PDA

View Full Version : Football 2014 Pre-Training Camp Standings Predictions


pugsnotdrugs19
07-16-2014, 06:54 PM
This is just MINE.... chip in your own if you'd like. Note that it is pre-training camp. A lot will change through preseason.

AFC East
1. Patriots (12-4)
2. Jets (8-8)
3. Dolphins (7-9)
4. Bills (4-12)

AFC North
1. Ravens (10-6)
2. Bengals (8-8)
3. Steelers (8-8)
4. Browns (5-11)

AFC South
1. Colts (12-4)
2. Texans (6-10)
3. Titans (6-10)
4. Jaguars (3-13)

AFC West
1. Broncos (11-5)
2. Chiefs (9-7)*
3. Chargers (7-9)
4. Raiders (6-10)

NFC East
1. Eagles (10-6)
2. Giants (8-8)
3. Redskins (7-9)
4. Cowboys (6-10)

NFC North
1. Green Bay (10-6)
2. Detroit (9-7)
3. Chicago (9-7)
4. Minnesota (3-13)

NFC South
1. Saints (11-5)
2. Buccaneers (9-7)
3. Falcons (8-8)
4. Panthers (6-10)

NFC West
1. Seahawks (12-4)
2. 49ers (11-5)*
3. Rams (9-7)*
4. Cardinals (6-10)

Discuss Thrower
07-16-2014, 06:59 PM
Knock yourself out. (http://raylehnhoff.github.io/nflschedulepicker/)

RealSNR
07-16-2014, 07:26 PM
You basically predicted the exact same playoff field as last year except for two teams. Seven out of your eight division winners won their divisions last year.

You have no balls.

Discuss Thrower
07-16-2014, 07:29 PM
Cue Gadzooks in 4... 3... 2...

ThaVirus
07-16-2014, 07:53 PM
You basically predicted the exact same playoff field as last year except for two teams. Seven out of your eight division winners won their divisions last year.

You have no balls.

My thoughts as well.

Mr. Laz
07-16-2014, 08:04 PM
We have absolutely no idea what the Chiefs are going to be this year.

Too many question marks

If things work out then we could be really good. If a few areas don't work out and we could be complete shit.

Oline - revamped and it wasn't great last year
Wr - same group and it wasn't good enough last year
TE - Health?
RB - all good as long as they stay healthy
QB - solid if Smith stays healthy

Dline - looks to have a big upgrade in depth
LB - Solid, about the same if Houston doesn't hold out
Safety - Free safety still unknown
Cornerbacks - looks weaker than last year and they struggled last year

special teams - should be good
Offensive coaches - same, should be quality
Defensive coaches - same, disappointing last year

So is the upgrade at Dline depth enough to make everything all better?

Bufkin
07-16-2014, 08:09 PM
Knock yourself out
Thanks for this friend! I can't believe how long that took. Here's what I came up with.

New England:12-4*
Miami: 6-10
Buffalo: 5-11
NY Jets: 2-14

Cincinnati: 10-6*
Pittsburgh: 8-8
Baltimore: 7-9
Cleveland: 4-12

Indianapolis: 12-4*
Houston: 9-7
Tennessee: 7-9
Jacksonville: 3-13

Denver: 12-4*
Kansas City: 10-6*
San Diego: 9-7*
Oakland: 4-12

Washington: 8-8*
Philadelphia: 7-9
NY Giants: 5-11
Dallas: 4-12

Chicago: 11-5*
Green Bay: 10-6
Detroit: 8-8
Minnesota: 6-10

New Orleans: 12-4*
Atlanta: 10-6*
Carolina: 8-8
Tampa Bay: 7-9

Seattle: 12-4*
San Francisco: 11-5*
St. Louis: 10-6
Arizona: 7-9

RealSNR
07-16-2014, 08:12 PM
Am I the only one who thinks Cincinnati will suck shit? I just got a feeling.

They're the goddamn Bengals. They're one of the few teams who are bigger disappointments than the Chiefs.

Mav
07-16-2014, 08:15 PM
Am I the only one who thinks Cincinnati will suck shit? I just got a feeling.

They're the goddamn Bengals. They're one of the few teams who are bigger disappointments than the Chiefs.
Cleveland takes that division.

Rudy tossed tigger's salad
07-16-2014, 08:17 PM
The NFL is going to go 265-247? Not sure how that will work out.

ThaVirus
07-16-2014, 08:17 PM
Am I the only one who thinks Cincinnati will suck shit? I just got a feeling.

They're the goddamn Bengals. They're one of the few teams who are bigger disappointments than the Chiefs.

I'd guess Pittsburgh and Baltimore will make a bit of a resurgence but the Bengals are probably the most talented team in the league. Dalton is holding them back but he's in a contract year, I believe.

RealSNR
07-16-2014, 08:52 PM
I'd guess Pittsburgh and Baltimore will make a bit of a resurgence but the Bengals are probably the most talented team in the league. Dalton is holding them back but he's in a contract year, I believe.

I've said this dozens of times before.

Why the fuck does Marvin Lewis still have a job?

BigMeatballDave
07-16-2014, 08:56 PM
I've said this dozens of times before.

Why the fuck does Marvin Lewis still have a job?

Mike Brown

pugsnotdrugs19
07-16-2014, 09:12 PM
You basically predicted the exact same playoff field as last year except for two teams. Seven out of your eight division winners won their divisions last year.

You have no balls.

That's usually what happens when you have no actual play to base predictions off of, except last year...

Talk to me after preseason.

pugsnotdrugs19
07-16-2014, 09:15 PM
You basically predicted the exact same playoff field as last year except for two teams. Seven out of your eight division winners won their divisions last year.

You have no balls.

Also, I had two different division winners but that's whatever...

Chiefs Pantalones
07-16-2014, 09:19 PM
Serious question. How are we going 10-6? Someone help me see a positive light.

Mennonite
07-16-2014, 09:21 PM
I think the Colts will take a step back this year. Mathis' suspension will be a big blow to their D. They have a very good chance of going 0-2 to start the season. They have two division games after that. I think the Texans or Titans have a shot of overtaking them.

BullJunkandIron
07-16-2014, 09:22 PM
Serious question. How are we going 10-6? Someone help me see a positive light.

10 teams forfeit, duh. Pretty simple.

Buzz
07-16-2014, 09:23 PM
You have the Chiefs ahead of the Chargers? With all the turn over and Flowers going to a division rival, knowing the play book and players? That one concerns me.

pugsnotdrugs19
07-16-2014, 09:28 PM
You have the Chiefs ahead of the Chargers? With all the turn over and Flowers going to a division rival, knowing the play book and players? That one concerns me.

