Discussion: NSFW images in spoiler tags

[Fire Me Boy!]

Can we take a moment to seriously discuss posting NSFW and full nude images inside spoiler tags? I'm not talking about NSFW images in a thread clearly marked NSFW like the porn gif thread, but NSFW images popping up in threads like today's Tiffani Thiessen thread (just an example since it's fresh on my mind and is not marked NSFW).

Let's forget for a moment that posting pictures showing genitalia and nipples in general is against board policy and focus merely on the spoiler tags.

While the spoiler tags DO hide the image from view for someone walking by, they do nothing for someone whose IS folks at work peek behind the scenes. Spoiler tags only hide the image from view; the image still loads on the machine and its cache.

Am I the only person bothered by this? If I am, I'll shut up. But this is really becoming such a rampant practice, it makes me hesitant to peruse Chiefsplanet at work, even threads that should be safe to go in.

[lewdog]

You should be working at work....problem solved.

[Fire Me Boy!]

You should be working at work....problem solved.

Way to skirt the question.

People are allowed breaks, no? And I generally eat lunch at my desk. That hour is mine.

[The Franchise]

Can we take a moment to seriously discuss posting NSFW and full nude images inside spoiler tags? I'm not talking about NSFW images in a thread clearly marked NSFW like the porn gif thread, but NSFW images popping up in threads like today's Tiffani Thiessen thread (just an example since it's fresh on my mind and is not marked NSFW).

Let's forget for a moment that posting pictures showing genitalia and nipples in general is against board policy and focus merely on the spoiler tags.

While the spoiler tags DO hide the image from view for someone walking by, they do nothing for someone whose IS folks at work peek behind the scenes. Spoiler tags only hide the image from view; the image still loads on the machine and its cache.

Am I the only person bothered by this? If I am, I'll shut up. But this is really becoming such a rampant practice, it makes me hesitant to peruse Chiefsplanet at work, even threads that should be safe to go in.

Did not know that.

I make it a point to stay out of the picture thread completely while I'm at work....but still.

[Sorter]

You should be working at work....problem solved.

ROFL

[Dave Lane]

Not an issue. Shouldn't work for Nazi's anyway.

The schnitzel smell is really bad.

[Fire Me Boy!]

Did not know that.

I make it a point to stay out of the picture thread completely while I'm at work....but still.

Whenever I've brought this up in threads, everyone just acts like it isn't a big deal. It's a bannable offense, and I don't understand why it's not enforced.

Most IT folks will look the other way at a few bikinis, but we've got outright porn on this site.

[007]

I just set it to not show any images while at work so none of that crap preloads

[Fire Me Boy!]

I just set it to not show any images while at work so none of that crap preloads

I'm already in work mode... guess I may have to go a step further.

[PaulAllen]

It may be your lunch hour but you're still using company property. Use your phone for porn when you're at work dude, like the rest of us.

[007]

I'm already in work mode... guess I may have to go a step further.

Yeah work mode isn't enough. You have to disable images completely.

[Johnny Vegas]

thats why smart phones should be used more often when at work to dodge all the nsfw all together. If you don't have one I really recommend getting one.

[Fire Me Boy!]

It may be your lunch hour but you're still using company property. Use your phone for porn when you're at work dude, like the rest of us.

This is such a lame argument. Where I view the thread doesn't change the fact it's against terms of service. And my company has said they don't mind a little personal surfing as long as it's work safe.

[chiefforlife]

I am glad you started this thread!!


Because Im sick of you bitching about it in all the others. I think its fine, if you shouldnt be doing it at work, then dont.

[007]

I have all avatars, images and signatures turned off at work. Wish there was a way to have multiple settings based on location so I didn't need to change everything everyday.

[BigRedChief]

Sorry spoilers is enough. Just don't click on spoilers when you are at work. Or alter your personal board settings.

[Fire Me Boy!]

I am glad you started this thread!!


Because Im sick of you bitching about it in all the others. I think its fine, if you shouldnt be doing it at work, then dont.

I actually haven't "bitched" about it in quite some time... so go fuck yourself.

[BlackHelicopters]

I stay out of the pictures thread at work, period. Even some of the sigs, including mine, might be considered borderline NSFW. best policy, work while at work.

[lewdog]

Way to skirt the question.

People are allowed breaks, no? And I generally eat lunch at my desk. That hour is mine.

I only have working lunches so I have no idea what you mean.

And when I GET HOME to peruse Chiefs Planet, I love the idea that I might get to see a cootchie or tit shot in any and all threads!

[Fire Me Boy!]

Sorry spoilers is enough. Just don't click on spoilers when you are at work. Or alter your board settings.

You're missing the point. Even in spoilers, the image still loads on your computer.

[Hammock Parties]

"PLEASE CHANGE BOARD POLICY FOR ME BECAUSE I AM A SLACKER"

[Lumpy]

Simple solution... don't look at porn or naughty pics at work.

Perv :p

[007]

I am glad you started this thread!!


Because Im sick of you bitching about it in all the others. I think its fine, if you shouldnt be doing it at work, then dont.

It is a board violation. FMB is right on this.

[The Franchise]

Sorry spoilers is enough. Just don't click on spoilers when you are at work. Or alter your personal board settings.

You didn't read the OP.....did you?

[bigbucks24]

I am glad you started this thread!!


Because Im sick of you bitching about it in all the others. I think its fine, if you shouldnt be doing it at work, then dont.

Wait. Since other people are doing things against the TOS, FMB should not surf CP on break, even though his company has said it is ok? So FMB is the bad guy? And the people violating the TOS are just fine? What am I missing? Or are you a Blackbob mult trying to contrary?

[Fire Me Boy!]

I only have working lunches so I have no idea what you mean.

And when I GET HOME to peruse Chiefs Planet, I love the idea that I might get to see a cootchie or tit shot in any and all threads!

I have no problem with properly labeled threads, and even links that are labeled NSFW. That gives me a choice to see them. But when they show up in random threads, there's where I find a problem...

:shrug:

[Sorter]

NSFW
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ljpqv7Hx2O1qzvevko1_500.jpg

LMAO

Happy FMB?

[007]

I stay out of the pictures thread at work, period. Even some of the sigs, including mine, might be considered borderline NSFW. best policy, work while at work.

Some people do it in forums other than pictures though. That is a problem.

[Hootie]

someone posted Kelly Kapowski's tits!?!?!? where? where?

[007]

I have no problem with properly labeled threads, and even links that are labeled NSFW. That gives me a choice to see them. But when they show up in random threads, there's where I find a problem...

:shrug:

EXACTLY

[Fire Me Boy!]

"PLEASE CHANGE BOARD POLICY FOR ME BECAUSE I AM A SLACKER"

Is this directed at me? I'm not asking for a policy change. I'm asking that policy be enforced. Board policy is no nudie pics. Says nothing about it being OK in spoiler tags...

[chiefforlife]

I actually haven't "bitched" about it in quite some time... so go fuck yourself.

You just started a thread about it, bitching, again. So go fuck yourself with a spoiler.

[DaFace]

I'm actually interested in this discussion as well. It's come up from time to time among the mods, but I'm not sure we've even come up with a firm rule about it.

My general feeling is that NSFW images should be linked only and that the spoiler tag isn't a sufficient method of masking it, but I'm open to thinking about it differently.

