PDA

View Full Version : Food and Drink Pre-game BBQ Poll: Chili - Beans or No Beans


Kaepernick
09-13-2014, 07:25 PM
I love Texas Chili with meat only. That is the only true Chili, if you ask me. If it's got beans, it ain't Chili.


Hence, the pre-game BBQ Poll: If Chili has beans, is it really Chili?

TripleThreat
09-13-2014, 07:27 PM
Throw some red onions, green peppers, maybe some hot links or sausage into the all meat chili... FUCIN A man.

Mennonite
09-13-2014, 07:27 PM
Beans are good. Authenticity be damned, if it makes the food taste better.

HonestChieffan
09-13-2014, 07:28 PM
The season of lost hope. Chiefs '14

ping2000
09-13-2014, 07:33 PM
Fuck beans!

Kaepernick
09-13-2014, 07:34 PM
California Sucks for BBQ, but in Sacramento, we have this place called JR's Texas BBQ.

The BEST Texas Chili west of the Rockies, and I've got 2 huge takeout cartons that I am just about to dive into.



http://media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/06/53/0d/06530d7cd8c5268fc433e793a7599a15.jpg

Rasputin
09-13-2014, 07:34 PM
Chili with out beans???

Kaepernick
09-13-2014, 07:35 PM
http://www.jrtexasbbq.com/Images/Header2.gif

ChiefsCountry
09-13-2014, 07:37 PM
Google Ads and keywords crack me up. The ad on this page is for Hormel chili.

Rasputin
09-13-2014, 07:37 PM
Fuck Texas.



No bean chili pffft

KCUnited
09-13-2014, 07:38 PM
You talking breadless sloppy joe here?

Kaepernick
09-13-2014, 07:41 PM
Chili with out beans???

Hell to the yes!

Real Texas Chili is bean-less. If it has beans, it is chili con carne, NOT Chili. I was a bit disappointed to find that both KC barbecue and memphis barbecue featured chili with beans. I guess Texas is the only place that features all-meat Chili, the way God intended it.


http://www.seriouseats.com/images/20111108-beef-texas-chili-con-carne-08.jpg

Mennonite
09-13-2014, 07:47 PM
http://www.seriouseats.com/images/20111108-beef-texas-chili-con-carne-08.jpg

I wonder which has tore up more asses - Texas chili or Texas wooden spoons?

Kaepernick
09-13-2014, 07:47 PM
You talking breadless sloppy joe here?

Sloppy Joe is ground beef. Yes, a lot of Texas chili feature chili grind. But the JR's Texas Chili I'm eating right now is made from big chunks of smoke brisket. Furthest thing from a sloppy joe you are gonna get. This is a smoked brisket stew and it is heaven on wheels.

AND NO BEANS!

Fire Me Boy!
09-13-2014, 07:50 PM
Hell to the yes!



Real Texas Chili is bean-less. If it has beans, it is chili con carne, NOT Chili. I was a bit disappointed to find that both KC barbecue and memphis barbecue featured chili with beans. I guess Texas is the only place that features all-meat Chili, the way God intended it.


:spock:

Kaepernick
09-13-2014, 07:54 PM
:spock:

I am just asking your preference in the poll. All meat, or beans. It is just a personal preference. For me, ever since having genuine Texas chili in Texas, and now with JR's Texas BBQ, for me Chili has to be all meat! Nothing wrong with a side of baked beans with your BBQ, but when I am going in for a serious Chili binge, it has to be Texas all meat chili.

So I was just asking for folks preference in the poll. It is not like beans don't have a place in this world.

Rasputin
09-13-2014, 07:55 PM
Hell to the yes!

Real Texas Chili is bean-less. If it has beans, it is chili con carne, NOT Chili. I was a bit disappointed to find that both KC barbecue and memphis barbecue featured chili with beans. I guess Texas is the only place that features all-meat Chili, the way God intended it.


]

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/Kp3XsQN8zWg?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Iconic
09-13-2014, 07:57 PM
Hell to the yes!

Real Texas Chili is bean-less. If it has beans, it is chili con carne, NOT Chili. I was a bit disappointed to find that both KC barbecue and memphis barbecue featured chili with beans. I guess Texas is the only place that features all-meat Chili, the way God intended it.


http://www.seriouseats.com/images/20111108-beef-texas-chili-con-carne-08.jpg

Dude, i'm gonna type as sober as possible, that honestly looks ****ing pathetic and digusting compared to my meal. and I'm being one hundred percent serious. Sorry we dont cook **** that was perviously in cans. you're a fuking joke dude, and im dead fuking serious. gert areal family that cooks good food, drinks beer and wine and winecoolers and has a good fuking time, and has a milliondollar house on the beach, im seriously.. dont eever potst your fuking families poverty dinner on these forums ever the fuk again bro, and by bro i mean never my bro, fuking ***got.

Mennonite
09-13-2014, 08:00 PM
:spock:

"Carne" is German for "with beans."

Fire Me Boy!
09-13-2014, 08:01 PM
Sloppy Joe is ground beef. Yes, a lot of Texas chili feature chili grind. But the JR's Texas Chili I'm eating right now is made from big chunks of smoke brisket. Furthest thing from a sloppy joe you are gonna get. This is a smoked brisket stew and it is heaven on wheels.