I get what you're saying but Flowers doesn't come off as the brightest fella.. certainly not as good as Reid. We also signed a SD defensive back a few weeks ago.

I loved Flowers, but people don't realize that he was good when we sucked.. but what we must replace from our playoff team last year, was not such a good cornerback...

Discuss Thrower
07-16-2014, 09:35 PM
Serious question. How are we going 10-6? Someone help me see a positive light.

Go 8-0 at home and win two of the following road games: Miami, Buffalo, Arizona or Pittsburgh

Buzz
07-16-2014, 09:51 PM
Gotta say, I'm soo glad training camp starts next week.

Gadzooks
07-16-2014, 10:07 PM
Cue Gadzooks in 4... 3... 2...

Sorry I'm late.

pugs on drugs, are you out of your ****ing mind?!?

Chargers 7-9?!? 3rd in the AFC West?!?

Your Mommy needs to drop you off at a postal station where you can get the care that you need. They'll be able to limit your internet access and provide you with the medication needed to prevent such asinine thoughts.

MMXcalibur
07-16-2014, 10:19 PM
I'm not going through all that jazz.
I'll just give you my playoff field:

AFC
1. Broncos
2. Colts
3. Patriots
4. Ravens
5. Chargers
6. Dolphins

NFC
1. Saints
2. Packers
3. 49ers
4. Giants
5. Seahawks
6. Cardinals

Super Bowl:
Packers over Broncos, 44-8

Chiefs Pantalones
07-16-2014, 10:32 PM
Go 8-0 at home and win two of the following road games: Miami, Buffalo, Arizona or Pittsburgh

I don't see us going undefeated at home.

Discuss Thrower
07-16-2014, 10:41 PM
I don't see us going undefeated at home.

2003, 1997 (OT), 1995 (3 OTs), 1971.

Those are the only seasons where KC stayed perfect at home.

Each time they were rewarded with a home playoff game and were 0-4 in those games.

RealSNR
07-16-2014, 10:46 PM
I have no fucking clue what's going to happen in the NFC North. Each team is expected to improve quite a bit. Going to be fun watching that battle play out.

More than likely the Lions will underwhelm greatly, and the Bears will somehow win the division even though they're largely inferior to the Packers.

MMXcalibur
07-16-2014, 10:55 PM
2003, 1997 (OT), 1995 (3 OTs), 1971.

Those are the only seasons where KC stayed perfect at home.

Each time they were rewarded with a home playoff game and were 0-4 in those games.

As far as I'm concerned, the season ends after 16 games whether we make these unsolveable "playoffs" or not.

Fool me once, shame on you.
Fool me 2985709857019 times, I'm just a fucking moron.

Discuss Thrower
07-16-2014, 11:04 PM
I have no fucking clue what's going to happen in the NFC North. Each team is expected to improve quite a bit. Going to be fun watching that battle play out.

More than likely the Lions will underwhelm greatly, and the Bears will somehow win the division even though they're largely inferior to the Packers.

I kind of wonder if this will be the season where every team is the closest to .500 but for maybe two or three exceptions...

Gadzooks
07-16-2014, 11:30 PM
I have no ****ing clue what's going to happen in the NFC North. Each team is expected to improve quite a bit. Going to be fun watching that battle play out.

More than likely the Lions will underwhelm greatly, and the Bears will somehow win the division even though they're largely inferior to the Packers.

NFC East is the hardest to predict for me. Not that it should matter.

ThaVirus
07-16-2014, 11:57 PM
I have no ****ing clue what's going to happen in the NFC North. Each team is expected to improve quite a bit. Going to be fun watching that battle play out.

More than likely the Lions will underwhelm greatly, and the Bears will somehow win the division even though they're largely inferior to the Packers.

I don't know.

They've got Forte, Marshall and Jeffery who are all better than their GB counterparts. The Pack scooped Julius Peppers from the Bears but they turned around and added Jared Allen and Lamarr Houston. The Pack lost Dietrich-Smith and Newhouse on the offensive line and never had much of a defense. Maybe Peppers and a healthy Matthews can change things but that defense bleeds points in the post season..

Of course, they're superior in the most important position on the field so the division is likely theirs to lose.

ThaVirus
07-16-2014, 11:58 PM
NFC East is the hardest to predict for me. Not that it should matter.

That one could be wild. I'd guess the worst team will go 6-10 and the best 10-6.

Should be a lot of competition in that division, as per usual. I'd expect another week 17 showdown for the division title.

Gadzooks
07-17-2014, 12:42 AM
That one could be wild. I'd guess the worst team will go 6-10 and the best 10-6.

Should be a lot of competition in that division, as per usual. I'd expect another week 17 showdown for the division title.

I was thinking the best team would go 6-10 and the worst team would go 6-10.

Coochie liquor
07-17-2014, 05:05 AM
Sorry I'm late.

pugs on drugs, are you out of your ****ing mind?!?

Chargers 7-9?!? 3rd in the AFC West?!?

Your Mommy needs to drop you off at a postal station where you can get the care that you need. They'll be able to limit your internet access and provide you with the medication needed to prevent such asinine thoughts.

I know you're a Chokers fan and all. So you being delusional is a guarantee. But yeah I'm sure replacing a good offensive mind like Wisenhut with an unproven Frank Reich is gonna change your offense. I'm looking forward to seeing how well McCoy can coach with no Manning, and now no Wisenhut. Let's face it, he got the job BECAUSE of having been OC to manning who was the real OC in Denver. Also you had a worse record than us last year, and both our opponents are much better this year. I think the Faiders challenge you for 3rd in the division this year!

Easy 6
07-17-2014, 05:17 AM
Coochie Liquor just pushed the kill switch.

Dave Lane
07-17-2014, 08:09 AM
You have the Chiefs ahead of the Chargers? With all the turn over and Flowers going to a division rival, knowing the play book and players? That one concerns me.

All the games should this is not a very good team.

duncan_idaho
07-17-2014, 08:32 AM
Just can't get the Chiefs past 7-9 when I do that all-league simulation.

Hopefully training camp changes that perception.

KC native
07-17-2014, 08:50 AM
Am I the only one who thinks Cincinnati will suck shit? I just got a feeling.

They're the goddamn Bengals. They're one of the few teams who are bigger disappointments than the Chiefs.

Andy Dalton, due to his TCU Rose Bowl winning heritage, will lead them to the promised land of a play off victory this year.