[BigRedChief]

You're missing the point. Even in spoilers, the image still loads on your computer.I understand cache. I don't go to the Planet at work to avoid all the NSFW stuff on here. Thats just me.

But, I'd have no issue if they banned it.

[CrazyPhuD]

CNSFW images popping up in threads like today's Tiffani Thiessen thread (just an example since it's fresh on my mind and is not marked NSFW).


wait there's nudie pics in the Tiffai Thiessen thread?????

BRB......:bolt:

[Fire Me Boy!]

I'm actually interested in this discussion as well. It's come up from time to time among the mods, but I'm not sure we've even come up with a firm rule about it.

That's all I really want. Enforcement of the existing rule or clarification that spoiler tags is A-OK.

[007]

What I would really love is the ability to set a thread on ignore without actually having to go into it first.

[Fire Me Boy!]

NSFW
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ljpqv7Hx2O1qzvevko1_500.jpg

LMAO

See, now that's filter evasion. I'm not reporting it, but I kinda hope you get a little vacation just on principle.

[Sorter]

I'm actually interested in this discussion as well. It's come up from time to time among the mods, but I'm not sure we've even come up with a firm rule about it.

I do think it is an interesting can of worms. While I can understand the OPs reasoning and it is sound, it would suck ass if enforced IMO.

[bigbucks24]

How about people like me that are on the road often and like to browse CP? Do i need to start bringing another laptop with me just so i can read CP? My company has no problem with using the work computer for personal use as long as it is SFW.

[Rasputin]

This is why we can't have nice things

:moon:

[Lumpy]

My boss already figures that I look at midget porn, so a few naughty pics in my cache is like a non-issue for me.

[Fire Me Boy!]

I do think it is an interesting can of worms. While I can understand the OPs reasoning and it is sound, it would suck ass if enforced IMO.

What's wrong with links to the NSFW material? That's what we did before spoiler tags...

[Sorter]

What's wrong with links to the NSFW material? That's what we did before spoiler tags...

It's not as enjoyable and I don't like clicking links, personally.

[007]

I do think it is an interesting can of worms. While I can understand the OPs reasoning and it is sound, it would suck ass if enforced IMO.

Those pictures have no place on this board outside the nudie thread in the pictures forum and even that says no nipples or clits.

[CrazyPhuD]

Those pictures have no place on this board outside the nudie thread in the pictures forum and even that says no nipples or clits.

So only dicks and asses are allowed in the nudie thread? Yea I don't think I'll check that out now.....

[DaFace]

Those pictures have no place on this board outside the nudie thread in the pictures forum and even that says no nipples or clits.

Yeah, to clarify, it's the "girly pictures thread" not the "nudie pictures thread". Over time, the pics forum has grown to include those kinds of pics outside that thread, but even that's a somewhat newish occurrence.

[Buehler445]

I'm actually interested in this discussion as well. It's come up from time to time among the mods, but I'm not sure we've even come up with a firm rule about it.

My general feeling is that NSFW images should be linked only and that the spoiler tag isn't a sufficient method of masking it, but I'm open to thinking about it differently.

That's where I'm at, but I'm not worked up about it either way.

[htismaqe]

I have no problem with properly labeled threads, and even links that are labeled NSFW. That gives me a choice to see them. But when they show up in random threads, there's where I find a problem...

:shrug:

The thing is, if your company is parsing HTML via proxy, the pictures are the least of your worries.

If someone were to post a NSFW link (perfectly within the rules) your IT could still catch that, figure out what it is, and you would be in trouble.

Also don't forget that every letter of text in the forum loads into your browser as well, so when people like me say fuck you, you fucking fuck over and over again every fucking day, that shows up too.

Quite honestly, if you're afraid your work is monitoring you, you probably shouldn't be on here AT ALL.

[007]

So only dicks and asses are allowed in the nudie thread? Yea I don't think I'll check that out now.....
LMAO
Yeah, to clarify, it's the "girly pictures thread" not the "nudie pictures thread". Over time, the pics forum has grown to include those kinds of pics outside that thread, but even that's a somewhat newish occurrence.

Hence why I called it nudie.

[PaulAllen]

This is such a lame argument. Where I view the thread doesn't change the fact it's against terms of service. And my company has said they don't mind a little personal surfing as long as it's work safe.

It's a lame argument to tell you to not use your company's property to surf potentially unwork safe sites and to use your own devices instead to avoid any trouble? I don't get it.

[Rasputin]

What's wrong with links to the NSFW material? That's what we did before spoiler tags...

Who wants to click on links that could be harmful to the computer? Clicking on links can be way annoying when they blog down the computer too.


I really don't see the big deal if they warn with NSFW for the spoiler tag? Simple don't click on the NSFW spoiler at work.

[Sorter]

The thing is, if your company is parsing HTML via proxy, the pictures are the least of your worries.

If someone were to post a NSFW link (perfectly within the rules) your IT could still catch that, figure out what it is, and you would be in trouble.

Also don't forget that every letter of text in the forum loads into your browser as well, so when people like me say **** you, you ****ing **** over and over again every ****ing day, that shows up too.

Quite honestly, if you're afraid your work is monitoring you, you probably shouldn't be on here AT ALL.

:)

[BigRedChief]

What's wrong with links to the NSFW material? That's what we did before spoiler tags...I think links are a good compromise.:thumb:

[007]

The thing is, if your company is parsing HTML via proxy, the pictures are the least of your worries.

If someone were to post a NSFW link (perfectly within the rules) your IT could still catch that, figure out what it is, and you would be in trouble.

Also don't forget that every letter of text in the forum loads into your browser as well, so when people like me say **** you, you ****ing **** over and over again every ****ing day, that shows up too.

Quite honestly, if you're afraid your work is monitoring you, you probably shouldn't be on here AT ALL.

Ihave a few words set to auto filter so that doesn't happen. It is annoying when somebody posts grape though. LMAO

[keg in kc]

Putting stuff like that in spoiler tags seems very similar to filter evasion to me. Links are one thing, embedding photos, even if they're hidden, is probably a line we shouldn't be crossing on here.

[Fire Me Boy!]

It's a lame argument to tell you to not use your company's property to surf potentially unwork safe sites and to use your own devices instead to avoid any trouble? I don't get it.

It's a lame argument because it still applies if I simply don't want trashy pictures on my home computer cache. The fact is it's against the terms of service, and it doesn't matter where I view the thread, it's still against the TOS.

[007]

Who wants to click on links that could be harmful to the computer? Clicking on links can be way annoying when they blog down the computer too.


I really don't see the big deal if they warn with NSFW for the spoiler tag? Simple don't click on the NSFW spoiler at work.

Read the OP again.

[htismaqe]

I think somebody needs to define "not safe for work".

Our corporate proxy does not allow us to download pictures of beer, for example.

For the longest time, my AVATAR (a bottle of Das Echte Schwaben Brau) was technically NOT SAFE FOR WORK.

Again, if your company is THAT uptight that an embedded graphic that you didn't even click on could be a potential problem for you, DON'T SURF CHIEFSPLANET WITH A COMPANY COMPUTER.

Quite frankly, if you work for a Fortune 500 publicly-traded company, surfing the Planet - SFW or not - is against company policy.

[BigRedChief]

It's a lame argument to tell you to not use your company's property to surf potentially unwork safe sites and to use your own devices instead to avoid any trouble? I don't get it.He has a valid point that the community and the mods do need to address. What should be the rule?