AND NO BEANS!


I'm not sure what "the furthest thing from sloppy joes" is, but I can think of any number of foods that are less like sloppy joes than the chili you're eating:

Ice cream
Limes
Vinegar
Bean sprouts
Avocado
Banana
Kale
Leeks
Strawberries
Yogurt
Feta
Gin
Bitter melon
Sea bass
Chicken piccata
Oreos
Macaroni and cheese
Carrots
Sweet potatoes
Celery
Granny Smith apples
Tater tots
Soft boiled eggs
Chicks and salsa
Saltines
Ginger ale
Tums
Marshmallows
Chocolate milk
Ants on a log
Nilla Wafers
Hot Pockets
Pop Tarts
Jalapeño poppers
Pecan pie
Sour cream and onion dip

Need I go on?

Bewbies
09-13-2014, 08:04 PM
What the hell? When did chili become BBQ? LMAO

BroncoDork
09-13-2014, 08:04 PM
Hell to the yes!

Real Texas Chili is bean-less. If it has beans, it is chili con carne, NOT Chili. I was a bit disappointed to find that both KC barbecue and memphis barbecue featured chili with beans. I guess Texas is the only place that features all-meat Chili, the way God intended it.


http://www.seriouseats.com/images/20111108-beef-texas-chili-con-carne-08.jpg

"chili con carne" translated is "chili with meat", dumbass.

lewdog
09-13-2014, 08:04 PM
What the hell? When did chili become BBQ? LMAO

When you live in backassward Texas?

Fire Me Boy!
09-13-2014, 08:05 PM
"chili con carne" translated is "chili with meat", dumbass.


THANK YOU!

ROFL

SAUTO
09-13-2014, 08:07 PM
"chili con carne" translated is "chili with meat", dumbass.

LMAO

BigMeatballDave
09-13-2014, 08:07 PM
Fuck what is real.

I like beans. Eat it how you fucking like it.

BigMeatballDave
09-13-2014, 08:10 PM
So, real chili is Coney dog sauce?

Mr. Laz
09-13-2014, 08:12 PM
You talking breadless sloppy joe here?

exactly

Chili without beans might as well be shit on a shingle or a sloppy joe

Hog Rider
09-13-2014, 08:13 PM
Chili without chili peppers is just soup or stew. Hence the name.
Everything else doesn't matter.
Duh, that was tough.

gblowfish
09-13-2014, 08:14 PM
No beans. Nope. Serve them on the side if you like.

TimBone
09-13-2014, 08:15 PM
I'm from Texas. I prefer the chili with beans.

milkman
09-13-2014, 08:16 PM
"Chili gives me Gaz".

The one time when no Gaz option is really a true poll fail.

TimBone
09-13-2014, 08:17 PM
Also, you forgot the "Kaepernick should die in an ebolaids tree fire and go the fuck away" option. So, I will not be voting.

Ming the Merciless
09-13-2014, 08:21 PM
Gravy train dog food in that slop bowl

Rausch
09-13-2014, 08:25 PM
I love Texas Chili with meat only. That is the only true Chili, if you ask me. If it's got beans, it ain't Chili.

Never heard of or eaten chili without beans...

KCUnited
09-13-2014, 08:34 PM
Wait, are we talking California Texas chili here?

Kaepernick
09-13-2014, 08:39 PM
Wait, are we talking California Texas chili here?

No, the real deal.

I'm eating JR's Texas BBQ Chili. It is smoked brisket, burnt to perfection outside, and shredded & chunked in their chili. It is to die for. Just a big bowl of brisket chili. This is the genuine article and the only delicious Texas Chili I have found east of the Rockies, outside of Texas itself.

It is awesome.

No disrespect to those who love their chili beans or don't like an all meat Texas chile. Just for me, there is nothing like a good Texas Chili. It is a meal in itself. I have a craving for this stuff and will go out of my way when I'm in Sacramento to pick up some of JR's Texas chili.


http://www.jrtexasbbq.com/Catering.htm

Kaepernick
09-13-2014, 08:47 PM
I am going to cry when JR's goes out of business. They closed the Campbell's soup plant nearby and that lunch business is what was keeping him afloat this time.

He already closed his doors once. Sacramento doesn't know what a Gem it has right under its very nose. Stupid Excrementans.

JR's is likely to close soon so I have got to swing by and get this chili early and often while he is still open. He is not likely to dig out and reopen this time. Danggit! Losing my fix...

srvy
09-13-2014, 08:47 PM
Chili without beans? How am I gonna fart under the covers and hold my wife's head under them?

listopencil
09-13-2014, 09:02 PM
History of Chili

From the time the second person on earth mixed some chile peppers with meat and cooked them, the great chili debate was on; more of a war, in fact. The desire to brew up the best bowl of chili in the world is exactly that old.

Perhaps it is the effect of Capisicum spices upon man's mind; for, in the immortal words of Joe DeFrates, the only man ever to win the National and the World Chili Championships, "Chili powder makes you crazy." That may say it all. To keep things straight, chile refers to the pepper pod, and chili to the concoction. The e and the i of it all.

