PDA

View Full Version : Home and Auto Has anyone ever bought a house without a Real Estate Agent?


BWillie
08-21-2015, 02:04 PM
I'm looking to buy a house, but I'd like to not use a real estate agent this time if I can help it. I should be able to finagle a better deal (offer less) without a selling agents commissions cutting into the previous homeowner's bottom line.

Just wanting to know how hard this is, and what I have to look out for. What obstacles there are. Mainly wouldn't know how to draft an offer, and what to do to get out of it if needed. I'm going to hire my own inspectors etc, could always draft something with an attorney but that kind of destroys the point in the first place of doing it on my own.

Hog's Gone Fishin
08-21-2015, 02:10 PM
You do realize real estate agents work for the seller ,right. If someone is doing a for sale by owner they're wanting a higher price trying to keep the agents commission. They are trying to do a potential buyer a favor.

BWillie
08-21-2015, 02:17 PM
You do realize real estate agents work for the seller ,right. If someone is doing a for sale by owner they're wanting a higher price trying to keep the agents commission. They are trying to do a potential buyer a favor.

I understand it as yes the listing agent gets a commission, and the selling agent gets a commission. I've been trying to work directly with the agents listing the homes, instead of having an agent to try to find me a home where they will have a additional commission.

That's how it has worked when I bought my other houses.

Ming the Merciless
08-21-2015, 02:21 PM
You do realize real estate agents work for the seller ,right.

In most transactions the buyer and seller have their own agents...

and they split the commission which is paid for by the seller.

They are trying to do a potential buyer a favor.


not necessarily

They (the seller) could be trying to keep the 'commission' (or a part of it) for themselves

Most people are greedy and try to keep at least some of it for themselves......or maybe split the savings, if theyre smart...

But very rarely do they 'give it all away...'


Most commissions are 3% to the buyers agent and 3 % to the seller so for example if there was a house that sold for $300,000 the total commission would be $18,000 which would come fropm the SELLER's proceeds. The house wouldn't go up in price to 318k

so the REAL questions are:

whats the REAL value of the house? Am I getting a better deal without an agent? (SOmetimes agents help the BUYER negotiate a lower price and help with getting financing and inspections etc...)

ALso an agent should help you understand all of the process so that you really know youre getting what you think you are etc...

seclark
08-21-2015, 02:29 PM
I did a long time ago...we were just starting out, and knew a couple where he'd lost his local job and was working in kc and was only coming home on weekends.

had a lawyer make up a what I believe was called a wrap around deed of trust. basically, we made a monthly payment to an account for them and then it was transferred to their mortgage account.

after about 3 years we were able to move everything over to our name, allowing the original owners to free themselves from the place we took from them and get their names off of it.

this has been about 28 years ago, so I might not have this completely right, but it did work for us and the owner.

they did have the house listed w/an agent, so we waited until their contract was up with them to make our move.

not sure if this helps, but...
sec

Ming the Merciless
08-21-2015, 02:33 PM
I understand it as yes the listing agent gets a commission, and the selling agent gets a commission. I've been trying to work directly with the agents listing the homes, instead of having an agent to try to find me a home where they will have a additional commission.

That's how it has worked when I bought my other houses.

If youre trying to save money:

Well this might be a good idea but youre not saving as much as you think you are, probably.

Look at the contract....and make sure youre saving anything at all. The contract should specify the selling agent's commission.

I highly doubt youre saving 50% on commission.

Usually commission is about 6%. Ive seen them lower it to 5 % before, which is about a 17% savings.

Ive never seen any of them lower it from 6% to 3%.....if you have someone willing to do that, thats a really good deal IMO.

Anyhow, check and make SURE what % the commission is, and if its something like only a 17% discount you might want to rethink not having your own agent...

Unless 17% of the commission is that big of a deal to you.

Your own agent might be able to negotiate a better price on the house anyway.....so I dunno man. I would have my own agent under normal circumstances, unless I was very familiar with the property.



If youre just trying to motivate the seller and have them go with your offer:

If youre just doing this to try and MOTIVATE the listing agent to pick your offer...well..thats a GREAT idea!
especially if its a tough market and you want the property really badly. I was thinking you were trying to save money but upon re-reading I think youre just doing it as an incentive to have them pick your offer over all others, which I believe is VERY VERY smart...and will work....because on their end it is DOUBLING their commission and on your end it doesnt affect the price much.