[Phobia]

Is this directed at me? I'm not asking for a policy change. I'm asking that policy be enforced. Board policy is no nudie pics. Says nothing about it being OK in spoiler tags...
I always enforce it. I don't see any links or reported threads. Apparently I haven't been into the thread in question.

[htismaqe]

It's a lame argument because it still applies if I simply don't want trashy pictures on my home computer cache. The fact is it's against the terms of service, and it doesn't matter where I view the thread, it's still against the TOS.

Seriously?

[Fire Me Boy!]

I think somebody needs to define "not safe for work".

Our corporate proxy does not allow us to download pictures of beer, for example.

For the longest time, my AVATAR (a bottle of Das Echte Schwaben Brau) was technically NOT SAFE FOR WORK.

Again, if your company is THAT uptight that an embedded graphic that you didn't even click on could be a potential problem for you, DON'T SURF CHIEFSPLANET WITH A COMPANY COMPUTER.

Quite frankly, if you work for a Fortune 500 publicly-traded company, surfing the Planet - SFW or not - is against company policy.

True enough. That said, a lot of IT departments will let bikini pics slide... throw in some full nudity and you've crossed a line.

[htismaqe]

Is Sorter's use of the spoiler tags earlier in this thread filter evasion?

[DaFace]

Here's a thought, with the caveat that I DON'T KNOW IF WE CAN MAKE THIS WORK.

I found another site out there in the world (http://www.freeratio.org/faq.php?faq=common_rayj2010_bbcodes) that has a NSFW tag. According to the description, it doesn't load the image until after the person clicks the link. This would also make sure that it's clear that this isn't a spoiler and is truly a way of masking the image.

Is that something that those against the spoiler route would be OK with?

(Other mods feel free to chime in on this as well, either publicly or privately.)

[The Franchise]

Who wants to click on links that could be harmful to the computer? Clicking on links can be way annoying when they blog down the computer too.


I really don't see the big deal if they warn with NSFW for the spoiler tag? Simple don't click on the NSFW spoiler at work.

Once again.....you didn't pay attention....did you?

[Fire Me Boy!]

Seriously?

No, I could give a shit on my home computer. It's an example.

[Hootie]

my work has free wifi so I just bring my laptop with me and surf whatever the fuck I want under a fake name and keep everything on the work computer right next to me work related! Must be nice, I know =)

[The Franchise]

Here's a thought, with the caveat that I DON'T KNOW IF WE CAN MAKE THIS WORK.

I found another site out there in the world (http://www.freeratio.org/faq.php?faq=common_rayj2010_bbcodes) that has a NSFW tag. According to the description, it doesn't load the image until after the person clicks the link. This would also make sure that it's clear that this isn't a spoiler and is truly a way of masking the image.

Is that something that those against the spoiler route would be OK with?

That would be an awesome fix.....if possible.

[BigRedChief]

I think somebody needs to define "not safe for work".

Our corporate proxy does not allow us to download pictures of beer, for example.

For the longest time, my AVATAR (a bottle of Das Echte Schwaben Brau) was technically NOT SAFE FOR WORK.

Again, if your company is THAT uptight that an embedded graphic that you didn't even click on could be a potential problem for you, DON'T SURF CHIEFSPLANET WITH A COMPANY COMPUTER.

Quite frankly, if you work for a Fortune 500 publicly-traded company, surfing the Planet - SFW or not - is against company policy.If you don't realize it then take it from me and htismage. Your work computer caches EVERYTHING on this website. If your company has a strict internet use policy, best to wait till your off work or on your smartphone to visit the site.

[KCUnited]

No, I could give a shit on my home computer. It's an example.

Couldn't.

[Crush]

Here's a thought, with the caveat that I DON'T KNOW IF WE CAN MAKE THIS WORK.

I found another site out there in the world (http://www.freeratio.org/faq.php?faq=common_rayj2010_bbcodes) that has a NSFW tag. According to the description, it doesn't load the image until after the person clicks the link. This would also make sure that it's clear that this isn't a spoiler and is truly a way of masking the image.

Is that something that those against the spoiler route would be OK with?

(Other mods feel free to chime in on this as well, either publicly or privately.)

I think that is a fair compromise.

[seclark]

Here's a thought, with the caveat that I DON'T KNOW IF WE CAN MAKE THIS WORK.

I found another site out there in the world (http://www.freeratio.org/faq.php?faq=common_rayj2010_bbcodes) that has a NSFW tag. According to the description, it doesn't load the image until after the person clicks the link. This would also make sure that it's clear that this isn't a spoiler and is truly a way of masking the image.

Is that something that those against the spoiler route would be OK with?

(Other mods feel free to chime in on this as well, either publicly or privately.)

sweet.
sec

[Fire Me Boy!]

Here's a thought, with the caveat that I DON'T KNOW IF WE CAN MAKE THIS WORK.

I found another site out there in the world (http://www.freeratio.org/faq.php?faq=common_rayj2010_bbcodes) that has a NSFW tag. According to the description, it doesn't load the image until after the person clicks the link. This would also make sure that it's clear that this isn't a spoiler and is truly a way of masking the image.

Is that something that those against the spoiler route would be OK with?

(Other mods feel free to chime in on this as well, either publicly or privately.)

As long as it doesn't load the image (does more than just mask it), I think that would be fine.

[BigMeatballDave]

"PLEASE CHANGE BOARD POLICY FOR ME BECAUSE I AM A SLACKER"

LMAO

[Fire Me Boy!]

Couldn't.

Fuck. That's one of my pet peeves, too.

:shake:

[Hoover]

So you're telling me that I should be looking at NSFW spoilers because my tech people think I'm looking at it anyway?

Well OK Then...

[007]

Here's a thought, with the caveat that I DON'T KNOW IF WE CAN MAKE THIS WORK.

I found another site out there in the world (http://www.freeratio.org/faq.php?faq=common_rayj2010_bbcodes) that has a NSFW tag. According to the description, it doesn't load the image until after the person clicks the link. This would also make sure that it's clear that this isn't a spoiler and is truly a way of masking the image.

Is that something that those against the spoiler route would be OK with?

(Other mods feel free to chime in on this as well, either publicly or privately.)

That looks like a viable option

[Sorter]

Here's a thought, with the caveat that I DON'T KNOW IF WE CAN MAKE THIS WORK.

I found another site out there in the world (http://www.freeratio.org/faq.php?faq=common_rayj2010_bbcodes) that has a NSFW tag. According to the description, it doesn't load the image until after the person clicks the link. This would also make sure that it's clear that this isn't a spoiler and is truly a way of masking the image.

Is that something that those against the spoiler route would be OK with?

(Other mods feel free to chime in on this as well, either publicly or privately.)

me gusta

[htismaqe]

No, I could give a shit on my home computer. It's an example.

Then why even say it?

I can totally understand not wanting to have pics with graphic nudity stuck in the cache of your work PC, possibly without you even knowing it.

I think we need to differentiate between things like nude pictures and pictures with the word FUCK in them.

That's just me.

[Sorter]

LMAOSo you're telling me that I should be looking at NSFW spoilers because my tech people think I'm looking at it anyway?

Well OK Then...

[BigRedChief]

So you're telling me that I should be looking at NSFW spoilers because my tech people think I'm looking at it anyway?