The great debate, it seems, is not limited to whose chili is best. Even more heated is the argument over where the first bowl was made; and by whom. Estimates range from "somewhere west of Laramie," in the early nineteenth century - being a product of a Texas trail drive - to a grisly tale of enraged Aztecs, who cut up invading Spanish conquistadors, seasoned chunks of them with a passel of chile peppers, and ate them.

Never has there been anything mild about chili.

Our travels through Texas, New Mexico, and California, and even Mexico, over the years have failed to turn up the elusive "best bowl of chili." Every state lays claim to the title, and certainly no Texan worth his comino (cumin) would think, even for a moment, that it rests anywhere else but in the Lone Star State - and probably right in his own blackened and battered chili pot.

There may not be an answer. There are, however, certain facts that one cannot overlook. The mixture of meat, beans, peppers, and herbs was known to the Incas, Aztecs, and Mayan Indians long before Columbus and the conquistadores.

Fact: Chile peppers were used in Cervantes's Spain and show up in great ancient cuisines of China, India, Indonesia, Italy, the Caribbean, France, and the Arab states.

Fact: Don Juan de Onate entered what is now New Mexico in 1598 and brought with him the green chile pepper. It has grown there for the nearly four hundred years since.

Fact: Canary Islanders, transplanted in San Antonio as early as 1723, used local peppers, wild onions, garlic, and other spices to concoct pungent meat dishes - improvising upon ones they had cooked for generations in their native land, where the chile pepper also grew.

Exit fact, enter conjecture.

There is little doubt that cattle drivers and trail hands did more to popularize the dish throughout the Southwest than anybody else, and there is a tale that we heard one frosty night in a Texican bar in Marfa, Texas, about a range cook who made chili along all the great cattle trails of Texas. He collected wild oregano, chile peppers, wild garlic, and onions and mixed it all with the fresh-killed beef or buffalo - or jackrabbit, armadillo, rattlesnake, or whatever he had at hand - and the cowhands ate it like ambrosia. And to make sure he had an ample supply of native spices wherever he went, he planted gardens along the paths of the cattle drives - mostly in patches of mesquite - to protect them from the hooves of the marauding cattle. The next time the drive went by there, he found his garden and harvested the crop, hanging the peppers and onions and oregano to dry on the side of the chuck wagon. The cook blazed a trail across Texas with tiny, spicy gardens.

As cattle trail chili grew in popularity throughout the tiny Texas trail towns, so too, did its devotees. Frank and Jesse James fell prey to its taste and are said to have eaten a few bowls of "red" before pulling many of their bank jobs. At least one town, it is noted, was spared from their shooting and looting by the local chili parlor. Fort Worth had a chili joint just north of town, and the James boys rode in there just for the chili, vowing never to rob their bank because "anyplace that has a chili joint like this just oughta' be treated better."

And Pat Garrett is supposed to have said of William Bonney - Billy the Kid: "Anybody that eats chili cant' be all bad."

Chili cooks are probably as creative with their stories as they are with their broth, but what can you expect when you go through Texas asking questions about chili? It's the home of the tall tale.

In case you ever want to brew up a batch of "original Texas chili," here is a version we got that night in Marfa - well, at least, a composite from a few of the old-timers at the bar; their account of what they remember the first recipe to be. There is a little of the influence of each side of the Rio Grande because there was a mixture there, and if you get right down to it, that probably describes the heritage of chili about as well as anything. This "original" recipe may be traced back to that same range cook who planted his gardens across Texas in the early 1800s. And it may well have been the granddaddy of the blend that Frank and Jesse were addicted to. Nobody will swear that it was the first true Texas chili recipe, but they all say it was close to it:
Chili Con Carne

Cut up as much meat as you think you will need (any kind will do, but beef is probably best) in pieces about the size of a pecan. Put it in a pot, along with some suet (enough so as the meat won't stick to the sides of the pot), and cook it with about the same amount of wild onions, garlic, oregano, and chiles as you have got meat. Put in some salt. Stir it from time to time and cook it until the meat is as tender as you think it's going to get.



The entire chili exercise, at that point in history, was undoubtedly out of necessity. If you have ever tasted fresh-killed beef, you know how much a lot of spices would help the flavor. The range cooks, too knew this. They also knew the cowpokes would have strung them up right on the spot for serving plain beef in that unaged state. There also is no question that the spices helped preserve the meat and often masked the flavor of meat that was near spoiling; so the trail cook frequently brewed up chile con carne, which is simply the Spanish way of saying j" peppers and meat." The name, incidentally, is as close as any self-respecting Mexican cares to get in claiming the dish's place of origin.

By the time we had finished writing down the recipe, the number of Tex-Mex patrons in the tiny bar had grown considerably, and each had his own version of cattle drive chili stories - each one becoming more embellished as the cerveza flowed. Then one hauled out a yellowed clipping from his wallet. He didn't remember what newspaper it had come from, or even when. He just knew he had had it a long time. It was a prayer - something an old black range cook had prayed once. His name, euphonically, was Bones Hook, and the prayer went:

Lord, God, you know us old cowhands is forgetful. Sometimes, I can't even recollect what happened yesterday. We is forgetful. We just know daylight from dark, summer, fall, winter, and spring. But I sure hope we don't never forget to thank you before we eat a mess of good chili.