The only way you could get 'hurt' is if there was room to haggle and you didn't haggle as much as you could have because your agent is the same as theirs...but if you know what youre doing and youre sure of the value of the property, I would not hesitate to use this idea in a tough market.

xbarretx
08-21-2015, 02:51 PM
as was said earlier, from the buyers side you having an agent or not will not affect the price you pay. the listing agent already has a contract with the seller and thus knows what his/her %(cut) will be. When buying or selling I always use an agent because im not contract expert and feel that if im shelling out 350K+ on something...then I want to not get screwed or at least have a reliable set of eyes watching my back. Thus I do not sweat the commission because I paid the commission when I just sold my house...and someone else paid it when I bought.

It really depends on what market your in. houses in the KC area at 300 or less are going like hotcakes. listed my house out in Gardner, and it was under contract in just a few hours and I got full asking.

Lastly, just make sure you have applicable inspections done and that you know your rights. I have seen sellers not wanting to work without an agent because it can be too much hassle to deal with someone who doesn't know enough about real estate. to many moving parts. make sure to look at the sellers disclosure because if theres a problem or something major on the property then it should be listed on there. I bet the listing agent wont (may not) offer that info of on there own accord.

Speaking of which....I need to update my profile because I busted out of Gardner! wooooo!

Trivers
08-21-2015, 03:32 PM
as was said earlier, from the buyers side you having an agent or not will not affect the price you pay. the listing agent already has a contract with the seller and thus knows what his/her %(cut) will be. When buying or selling I always use an agent because im not contract expert and feel that if im shelling out 350K+ on something...then I want to not get screwed or at least have a reliable set of eyes watching my back. Thus I do not sweat the commission because I paid the commission when I just sold my house...and someone else paid it when I bought.

It really depends on what market your in. houses in the KC area at 300 or less are going like hotcakes. listed my house out in Gardner, and it was under contract in just a few hours and I got full asking.

Lastly, just make sure you have applicable inspections done and that you know your rights. I have seen sellers not wanting to work without an agent because it can be too much hassle to deal with someone who doesn't know enough about real estate. to many moving parts. make sure to look at the sellers disclosure because if theres a problem or something major on the property then it should be listed on there. I bet the listing agent wont (may not) offer that info of on there own accord.

Speaking of which....I need to update my profile because I busted out of Gardner! wooooo!

Words of wisdom from both xbarretx and pawnmover. The buyer agent costs you nothing; but gives you the piece of mind as they are there to protect YOU.. However, for some reason, if the seller does not pay the commission, some contracts state that then YOU are responsible for payment. If the buyer agent contract contains that, walk away and find another agent.

Iowanian
08-21-2015, 03:48 PM
Your reasoning makes no sense unless you are buying a for sale by owner.

I have been on the other side and had a home for sale by owner and have potential buyers show up to look with realtors. In those cases I stop the realtor at the door and explain clearly that they do not represent me and I will not pay any fees to them.

I got screwed out of 3% on a deal like that on one of the first houses I sold. I was naive. I spoke to the buyer, priced it, he agreed and looked. Came back again with a realtor " because he felt guilty because the person had been showing him homes and he wanted them involved on his side". I didn't pay close enough attention, signed a paper and at closing had to pay that B 3%. I was furious because I gave the guy the bare bones, no realtor fees price. I didn't want to kill the deal because I was moving across the state and let it go. Never again.

Bewbies
08-21-2015, 03:51 PM
Agents are free for buyers. Would you go to court without an attorney to save a few bucks? LMAO

aturnis
08-21-2015, 04:11 PM
Bought one without, and am currently selling one without.

Pretty painless. The site I used to list basically takes the place of the agent and offers the services and expertise needed to get things done.

Buying was much easier though.

The problem with selling is, everyone assumes I'm trying to keep the realtors commission, so they want to haggle. Like, "I want the house for nothing, even though this is by far the best house I've seen in the price range" offers.

The house is turn key, and in a low price range with high end finishes all new siding/windows, mechanical etc. Basically the only thing that isn't brand new is the electrical and plumbing in the walls.

Listing myself allowed me to keep it priced attractively. Wish people would realize that.

xbarretx
08-21-2015, 04:16 PM
Your reasoning makes no sense unless you are buying a for sale by owner.

