And that would also be a solid coaching staff.

Im just a little leery on McDaniels though. Wasn't he the guy that felt a little IFFY on Kyle Orton? And did his insecurity of Orton alone have influence on the Tebow pick?

I think McDaniels was part of the reason why Orton received a bad rep in Denver. But Im just cautious of that move because it could come at the expense of the chiefs keeping Cassel and possibly not keeping Orton. Im for mcDaniels as OC, but not if it comes along with keeping Cassel. Cassel just needs to gtfo period.

milkman
12-23-2011, 09:10 PM
Any coaching hire that includes Matt Cassel as part of the equation is setting the team up for continued suckage.

JD10367
12-23-2011, 09:23 PM
Those are actually all valid points.

Titty Meat
12-23-2011, 10:43 PM
Your logic is irrefutable. :rolleyes:

Don't you have some Jeff Fischer balls you're supposed to be playing with?

The whole bringing in coaches for 3 years and getting a new one doesn't make sense. Romeo isn't even a good head coach grow some balls and get Rob Chudzinski he'll be cheap and a good coach for more than 3 years.

Easy 6
12-24-2011, 02:19 PM
Any coaching hire that includes Matt Cassel as part of the equation is setting the team up for continued suckage.

.

Reerun_KC
12-24-2011, 02:37 PM
the knee jerking off of Crennel is fucking sickening...


Why in God name do you want Crennel Cassel or Orton?

whosyou
12-24-2011, 02:39 PM
the knee jerking off of Crennel is ****ing sickening...


Why in God name do you want Crennel Cassel or Orton?

Battered woman syndrome

Reerun_KC
12-24-2011, 02:40 PM
Battered woman syndrome

Better than the quest for True fan aids...

mnchiefsguy
12-24-2011, 03:18 PM
I just want a coach that can get all three phases of the game to show up on Sunday. Romeo did a great job of getting the defense to show up, but no offense again today.

Who can we get?

Romeo probably won the job today since the game went to OT and we almost won.

Only thing I can hope for is that if Romeo does get the job...he is like Frank Haith and exceeds initial expectations.

Chiefs Pantalones
12-24-2011, 03:19 PM
Blow it all up. We're probably screwed until Pioli is gone.

FloridaMan88
12-24-2011, 03:21 PM
All three phases lost today's game... offense, defense and special teams.

Combine that with all the penalties, the horrific game management at the end of the first half and it should be lights out for Romeo.

Chiefs Pantalones
12-24-2011, 03:23 PM
All three phases lost today's game... offense, defense and special teams.

Combine that with all the penalties, the horrific game management at the end of the first half and it should be lights out for Romeo.
This. And fuck the patriot way