We don't know why, in your wisdom, you been so doggone good to us. The heathen Chinese don't have no chili, never. The Frenchmen is left out. The Russians don't know no more about chili than a hog knows about a sidesaddle. Even the Mexicans don't get a good whiff of chili unless they live around here.

Chili-eaters is some of your chosen people, Lord. We don't know why you're so doggone good to us. But, Lord God, don't never think we ain't grateful for this chili we are about to eat. Amen.


Chili buffs in San Antonio - and in most of Texas, for that matter - say the stuff called "chili" was invented there, probably by "Chili Queens," women who dotted the Military Plaza and sold highly seasoned brews called "chili" from rudimentary carts, all through the night, to a cadre of customers who rode in from all over the prairies to singe their tonsils. The "Queens" did exist, for nearly two hundred years, the locals say. Yet most historians fail to tell of them selling chili much before 1880. Before then it was probably strictly Mexican food.

If chili next moved from the greatly romanticized cattle trail to the Military Plaza of San Antonio, it also moved right back into the factual stage. It is all pretty well documented from there. The "Queens" may have been there for two hundred years, but they probably had sold chili only for the last third of that period; and, if for no other reason than one that usually improves a product, they began to refine and add sophistication to the dish. They brought it somewhere near today's stage. The reason, of course, was competition. There were dozens of the Chili Queens on the plaza, and you can bet that each one was constantly striving to improve her blend, simply to attract more customers than any of the competition.

The Queens, who were for the most part Mexican, made their chili at home and then loaded it onto colorful little chili wagons, on which they transported it to the plaza, along with pots, crockery, and all the other gear necessary to feed the nineteenth-century night people. They build mesquite fires on the square to keep the chili warm, lighted the wagons with colored lanterns, and squatted on the ground beside the cart, dishing out chili to customers who sat on wooden stools to eat the delightful and fiery stew.

All this went on from nightfall until just before sunrise, when the vegetable vendors came on with their carts to occupy the Military Plaza, which had become known as "La Plaza del Chile con Carne."

The Chili Queens remained a highlight in San Antonio for many years (there was even a "San Antonio Chili Stand" at the Chicago World's Fair in 1893), until the late 1930s, in fact, when the health department put an end to their time-honored profession.

The following is reprinted from the San Antonio Light of September 12, 1937:

Recent action of the city health department in ordering removal from Haymarket square of the chili queens and their stands brought an end to a 200-year-old tradition. The chili queens made their first appearance a couple of centuries back after a group of Spanish soldiers camped on what is now the city hall site and gave the place the name, Military Plaza. At one time the chili queens had stands on Military, Haymarket and Alamo plazas but years ago the city confined them to Haymarket plaza. According to Tax Commissioner Frank Bushick, a contemporary and a historian of those times, the greatest of all the queens was no Mexican but an American named Sadie. Another famous queen was a senorita named Martha who later went on the stage. Writing men like Stephen Crane and O. Henry were impressed enough to immortalize the queens in their writings. With the disappearance from the plaza of the chili stands, the troubadors who roamed the plaza for years also have disappeared into the night. Some of the chili queens have simply gone out of business. Others, like Mrs. Eufemia Lopez and her daughters, Juanita and Esperanza Garcia, have opened indoor cafes elsewhere. But henceforth the San Antonio visitor must forego his dining on chili al fresco.


From the research library of the Institute of Texan Cultures comes this link with the past - a Chili Queen recipe (slightly updated for shopping convenience):
Original San Antonio Chili

2 pounds beef shoulder, cut into ½-inch cubes
1 pound pork shoulder, cut into ½-inch cubes
¼ cup suet
¼ cup pork fat
3 medium-sized onions, chopped
6 garlic cloves, minced
1 quart water
4 ancho chiles
1 serrano chile
6 dried red chiles
1 tablespoon comino seeds, freshly ground
2 tablespoons Mexican oregano
Salt to taste

Place lightly floured beef and pork cubes in with suet and pork fat in heavy chili pot and cook quickly, stirring often. Add onions and garlic and cook until they are tender and limp. Add water to mixture and simmer slowly while preparing chiles. Remove stems and seeds from chiles and chop very finely. Grind chiles in molcajete and add oregano with salt to mixture. Simmer another 2 hours. Remove suet casing and skim off some fat. Never cook frijoles with chiles and meat. Serve as separate dish.



The hearty smell of mesquite smoke mingling with the spicy aroma of chiles is gone. Gone, too, are the gaily painted carts and the fancy costumes and flowers of the Chili Queens. But before their passing, chili had become somewhat of a national dish.

Chili parlors sprang up all over the country, and many small-town cafes served little else than chili. By the depression years, there was hardly a town that didn't have a chili parlor, even if it was nothing more than a hole-in-the-wall place with half-a-dozen bar stools in front of the linoleum-topped counter. To many a wandering work-seeker in those depression days, the wayside chili shack meant the difference between starvation and staying alive. Chili was cheap and crackers were free.