Well OK Then...yep. Tell em I said it was okay.

[Fire Me Boy!]

Is Sorter's use of the spoiler tags earlier in this thread filter evasion?

Yes.

[htismaqe]

my work has free wifi so I just bring my laptop with me and surf whatever the fuck I want under a fake name and keep everything on the work computer right next to me work related! Must be nice, I know =)

I work out of my house and have my home PC and my work PC hooked up to a KVM and switch back and forth. :D

[htismaqe]

Yes.

Now see, I think that's just being too uptight about it.

That picture is funny. I want to see it.

I don't want to click a link to see it - I have no idea what's behind that link.

[Sorter]

Yes.

Really?

I thought by marking a link NSFW and additionally encoding it in the spoiler tags but not making it an IMG and providing just the link was fine.

[007]

People still need to post this stuff in the pics forum and not any of the others

[Hammock Parties]

my work has free wifi so I just bring my laptop with me and surf whatever the fuck I want under a fake name and keep everything on the work computer right next to me work related! Must be nice, I know =)

What does your boss think about that? ROFL

[Sorter]

Now see, I think that's just being too uptight about it.

That picture is funny. I want to see it.

I don't want to click a link to see it - I have no idea what's behind that link.

A really sexy tattoo. :)

[Fire Me Boy!]

Then why even say it?

I can totally understand not wanting to have pics with graphic nudity stuck in the cache of your work PC, possibly without you even knowing it.

I think we need to differentiate between things like nude pictures and pictures with the word **** in them.

That's just me.

Read the whole post. I was explaining that as far as this board's terms of service go, it doesn't matter where I'm looking at the board - at home, at work, at the library... that's why I hate the "you should work at work" argument for allowing things. Me being at work doesn't change the fact that it's against TOS.

[htismaqe]

A really sexy tattoo. :)

When I click the spoiler tag, I see the pic, not a link.

[Hootie]

What does your boss think about that? ROFL

the mother fucker works 10 hours a week

I envy him.

and even so, he wouldn't care since I do ALL OF THE WORK, both his and mine.

I keep my mouth shut because when he's not here I don't have a boss and I prefer that alternative and extra work then him constantly being here and being a pissed off alcoholic yelling at everyone and making my EASY job more difficult.

[KCUnited]

****. That's one of my pet peeves, too.

:shake:

It never bothers me, but it's a rare opportunity to catch you slippin'.

[Hootie]

shit, I play 3 hours of poker a shift once I get done with my work...which usually takes me about half a day

[htismaqe]

Read the whole post. I was explaining that as far as this board's terms of service go, it doesn't matter where I'm looking at the board - at home, at work, at the library... that's why I hate the "you should work at work" argument for allowing things. Me being at work doesn't change the fact that it's against TOS.

I read the whole post.

You're using the TOS as a crutch to protest that you don't want indecent material loaded into your cache, potentially without your knowledge.

It's a legit complaint, don't hide behind the TOS.

[PaulAllen]

Then why even say it?

I can totally understand not wanting to have pics with graphic nudity stuck in the cache of your work PC, possibly without you even knowing it.

I think we need to differentiate between things like nude pictures and pictures with the word **** in them.

That's just me.

Because apparently he just likes to bitch.

[Fire Me Boy!]

Now see, I think that's just being too uptight about it.

That picture is funny. I want to see it.

I don't want to click a link to see it - I have no idea what's behind that link.

He edited it. When he originally posted it (look at my quoted version (http://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showpost.php?p=9362771&postcount=38)) he used the IMG tags. It just has the f-word in it, which is filter evasion.

The way he edited it 20 minutes ago is fine.

[Sorter]

When I click the spoiler tag, I see the pic, not a link.

You must have clicked on FMB's quoting me. I edited my post so he'd be happier.

[Sorter]

He edited it. When he originally posted it (look at my quoted version (http://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showpost.php?p=9362771&postcount=38)) he used the IMG tags. It just has the f-word in it, which is filter evasion.

The way he edited it 20 minutes ago is fine.

Motherfucker, you're quick. :)

[Fire Me Boy!]

I read the whole post.

You're using the TOS as a crutch to protest that you don't want indecent material loaded into your cache, potentially without your knowledge.

It's a legit complaint, don't hide behind the TOS.

There's a fair amount of truth that, but if you knew me personally you'd know I'm kind of a stickler about rules.

[PaulAllen]

I can't believe you neg repped me for that first post FMB LMAO what a bitch...

[Hootie]

while we're at it, we need to kill CosmicPal's avatar. That avy makes me want to jurg it every time I see it and it is definitely NSFW

[htismaqe]

He edited it. When he originally posted it (look at my quoted version (http://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showpost.php?p=9362771&postcount=38)) he used the IMG tags. It just has the f-word in it, which is filter evasion.

The way he edited it 20 minutes ago is fine.

Stop being such a fuddy duddy.

There is NOTHING wrong with that picture.

I get you don't want bare tits and pussies on your PC.

[Fire Me Boy!]

It never bothers me, but it's a rare opportunity to catch you slippin'.

Then rep to you, sir. :D

[Fire Me Boy!]

Stop being such a fuddy duddy.

There is NOTHING wrong with that picture.

I get you don't want bare tits and pussies on your PC.

That pic doesn't bother me one bit, in all honesty. But it is filter evasion, by letter of the (Chiefsplanet) law.

[Sorter]

while we're at it, we need to kill CosmicPal's avatar. That avy makes me want to jurg it every time I see it and it is definitely NSFW

who is CosmicPal and what is this av you speak of?

[Fire Me Boy!]

I can't believe you neg repped me for that first post FMB LMAO what a bitch...

It was kinda fun watching your red bars double... :LOL:

[Sorter]

That pic doesn't bother me one bit, in all honesty. But it is filter evasion, by letter of the (Chiefsplanet) law.

The pic bothers me because lip tattoos look painful as hell. It is funny, however.

[Sorter]

I can't believe you neg repped me for that first post FMB LMAO what a bitch...

Can we see your card, Paul?

[Hootie]

who is CosmicPal and what is this av you speak of?

you're a smart guy, I'm sure you can find him

[Sorter]

you're a smart guy, I'm sure you can find him

too. lazy. to. use. search. function. argghh.

[htismaqe]

That pic doesn't bother me one bit, in all honesty. But it is filter evasion, by letter of the (Chiefsplanet) law.

You'll never be one of the cool kids.

[007]

while we're at it, we need to kill CosmicPal's avatar. That avy makes me want to jurg it every time I see it and it is definitely NSFW

Yeah, I hate that I have to have sigs and avs turned off now.

[Fire Me Boy!]

too. lazy. to. use. search. function. argghh.

http://chiefsplanet.com/BB/member.php?u=2033

[Fire Me Boy!]

You'll never be one of the cool kids.

Never have been one. I'm good with it.

[Hootie]

the filter evasion thing is one of the biggest sham's of all time on this site.

it only gets moderated 10% of the time and in order for it to get moderated it has to be someone that isn't very well "liked", for lack of a better word

but as a person who doesn't filter evade, I don't give a flying fuck!

