PDA

View Full Version : Chiefs Not yet late night bullshit: Speed kills.


Direckshun
03-25-2013, 08:51 PM
I've been scouring the scouting reports, YouTube vids, all that good stuff this scouting season. And I've discovered something about myself: I've started evolving away from the bigger, bruising RBs and the tougher possession WRs, and started favoring more athletic, nimble skill position players.

I don't think I was always this way. Back when this team had Larry Johnson bruising people inside, a punishing offensive line, and two of the better punishing possession receivers in Gonzalez and then Bowe, I was all about the three-yards-and-a-cloud-of-dust philosophy.

But Jamaal Charles' gamebreaking ability, along with some of his peers like Chris Johnson, Mike Wallace, and Torrey Smith, has started changing my mind.

Keep in mind, I've always thought speed was incredibly important, but now I'm thinking it's speed that truly breaks the back of defenses, not simply out-muscling the other team.

Jamaal Charles is the perfect example of this. Compared to Larry Johnson, Thomas Jones, or Peyton Hillis, his incredible speed (a.) doesn't require the OL to open massive holes for him to make noise, and (b.) it puts tremendous pressure on defenses to make sure they are playing every gap perfectly.

That's why I really do wonder why this team doesn't just draft somebody like Gillislee or Ellington and just go pure speed in the backfield. Charles, Gray, Gillislee with McCluster options.

And I think the team should seriously make an aggressive move and draft Marquise Goodwin, the track star receiver out of Texas.

Most of us on this board have played sports, I played basketball and, more comparably to the receiver/cornerback battles, I played a lot of soccer. And there is nothing more miserable than having to guard somebody who is genuinely much, much faster than you. Playing somebody stronger than you sucks as well, but you can compensate for a lot of that with strategy and technique.

But speed guys? They don't even have to be talented. Remember Jacoby Forb de-pantsing Brandon Flowers a couple years ago? Flowers is by far the superior player, but all those ballskills and that coverage ability doesn't mean shit if they can't ****ing catch you. Now you have to dedicate two players to guarding this guy, simply because he's ****ing fast. And I think that's exactly what Goodwin projects to be.

Makes me wonder why teams don't do that more often. Just go with pure speed packages, like a less braindead version of what the Raiders did in the 90s and early 00s. Pack as much speed on the field as possible, and give your offense the two best tackles you can find to protect your QB, and do more than just take the top off the D, eliminate the top altogether.

What exactly do you lose with going pure speed? You might have trouble pounding the ball in on the 1, but if you have effective receivers on the outside, you don't have to go into your traditional goal line offense, ever. You might have trouble tossing jump balls in the endzone, so just run creative hot routes that allow for smart, quick slants rather than those grotesque corner lobs our QBs have been flailing with for ages.

Just some thoughts on speed, more than anything. I think giving this offense more deep threats (rather than just Avery) and our rungame more homerun hitters can open up opposing defenses.

Demonpenz
03-25-2013, 08:53 PM
Larry Johnson was plenty fast.

B14ckmon
03-25-2013, 08:54 PM
http://i.imgur.com/MwBEnUp.jpg

Direckshun
03-25-2013, 08:55 PM
Larry Johnson was plenty fast.

He was Usain Bolt-type runner, in that his top speed was great, but he doesn't just start off at that speed like a lot of the burners I mentioned in the OP.

tk13
03-25-2013, 08:58 PM
Larry Johnson had great speed. Even when he was a rookie people used to act like he was slow because of the way he ran... but just watch him return kicks. His burst once he hit the hole was fantastic. That's what made him so tough. He was the opposite of Priest. Priest didn't have the top end-speed but his burst from yards 1-10 he was unparalleled.

Buehler445
03-25-2013, 09:07 PM
I've always loved speed. But it has to be a balance. If a CB can knock the WR off his route easily, it is pretty tough to get him the ball anywhere near where he is supposed to be. And if a RB is easy to bring down, it's ballgame whenever they get a mitt on him.

The thing about Charles is he is a football player with track speed. Not a track guy in pads. If you can get a gamer with speed, you do that everyday of the week.

You could take some shots on WR with elite speed and put him opposite Bowe, that would be super sick.

Demonpenz
03-25-2013, 09:11 PM
Sammie Parker was fast, but sucked.

crispystl
03-25-2013, 09:12 PM
I think it's part of the evolution of the game thanks to Rodger. Speed is exponentially more lethal than it used to be and power is worthless because.. hey it's a pussy league now.. and now running backs can't lead with the helmet?? Give me a fucking break!

Deberg_1990
03-25-2013, 09:14 PM
Ethan Horton and Paul Palmer were plenty fast

BossChief
03-25-2013, 09:24 PM
Just think if Larry Johnson had been the feature back the whole year in the season he had 1750 yards. He could have easily passed 2105.

The guy had sick talent but a ten cent brain.

Guy might have been a HOFer if he had his head on straight.

Simply Red
03-25-2013, 09:25 PM
http://i.imgur.com/sO8Xhnw.png

Dante84
03-25-2013, 09:26 PM
This is why Oregon was so fun to watch in college. They recruited speed.

Speed kills.

mcaj22
03-25-2013, 09:29 PM
there is plenty of things you lose with pure speed players

one is size, two is durability. usually fast players are very light and break easily

see: Johnny Knox, any Raiders player.

all you have to do is press any speed WR and they are jammed off their routes. Which makes a guy like Calvin Johnson that rare of a player, a guy that fast with that size, is very, very rare.


Mike Wallace cant beat the press, Torrey Smith cant beat the press, and they are currently the two best speed WRs in the NFL.