Joe DeFrates's father, "Port," worked as a bartender at the Adolphis Hotel in Dallas in 1914 and learned to love the chili that was served in the chili parlor just off the main lobby of the lavish hotel. When the older DeFrates returned to his native Springfield, Illinois, to open his own place, serving chili only to his friends and regular customers (it was not on the menu), he found chili parlors everywhere. He also found that the name of the dish was spelled chilli, because a sign painter named Sheehan had made an error when lettering the window of a local chili parlor and everybody liked it so much that it stayed. To this day, it is spelled with two ls in Illinois.

By the fifties, everbody was talking and writing about chili. Columnist Westbrook Pegler was taken to task by chili lovers everywhere when he suggested that chili should be made with beans. In response to the flood of mail, Pegler wrote:

In praising the beautiful version of chili-con that was revealed to me in my gallivanting youth in the Mid and Southwest I had no intention to invite or wage controversy. Yet I should have remembered that gladsomeness begets its own comeuppance and that compliments are made only on pain of angry dissent. During his Christmas trip home President Truman sopped at Vergne Dixon's chili parlor at 1904-1906 Olive St., Kansas City, and put himself outside a bowl of chili along with a scuttle of beer fetched him from yonder, Mr. Dixon having no beer license. It seems to me that some law got busted here, but I am not for multiplying our President's problems, so I will only mutter in a low voice that the W.C.T.U., which hollered murder when our troops got beer in Korea, certainly booted one. I am afraid I carried on when I got going about chili-con, for this delicatessen is downright spiritual with us who long since sat on the high stools, as Mr. Truman did in Dixon's, and on $25 a week got by payday to payday, well-fed and well-content. I wrote that chili-con should be made with ground beef, beans, chili powder, tomatoes, onions and garlic, and seized an occasion to extol by name the put-up chili and the beans and powder sold by Gebhardt's of El Paso. I had no inkling of the feeling among the devotees of the house of Gebhardt, who fell on me in numbers, by telegram and mail. Not only is Gebhardt's an ancient and honorable institution in San Antonio, but Gebhardt's meat is not ground but cooked so well that it comes undone, releasing its juices among the beans. Then, too, I ran afoul of the devotees of Wolf's chili-con and related products, which actually are made in El Paso.

Chili had made it.

In 1952, a Texas journalist who had devoted much of his life to the study of chili wrote a book entitled With or Without Beans. His name was Joe Cooper. After examining the best chili on record to that date, he released his own recipe - one that he described as "maybe not the best ever, but one which satisfies the Coopers' appetites," and is one which poses no undue problems for the average home cook. It will put good chili on the table without much effort or attention other than what is normal routine in any kitchen.

Joe Cooper's Chili

3 pounds lean beef (never veal)
¼ cup olive oil
1 quart water
2 bay leaves
8 dry chile pods or 6 tablespoons chili powder
3 teaspoons salt
10 cloves finely chopped garlic
1 teaspoon cumin powder
1 teaspoon oregano or marjoram
1 teaspoon red pepper
½ teaspoon black pepper
1 tablespoon sugar
3 tablespoons paprika
3 tablespoons flour
6 tablespoons cornmeal

When olive oil is hot, in 6-quart pot, add meat and sear over high heat; stir constantly until gray - not brown. It then will have the consistency of whole-grain hominy. Add 1 quart water and cook (covered) at bubbling simmer 1½ to 2 hours. Then add all ingredients, except flour and cornmeal. Cook another 30 minutes at same bubbling simmer, but no longer, as further cooking will damage some of the spice flavors. Now add thickening, previously mixed in 3 tablespoons cold water. Cook 5 minutes to determine if more water is necessary (likely) for your desired consistency. Stir to prevent sticking after thickening is added. Some prefer all flour, others all cornmeal, and still others use cracker meal - about as good, and more convenient. Suit your own taste.

Some Texans agree with Joe Cooper, some don't. Hal John Wimberly, editor and publisher of the Goat Gap Gazette, a Houston newspaper "mainly for chiliheads and their ilk," likes it simple. He says reverently of chili: "I don't know why people screw around with it. It's a marvelous dish if you treat it right, with a few simple ingredients. I mean, look at California cooks, they're likely to throw the whole garden in."

Wimberly brings to light yet another controversy that has raged among chili cooks since the beginning of time: whether or not one should put tomatoes in chili. "Jailhouse chili," he says, "is a good example. It's always been a favorite. It has been served to many a prisoner, and it was always very basic - meat, spices, peppers, and grease from the suet."

Over the past one hundred fifty years, many personalities and anecdotes have been linked with chili. It has been lauded by presidents, show-business types have defended it, and it was said that Will Rogers judged a town by its chili, and even kept scores.

Chili aficionados are no longer mostly Texans. The famous Chasen's restaurant in Beverly Hills serves more "Soup of the Devil" to international celebrities than any other restaurant. Jack Benny, J. Edgar Hoover, and even Elizabeth Taylor have eaten chili there. In fact, Liz had some Chasen's chili sent, frozen, to her in Rome during the shooting of Cleopatra.

Frank Tolbert, the noted Texas chili authority, received 29,000 letters from all over the world relating chili experiences after an article of his appeared in the Saturday Evening Post.

