PDA

View Full Version : Chiefs Niners not likely to tag Goldson

Titty Meat
02-26-2013, 02:47 PM
http://49ersnews.com/2013/02/49ers-not-likely-to-tag-dashon-goldson/?fb_source=pubv1

Matt Maiocco of CSNBayArea.com is reporting that the 49ers are leaning in the favor of not using the tag on safety Dashon Goldson.

“Whether we use the tag or not, I really don’t know at this point. I think I do know, but I’m not willing to share it at this time,” Baalke said.
It is also rumored that both sides are far apart on a long term deal and that Dashon Goldson will most likely hit the free agent market.


Collect two hundid and sign him Dorsey!
The Franchise
02-26-2013, 02:48 PM
Come on downnnnnnnnnnn......
Pasta Little Brioni
02-26-2013, 02:49 PM
He can drop the rope on Lewis
Shox
02-26-2013, 02:51 PM
I can't believe the 49ers will let him get away.

He would look great in a Chief uniform.
Mr. Flopnuts
02-26-2013, 02:58 PM
Bo, you could've done so much better. Let's pick up Park Place to go with our Boardwalk and start building on it baby!
BlackHelicopters
02-26-2013, 03:02 PM
Would look mighty fine at Arrowhead on Sundays.
Cephalic Trauma
02-26-2013, 03:26 PM
That monopoly bet had potential.

However, after seeing a few posts from Bo's pellini, I can't help but wish someone more creative was on the losing end.
CaliforniaChief
02-26-2013, 03:28 PM
We should definitely take a chance on him.
lcarus
02-26-2013, 03:36 PM
We gotta strike while the iron is hot. Before the iron is gone.
58-4ever
02-26-2013, 04:16 PM
We should definitely take a chance on him.

A chance? The guy is a force. You take a chance on someone like Ed Reed who is in the twilight of his career. You invest in a guy like this that is in his prime.
Hootie
02-26-2013, 04:18 PM
so we can't spend $20M a year on CB's but we can spend $20M a year on safeties

yeah I don't see this being realistic when we have a top 5 paid safety (if not highest paid) already
Al Bundy
02-26-2013, 04:18 PM
He'll look great in a Tampa Bay uniform.
Hootie
02-26-2013, 04:19 PM
I will say I'm not against bringing in a veteran like this from a WINNING and TOUGH defense...

but I don't think it's realistic when we have a $60M safety already
Strongside
02-26-2013, 04:23 PM
Berry and Goldson would be DIIIIRRRRRTTTTTYYYYYYYYYY!!!
Brooklyn
02-26-2013, 04:37 PM
I will say I'm not against bringing in a veteran like this from a WINNING and TOUGH defense...

but I don't think it's realistic when we have a $60M safety already

Berry can be asked to restructure his deal, no? Frankly, none of the recent rookies should be making these insane contracts, and most of them should be asked to restructure to what's more inline with the current crop of kids.

so we can't spend $20M a year on CB's but we can spend $20M a year on safeties

yeah I don't see this being realistic when we have a top 5 paid safety (if not highest paid) already

define "we" though. The front office that wouldn't tie up that sorta cash in the secondary is gone. Maybe Dorsey has a different outlook that Pioli, and hopefully so!
CaliforniaChief
02-26-2013, 04:48 PM
A chance? The guy is a force. You take a chance on someone like Ed Reed who is in the twilight of his career. You invest in a guy like this that is in his prime.

Trying to keep the Monopoly thing going....
Sorter
02-26-2013, 04:52 PM
He'll look great in a Tampa Bay uniform.

Argh
DonTellMeShowMe
02-26-2013, 04:53 PM
Berry and Goldson would be DIIIIRRRRRTTTTTYYYYYYYYYY!!!

Wow even as a 49ers fan I think that would absolutely be sick
CaliforniaChief
02-26-2013, 04:56 PM
You know it is a passing league...so investing in the secondary makes a lot of sense...unless you're an overrated douche who is willing to let a very good CB walk for no good reason.

I have no problem giving Goldson Weddle-like money and put him next to Berry, with Lewis and Abdullah for depth.
Sorter
02-26-2013, 04:57 PM
Berry + Goldson + Rambo.


Nom. Nom. Nom.
ShowtimeSBMVP
03-11-2015, 05:59 PM
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Report: Buccaneers ready to part ways with Dashon Goldson if they can reach a deal with Chris Conte <a href="http://t.co/7pYRrXezK5">http://t.co/7pYRrXezK5</a></p>&mdash; ProFootballTalk (@ProFootballTalk) <a href="https://twitter.com/ProFootballTalk/status/575807506674413568">March 11, 2015</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Bootlegged
03-11-2015, 06:18 PM
Oh yeah. Do it. Do it. Do it.
brucey_72
03-11-2015, 06:38 PM
He would be a great addition to your team, he shouldn't be to expensive
O.city
03-11-2015, 06:38 PM
Save for the fact that he sucks
In58men
03-11-2015, 06:39 PM
Save for the fact that he sucks

He'll be cheap. Low risk high reward. Good depth.
O.city
03-11-2015, 06:42 PM
They just signed branch, who if can stay healthy, actually is a good player.

This dude is done
Rudy tossed tigger's salad
03-11-2015, 06:50 PM
Berry + Goldson + Rambo.


Nom. Nom. Nom.

Yikes. This didn't turn out well.
Iconic
03-11-2015, 07:03 PM
Goldson is a fucking beast for me in Madden. Sign him ASAP Dorsey!
mcaj22
03-11-2015, 07:07 PM
Just because the guy struggled in the outdated crappy tampa 2 defense doesn't mean he's done.

Could be good in our 3-4. Was great in the Niners 3-4. Could get him cheap.

Goldson-Abdullah-Branch is a great trio to go into the season with.
Iconic
03-11-2015, 07:11 PM
Goldson-Abdullah-Branch

#1 run D
O.city
03-11-2015, 07:19 PM
What does a 34 have to do with a safety?
jspchief
03-11-2015, 07:23 PM
Just because the guy struggled in the outdated crappy tampa 2 defense doesn't mean he's done.

Could be good in our 3-4. Was great in the Niners 3-4. Could get him cheap.

Goldson-Abdullah-Branch is a great trio to go into the season with.
You could also argue that he only excelled in SF because of their front seven.

I'm not against signing him, but it better be cheaper than the tier 1 safeties that KC passed on last year.
DenverChief
03-11-2015, 07:23 PM
What does a 34 have to do with a safety?

Less run responsibility? :shrug:
Mav
03-11-2015, 07:25 PM
Less run responsibility? :shrug:
He played well in sf because he had whitner to let him roam. He's a bad coverage safety. He likes to look for the big hit, always takes too many penalties.
mcaj22
03-11-2015, 07:51 PM
You could also argue that he only excelled in SF because of their front seven.

I'm not against signing him, but it better be cheaper than the tier 1 safeties that KC passed on last year.

that's why bad safeties can excel in KC (Ron Parker, Abdullah, Kurt Coleman, etc) those guys aren't actually GOOD NFL safeties, it's basically fools gold, because of our front seven

that was my argument, a good front seven lets safeties like Goldson play well above their means
Pasta Little Brioni
03-12-2015, 07:29 AM
You could also argue that he only excelled in SF because of their front seven.

I'm not against signing him, but it better be cheaper than the tier 1 safeties that KC passed on last year.

Good thing KC has a dynamic pass rush. Bring him in then.
Eleazar
03-12-2015, 08:00 AM
For a moment I thought this thread was about ChiefsPlanet Brain Trust Draft Hero Emeritus Vernon Gholston