[Hootie]

http://chiefsplanet.com/BB/member.php?u=2033

be back in 3 minutes

[htismaqe]

http://chiefsplanet.com/BB/member.php?u=2033

His profile picture is even worse.

http://chiefsplanet.com/BB/customprofilepics/profilepic2033_1.gif

[Fire Me Boy!]

the filter evasion thing is one of the biggest sham's of all time on this site.

it only gets moderated 10% of the time and in order for it to get moderated it has to be someone that isn't very well "liked", for lack of a better word

but as a person who doesn't filter evade, I don't give a flying ****!

Agreed.

[Sorter]

http://chiefsplanet.com/BB/member.php?u=2033

That is indeed an ass.

http://i55.tinypic.com/e9yg0i.jpg

[htismaqe]

Never have been one. I'm good with it.

I was just teasing.

You can be a cool kid if you want.

I accept Paypal and Western Union.

Oh, and pickled okra. I love that shit.

[Sorter]

LMAOLMAObe back in 3 minutes

[Fire Me Boy!]

I was just teasing.

You can be a cool kid if you want.

I accept Paypal and Western Union.

Oh, and pickled okra. I love that shit.

ROFL

[saphojunkie]

Wait...


There's a porn gif thread?


:bolt:

[Rasputin]

Once again.....you didn't pay attention....did you?

I understand what OP is saying.

I don't like it or agree.


I don't think spoiler tag in the picture threads with NSFW should be a big deal to be bannworth. Just don't click on the NSFW. I'd rather not click on a link because it could be harmful to my computer or just blog it down. It does that at times.

This is a discussion so I am doing just that with my oppinion on the subject.

Maybe at work shouldn't be looking at the pictures if you got to worry about someone sneeking up behind you. At least the NSFW suggest that it isn't a good idea to look at that spoiler tag. It's on person clicking it at work own fault for getting busted.

[Fire Me Boy!]

I understand what OP is saying.

I don't like it or agree.


I don't think spoiler tag in the picture threads with NSFW should be a big deal to be bannworth. Just don't click on the NSFW. I'd rather not click on a link because it could be harmful to my computer or just blog it down. It does that at times.

This is a discussion so I am doing just that with my oppinion on the subject.

Maybe at work shouldn't be looking at the pictures if you got to worry about someone sneeking up behind you. At least the NSFW suggest that it isn't a good idea to look at that spoiler tag. It's on person clicking it at work own fault for getting busted.

It's been stated repeatedly (in the OP and elsewhere) I'm not talking about threads marked NSFW. If the THREAD (not just the post) is marked NSFW, I don't care.

[BigRedChief]

I get you don't want bare tits and pussies on your PC.that's damn un-American :shrug:

[007]

I understand what OP is saying.

I don't like it or agree.


I don't think spoiler tag in the picture threads with NSFW should be a big deal to be bannworth. Just don't click on the NSFW. I'd rather not click on a link because it could be harmful to my computer or just blog it down. It does that at times.

This is a discussion so I am doing just that with my oppinion on the subject.

Maybe at work shouldn't be looking at the pictures if you got to worry about someone sneeking up behind you. At least the NSFW suggest that it isn't a good idea to look at that spoiler tag. It's on person clicking it at work own fault for getting busted.
Read it again.

[Lumpy]

Wait...


There's a porn gif thread?


:bolt:

It's down the hall and to the left.

[htismaqe]

I understand what OP is saying.

I don't like it or agree.


I don't think spoiler tag in the picture threads with NSFW should be a big deal to be bannworth. Just don't click on the NSFW. I'd rather not click on a link because it could be harmful to my computer or just blog it down. It does that at times.

This is a discussion so I am doing just that with my oppinion on the subject.

Maybe at work shouldn't be looking at the pictures if you got to worry about someone sneeking up behind you. At least the NSFW suggest that it isn't a good idea to look at that spoiler tag. It's on person clicking it at work own fault for getting busted.

Encasing a pic in spoiler tags only hides it from your view, it doesn't prevent it from being loaded into your browser's cache.

It's a legitimate concern. Perhaps the suggestion DaFace came up with is possible, it looks like a good solution.

That being said, I agree with you. I don't want links. I don't click on links unless I'm absolutely certain I know where they're going. I'd much rather just see the pic.

[Fire Me Boy!]

Read it again.

ROFL

Somethin' just ain't clicking.

[htismaqe]

that's damn un-American :shrug:

I don't know. To each their own.

Personally, I'd rather have bare tits and pussies on my face than on my computer but that's just me.

[AustinChief]

I'm actually interested in this discussion as well. It's come up from time to time among the mods, but I'm not sure we've even come up with a firm rule about it.

My general feeling is that NSFW images should be linked only and that the spoiler tag isn't a sufficient method of masking it, but I'm open to thinking about it differently.

This is the rule... unless someone can come up with a compelling reason against it. It isn't really even about NSFW it's so we don't get blacklisted as a porn site. So, again, unless there are some convincing arguments to the contrary, this should remain the official rule. As for enforcement, I could care less on that... that's entirely a mod discussion thing as far as I'm concerned.

[Fish]

True enough. That said, a lot of IT departments will let bikini pics slide... throw in some full nudity and you've crossed a line.

What are you talking about? Very very very few IT departments give two shits about that kind of thing. We have much better things to worry about than wasting time and bandwidth to scan your computer cache for pictures. And you keep trying to differentiate between bikini and nude pics. But the system doesn't care. Unless you're running some kind of image scanning process on all cache images, the system doesn't differentiate between a bikini pic and a horserape pic. The resources required for that kind of thing wouldn't be wasted on determining whether Joe Businessman is looking at nudie pics linked from chiefsplanet. Like has been said, if your IT is watching you at anything close to that level, you're already fucked and chiefsplanet is the least of your worries.

You're making way to big of a deal about this...

[Mr. Laz]

ROFL

[Rasputin]

ROFL

Somethin' just ain't clicking.

I get it that you don't want it being loaded into your browser's cache. I get that.

However a thread like Boobs nothing but Boobs Or Would You threads or the Ass threads or the Red head threads. These threads are fun with the NSFW spoiler tags. That is the issue I have to take away. Ask the mods to rename the threads to NSFW then.

Can the mods rename the notorious riskey' threads to NSFW then that could solve some of the issue.

[Fire Me Boy!]

I get it that you don't want it being loaded into your browser's cache. I get that.

However a thread like Boobs nothing but Boobs Or Would You threads or the Ass threads or the Red head threads. These threads are fun with the NSFW spoiler tags. That is the issue I have to take away. Ask the mods to rename the threads to NSFW then.

Can the mods rename the notorious riskey' threads to NSFW then that could solve some of the issue.

How does that solve the problem when someone does it in what otherwise is a fairly innocuous thread?

[Mr. Laz]

I get it that you don't want it being loaded into your browser's cache. I get that.

However a thread like Boobs nothing but Boobs Or Would You threads or the Ass threads or the Red head threads. These threads are fun with the NSFW spoiler tags. That is the issue I have to take away. Ask the mods to rename the threads to NSFW then.

Can the mods rename the notorious riskey' threads to NSFW then that could solve some of the issue.
been there, tried that

He doesn't care that a thread is titled 'look at these BOOBS!!!!!'

This picture/spoiler thing as been bugging him for months


of course he could just stay out of the 'dirty' threads but that doesn't seem to be acceptable either.

Sheldon want those rules.

[Fire Me Boy!]

been there, tried that

He doesn't care that a thread is titled 'look at these BOOBS!!!!!'