Hammock Parties
07-17-2014, 08:50 AM
Rocks fall. Everybody dies. I laugh.

KC native
07-17-2014, 08:52 AM
I'd guess Pittsburgh and Baltimore will make a bit of a resurgence but the Bengals are probably the most talented team in the league. Dalton is holding them back but he's in a contract year, I believe.

You shut your whore mouth about the Ginger Jesus (Andy Dalton).

Kansas City Kid
07-17-2014, 10:45 AM
AFC East
1. Patriots (12-4)
2. Dolphins (9-7)
3. Jets (8-8)
4. Bills (5-11)

AFC North
1. Steelers (10-6)
2. Browns (7-9)
3. Ravens (7-9)
4. Bengals (6-10)

AFC South
1. Colts (10-6)
2. Texans (8-8)
3. Titans (6-10)
4. Jaguars (1-15)

AFC West
1. Broncos (13-3)
2. Chargers (10-6)
3. Chiefs (7-9)
4. Raiders (3-13)

NFC East
1. Eagles (10-6)
2. Giants (9-7)
3. Cowboys (8-8)
4. Redskins (5-11)

NFC North
1. Chicago (11-5)
2. Green Bay (10-6)
3. Minnesota (7-9)
4. Detroit (4-12)

NFC South
1. Saints (12-4)
2. Buccaneers (9-7)
3. Falcons (6-10)
4. Panthers (4-12)

NFC West
1. 49ers (12-4)
2. Rams (10-6)
3. Cardinals (9-7)
4. Seahawks (8-8)


SUPER BOWL: SAINTS 33 PATRIOTS 23

Sweet Daddy Hate
07-17-2014, 12:31 PM
9-7 my happy ass.

srvy
07-17-2014, 12:39 PM
Commence belly laughs.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v322/srvy/srvy2014-2015NFLprediction.jpg

RealSNR
07-17-2014, 01:33 PM
Commence belly laughs.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v322/srvy/srvy2014-2015NFLprediction.jpg

You must think Brian Hoyer is a REALLY good QB

pugsnotdrugs19
07-17-2014, 01:46 PM
I'm sorry, I just really think a lot of Phyllis Rivers' resurgence was due to Whisenhunt's offense. 7-9 seems very likely. I see us anywhere from 7-9 to 9-7, 10-6. People assume because we lost players from last year who got paid a lot, that they were good... Flowers was bottom 5 corner in the NFL last year according to PFF. Albert was good. Schwartz was. DMC was good on ST's with DAVE TOUB... so was Demps. Lewis sucked, Jackson gave 0 pass rush. We aren't replacing much. It's year two for our guys now, and the only 'hole' I am concerned with is LT. One of the WR's I believe will step up in year 2.

Kansas City Kid
07-17-2014, 01:48 PM
It doesn't help thought that the Chiefs get the NFC WEST this year instead of the weak ass EAST like last year.

Gadzooks
07-17-2014, 04:38 PM
I know you're a Chokers fan and all. So you being delusional is a guarantee. But yeah I'm sure replacing a good offensive mind like Wisenhut with an unproven Frank Reich is gonna change your offense. I'm looking forward to seeing how well McCoy can coach with no Manning, and now no Wisenhut. Let's face it, he got the job BECAUSE of having been OC to manning who was the real OC in Denver. Also you had a worse record than us last year, and both our opponents are much better this year. I think the Faiders challenge you for 3rd in the division this year!

Who's "Wisenhut"? You seem to take as much care in your posting as you do in your football knowledge. Reich was has been an assistant in the NFL since 2008.

He was a QB coach in Indy, then moved to WR coach in Arizona under Whisenhunt.

Whisenhunt tried to take Reich with him to Tenn as the OC.

Reich's a big 'no huddle' guy and the Chargers used it quite a bit last year with success.

As for McCoy, it's safe to say that Tebow's success gave him more name recognition than Peyton did.

Where do you come up with your horseshit hallucinations?

New World Order
07-17-2014, 08:22 PM
Cleveland takes that division.



It's going to get ugly with Manziel and no Josh Gordon.

In fact, it's going to be meltdown city

New World Order
07-17-2014, 08:26 PM
Sorry I'm late.

pugs on drugs, are you out of your ****ing mind?!?

Chargers 7-9?!? 3rd in the AFC West?!?

Your Mommy needs to drop you off at a postal station where you can get the care that you need. They'll be able to limit your internet access and provide you with the medication needed to prevent such asinine thoughts.


Chargers almost lost to our backup scrubs.

In fact, your team was trailing 14-3 in our first meeting before Tamba and Houston got hurt.

Without those 2 wins you would have been 7-9.

CoMoChief
07-17-2014, 08:31 PM
We're going to sweep the NFCW again.

New World Order
07-17-2014, 08:33 PM
We're going to sweep the NFCW again.



Call me crazy but why should we fear the SF defense?

Bowman and possibly Aldon Smith will be out.

Gadzooks
07-17-2014, 08:56 PM
Chargers almost lost to our backup scrubs.

In fact, your team was trailing 14-3 in our first meeting before Tamba and Houston got hurt.

Without those 2 wins you would have been 7-9.

If ifs and buts were candies and nuts the Chiefs might win against a 1st string QB.:)

ThaVirus
07-17-2014, 09:03 PM
Call me crazy but why should we fear the SF defense?



Bowman and possibly Aldon Smith will be out.


Pat Willis is one of the best coverage LBs in the league. He'll be patrolling the middle of the field where Alex likes to do most of his work. Plus their pass rush is pretty good and they're stout against the run.. Could spell trouble with our patchwork offensive line.

Misplaced_Chiefs_Fan
07-17-2014, 09:03 PM
It doesn't help thought that the Chiefs get the NFC WEST this year instead of the weak ass EAST like last year.

And last year, everyone here swore we'd go 0-4 against the Mighty NFC East also. Seattle and SF are tough, but I'm not sold on Arizona and St. Louis at all. Pittsburgh is very beatable, as is Miami, Buffalo, and the Jets.

I don't think we're nearly as bad off as most people here.

Discuss Thrower
07-17-2014, 09:36 PM
And last year, everyone here swore we'd go 0-4 against the Mighty NFC East also. Seattle and SF are tough, but I'm not sold on Arizona and St. Louis at all. Pittsburgh is very beatable, as is Miami, Buffalo, and the Jets.

I don't think we're nearly as bad off as most people here.

STL is due for a win against KC.. And their defensive line is probably going to be evil fucking incarnate.