I have been on the other side and had a home for sale by owner and have potential buyers show up to look with realtors. In those cases I stop the realtor at the door and explain clearly that they do not represent me and I will not pay any fees to them.

I got screwed out of 3% on a deal like that on one of the first houses I sold. I was naive. I spoke to the buyer, priced it, he agreed and looked. Came back again with a realtor " because he felt guilty because the person had been showing him homes and he wanted them involved on his side". I didn't pay close enough attention, signed a paper and at closing had to pay that B 3%. I was furious because I gave the guy the bare bones, no realtor fees price. I didn't want to kill the deal because I was moving across the state and let it go. Never again.

well, unless you had your own open house....I imagine the realtor/buyer did not simply "show up" at your house. usually if a Realtor has a client wanting to buy a FSBO....they (the Realtor) contact the Owner/responsible party and work out the commission ahead of time. the flip side would be the Realtor (buyers agent) has it in the representation agreement with the buyer that in the event of a FSBO, or a low value property , that the Realtor will get X amount of commission and if the commission is below said amount then the buyer is responsible for the difference. otherwise, the agent is working pro bono. everything's negotiable

xbarretx
08-21-2015, 04:20 PM
Bought one without, and am currently selling one without.

Pretty painless. The site I used to list basically takes the place of the agent and offers the services and expertise needed to get things done.

Buying was much easier though.

The problem with selling is, everyone assumes I'm trying to keep the realtors commission, so they want to haggle. Like, "I want the house for nothing, even though this is by far the best house I've seen in the price range" offers.

The house is turn key, and in a low price range with high end finishes all new siding/windows, mechanical etc. Basically the only thing that isn't brand new is the electrical and plumbing in the walls.

Listing myself allowed me to keep it priced attractively. Wish people would realize that.

it all depends on the market analysis. if you have someone who knows Real Estate... then they can figure that out on there own...or if they have Representation...they would know that info and be able to advise the client appropriately. if you have someone without representation then of course they think that... because people don't say.. Hey world im selling this on my own so I can give you a better deal....they say " hey im selling this myself so I can pocket the commission"

Deberg_1990
08-21-2015, 04:21 PM
The more you think about it, the more it feels like an agent doesnt do much for you? At least not as much as they make off of you...

aturnis
08-21-2015, 04:27 PM
Eh. We got comps from the listing website, listed where we thought was fair. Have had realtors calling trying to get us to list with them for more, b/c "...", of course. Only, once realtors are paid, we end up with the same money as FSBO, only the buyer gets a raw deal.

Forget that. I'd rather choose someone I think is deserving of the deal they're getting. Lots of people who could use a win out there.

aturnis
08-21-2015, 04:28 PM
I liken it to car dealers. Our cars cost more b/c of them.

xbarretx
08-21-2015, 04:34 PM
I liken it to car dealers. Our cars cost more b/c of them.

sure except for that's not apples to apples. when you buy a car, the stealership/BIG AUTO has an "agent" and you have nothing. thus it is one sided and you aren't getting any value...especially on a new car that you already chose yourself.

in Realestate both sides have (can )have representation.

I wish we were allowed to get some sort of realtor for buying a car... that way you can make sure you don't get screwed on the financing terms, end up buying a lemon , etc..... (yes I know there are laws but stuff still happens). Also, yes someone could rebuttal with...well Mr XbarretX...if your a responsible adult you should know the financial ins and outs of the deal/contract before you sign anything. yes that's true, but again that's not my forte thus I leave it to the professionals when needed and when applicable. besides, at the end of the day 1 grand on the purchase price of a house ends up being 7 or 8 bucks a month on a mortgage (depending on rates of course). thus I don't sweat that stuff.....unless of course im paying CASH...because cash is king and that's a whole new ball of wax.

Molitoth
08-21-2015, 04:37 PM
Sold my house 3 months ago with no realtors involved and it was freaking painless.

aturnis
08-21-2015, 04:38 PM
I've found listing agents, unless their trying to coax you away from FSBO market, like to list below the actual value of the home.

That way, the home sells faster, and they get money. A few thousand doesn't really mean much to their commission.

Not really what I consider "in my interests".

BWillie
08-21-2015, 04:39 PM
Bought one without, and am currently selling one without.

Pretty painless. The site I used to list basically takes the place of the agent and offers the services and expertise needed to get things done.

Buying was much easier though.