This picture/spoiler thing as been bugging him for months


of course he could just stay out of the 'dirty' threads but that doesn't seem to be acceptable either.

Sheldon want those rules.

As has been mentioned, it's not a problem in the dirty threads. I don't even remark on it in the dirty threads anymore. But what about threads that aren't marked?

[CoMoChief]

Can we take a moment to seriously discuss posting NSFW and full nude images inside spoiler tags? I'm not talking about NSFW images in a thread clearly marked NSFW like the porn gif thread, but NSFW images popping up in threads like today's Tiffani Thiessen thread (just an example since it's fresh on my mind and is not marked NSFW).

Let's forget for a moment that posting pictures showing genitalia and nipples in general is against board policy and focus merely on the spoiler tags.

While the spoiler tags DO hide the image from view for someone walking by, they do nothing for someone whose IS folks at work peek behind the scenes. Spoiler tags only hide the image from view; the image still loads on the machine and its cache.

Am I the only person bothered by this? If I am, I'll shut up. But this is really becoming such a rampant practice, it makes me hesitant to peruse Chiefsplanet at work, even threads that should be safe to go in.

Join the 21st century and get a smart phone or tablet and get on CP then WHILE YOUR'E AT WORK....if you need CP that much.

JFC

[lewdog]

Over/Under .5


The number of Chiefs Planet posters who will lose sleep over this topic tonight?

[Dave Lane]

It's a lame argument because it still applies if I simply don't want trashy pictures on my home computer cache. The fact is it's against the terms of service, and it doesn't matter where I view the thread, it's still against the TOS.

God damn you are a little bitch.

[Dave Lane]

Can we have a Ban Fire Me Boy thread please?

[Fire Me Boy!]

Over/Under .5


The number of Chiefs Planet posters who will lose sleep over this topic tonight?

Under.

[Fire Me Boy!]

Can we have a Ban Fire Me Boy thread please?

So glad you're able to look at the number of other folks - respected members even - and decide I'm out of line for simply wanting us to go one way or the other... allow it or don't.

Start a thread. If after 48 hours more people want me gone than want me to stay, I'll take a 6-month hiatus from posting.

[-King-]

I have no problem with properly labeled threads, and even links that are labeled NSFW. That gives me a choice to see them. But when they show up in random threads, there's where I find a problem...

:shrug:

Cmon man. It's not really a random thread. It's not like someone posted it in the Geno Smith thread or anything. It was in the pictures forum in a thread about her. How many threads are there in the picture forums specifically made about a certain girl that don't contain at least one or two slightly NSFW, or totally NSFW pics?

Just don't go into the picture forum when you're at work.

[Fire Me Boy!]

Cmon man. It's not really a random thread. It's not like someone posted it in the Geno Smith thread or anything. It was in the pictures forum in a thread about her. How many threads are there in the picture forums specifically made about a certain girl that don't contain at least one or two slightly NSFW, or totally NSFW pics?

Just don't go into the picture forum when you're at work.

I don't. And it has been a problem in random threads before, I just used the Thiessen thread as an example.

[unlurking]

So glad you're able to look at the number of other folks - respected members even - and decide I'm out of line for simply wanting us to go one way or the other... allow it or don't.

Start a thread. If after 48 hours more people want me gone than want me to stay, I'll take a 6-month hiatus from posting.
And if you win the poll, whoever requested must leave. Sounds fair to me.

[Dave Lane]

Here's a thought, with the caveat that I DON'T KNOW IF WE CAN MAKE THIS WORK.

I found another site out there in the world (http://www.freeratio.org/faq.php?faq=common_rayj2010_bbcodes) that has a NSFW tag. According to the description, it doesn't load the image until after the person clicks the link. This would also make sure that it's clear that this isn't a spoiler and is truly a way of masking the image.

Is that something that those against the spoiler route would be OK with?

(Other mods feel free to chime in on this as well, either publicly or privately.)

I think its fine the way it is but if this gets Fuck Me Bitches panties unbunched its fine by me.

[Just Passin' By]

Here's a thought, with the caveat that I DON'T KNOW IF WE CAN MAKE THIS WORK.

I found another site out there in the world (http://www.freeratio.org/faq.php?faq=common_rayj2010_bbcodes) that has a NSFW tag. According to the description, it doesn't load the image until after the person clicks the link. This would also make sure that it's clear that this isn't a spoiler and is truly a way of masking the image.

Is that something that those against the spoiler route would be OK with?

(Other mods feel free to chime in on this as well, either publicly or privately.)

Seems like a good idea even for things that might not be considered too revealing, but could still cause workplace troubles.

[Phobia]

the filter evasion thing is one of the biggest sham's of all time on this site.

it only gets moderated 10% of the time and in order for it to get moderated it has to be someone that isn't very well "liked", for lack of a better word

but as a person who doesn't filter evade, I don't give a flying ****!

That's not even remotely true. I've cracked the whip on two guys who have been here since Aug 2000 and are well-liked in the past couple weeks for getting loose with filter evasion. I fix every one I notice whether inner-circle or not. The irony is that I don't even care. While I'd rather not hang out frequently with a potty-mouth, profanity dosn't bother me. But it does bother some people and we have systems in place to keep this place mostly profanity-free.

[AustinChief]

Not to be a dick about this... but it seems my post was ignored... there is a rule in place and unless someone convinces me otherwise... that's the rule. This really isn't something up for public debate on what people like or don't. It's a practical matter on what internet filters look at. Sorry, but I have to be pragmatic on this one. So FMB is right, actually he is being far too loose on the issue. If you want to post a pic that isn't "completely work safe" then it needs to be a link. Period. Otherwise we, as a website, risk being categorized in a way that I don't think is accurate.

[Rausch]

That's not even remotely true. I've cracked the whip on two guys who have been here since Aug 2000 and are well-liked in the past couple weeks for getting loose with filter evasion. I fix every one I notice whether inner-circle or not. The irony is that I don't even care. While I'd rather not hang out frequently with a potty-mouth, profanity dosn't bother me. But it does bother some people and we have systems in place to keep this place mostly profanity-free.

Wink wink, nudge nudge.

See you in 9 weeks...

http://www.lovethetruth.com/jis_images/cremation_of_care.jpg

[wazu]

Even without nudity, or even with filters on, I consider Chiefsplanet unviewable at work and removed it from the list years ago based purely on the sexually explicit discussion and racism. Threads about ass licking, or whatever Florida based story of the day is going on, or praising chocolate penis...I really don't feel like ever having to explain to my boss that its just an innocent Chiefs fan site.

[BigRichard]

Well if you would just quit jacking off at work they probably wouldn't care as much.

[Rausch]

Threads about ass licking, or whatever Florida based story of the day is going on, or praising chocolate penis...I really don't feel like ever having to explain to my boss that its just an innocent Chiefs fan site.

Yeah, that'd be hard to explain for me as well...

[Fire Me Boy!]

Not to be a dick about this... but it seems my post was ignored... there is a rule in place and unless someone convinces me otherwise... that's the rule. This really isn't something up for public debate on what people like or don't. It's a practical matter on what internet filters look at. Sorry, but I have to be pragmatic on this one. So FMB is right, actually he is being far too loose on the issue. If you want to post a pic that isn't "completely work safe" then it needs to be a link. Period. Otherwise we, as a website, risk being categorized in a way that I don't think is accurate.