And MIA and BUF as teams aren't very good on paper.. But they are hosting both games and KC struggles to win in Florida and in upstate New York.

Chiefs Pantalones
07-17-2014, 10:24 PM
I'm praying we get a playoff win this year but I'm not holding my breath. I usually have a good feel how we're gonna fair before training camp starts (nothing based on facts just feeling lol), but this year is hard to get a read on. It's gonna be fun, though.

Hootie
07-17-2014, 10:53 PM
I have a hard time trying to figure out how the Chiefs are going to win 9 games this year when they play the NFC West (which could very well account for 4 losses right there)

If we win 8 games this year, I'll consider it a success and be a big Andy Reid fan.

Mav
07-17-2014, 11:23 PM
It's going to get ugly with Manziel and no Josh Gordon.

In fact, it's going to be meltdown city
Nah. Manziel won't play. This is hoyers world. Also that defense is nasty.

New World Order
07-18-2014, 02:52 AM
Nah. Manziel won't play. This is hoyers world. Also that defense is nasty.


What if Hoyer is a bad ass? What the hell are they going to do with Manziel?

New World Order
07-18-2014, 02:58 AM
If ifs and buts were candies and nuts the Chiefs might win against a 1st string QB.:)


Yes this is true.

Coochie liquor
07-18-2014, 04:14 AM
If ifs and buts were candies and nuts the Chiefs might win against a 1st string QB.:)

How many backup qbs did you play last year on your way to a worse reg season record than us? How many of the same crappy teams did you play that we did? Let the delusions of a Chokers fan continue. Now call us when you've won a Super Bowl! Phyllis takes a step back this year like he did before Wackenhut got there.

Mav
07-18-2014, 05:28 AM
What if Hoyer is a bad ass? What the hell are they going to do with Manziel?
Honestly, I couldn't care less what they do with him. I don't like him. Don't trust him, bleh.

Hog's Gone Fishin
07-18-2014, 06:14 AM
You basically predicted the exact same playoff field as last year except for two teams. Seven out of your eight division winners won their divisions last year.

You have no balls.

And he's got Cleveland at 5-11 ROFL

What a dumbass !

Halfcan
07-18-2014, 08:51 AM
This is just MINE.... chip in your own if you'd like. Note that it is pre-training camp. A lot will change through preseason.

AFC East
1. Patriots (12-4)
2. Jets (8-8)
3. Dolphins (7-9)
4. Bills (4-12)

AFC North
1. Ravens (10-6)
2. Bengals (8-8)
3. Steelers (8-8)
4. Browns (5-11)

AFC South
1. Colts (12-4)
2. Texans (6-10)
3. Titans (6-10)
4. Jaguars (3-13)

AFC West
1. Broncos (11-5)
2. Chiefs (9-7)*
3. Chargers (7-9)
4. Raiders (6-10)

NFC East
1. Eagles (10-6)
2. Giants (8-8)
3. Redskins (7-9)
4. Cowboys (6-10)

NFC North
1. Green Bay (10-6)
2. Detroit (9-7)
3. Chicago (9-7)
4. Minnesota (3-13)

NFC South
1. Saints (11-5)
2. Buccaneers (9-7)
3. Falcons (8-8)
4. Panthers (6-10)

NFC West
1. Seahawks (12-4)
2. 49ers (11-5)*
3. Rams (9-7)*
4. Cardinals (6-10)

yep lets go with that-except I am betting 6-10 on the Chiefs.

Pablo
07-18-2014, 10:11 AM
Chiefs 16-0

Everyone else 0-16.

Obviously we're winning the SB.

Pablo
07-18-2014, 10:13 AM
I'll predict the only division that matters:

1. Broncos (12-4)
2. Chargers (10-6)
3. Chiefs (9-7)
4. Raiders (4-12)

Coochie liquor
07-18-2014, 10:25 AM
Are you taking the Chargers 10–6 before looking at their brutal schedule? They were pretty average last year, and their schedule is just as hard as ours this year.

RunKC
07-18-2014, 10:36 AM
I don't see anyone topping Seattle in the NFC. Sure the Saints will be better, but Seattle is still far above even them.

I think we could see a repeat.

RunKC
07-18-2014, 10:40 AM
If ifs and buts were candies and nuts the Chiefs might win against a 1st string QB.:)

You keep saying this when your team couldn't beat terrible QB'd teams like Houston, Tennessee and Washington last year.

Pablo
07-18-2014, 01:28 PM
I have a hard time trying to figure out how the Chiefs are going to win 9 games this year when they play the NFC West (which could very well account for 4 losses right there)

If we win 8 games this year, I'll consider it a success and be a big Andy Reid fan.LMAO

Great Success!!

Gadzooks
07-18-2014, 02:50 PM
You keep saying this when your team couldn't beat terrible QB'd teams like Houston, Tennessee and Washington last year.

LMAO It's funny that you use these examples since, IIRC, the Chiefs played back-ups QBs against 2 of these teams. 3, if you count playing against Kirk Cousins after Shanny started the implosion in Washington by benching RGIII.

Let's use Houston as an example...

Week 1 - Chargers lose 31-28 and faced QB Matt Schaub, before he'd go on to set the NFL record for consecutive games throwing a pick 6, (He started the streak in Week 2). The game was marred by a B.S. personal foul called on Cam Thomas for hitting the LS during a FG attempt. The impact on the outcome wasn't important because the officials publicly apologized for the gaff.:rolleyes:

Week 7 - Chiefs W 17-16 and faced QB Case Keenum.

There's not much to say about the Chiefs win. They clearly demolished a strong Texans team riding a hot streak.

There are plenty of other examples that would indicate that the Chiefs may have played under preferred circumstances. These examples could be used to point out that the Chiefs are not quite as good as advertised by the homers on this board. Don't worry, just keep those Chiefs blinders on tight and everything will be OK.:thumb:

Gadzooks
07-18-2014, 08:46 PM
Due to the lack of responses, it would appear that I have won the Internet.

ThaVirus
07-18-2014, 08:50 PM
The Chargers suck, dude. They'll be lucky to go 8-8 this season.

Gadzooks
07-18-2014, 08:51 PM
From this day forward Scott Free will change his user name to "Toadie" and this will be his avatar (Scott you're the one on the right):
http://i54.tinypic.com/2arew7.jpg

Gadzooks
07-18-2014, 08:52 PM
The Chargers suck, dude. They'll be lucky to go 8-8 this season.

This is statement is not supported with factual evidence.. You lose at the Internet.