The problem with selling is, everyone assumes I'm trying to keep the realtors commission, so they want to haggle. Like, "I want the house for nothing, even though this is by far the best house I've seen in the price range" offers.

The house is turn key, and in a low price range with high end finishes all new siding/windows, mechanical etc. Basically the only thing that isn't brand new is the electrical and plumbing in the walls.

Listing myself allowed me to keep it priced attractively. Wish people would realize that.

What site do you use?

I don't really want to use an agent because I feel like they inflate the costs from both sides. It'd be fine if they added enough value, I just don't feel like what they make corresponds to what you get out of them. They don't seem to do a whole lot except be able to let you in. I can look at any house I want on MLS, Kansas City Homes, Reece & Nichols and find exactly what I want. I'm looking for a very specific floorplan, and most agents just try to show me homes I have no interest in as well. When I ask them a question about a home, they don't really know anymore than me. (I mean why would they?) They just read off of the MLS sheet, & go lets look at the disclosure.

The only value I see in them is at the time it comes to make an offer, or backing out of an contract. If I could figure that out on my own, I really see no point in having a Realtor.

xbarretx
08-21-2015, 04:41 PM
I've found listing agents, unless their trying to coax you away from FSBO market, like to list below the actual value of the home.

That way, the home sells faster, and they get money. A few thousand doesn't really mean much to their commission.

Not really what I consider "in my interests".

that's the mark a bad realtor. Thus I would understand your point of view. if you had a legit Realtor they would think of your best interests. because they want a client and not just a sale.

ducking out of the conversation as its Friday Beaches :)

BWillie, GL with whatever you do...just be cautious bro

aturnis
08-21-2015, 04:42 PM
I'm in Iowa, so there is a locally owned website, IAHomesforsale.com. It was started by a couple of guys from my area, so I use it, and they do a great job.

I would recommend FSBO.com though. Very similar. A little more expensive(a few hundred dollars, not thousands), but pretty well the same service.

Iowanian
08-21-2015, 04:59 PM
Did I stutter?

I decided to sell a house, it was word of mouth stage. I spoke to someone I knew who was looking. He came to look at the house. He returned a second time, accompanied by a realtor.
He wanted the realtor to represent him, and it was my initial understanding he would pay any fees. It didn't end up that way, because I made a mistake and didn't read everything I was signing. I was young and naive. If you don't give shit if you don't believe it.

I have sold other homes with a realtor as well as by owner using an attorney. I have had potential buyers show up to look at my homes on more than once occasion with a realtor in tow, without prior arrangements. It happened 2-3 times during a sale a year and a half ago.


well, unless you had your own open house....I imagine the realtor/buyer did not simply "show up" at your house. usually if a Realtor has a client wanting to buy a FSBO....they (the Realtor) contact the Owner/responsible party and work out the commission ahead of time. the flip side would be the Realtor (buyers agent) has it in the representation agreement with the buyer that in the event of a FSBO, or a low value property , that the Realtor will get X amount of commission and if the commission is below said amount then the buyer is responsible for the difference. otherwise, the agent is working pro bono. everything's negotiable

Bugeater
08-21-2015, 04:59 PM
The more you think about it, the more it feels like an agent doesnt do much for you? At least not as much as they make off of you...
The seller's agent is the biggest ripoff. I'd like to sell in the next couple years and stuff in my area generally goes really fast, and it irritates the hell out of me that I'm going to have to give some schmuck with a realtor's license close to $5k for throwing it in the MLS and nothing else.

Bugeater
08-21-2015, 05:03 PM
I've found listing agents, unless their trying to coax you away from FSBO market, like to list below the actual value of the home.

That way, the home sells faster, and they get money. A few thousand doesn't really mean much to their commission.

Not really what I consider "in my interests".
They also love to tell you all the things you need to upgrade to make it sell. Sorry but I'm not shelling out several thousand for fucking granite just to make your job easier.

xbarretx
08-21-2015, 05:17 PM
Okay Iowa, congrats . Plus I said usually.

mlyonsd
08-21-2015, 05:25 PM
I sold one without a realtor. Put an ad in the paper and did my own open house one weekend. It sold that day. I think it cost me somewhere in $150 attorney fees to make my end legal.

Buehler445
08-21-2015, 08:55 PM
I just bought one without it. We came to terms and used the realtor to manage the closing. Half the commission.