Thanks. It sounds like this rule needs to be reiterated (maybe with a sticky explainer) and enforced then.

[Fire Me Boy!]

I think its fine the way it is but if this gets Fuck Me Bitches panties unbunched its fine by me.

I see you feel so strongly that I bring nothing to this community that you still haven't made that thread calling for my head...

[Chief Roundup]

Why have rules if they are not going to be enforced? Why have guidelines if they are not going to be used?
Come on everyone if you agree to the terms of service then you agree to the rules. If you don't like the rules tough shit. Use the site properly or don't use it at all. This telling someone else to not use use this site because you all want to break the rules or you don't want to be put out to click on a link is ridiculous.
We have some weak mods around here anymore.

[Mr. Laz]

Thanks. It sounds like this rule needs to be reiterated (maybe with a sticky explainer) and enforced then.
Vindication!!!!!!!!!



now maybe your tattletale OCD ass can shut the fuck up about it

[htismaqe]

Why have rules if they are not going to be enforced? Why have guidelines if they are not going to be used?
Come on everyone if you agree to the terms of service then you agree to the rules. If you don't like the rules tough shit. Use the site properly or don't use it at all. This telling someone else to not use use this site because you all want to break the rules or you don't want to be put out to click on a link is ridiculous.
We have some weak mods around here anymore.

Put out?

Hyperlinks are the #1 security threat to a home PC.

This isn't about laziness, numbskull.

[htismaqe]

Not to be a dick about this... but it seems my post was ignored... there is a rule in place and unless someone convinces me otherwise... that's the rule. This really isn't something up for public debate on what people like or don't. It's a practical matter on what internet filters look at. Sorry, but I have to be pragmatic on this one. So FMB is right, actually he is being far too loose on the issue. If you want to post a pic that isn't "completely work safe" then it needs to be a link. Period. Otherwise we, as a website, risk being categorized in a way that I don't think is accurate.

Linking to pornography or similar content will result in the same type of blacklisting, just FYI.

[Fire Me Boy!]

Vindication!!!!!!!!!



now maybe your tattletale OCD ass can shut the fuck up about it

Panties still in a bunch since I reported you one time? I think it's about time you got over that (especialliy since I've apologized twice). That also is the only time I've reported this issue.

[Chief Roundup]

Put out?

Hyperlinks are the #1 security threat to a home PC.

This isn't about laziness, numbskull.

Dude that is not what the problem is, or what this thread was about. It is about the NSFW stuff being posted directly and that is not suppose to be happening. This isn't about your computer, numbskull.

[htismaqe]

Dude that is not what the problem is, or what this thread was about. It is about the NSFW stuff being posted directly and that is not suppose to be happening. This isn't about your computer, numbskull.

Someone didn't read the OP.

[tecumseh]

So sad. Can't trust CP at work. Let's get together and tighten up this site! Who's with me...uh wait, boss just walked in.

[Chief Roundup]

Someone didn't read the OP.

Someone has been posting pictures direct but hiding them under the spoiler tags but IT people can still see those picks which can get people in trouble at work. Not about your computer but about keeping people from getting in trouble from the companies they work for.
Not Safe For WORK

[htismaqe]

Someone has been posting pictures direct but hiding them under the spoiler tags but IT people can still see those picks which can get people in trouble at work. Not about your computer but about keeping people from getting in trouble from the companies they work for.
Not Safe For WORK

I RAISED THAT VERY POINT.

And FMB came back with "I don't want that stuff on my computer at home, either."

Furthermore, clicking on link isn't any less advisable for you work computer than it is for your home computer.

[Chief Roundup]

I RAISED THAT VERY POINT.

And FMB came back with "I don't want that stuff on my computer at home, either."

Furthermore, clicking on link isn't any less advisable for you work computer than it is for your home computer.

I understand and agree that the hyperlink stuff is very dangerous.
Well he can deal with his personal home computer in his own manner. That is not what this rule is about or for.

[Fire Me Boy!]

I RAISED THAT VERY POINT.

And FMB came back with "I don't want that stuff on my computer at home, either."

Furthermore, clicking on link isn't any less advisable for you work computer than it is for your home computer.

Don't put words in my mouth, especially in quotes. I said no such thing. I said the argument about cache would be the same for work and home. I even specifically said in this thread I don't care about it being on my home computer.

[htismaqe]

I understand and agree that the hyperlink stuff is very dangerous.
Well he can deal with his personal home computer in his own manner. That is not what this rule is about or for.

The rule, according to AustinChief, is to prevent us from being blacklisted as a porn provider.

Linking to questionable material can result in that just as easily as allowing it to be hosted here.

[htismaqe]

Don't put words in my mouth, especially in quotes. I said no such thing. I said the argument about cache would be the same for work and home. I even specifically said in this thread I don't care about it being on my home computer.

Dude, stop being so uptight.

I paraphrased you. I never said I was quoting you verbatim, otherwise I would have used quote tags.

[Chief Roundup]

The rule, according to AustinChief, is to prevent us from being blacklisted as a porn provider.

Linking to questionable material can result in that just as easily as allowing it to be hosted here.

Ok. Either way it should be stopped.

[Fire Me Boy!]

Dude, stop being so uptight.

I paraphrased you. I never said I was quoting you verbatim, otherwise I would have used quote tags.

You put the words in quotation marks... that's by very definition quoting me. If you paraphrase, you don't use quote marks. That's basic writing.

[Bowser]

This reminds me of a conversation I overheard between supervisors at work once -

Manager - "We really need to watch our language around here. Lately, I've noticed a LOT of swearing and curse words. We have ladies walking around, and that kind of language is not appropriate in their company."

Supervisor - "We always try to be polite when they're around. I hold the doors open for those broads all the time." (the statement either goes over the manager's head, or he completely ignores it)

[Fire Me Boy!]

This reminds me of a conversation I overheard between supervisors at work once -

Manager - "We really need to watch our language around here. Lately, I've noticed a LOT of swearing and curse words. We have ladies walking around, and that kind of language is not appropriate in their company."

Supervisor - "We always try to be polite when they're around. I hold the doors open for those broads all the time." (the statement either goes over the manager's head, or he completely ignores it)

ROFL

[htismaqe]

You put the words in quotation marks... that's by very definition quoting me. If you paraphrase, you don't use quote marks. That's basic writing.

OMFG

I AM SO SORRY FOR OFFENDING YOU.

Take some fucking Midol or something.

[frankotank]

What's wrong with links to the NSFW material? That's what we did before spoiler tags...

I KNEW as soon as I saw the title of this thread that it would be MY post that instigated it.
although many many others do the exact same thing, this is at least the second time you've used MY posts when bringing this subject up yet again.
is this coincidence, or is it a conspiracy against the tank?

FYI - I don't disagree with you. it's as simple as seeing the same thing done in many many threads by many many users. yet here we are again....hey everybody! look at what frank did! :LOL:
those are nice tittas.....

[htismaqe]

This reminds me of a conversation I overheard between supervisors at work once -

Manager - "We really need to watch our language around here. Lately, I've noticed a LOT of swearing and curse words. We have ladies walking around, and that kind of language is not appropriate in their company."

Supervisor - "We always try to be polite when they're around. I hold the doors open for those broads all the time." (the statement either goes over the manager's head, or he completely ignores it)

LOL

I remember once we had to all huddle in an auditorium to attend Workplace Sensitivity Training.