Saccopoo
07-18-2014, 08:59 PM
I don't see anyone topping Seattle in the NFC. Sure the Saints will be better, but Seattle is still far above even them.

I think we could see a repeat.

Rams take that division this coming season.

Book that.

ThaVirus
07-18-2014, 09:03 PM
This is statement is not supported with factual evidence.. You lose at the Internet.


We played RGIII. DJ picked him off like 3 minutes into the game. If I remember correctly, it was after we slaughtered them that Shanny officially benched him.

.. And yeah, we played against Keenum, but that was after Schaub had thrown pick 6s in something like 4 straight games. It was obvious they were tanking hard. Sometimes a new QB can reinvigorate a team so there's no telling who had an easier go of it.

Gadzooks
07-18-2014, 09:05 PM
Here's a good avi for Cockcheese liquor, a fat bitch full of hot air.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/01/08/article-1241649-03B62C480000044D-657_233x289.jpg

Gadzooks
07-18-2014, 09:07 PM
We played RGIII. DJ picked him off like 3 minutes into the game. If I remember correctly, it was after we slaughtered them that Shanny officially benched him.

.. And yeah, we played against Keenum, but that was after Schaub had thrown pick 6s in something like 4 straight games. It was obvious they were tanking hard. Sometimes a new QB can reinvigorate a team so there's no telling who had an easier go of it.

Please, you're in denial. Here's your new avi:
http://www.ostrichheadinsand.com/images/ostrich-head-in-sand.jpg

Buzz
07-18-2014, 09:08 PM
Rams take that division this coming season.

Book that.

Rams? what makes you think that, is Sam Bradford the QB and savior, I don't know, just asking where you are coming from?

RunKC
07-18-2014, 09:10 PM
LMAO It's funny that you use these examples since, IIRC, the Chiefs played back-ups QBs against 2 of these teams. 3, if you count playing against Kirk Cousins after Shanny started the implosion in Washington by benching RGIII.

Let's use Houston as an example...

Week 1 - Chargers lose 31-28 and faced QB Matt Schaub, before he'd go on to set the NFL record for consecutive games throwing a pick 6, (He started the streak in Week 2). The game was marred by a B.S. personal foul called on Cam Thomas for hitting the LS during a FG attempt. The impact on the outcome wasn't important because the officials publicly apologized for the gaff.:rolleyes:

Week 7 - Chiefs W 17-16 and faced QB Case Keenum.

There's not much to say about the Chiefs win. They clearly demolished a strong Texans team riding a hot streak.

There are plenty of other examples that would indicate that the Chiefs may have played under preferred circumstances. These examples could be used to point out that the Chiefs are not quite as good as advertised by the homers on this board. Don't worry, just keep those Chiefs blinders on tight and everything will be OK.:thumb:

Case Keenum was easily better than Schaub last year. Dumbass.

Gadzooks
07-18-2014, 09:15 PM
Case Keenum was easily better than Schaub last year.

Look up his stats for Week 1 and compare them to the next 4 games.
My grandma would've been better from week 2 onwards. Week 2 is when he shit the bed. Something snapped. It's too bad the Chargers didn't get to play against the shitty Schaub or the Newbie.

How do you explain the final score for the Chiefs against the back-up?

ThaVirus
07-18-2014, 09:37 PM
Look up his stats for Week 1 and compare them to the next 4 games.

My grandma would've been better from week 2 onwards. Week 2 is when he shit the bed. Something snapped. It's too bad the Chargers didn't get to play against the shitty Schaub or the Newbie.



How do you explain the final score for the Chiefs against the back-up?


How do you explain the Vikings stomping a mudhole in the Eagles' ass with Matt Cassel at QB and no Adrian Peterson?

How do you explain a Scott Tolzien-led Packers team storming back from a 23 point deficit and beating the Cowboys?

How do you explain the Colts beating the Broncos, Seahawks and 49ers but getting slaughtered by the Rams?

Gadzooks
07-18-2014, 10:08 PM
How do you explain the Vikings stomping a mudhole in the Eagles' ass with Matt Cassel at QB and no Adrian Peterson?

How do you explain a Scott Tolzien-led Packers team storming back from a 23 point deficit and beating the Cowboys?

How do you explain the Colts beating the Broncos, Seahawks and 49ers but getting slaughtered by the Rams?

Well there we have it... Well done.:clap:

You took the blinders off and looked for teams outside of the AFC West to reference.

The NFL is a total crap shoot. You never know what's going to happen, and that's the point. The whole saying of, "that's why they play the games", is the point.

I don't want to invite cosmo2023 into this thread, but, it makes you think, How? Why? What the..? etc...

The NFL lives off of gambling and the fans suffer in it's wake.

IMO, the Chargers were granted a seat in the playoffs. They were losing to 2nd stringers and a bunch of bullshit calls got them into the post season where they beat the Bengals. WTF?

Goodell is ruining the game by allowing too much power to officiating. This is the league's only opportunity to dictate the outcome of games.

BTW - Scott Tolzien led the Packers to a victory because he was drafted and coached up by Mr. Norf Turner.

RunKC
07-18-2014, 11:09 PM
Look up his stats for Week 1 and compare them to the next 4 games.
My grandma would've been better from week 2 onwards. Week 2 is when he shit the bed. Something snapped. It's too bad the Chargers didn't get to play against the shitty Schaub or the Newbie.

How do you explain the final score for the Chiefs against the back-up?

Schaub was playing San Diego's pathetic secondary week 1. Of course Schaub looked good LMAO

Gadzooks
07-18-2014, 11:23 PM
Schaub was playing San Diego's pathetic secondary week 1. Of course Schaub looked good LMAO

I'm very disappointed in you. You showed potential to initiate reasonable debate.
Those hopes are over. You've proven your lack of intellect and that has stained my opinion of anything you say in the future.

There is no hope for you. May your god have mercy on your soul.

New World Order
07-18-2014, 11:28 PM
It's really very simple:

If our pass rush is healthy the Chargers can't beat us. If Tamba and Houston are hurt we won't beat the Chargers.

Now we can agree that no one has conquered the internet.

Discuss Thrower
07-18-2014, 11:43 PM
All I can definitively say is that the Charger's coaching staff shit the bed not getting their squad focused for Week 17 because no true playoff caliber team gets taken to overtime by backups.

New World Order
07-18-2014, 11:48 PM
All I can definitively say is that the Charger's coaching staff shit the bed not getting their squad focused for Week 17 because no true playoff caliber team gets taken to overtime by backups.



Norv Turner Curse.