In 1977, a bill was introduced in the Texas legislature to designate chili as the official state dish, and one year earlier, back in California, Rufus (Rudy) Valdez, a full-blooded Ute Indian, won the world chili championship, using what he claimed to be a two thousand-year-old recipe.

"Originally," says Valdez, "chili was made with meat of horses or deer, chile peppers and cornmeal from ears of stalks that grew only to the knee. No beans." Valdez says he got his recipe from his grandmother when he was a boy on the Ute reservation near Ignacio, Colorado. She lived to the age of 102 and Valdez says she credited her longevity and that of her relatives to the powers of chili. Actually, he says, chili was invented by the Pueblo cliff dwellers in Mesa Verde who passed it on to the Navajos before it became popular with the Utes.

Carroll Shelby is more sanguine in his approach: "The beauty of chili to me is that it's really a state of mind," he says. "It's what you want when you make it. You can put anything in there you want, make it hot or mild, any blend of spices you feel like at the time. You make it up to suit your mood."

So the chili pot still boils. As does the controversy. We certainly don't know who started it, or where. We just know that, as with Billy the Kid, anybody who likes chili can't be all bad.

http://www.chilicookoff.com/history/history_of_chili.asp

Mr. Laz
09-13-2014, 09:08 PM
No, the real deal.

I'm eating JR's Texas BBQ Chili. It is smoked brisket, burnt to perfection outside, and shredded & chunked in their chili. It is to die for. Just a big bowl of brisket chili. This is the genuine article and the only delicious Texas Chili I have found east of the Rockies, outside of Texas itself.

It is awesome.

No disrespect to those who love their chili beans or don't like an all meat Texas chile. Just for me, there is nothing like a good Texas Chili. It is a meal in itself. I have a craving for this stuff and will go out of my way when I'm in Sacramento to pick up some of JR's Texas chili.


http://www.jrtexasbbq.com/Catering.htm

I'm sure that is some great meaty soup, it just isn't chili.

BroncoDork
09-13-2014, 09:09 PM
I am going to cry when JR's goes out of business. They closed the Campbell's soup plant nearby and that lunch business is what was keeping him afloat this time.

He already closed his doors once. Sacramento doesn't know what a Gem it has right under its very nose. Stupid Excrementans.

JR's is likely to close soon so I have got to swing by and get this chili early and often while he is still open. He is not likely to dig out and reopen this time. Danggit! Losing my fix...

Dude, looking at that pic you could go to any BBQ joint, get you some brisket, put it in a pot with water and red chili powder and you'd have the same thing.

Anyway, learn how to cook pork green chile or buy some at a Mexican joint.

Discuss Thrower
09-13-2014, 10:01 PM
Beans are filler.

Buehler445
09-13-2014, 10:21 PM
OK.... Straighten me out here.

So if you have outstanding brisket, please, for the love of fuck tell me why the fuck you would dilute one of the most outstanding tastes on the planet with Chili?

I love the fuck out of chili. But real, outstanding Q is better. Hands down.

The thing about chili is that it is a great avenue to take cheap mundane ingredients and spice them up into something good, relativity easily. You don't take something already out of this world and fuck with it. I mean, I'm sure it's good, but like I said, brisket is better.

jspchief
09-13-2014, 10:25 PM
So let me get this straight... Chili is BBQ, and "chili con carne" refers to chili with beans.

Is it any wonder we hate these 49er idiots so much?

listopencil
09-13-2014, 10:29 PM
OK.... Straighten me out here.

So if you have outstanding brisket, please, for the love of **** tell me why the **** you would dilute one of the most outstanding tastes on the planet with Chili?

I love the **** out of chili. But real, outstanding Q is better. Hands down.

The thing about chili is that it is a great avenue to take cheap mundane ingredients and spice them up into something good, relativity easily. You don't take something already out of this world and **** with it. I mean, I'm sure it's good, but like I said, brisket is better.

Yup, this.

listopencil
09-13-2014, 10:30 PM
Beans are filler.

Beans are tasty and they add a distinct consistency. They are also relatively healthy and take seasonings well.

listopencil
09-13-2014, 10:31 PM
And they make you fart. Which is awesome.

Kaepernick
09-14-2014, 02:11 AM
I'm sure that is some great meaty soup, it just isn't chili.

Go back and look at the "chili history" posted just above your post which I am responding to.

3 recipes listed and not a single one of them with beans.

Texas all-meat chili IS chili. If it's got beans, it ain't chili. Don't let Hormel corporation convince you otherwise.

brucey_72
09-14-2014, 04:59 AM
I have never had chili without beans except on a chili dog I bought once. Not a fan I like Beans even on my chili dogs and chili fries. I am from Ohio and when it gets fall then everyone is making chili for football games and fall parties. We even have chili cookoff festivals and I have never saw anyone hand out beanless chili. Not saying anything against people who like it beanless but from where I am from its beans in chili and chili is very intrograted into the culture here since the weather gets down to 0 on a regular bases.