On our way back, we passed by the boss' office and he said "hey guys, how was sensitivity training?"

All 3 of us simultaneously said "fuck you".

[Lumpy]

:popcorn:

[frankotank]

Those pictures have no place on this board outside the nudie thread in the pictures forum and even that says no nipples or clits.

hahahaha!
a nudie thread with no nipples.
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHA! that's AWESOME! :LOL:

[Fire Me Boy!]

I KNEW as soon as I saw the title of this thread that it would be MY post that instigated it.
although many many others do the exact same thing, this is at least the second time you've used MY posts when bringing this subject up yet again.
is this coincidence, or is it a conspiracy against the tank?

FYI - I don't disagree with you. it's as simple as seeing the same thing done in many many threads by many many users. yet here we are again....hey everybody! look at what frank did! :LOL:
those are nice tittas.....

Hand to god, I didn't even look at who posted it. Wouldnt have known if you hadn't mentioned it.

You're right, though. Lots of people do it all over the Planet.

[Bowser]

This is silly.

If there was an integrity issue imminent with ChiefsPlanet, I'm going to go ahead and assume that AustinChief or DaFace or one of the others would have addressed it sternly, and made the penalty for such links pretty harsh.

If this is about risking people's ability to surf CP at work, well, don't surf CP at work if you think there may be a chance your overzealous IT overlords may come down hard on you.

If this is about FMB's out of control OCD (it says THIS, why don't people do THAT), well, seek counseling and/or medication, you megalomaniacal control freak.

[Sorter]

This is silly.

If there was an integrity issue imminent with ChiefsPlanet, I'm going to go ahead and assume that AustinChief or DaFace or one of the others would have addressed it sternly, and made the penalty for such links pretty harsh.

If this is about risking people's ability to surf CP at work, well, don't surf CP at work if you think there may be a chance your overzealous IT overlords may come down hard on you.

If this is about FMB's out of control OCD (it says THIS, why don't people do THAT), well, seek counseling and/or medication, you megalomaniacal control freak.

Surfing child porn at work is not something I'd recommend. ROFL

[Fire Me Boy!]

This is silly.

If there was an integrity issue imminent with ChiefsPlanet, I'm going to go ahead and assume that AustinChief or DaFace or one of the others would have addressed it sternly, and made the penalty for such links pretty harsh.

If this is about risking people's ability to surf CP at work, well, don't surf CP at work if you think there may be a chance your overzealous IT overlords may come down hard on you.

If this is about FMB's out of control OCD (it says THIS, why don't people do THAT), well, seek counseling and/or medication, you megalomaniacal control freak.

Why do people say I'm asking others do something out of the ordinary or that I'm trying to be a control freak? I'm asking people do it the way it's supposed to be done, no more or less.

And FTR, I've said if the board says it's OK, that's fine with me, too.

[Bowser]

Surfing child porn at work is not something I'd recommend. ROFL

I'm not judging you at all that Child Porn is the first thing you thought of when you saw "CP". Nope, not one bit.:bolt:

[Bowser]

Why do people say I'm asking others do something out of the ordinary or that I'm trying to be a control freak? I'm asking people do it the way it's supposed to be done, no more or less.

And FTR, I've said if the board says it's OK, that's fine with me, too.

Eh, that's kind of the OCD reference, but it was mostly in jest.

Mostly, you freak.

[frankotank]

Hand to god, I didn't even look at who posted it. Wouldnt have known if you hadn't mentioned it.

You're right, though. Lots of people do it all over the Planet.

before this tread I'd have simply responded by posting my favorite pic.
but NOW....by the letter of the law....if I actually post this pic which contains the B word....it's technically filter evasion....yes?

I love this pic! just creepily awesome....

http://img844.imageshack.us/img844/3703/midgetclownsonofab.jpg

[Lumpy]

I KNEW as soon as I saw the title of this thread that it would be MY post that instigated it.
although many many others do the exact same thing, this is at least the second time you've used MY posts when bringing this subject up yet again.
is this coincidence, or is it a conspiracy against the tank?

FYI - I don't disagree with you. it's as simple as seeing the same thing done in many many threads by many many users. yet here we are again....hey everybody! look at what frank did! :LOL:
those are nice tittas.....

Fwiw, I clicked on your spoiler, (at work nonetheless), and I personally don't have a problem with how you posted it. You marked it NSFW and it was hidden from view. Now, had I clicked on the thread and BAM boobies, that would have been a different story. I don't like surprises. :)

I do agree though that posting a link is the wiser choice. Plus, if it is a CP rule, then it should be followed.

That reminds me, (perhaps DaFace or AC could answer this)... with the picture subforum being hidden to everyone except members, is there a trace of the activity on search engines?

[Fire Me Boy!]

before this tread I'd have simply responded by posting my favorite pic.
but NOW....by the letter of the law....if I actually post this pic which contains the B word....it's technically filter evasion....yes?

I love this pic! just creepily awesome....

http://img844.imageshack.us/img844/3703/midgetclownsonofab.jpg

I don't think the b word is filtered... if it's not filtered, it's not filter evasion.

[Rasputin]

before this tread I'd have simply responded by posting my favorite pic.
but NOW....by the letter of the law....if I actually post this pic which contains the B word....it's technically filter evasion....yes?

I love this pic! just creepily awesome....

http://img844.imageshack.us/img844/3703/midgetclownsonofab.jpg

Actually bitch as in yousonofabitch is not a word filter violation. You can post that pick & not get in trouble.

[Chief Roundup]

Give an inch people take a mile. It isn't enough to have a thread that states it has to be PG or it shouldn't be posted or that they should be posted via link.
JMO but people should abide by the rules or all nudie, girlie pics should be removed and not allowed at all.
Pick your poison.

[frankotank]

I don't like surprises. :)


aww....how disappointing.

Lumpy, DO NOT LOOK!

NSFL (not safe for Lumpy)

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-VevoAmpVA64/UG3_rYSprCI/AAAAAAAAAoc/dN2pUOga1Rk/s1600/surprise-jpg-w300h104.jpeg

[htismaqe]

Surfing child porn at work is not something I'd recommend. ROFL

What's wrong with Lazytown?

Warning - SFABBB

http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/_/48801547/LazyTown+stephanieposter2468568.jpg

EDIT: Sorry, forget to tag it SFABBB!

[Lumpy]

aww....how disappointing.

Lumpy, DO NOT LOOK!

NSFL (not safe for Lumpy)

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-VevoAmpVA64/UG3_rYSprCI/AAAAAAAAAoc/dN2pUOga1Rk/s1600/surprise-jpg-w300h104.jpeg

GAH! I looked. I couldn't help it.

[Sorter]

What's wrong with Lazytown?

Warning - SFABBB

http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/_/48801547/LazyTown+stephanieposter2468568.jpg

EDIT: Sorry, forget to tag it SFABBB!

Bwahahaha

[Lumpy]

What's wrong with Lazytown?

Warning - SFABBB

http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/_/48801547/LazyTown+stephanieposter2468568.jpg

EDIT: Sorry, forget to tag it SFABBB!

I was really disappointed that it wasn't a pic of Sportacus. :(

[ct]

I just set it to not show any images while at work so none of that crap preloads

this.

[dtebbe]

Working for the man must suck.