RunKC
07-18-2014, 11:50 PM
I'm very disappointed in you. You showed potential to initiate reasonable debate.
Those hopes are over. You've proven your lack of intellect and that has stained my opinion of anything you say in the future.

There is no hope for you. May your god have mercy on your soul.

Yeah not like SD tried to add multiple DB's this offseason bc it was a problem last year.

Carry on, homer.

Gadzooks
07-18-2014, 11:50 PM
I'm astounded by the lack of reading comprehension on this board. I'd assume most of you were at least tested for state funding.

- Discuss, please read post #84.

- NWO, Stop being teh ghey.

Gadzooks
07-18-2014, 11:53 PM
Yeah not like SD tried to add multiple DB's this offseason bc it was a problem last year.

Carry on, homer.

What's wrong with you? Seriously, you need help?

New World Order
07-18-2014, 11:54 PM
I'm astounded by the lack of reading comprehension on this board. I'd assume most of you were at least tested for state funding.

Discuss, please read post #84.

NWO, Stop being teh ghey.


Preacher telling the truth and it hurts:

http://espn.go.com/nfl/recap?gameId=331124012

The Chiefs led 7-3 in the second quarter when Hali left the game, and 14-3 in the same period when Houston departed. The Chargers went on to score a season high in points against the Chiefs, who sacked San Diego quarterback Philip Rivers just once.



If you check the play by play, the Chargers' best drive before Tamba and Houston left is 7 plays for 43 yards.

I officially won the internet!

Discuss Thrower
07-18-2014, 11:59 PM
I'm astounded by the lack of reading comprehension on this board. I'd assume most of you were at least tested for state funding.

Discuss, please read post #84.

NWO, Stop being teh ghey.

"The NFL is a crap shoot“ angle really only vindicates the one win against Denver and coming back to beat the Bengals (who are coached by the second most underachieving skipper not named Norv).

The narrative is the Chiefs were a bad football team who feasted on an easy schedule in 2013. So does it really make San Diego all that much better of team that only beat said team by two field goals?

New World Order
07-19-2014, 12:03 AM
"The NFL is a crap shoot“ angle really only vindicates the one win against Denver and coming back to beat the Bengals (who are coached by the second most underachieving skipper not named Norv).

The narrative is the Chiefs were a bad football team who feasted on an easy schedule in 2013. So does it really make San Diego all that much better of team that only beat said team by two field goals?


You didn't read my post!

Gadzooks
07-19-2014, 12:08 AM
Preacher telling the truth and it hurts:

http://espn.go.com/nfl/recap?gameId=331124012

The Chiefs led 7-3 in the second quarter when Hali left the game, and 14-3 in the same period when Houston departed. The Chargers went on to score a season high in points against the Chiefs, who sacked San Diego quarterback Philip Rivers just once.



If you check the play by play, the Chargers' best drive before Tamba and Houston left is 7 plays for 43 yards.

I officially won the internet!

Heh, yur funny...

Can you name the starting OLBs for the Chargers in that game? I doubt it...
Ya' know why? I doubt it...
Because you're a fucking homer who only cares about the Chiefs and has no concept of a world outside of anything that would affect the Chiefs.

"WAH! my OLBs have a boo boo. WAH! It's not fair the Chargers aren't getting sacked. WAH!!!
How come only the Chiefs get injuries. IT'S NOT FAIR, IT'S NOT FAIR, IT'S NOT FAIR."

NWO, do me a favor and take a look around before you start spouting off about injuries.

New World Order
07-19-2014, 12:14 AM
Heh, yur funny...

Can you name the starting OLBs for the Chargers in that game? I doubt it...
Ya' know why? I doubt it...
Because you're a ****ing homer who only cares about the Chiefs and has no concept of a world outside of anything that would affect the Chiefs.

"WAH! my OLBs have a boo boo. WAH! It's not fair the Chargers aren't getting sacked. WAH!!!
How come only the Chiefs get injuries. IT'S NOT FAIR, IT'S NOT FAIR, IT'S NOT FAIR."

NWO, do me a favor and take a look around before you start spouting off about injuries.


LMAO

Oh no not Ingram who had 1 sack in 2012 and an over the hill Dwight Freeney!

Gadzooks
07-19-2014, 12:21 AM
LMAO

Oh no not Ingram who had 1 sack in 2012 and an over the hill Dwight Freeney!

Oh, so you've heard of Ingram and Freeney... Can you name their replacements?
NWO - "WAH!!! My butt hurts cus our OLBs got teh injured..."

Gadzooks
07-19-2014, 12:22 AM
"The NFL is a crap shoot“ angle really only vindicates the one win against Denver and coming back to beat the Bengals (who are coached by the second most underachieving skipper not named Norv).

The narrative is the Chiefs were a bad football team who feasted on an easy schedule in 2013. So does it really make San Diego all that much better of team that only beat said team by two field goals?
Discuss, do I have to fucking draw it out for you? You're 1 of 10 people on this board who would ever use the word "narrative", yet you're too thick to understand my implication?

New World Order
07-19-2014, 12:55 AM
Oh, so you've heard of Ingram and Freeney... Can you name their replacements?
NWO - "WAH!!! My butt hurts cus our OLBs got teh injured..."


Why does it matter? You're complaining about Ingram and Freeney not being out there due to injuries when in reality they're useless.

Gadzooks
07-19-2014, 01:23 AM
Why does it matter? You're complaining about Ingram and Freeney not being out there due to injuries when in reality they're useless.

You're right, how would anyone know? The Chargers played most of the season with their 3rd stringers at OLB. Larry English and Jerret Johnson were out and that left? You'll never know because you don't care, because you're a homer.

You cry when Hali and Houston can't play, yet you don't consider the disadvantages of your opponents.

Do you know the Chiefs 3rd string OLBs? Fuck no. What are the chances of that happening?

You are a hypocritical homer and, I'm afraid, there is no hope for you.

New World Order
07-19-2014, 04:01 AM
You're right, how would anyone know? The Chargers played most of the season with their 3rd stringers at OLB. Larry English and Jerret Johnson were out and that left? You'll never know because you don't care, because you're a homer.

You cry when Hali and Houston can't play, yet you don't consider the disadvantages of your opponents.

Do you know the Chiefs 3rd string OLBs? **** no. What are the chances of that happening?

You are a hypocritical homer and, I'm afraid, there is no hope for you.

Let me break it down for you:

Larry English had more sacks (1.5) than Ingram(1) in 2012 (both played a full season).

Freeney had 5 sacks in 2012. I mention 2012 because that is the last time
Freeney and Ingram played a full season.