I make my chili like this:
3lbs ground beef
2lbs of spicey all pork sausage
a bunch of beans(chili,kidney,red)
Chili Powder (varies on how much of a bold of a flavor I want)
few more seasonings
5 tablespoons of minced garlic
1 Tomato Juice
1 Tomato Puree
1 Tomato Paste
3 cans of diced tomatos with chilies and habaneros
Also normally a few diced habaneros

I am probably missing something haha

Bufkin
09-14-2014, 05:09 AM
Who care? Chiefs sux. Alex sux. Dorsey sux.

scho63
09-14-2014, 06:32 AM
California Sucks for BBQ, but in Sacramento, we have this place called JR's Texas BBQ.

The BEST Texas Chili west of the Rockies, and I've got 2 huge takeout cartons that I am just about to dive into.



http://media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/06/53/0d/06530d7cd8c5268fc433e793a7599a15.jpg

My brother lives close by so I will tell him about it. :thumb:

BigMeatballDave
09-14-2014, 06:45 AM
Beans are tasty and they add a distinct consistency. They are also relatively healthy and take seasonings well.

This.

I'll eat chili any way, really, but I love beans in it.

redfan
09-14-2014, 07:54 AM
Poll option fail. Beans are great.

BigMeatballDave
09-14-2014, 08:01 AM
I really love black beans in chili.

Kaepernick
09-14-2014, 08:14 AM
My brother lives close by so I will tell him about it. :thumb:

It is in South Sacramento off 47th street on Otto Circle.

If he loves Texas chili, he is in for a treat.

If he has never had Texas chili but loves meat and loves BBQ, he is still in for a treat. It is gooooood chili! :thumb:

Kaepernick
09-14-2014, 08:16 AM
So all you people saying you love chili with beans. Just curious...

Have you ever had good all-meat Texas chili or is the bean stuff the only "chili" you've ever had?

BigMeatballDave
09-14-2014, 08:24 AM
So all you people saying you love chili with beans. Just curious...

Have you ever had good all-meat Texas chili or is the bean stuff the only "chili" you've ever had?

Most of us around here are not inbred CamaroHeads.

We know how to cook.

Kaepernick
09-14-2014, 08:31 AM
Most of us around here are not inbred CamaroHeads.

We know how to cook.

I'll take that as a "no". You have never had delicious Texas style chili with all meat and no beans. If you ever get the chance, you are in for a treat.

Dinny Bossa Nova
09-14-2014, 08:41 AM
Teeny weeny chili beanie. The spirits are about to speak.

Bullwinkle.

Fire Me Boy!
09-14-2014, 08:59 AM
So all you people saying you love chili with beans. Just curious...

Have you ever had good all-meat Texas chili or is the bean stuff the only "chili" you've ever had?

Yes, I have. And I've made it myself. I love it.

That said, I enjoy black and/or kidney beans in a good robust chili. There's a different texture, it's heartier, and the beans take the flavor well.

Fire Me Boy!
09-14-2014, 09:08 AM
And I'm refusing to take part in the poll, because it's stupidly worded.

mlyonsd
09-14-2014, 09:12 AM
Beans in bowl chili, no beans in hot dog chili is the way I like it.

Fire Me Boy!
09-14-2014, 09:13 AM
You know, really, as long as it's not "Cincinnati chili," I'm good with it.

mlyonsd
09-14-2014, 09:15 AM
You know, really, as long as it's not "Cincinnati chili," I'm good with it.Yeah I agree.

BigMeatballDave
09-14-2014, 09:16 AM
You know, really, as long as it's not "Cincinnati chili," I'm good with it.

This. That shit is not good.

BigMeatballDave
09-14-2014, 09:19 AM
Yes, I have. And I've made it myself. I love it.

That said, I enjoy black and/or kidney beans in a good robust chili. There's a different texture, it's heartier, and the beans take the flavor well.

ABSOLUTELY NO DAMN KIDNEY BEANS! BLAH!

Pinto or Black.

Fire Me Boy!
09-14-2014, 09:20 AM
ABSOLUTELY NO DAMN KIDNEY BEANS! BLAH!

Pinto or Black.

We'll have to agree on black beans then, my friend.

Pinto: :Lin:

BigMeatballDave
09-14-2014, 09:22 AM
We'll have to agree on black beans then, my friend.

Pinto: :Lin:

Really? Don't like re-fried beans?

BigMeatballDave
09-14-2014, 09:23 AM
My main issue with Kidney is the skin is just way too thick.

Fire Me Boy!
09-14-2014, 09:23 AM
Really? Don't like re-fried beans?

Generally not a bean fan. I like 'em in chili, I like 'em barbecued. Refried are OK, but I'm totally cool without it.

Mennonite
09-14-2014, 09:24 AM
I love pinto beans in chili. Kidney beans, too. Black beans just don't have any flavor.

Fire Me Boy!
09-14-2014, 09:24 AM
My main issue with Kidney is the skin is just way too thick.

Extra fiber.

Mennonite
09-14-2014, 09:27 AM
My main issue with Kidney is the skin is just way too thick.

Ive recently started cooking kidney beans. The light red variety cook up much better than the dark red kind. Bring them to a boil and let them simmer for a couple of hours and they should be plenty tender. I like my beans cooked down to the point that the juice thickens, so I'll cook mine for closer to 2 and a half hours.