L.A. Chieffan
03-25-2013, 09:30 PM
Tavon Austin is indeed intriguing

Rain Man
03-25-2013, 09:49 PM
Dallas took this approach on defense back in the 90s. They had a very light defense, but very fast, and it worked.

I think the key, though, is presenting tough or confusing matchups. The players today are all great athletes, so I think the emphasis is on being leading edge in creating confusion or hesitation. I think a big part of the Chiefs' offensive success in the Vermeil era was all the shifts that confused defenses. I suspect the Cowboys' defense in the 90s was successful because teams weren't expecting to play a pure speed defense.

BossChief
03-25-2013, 09:54 PM
I actually used this strategy in the CP mock by drafting Tavon Austin for the Bills. Having him and Stevie Johnson would be tough for any team to match up with. Especially with Spiller out of the backfield. It was worth using a premium pick on a game changer.

Demonpenz
03-25-2013, 09:58 PM
Dallas took this approach on defense back in the 90s. They had a very light defense, but very fast, and it worked.

I think the key, though, is presenting tough or confusing matchups. The players today are all great athletes, so I think the emphasis is on being leading edge in creating confusion or hesitation. I think a big part of the Chiefs' offensive success in the Vermeil era was all the shifts that confused defenses. I suspect the Cowboys' defense in the 90s was successful because teams weren't expecting to play a pure speed defense.

The shifting never confused me..they would line up all funky but they never snapped the ball that way. TG would start at FB but then Trent would yell out something awesome like "MEGADEATH" and then everyone would go to their normal spots.

Demonpenz
03-25-2013, 09:59 PM
CJ SPILLER IS ONLY GOOD ON TURF

Simply Red
03-25-2013, 10:14 PM
Tavon Austin is indeed intriguing

L.A. Chieffan - is she saying 'bleachy?'

Hammock Parties
03-25-2013, 10:18 PM
McCluster options?

I thought this was a thread about speed.

L.A. Chieffan
03-25-2013, 10:28 PM
L.A. Chieffan - is she saying 'bleachy?'

One: You can't bleach a Cerruti. Out of the question. Two: I can only get these sheets in Santa Fe.

cdcox
03-25-2013, 10:53 PM
McCluster

LMAO

cdcox
03-25-2013, 11:02 PM
Derrick Johnson is faster than McCluster.

McCluster is closer to Moeaki speed than he is Jamaal Charles speed.

Think about these things.

cdcox
03-25-2013, 11:03 PM
If speed kills, McCluster might produce a paper cut once in a while.

Reaper16
03-25-2013, 11:05 PM
there is plenty of things you lose with pure speed players

one is size, two is durability. usually fast players are very light and break easily

see: Johnny Knox, any Raiders player.

all you have to do is press any speed WR and they are jammed off their routes. Which makes a guy like Calvin Johnson that rare of a player, a guy that fast with that size, is very, very rare.


Mike Wallace cant beat the press, Torrey Smith cant beat the press, and they are currently the two best speed WRs in the NFL.

That's not fair to Johnny Knox. He didn't break easy. He broke real, real hard.

Simply Red
03-25-2013, 11:06 PM
McCluster options?

I thought this was a thread about speed.

He gay.

Simply Red
03-25-2013, 11:07 PM
That's not fair to Johnny Knox. He didn't break easy. He broke real, real hard.

JDPrez isn't your weezie?

RunKC
03-25-2013, 11:08 PM
McCluster will be fine. Tape a cheetah to his back and he'll be good. LMAO

Simply Red
03-25-2013, 11:16 PM
What's funny about this - I've seen GoChiefs at the game screaming in 40mph winds and virtual sleet - as loud as he could, I might add, at McCluster's punt return vs SD.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Q0b-aS6KkdY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Hammock Parties
03-25-2013, 11:18 PM
Yeah well fuck me for being a fan once upon a time.

L.A. Chieffan
03-25-2013, 11:21 PM
Reid had a gigantic hard on for Dexter coming out, that's why Scott drafted him so early. Andy has big plans for him

Simply Red
03-25-2013, 11:22 PM
That was a badass cut though, I was a fan once also.

Maybe next year they fire Reid and hire Vermeil to groom the Carson Palmer to McCluster chemistry..

beer bacon
03-26-2013, 12:25 AM
Now I have the need for speed. It's very important, it's inherent, there is nothing I can do about it. So speed is a must.

Dante84
03-26-2013, 12:28 AM
D, where's the "all-speed" mock?

ThaVirus
03-26-2013, 12:33 AM
That was a badass cut though


Damn, it really was. Watching that vid, you'd think McCluster was pretty damn good.

I honestly can't remember the last time he impressed me with the ball in his hands. I think he had, like, a 60 yard reverse that got called back once upon a time. That's about it.

Direckshun
03-26-2013, 06:28 AM
D, where's the "all-speed" mock?

LMAO

It's been my mantra all offseason. Almost every receiver I've (mock) drafted has 4.4 speed or better.

The exceptions, that I can recall: Da'Rick Rogers, Terrance Williams, and Aaron Dobson.

All three of them exceptional talents, for what it's worth. But none of them are 4.4 burners. Rogers has great hands, Williams is an exceptional route runner, and Dobson is both.

Deberg_1990
03-26-2013, 06:35 AM
Damn, it really was. Watching that vid, you'd think McCluster was pretty damn good.

I honestly can't remember the last time he impressed me with the ball in his hands. I think he had, like, a 60 yard reverse that got called back once upon a time. That's about it.

he really wasnt that good last year, but i thought he was decent in 2011. He damn near won that Raider game at Arrowhead for us.....if our special teams and kicker didnt suck.

Demonpenz
03-26-2013, 07:00 AM
If you want something like this I would probably draft on two foot standing vertical. I put more into a persons vert than 40 time.