That is a whopping 6 sacks between Ingram and Freeney in 2012!


Now:

Tamba Hali had 11 sacks this year

Justin Houston had 11 sacks this year.

That is 22 sacks total. Taking out 2 guys that had 22 sacks that season is a HUGE loss. Taking out 2 players with a combined total of 6 sacks in 2012? Not so much.

Don't ever compare the two pairs when Melvin Ingram hasn't done shit and Dwight Freeney has not had a good season since 2010.

Argument over.

Coochie liquor
07-19-2014, 04:06 AM
LMAO It's funny that you use these examples since, IIRC, the Chiefs played back-ups QBs against 2 of these teams. 3, if you count playing against Kirk Cousins after Shanny started the implosion in Washington by benching RGIII.

Let's use Houston as an example...

Week 1 - Chargers lose 31-28 and faced QB Matt Schaub, before he'd go on to set the NFL record for consecutive games throwing a pick 6, (He started the streak in Week 2). The game was marred by a B.S. personal foul called on Cam Thomas for hitting the LS during a FG attempt. The impact on the outcome wasn't important because the officials publicly apologized for the gaff.:rolleyes:

Week 7 - Chiefs W 17-16 and faced QB Case Keenum.

There's not much to say about the Chiefs win. They clearly demolished a strong Texans team riding a hot streak.

There are plenty of other examples that would indicate that the Chiefs may have played under preferred circumstances. These examples could be used to point out that the Chiefs are not quite as good as advertised by the homers on this board. Don't worry, just keep those Chiefs blinders on tight and everything will be OK.:thumb:
Sounds oddly familiar, like week 17 when the officials put your Chokers team into the playoffs on a bad call?? You were GIVEN playoff birth, you earned nothing. Could barely beat our scrubs... And you think you won at the internet?? Lmao, just another loser Choker fan who lost at life. You claim our homers have tight blinders on? Lmao sounds to me like your butt plug is too tight. Delusional Chokers fans, LOSERS!!!

New World Order
07-19-2014, 04:13 AM
Sounds oddly familiar, like week 17 when the officials put your Chokers team into the playoffs on a bad call?? You were GIVEN playoff birth, you earned nothing. Could barely beat our scrubs... And you think you won at the internet?? Lmao, just another loser Choker fan who lost at life. You claim our homers have tight blinders on? Lmao sounds to me like your butt plug is too tight. Delusional Chokers fans, LOSERS!!!



The Norv Turner Curse will haunt SD forever.

Marty ball and then Norv LMAO

Coochie liquor
07-19-2014, 04:21 AM
Here's a good avi for Cockcheese liquor, a fat bitch full of hot air.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/01/08/article-1241649-03B62C480000044D-657_233x289.jpg

Let's not forget Gayzooks er Gaycocks?? He needs to actually add a avi of himself with his life partner. This my sweet little princess is your new avi....

Now I'm sure over on the Chokers forums they're probably sucking big bags of dicks. You likely saw a 4 incher in there and got frustrated. I don't blame you, when your penis is so small that you dribble in your own nuts, a 4 inch penis will make you feel inadequate.
Typical Chokers fan, don't worry pumpkin, you'll find a man one day that can look past your "shortcomings"

New World Order
07-19-2014, 04:27 AM
Gadzooks is a good dude. He just needs to realize his starting OLB are shit, but so is our secondary.

I guess we will see.

Coochie liquor
07-19-2014, 04:28 AM
Also Gaybooks....I'm pretty sure that you don't get to sit at the big table with the men til your team has a Super Bowl win.....

Coochie liquor
07-19-2014, 04:33 AM
Gadzooks is a good dude. He just needs to realize his starting OLB are shit, but so is our secondary.

I guess we will see.

She maybe an alright person (debatable), but she's still a delusional Chokers fan. Wouldn't be so bad if she didn't talk out of both sides of her mouth , but that's typical Chokers fans. Except they're usually doing something else out of both sides o their mouth! She likes to give half facts, and not give credit where it's due!

Direckshun
07-19-2014, 06:48 AM
I think the bottom is going to fall out in Kansas City. There is just no way we lose the amount of talent we did and succeed. That's now how football works.

I bet we go 6-10. The more I look at our roster, the less I like it.

I think San Diego challenges Denver for the AFCW this year, but Denver's just got too many big guns.

Halfcan
07-19-2014, 09:35 AM
I think the bottom is going to fall out in Kansas City. There is just no way we lose the amount of talent we did and succeed. That's now how football works.

I bet we go 6-10. The more I look at our roster, the less I like it.

I think San Diego challenges Denver for the AFCW this year, but Denver's just got too many big guns.

I agree with the prediction just not that we lost a ton of talent. Albert-yes- but he was coming off a year of being hurt-is he worth that massive contract?? Sucks we couldn't have traded him though. The rest signed for highest market value based on their talent and production.

I mean TJack never made an impact here. Never. Name one game you can say he dominated it- and getting 1 and half sacks in one game-was mostly cleanup work. Was he worth that contract? Hell no-but the media loves talking about how we lost so much talent with him.

We replaced those players with similar talent for a fraction of the cost and shed some big salaries. Great moves since we couldn't win with them.

I think we are waiting for next year and hoping some of our recent draft picks blossom. More draft picks and a better Cap situation according to some on here.

New World Order
07-19-2014, 09:41 AM
I think the bottom is going to fall out in Kansas City. There is just no way we lose the amount of talent we did and succeed. That's now how football works.

I bet we go 6-10. The more I look at our roster, the less I like it.

I think San Diego challenges Denver for the AFCW this year, but Denver's just got too many big guns.


Only loss that hurt us was Albert. We cut Lewis and Dunta Robinson which automatically makes our defense better.

I don't trust our secondary or offensive line/qb. We also haven't beaten a winning team since the 2011 season (I didn't count the Eagles because Foles didn't play).

I think we will go 8-8.

Halfcan
07-19-2014, 09:54 AM
Only loss that hurt us was Albert. We cut Lewis and Dunta Robinson which automatically makes our defense better.

I don't trust our secondary or offensive line/qb. We also haven't beaten a winning team since the 2011 season (I didn't count the Eagles because Foles didn't play).

I think we will go 8-8.

I would probably pick this or a bit higher if Andy would let the team be what it is (a running team with some great talent at RB) instead of what he wants it to be (Greatest show on turf). Yes Andy loves to pass, pass, pass- but with a lack of talent at TE, O line and WR- we get what we had last year- a team that can't move the ball. Some of the drives for Offense barely took a minute off the clock-3 and out-and the D was back in there.