When cooking a pound of them, I usually add two bay leaves, 1/3 of a medium onion, and one stalk of celery finely diced.


Edit: and if anyone is a fan of pinto beans, they should give cranberry beans a try. Very similar, but the cranberry beans have a better flavor and cook up a little faster generally.

MTG#10
09-14-2014, 10:04 AM
This is the dumbest goddamned thread Ive ever read. And that's saying something for Chiefsplanet.

Fuck you Kaepernick. Go straight to hell you worthless piece of shit.

Kaepernick
09-14-2014, 10:05 AM
This is the dumbest goddamned thread Ive ever read. And that's saying something for Chiefsplanet.

**** you Kaepernick. Go straight to hell you worthless piece of shit.

ROFL

MTG#10
09-14-2014, 10:15 AM
Glad you could tell I was trolling...I came back to edit my post feeling bad

LMAO

SAUTO
09-14-2014, 10:18 AM
So let me get this straight... Chili is BBQ, and "chili con carne" refers to chili with beans.

Is it any wonder we hate these 49er idiots so much?

If there was it should be gone now
Posted via Mobile Device

hometeam
09-14-2014, 10:22 AM
You are posing this poll to a group that is largely midwest based. In the midwest, "chili" always has beans.

Also in the midwest, they call bean soup chili.

GloucesterChief
09-14-2014, 10:23 AM
You are posing this poll to a group that is largely midwest based. In the midwest, "chili" always has beans.

Also in the midwest, they call bean soup chili.

Is Cincinnati the midwest? Cincinnati chili doesn't have beans unless you order it with beans.

mcan
09-14-2014, 10:25 AM
I voted no beans, but actually don't have quite as visceral of a reaction to the bean thing as some. My mom's chili had beans and its still some of my favorite chili. But frankly, when I make it I don't bother with them. They're filler and not really good filler at that.

sedated
09-14-2014, 10:27 AM
Nice thread. I got tired of reading "real texas chili has no beans, if it has beans its not real chili" after about 5 posts.

So real chili has beans or what?

Pasta Little Brioni
09-14-2014, 10:30 AM
Chili with out beans is not chili

Fire Me Boy!
09-14-2014, 10:33 AM
Nice thread. I got tired of reading "real texas chili has no beans, if it has beans its not real chili" after about 5 posts.

So real chili has beans or what?


My particular favorite was his assertion that chili con carne has beans, but real chili doesn't. :facepalm:

Buehler445
09-14-2014, 10:34 AM
OK.... Straighten me out here.

So if you have outstanding brisket, please, for the love of fuck tell me why the fuck you would dilute one of the most outstanding tastes on the planet with Chili?

I love the fuck out of chili. But real, outstanding Q is better. Hands down.

The thing about chili is that it is a great avenue to take cheap mundane ingredients and spice them up into something good, relativity easily. You don't take something already out of this world and fuck with it. I mean, I'm sure it's good, but like I said, brisket is better.

Bump. OP never answered.

Pablo
09-14-2014, 10:39 AM
Chili going in the crockpot right now. Beans galore. Should be delicious.

Fish
09-14-2014, 10:54 AM
HEY GUYS I ATE AT THIS ONE PLACE AND HAVE PASSIONATE OPINIONS ABOUT FOOD NOW!

Fucking 9er douches....

oldman
09-14-2014, 11:25 AM
I spent quite a bit of time in Texas and have had many bowls of Texas chili. Thanks, but I'll have mine with beans. Just to clarify, "carne" is meat in Spanish, not beans.

listopencil
09-14-2014, 11:34 AM
So all you people saying you love chili with beans. Just curious...

Have you ever had good all-meat Texas chili or is the bean stuff the only "chili" you've ever had?

I lived in Texas between the ages of 5 and 11. That was the first time I had ever eaten chili and it did not have beans in it. I used to be annoyed by chili with beans and thought of it as lower quality. I have grown used to beans in my chili since then. I tend not to have such large chunks of meat in it as in your pic.

Discuss Thrower
09-14-2014, 11:35 AM
HEY GUYS I ATE AT THIS ONE PLACE AND HAVE PASSIONATE OPINIONS ABOUT FOOD NOW!

Fucking 9er douches....

Shades of Bono...

Easy 6
09-14-2014, 12:13 PM
Chili in a bowl = beans

Chili on a hot dog = no beans

Easy 6
09-14-2014, 12:16 PM
Beans in bowl chili, no beans in hot dog chili is the way I like it.

Ah, someone made the distinction before I did :thumb:

TimBone
09-14-2014, 12:28 PM
Ah, someone made the distinction before I did :thumb:

READ THE THREAD BEFORE POSTING, BUD!!!!

Easy 6
09-14-2014, 12:31 PM
READ THE THREAD BEFORE POSTING, BUD!!!!

LMAO I constantly jump in without reading first.

Raiderhater
09-14-2014, 01:03 PM
You know, really, as long as it's not "Cincinnati chili," I'm good with it.


ukCr6fG9pug

Buzz
09-14-2014, 01:48 PM
I like it with beans, the fiber makes for a good poop.