Booth Review

[Lprechaun]

After today's games there is clear evidence the league is interfering in games. I never wanted to admit it but there it is. Plays that arent supposed to be reviewed get looked at and then reversed but when you challenge a PI call they NEVER change it.
Agree or disagree?
(I dont think its about fixing games for certain teams I think its definitely the mechanics of the officiating getting screwed up)

[-King-]

The booth can review a play for PI inside 2 minutes.

[lcarus]

I mean, the one against the Vikings today that was overturned was the right call.

[petegz28]

I mean, the one against the Vikings today that was overturned was the right call.

what about the one not reviewed on the last play of the Raiders game???

[Lprechaun]

The booth can review a play for PI inside 2 minutes.

So what's the explanation for the booth review on the short run just now?
A scoring play is, a penalty is.... a booth review should be asked for from the on field crew not a "put a call in" from behind a TV.

[DaFace]

So what's the explanation for the booth review on the short run just now?

A scoring play is, a penalty is.... a booth review should be asked for from the on field crew not a "put a call in" from behind a TV.You apparently don't understand the rules. There was nothing wrong with that review.

[-King-]

LMAO It's funny how people can watch football games for years and still not understand some stuff and get outraged by it

[MGRS13]

The review at the end of the first half when they basically broke down on the telecast every reciever route was awful. The ref came back and said the play on the field stands. There was no call. They were just looking for interference.

[Lprechaun]

You apparently don't understand the rules. There was nothing wrong with that review.

Even the officiating specialist NBC has said it wasnt reviewable.
Explain it to me then what was reviewable. It wasnt called a score on the field. If it WAS a score then it could be reviewed.

[-King-]

Even the officiating specialist NBC has said it wasnt reviewable.
Explain it to me then what was reviewable. It wasnt called a score on the field. If it WAS a score then it could be reviewed.
You have to put on your listening ears because he later corrected himself regarding whether the spot could be changed. But the initial review was whether it was a touchdown or not and that's always reviewable.

[FAX]

I'll tell you what's funny (but not in an amusing sense) ...

Funny is a damn field judge changing a call after "getting a call" on his ear-pod device which cost Mahomes a turnover and the damn officials STILL didn't get the call correct.

Something is rotten in New York.

FAX

[DaFace]

Even the officiating specialist NBC has said it wasnt reviewable.

Explain it to me then what was reviewable. It wasnt called a score on the field. If it WAS a score then it could be reviewed.If the coach can ask for a review of something normally, the booth can ask for a review inside 2 minutes. There are no exceptions as far as I know.