Yes grind it out football is old school- but that is what the chiefs are- a stout D. and a good running game.

As it stands now with this team-I don't see how our Offense can match up to the teams we have to play. We just don't have the talent on the Offensive side of the ball.

6-10

RunKC
07-19-2014, 10:56 AM
You're right, how would anyone know? The Chargers played most of the season with their 3rd stringers at OLB. Larry English and Jerret Johnson were out and that left? You'll never know because you don't care, because you're a homer.

You cry when Hali and Houston can't play, yet you don't consider the disadvantages of your opponents.

Do you know the Chiefs 3rd string OLBs? **** no. What are the chances of that happening?

You are a hypocritical homer and, I'm afraid, there is no hope for you.

You're a raging homer if you think Larry English is worth two shits

Hootie
07-19-2014, 11:03 AM
I see us between 6-10 and 8-8.

Our only shot is if our defense truly develops into a top 3 defense.

Schedule is simply too tough.

RunKC
07-19-2014, 11:13 AM
I think the bottom is going to fall out in Kansas City. There is just no way we lose the amount of talent we did and succeed. That's now how football works.

I bet we go 6-10. The more I look at our roster, the less I like it.

I think San Diego challenges Denver for the AFCW this year, but Denver's just got too many big guns.

Relying on our draft picks was Dorsey's plan day 1. It's scary, but boy if most of those guys turn out, then we're in business.

RealSNR
07-19-2014, 11:29 AM
Relying on our draft picks was Dorsey's plan day 1. It's scary, but boy if most of those guys turn out, then we're in business.

Packers fans said the same things about Ted Thompson that we're now saying about Dorsey.

Then the strategy actually paid off.

RunKC
07-19-2014, 12:48 PM
Packers fans said the same things about Ted Thompson that we're now saying about Dorsey.

Then the strategy actually paid off.

Yup. We're going to find out just how good Dorsey is this year. I was impressed with Knile Davis and Marcus Cooper. Sure hope most of these other guys show that kind of promise.

Coochie liquor
07-19-2014, 12:49 PM
Packers fans said the same things about Ted Thompson that we're now saying about Dorsey.

Then the strategy actually paid off.

Yeah, all we can do at this point is hope we have the same fortunes. Still really too early to tell. Dorsey had a good track record with finding good players for GB to draft. I'm hoping some from last year step up this year.

Gadzooks
07-19-2014, 07:16 PM
You're a raging homer if you think Larry English is worth two shits

He's actually pretty decent at putting pressure on the QB when he's healthy. Unfortunately, that's been pretty rare. Most teams wouldn't mind having him in their OLB rotation.

BTW - I don't think Freeney and Ingram are anywhere near as good as Hali and Houston but the defense is designed to rotate the Top 4 OLBs based on the situation. We lost all 4 at different points in the season.

We had a 6th round rookie start 6 games.

We had a 3rd year UDFA from Carolina start 3 games.

If you don't think that hurt the Chargers defense last season your kidding yourself.

A healthy group, with the addition of Attaochu, should improve the pass rush quite a bit.

I wonder how well the Chiefs would do in a similar situation? (Even Zombo is out!)

We haven't even discussed how the Chargers lost their top 2 receivers for the majority of the season. How are the Chiefs WRs lookin'? What would happen if you lost Bowe and Avery? I guess Jenkins would become the next Keenan Allen?...:rolleyes:

New World Order
07-19-2014, 08:45 PM
He's actually pretty decent at putting pressure on the QB when he's healthy. Unfortunately, that's been pretty rare. Most teams wouldn't mind having him in their OLB rotation.

BTW - I don't think Freeney and Ingram are anywhere near as good as Hali and Houston but the defense is designed to rotate the Top 4 OLBs based on the situation. We lost all 4 at different points in the season.

We had a 6th round rookie start 6 games.

We had a 3rd year UDFA from Carolina start 3 games.

If you don't think that hurt the Chargers defense last season your kidding yourself.

A healthy group, with the addition of Attaochu, should improve the pass rush quite a bit.

I wonder how well the Chiefs would do in a similar situation? (Even Zombo is out!)

We haven't even discussed how the Chargers lost their top 2 receivers for the majority of the season. How are the Chiefs WRs lookin'? What would happen if you lost Bowe and Avery? I guess Jenkins would become the next Keenan Allen?...:rolleyes:


Like I said: Our defense relies on our pass rush. If we don't have Houston and Hali (healthy) then we aren't stopping anyone.

Case in point, the first time SD played KC.

ThaVirus
07-19-2014, 10:28 PM
You guys should make a wager. Put your money where your mouth is..

New World Order
07-19-2014, 11:30 PM
You guys should make a wager. Put your money where your mouth is..



Okay, what are the stipulations?

Gadzooks
07-19-2014, 11:57 PM
Like I said: Our defense relies on our pass rush. If we don't have Houston and Hali (healthy) then we aren't stopping anyone.

Case in point, the first time SD played KC.

Agreed, the tables can be easily turned.

The familiarity of divisional foes typically makes for interesting games. I hope both of our teams can be healthy for this season and we'll see what happens.

Easy 6
07-20-2014, 11:18 AM
While I strongly disagree with the final record prediction (he's not counting on growth from the younger guys/everyone else in the second year of this system), this is still a pretty good read from a national outlet.

http://www.foxsports.com/kansas-city/story/kansas-city-chiefs-2014-preview-as-long-as-jamaal-charles-is-around-anything-is-possible-071614

Chiefshrink
07-20-2014, 12:01 PM
While I strongly disagree with the final record prediction (he's not counting on growth from the younger guys/everyone else in the second year of this system), this is still a pretty good read from a national outlet.

http://www.foxsports.com/kansas-city/story/kansas-city-chiefs-2014-preview-as-long-as-jamaal-charles-is-around-anything-is-possible-071614

It was a good read and backs my thoughts about the trouble Coughlin had last yr with his O-line and what could happen with our O-line this yr.

Fair and objective and like you I disagree with our year end record as well which I predicted 7-9.

Easy 6
07-20-2014, 12:42 PM
It was a good read and backs my thoughts about the trouble Coughlin had last yr with his O-line and what could happen with our O-line this yr.

Fair and objective and like you I disagree with our year end record as well which I predicted 7-9.

No question about it, the O line is a big question mark until proven otherwise, its definitely our achilles heel this year.

It all starts with Fisher, and all we can do is cross our fingers, I guess.