Chiefs Making History...

[mikey23545]

All-time worst turnover differentials after four games:


http://imageshack.us/a/img854/9376/turnoverdifferentialaft.png (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/854/turnoverdifferentialaft.png/)

[Mr. Arrowhead]

Pioli your not a floppy, your a dumbass

[mikey23545]

I wonder what kind of week 5 performance will be necessary to vault us into the number one slot?

[htismaqe]

Only TWO teams have done it since the AFL-NFL merger?

WOW

[Fire Me Boy!]

I'm trying to figure out how -13 after four games makes us all-time worst when there are two teams at -15....

[mikey23545]

I'm trying to figure out how -13 after four games makes us all-time worst when there are two teams at -15....

Maybe you just can't read.

Where does it say the Chiefs are number one?

[whoman69]

I'm trying to figure out how -13 after four games makes us all-time worst when there are two teams at -15....

Nobody claimed that, but when you are third worst in league history, its not going well.

[Fire Me Boy!]

Maybe you just can't read.

Where does it say the Chiefs are number one?

Eh... The "Chiefs making history" title, along with "all-time worst turnover differential" makes an implication that I'm certain wasn't intended.

[mikey23545]

Eh... The "Chiefs making history" title, along with "all-time worst turnover differential" makes an implication that I'm certain wasn't intended.

You're just inferring when I'm not implying.

[Time's Yours]

Eh... The "Chiefs making history" title, along with "all-time worst turnover differential" makes an implication that I'm certain wasn't intended.

"all-time worst turnover differentials" is just the title for the following chart.

[BoneKrusher]

Pioli sure picked the Chiefs a winner.

[Pasta Little Brioni]

Cassel's favorite dessert is also his favorite hobby

[Fire Me Boy!]

"all-time worst turnover differentials" is just the title for the following chart.

Yes, I understand that now. But it's easy to read it the other, IMHO, especially when you talk about the Chiefs making "history". For me, making history is when something has never been done before.

[Papi]

You're just inferring when I'm not implying.

Stop back peddling. Fire Me Boy's logic is undeniable. You went for the sensationalist title and can't take it back now.

[mikey23545]

Stop back peddling. Fire Me Boy's logic is undeniable. You went for the sensationalist title and can't take it back now.

Who the fuck are you to lecture me, you fucking noob?

People who jump to conclusions can jump right into a pile of neg rep.

[Papi]

Who the **** are you to lecture me, you ****ing noob?

People who jump to conclusions can jump right into a pile of neg rep.

Wow straight to anger. Nothing worth getting worked up about. It was an interesting OP but FMB and I don't agree with the title, that's all.

[whoman69]

Who the **** are you to lecture me, you ****ing noob?

People who jump to conclusions can jump right into a pile of neg rep.

Technically he's a lurker, not a noob. But his case is very poor in any case. That the Chiefs have the third highest total in history is big news.

[Fire Me Boy!]

Technically he's a lurker, not a noob. But his case is very poor in any case. That the Chiefs have the third highest total in history is big news.

Not disagreeing that it's news. Disagreeing that it's "making history."

The first team to -15 made history. Everyone else did it again. Neil Armstrong made history when he walked on the moon. Buzz Aldrin just did it again.

[Rasputin]

On the 50th year we make history.

[Saul Good]

Cassel's favorite dessert is also his favorite hobby

Pudding the ball on the ground?

[mcaj22]

seriously, the two teams ahead of use are from the 50s and 60s


thats how bad this team is in this era of football. Outdated schemes and shallow talent.

[Tombstone RJ]

Yes, I understand that now. But it's easy to read it the other, IMHO, especially when you talk about the Chiefs making "history". For me, making history is when something has never been done before.

just give kc time my man, just give them time...:p

[BossChief]

Cassel is responsible for 10 of those turnovers, himself.

[Psyko Tek]

Pudding the ball on the ground?

I was gonna guess dick

[FlaChief58]

Inconcievable. We're the best offence in the league and casshole has more yards through 4 games than any QB in Chiefs history! Naner naner boo boo / Pissholy

[JoeyChuckles]

If we were even on turnovers for the year, what would our record be right now?

[milkman]

If we were even on turnovers for the year, what would our record be right now?

1-3.

[ThaVirus]

Eh... The "Chiefs making history" title, along with "all-time worst turnover differential" makes an implication that I'm certain wasn't intended.

You're just inferring when I'm not implying.

Stop back peddling. Fire Me Boy's logic is undeniable. You went for the sensationalist title and can't take it back now.

Who the **** are you to lecture me, you ****ing noob?

People who jump to conclusions can jump right into a pile of neg rep.

This little exchange made me giggle.

[Tombstone RJ]

This little exchange made me giggle.

chiefsplanet is just good entertainment. Come here after a loss, it's pure gold. LMAO

[ThaVirus]

chiefsplanet is just good entertainment. Come here after a loss, it's pure gold. LMAO

No. That's more likely to incite suicide LMAO

It makes me feel better about myself though.

[MagicHef]

Actually, with the merger happening in 1970, that means the Chiefs and Lions are tied for worst since the merger.

Congrats.

[whoman69]

Inconcievable. We're the best offence in the league and casshole has more yards through 4 games than any QB in Chiefs history! Naner naner boo boo / Pissholy

http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/c0.0.400.400/p403x403/263856_484391471579848_739810128_n.jpg

[dj56dt58]

Chiefs have the best record in nfl history for a team -13 or more in turnovers through 4 games
-pioli

[007]

Cassel is responsible for 10 of those turnovers, himself.

Didn't you hear? He was only responsible for half of those according to NFL Network.