PDA

View Full Version : Shannon Sharpe vs. Tony Gonzalez career stats.


Kylo Ren
05-18-2004, 08:38 AM
Shannon Sharpe
http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/1329



Tony Gonzalez
http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/12400

Wrasse
05-18-2004, 08:42 AM
Shannon Sharpe
G GS No Yards Avg Lg TD20+40+FD
TOTAL2041698151006012.3826213617473
I'mhavingdifficultyreadingthesefigures.

mlyonsd
05-18-2004, 08:42 AM
I haven't had to read hex in a while...care to translate?

Kylo Ren
05-18-2004, 08:47 AM
I'mhavingdifficultyreadingthesefigures. I agree. I fixed it.

Garcia Bronco
05-18-2004, 08:51 AM
So TG is a wee bit over half of Sharpes numbers at the half way point in his career. Let's see if TG can stay healthy. He's primed to try and get to the spot.

Mile High Mania
05-18-2004, 09:51 AM
So, the debate begins...

Sharpe:
14 years - 202 games (avg 14.4 games year)
815 rec / 10,060 yds / 12.3 ypc / 62 TDs

3 - 1,000 yd+ seasons
8 - Pro Bowls
3 - Rings
Top 50 All-time Receivers
#9 - receptions
#21 - receiving yards
#45t - receiving TDs

Gonzo:
7 years - 110 games (avg 15.7 games year)
468 rec / 5,646 yds / 12.1 ypc / 47 TDs

1 - 1,000 yd+ season
5 - Pro Bowls
0 - Rings
Top 50 All-time Receivers
none

==========
Comparing their first 7 seasons, Gonzo has the edge ... which is expected considering when they were drafted and put into the game.

This is the time when injuries must be avoided for Gonzo if he is to surpass Sharpe in these statistical categories. If that happens, I have no issues with it. Records get broken.

If Gonzo plays another 7 years, he needs to average the following in order to surpass Sharpe:

Receptions - 50 per year for 7 years. On his current pace, that could very well happen, barring injuries.

Receiving Yards - 630 yds per year for 7 years. Again, that could very well happen.

TDs - Gonzo is 15 away and that will happen within the next 2-3 years.

------------

So, there you go. Right now, it's key for Gonzo to avoid injuries. He's only missed 2 career starts and he has been the leading receiver on the team for years... that's a heavy load he's carrying. So, the key now is for the team to take the pressure off Gonzo if he is to play at that level for another 7 years.

ptlyon
05-18-2004, 10:01 AM
The only thing I can guarantee (barring injury), is that Gonzalez will surpass Sharpe in Pro Bowls.

Garcia Bronco
05-18-2004, 10:03 AM
Without looking I would say the Sharpe missed a little less than one whole season in his career. Another stat, although not the most telling, is playoff wins. We know how many TG has....Sharpe is like 12-6 or something like that.

TEX
05-18-2004, 10:04 AM
So TG is a wee bit over half of Sharpes numbers at the half way point in his career. Let's see if TG can stay healthy. He's primed to try and get to the spot.

If he stays healthy, he'll not only surpass Sharpe's accomplisnments, he'll blow them away.

Hoover
05-18-2004, 10:07 AM
Those three rigns are really impressive

Garcia Bronco
05-18-2004, 10:07 AM
If he stays healthy, he'll not only surpass Sharpe's accomplisnments, he'll blow them away.

It's possible...but not probable

Mile High Mania
05-18-2004, 10:07 AM
The only thing I can guarantee (barring injury), is that Gonzalez will surpass Sharpe in Pro Bowls.

The Pro Bowl thing has really lost something the last few years - it's really a popularity contest. Not to mention, there's not a whole lot of competition at that position - really hasn't been since the days that Coates, Sharpe and Gonzo would garner the rights to go.

That's not to say that Gonzo hasn't deserved to go, he has ... but there has been a lack of quality Pro Bowl TEs the last decade in the AFC. It's been a 2-3 player race.

Mile High Mania
05-18-2004, 10:09 AM
Without looking I would say the Sharpe missed a little less than one whole season in his career. Another stat, although not the most telling, is playoff wins. We know how many TG has....Sharpe is like 12-6 or something like that.

I think it's odd to count playoff wins for a player... even a QB, that should be more of a team thing. I really can't validate comparing playoff wins between TEs. It's like comparing playoff wins for Left Tackles or something. The comparison flies with QBs ... possibly RBs, but that's about it.

ptlyon
05-18-2004, 10:10 AM
The Pro Bowl thing has really lost something the last few years - it's really a popularity contest. Not to mention, there's not a whole lot of competition at that position - really hasn't been since the days that Coates, Sharpe and Gonzo would garner the rights to go.

That's not to say that Gonzo hasn't deserved to go, he has ... but there has been a lack of quality Pro Bowl TEs the last decade in the AFC. It's been a 2-3 player race.

Agreed. Sapp doesn't put up the numbers to make it but he is a media darling.

I know there's more, I just can't think of them right now.

mlyonsd
05-18-2004, 10:11 AM
As much as I couldn't stand him because he was a Donk and had a mouth that wouldn't quit he was one hell of a FB player.

Red Dawg
05-18-2004, 10:30 AM
In two seasons he'll pass him on the TD mark.

TEX
05-18-2004, 10:38 AM
I think it's odd to count playoff wins for a player... even a QB, that should be more of a team thing. I really can't validate comparing playoff wins between TEs. It's like comparing playoff wins for Left Tackles or something. The comparison flies with QBs ... possibly RBs, but that's about it.

Then why did you list Super Bowl rings when you listed their career stats? :hmmm:

Garcia Bronco
05-18-2004, 10:40 AM
I think it's odd to count playoff wins for a player... even a QB, that should be more of a team thing. I really can't validate comparing playoff wins between TEs. It's like comparing playoff wins for Left Tackles or something. The comparison flies with QBs ... possibly RBs, but that's about it.

Like I said...not the most telling stat, but it does show contribution to the desired result. TG put in the contribution but he's not getting the results.

TEX
05-18-2004, 10:40 AM
It's possible...but not probable

If he stays healthy it's BOTH possible and probable. Please explain how it is not. Being a DONX fan and not wanting to accept such things is not a good reason... ;)

Mile High Mania
05-18-2004, 10:42 AM
Then why did you list Super Bowl rings when you listed their career stats? :hmmm:

Playoff wins is more granular than SB wins... if you want to remove Pro Bowls and Super Bowls from the stats, feel free.

KingPriest2
05-18-2004, 10:43 AM
Stats broken down

Sharpe 7th round pick

3.99 catches pg
49.3 yards pg
.3 touchdowns pg
.67 20+ pg
2.31 first downs pg
17 40+
15.4 yards per catch highest

Started only two seasons all 16 games.
Started only 11 games but played in all 16 in first 2 years.

Gonzo 1st round pick

4.21 cpg
50.8 ypg
.42 tpg
.64 20+ pg
2.72 fdpg
4 40+
12.9 ypc highest

Played but not start all 16 games rookie year.
Has started 95 straight games since.
Has led his team in receiving 3 times in 99,01,03 (yards)

I do see Gonzo breaking the records. He is more consistent then Sharpe.

Some thing that have caught my eye is Sharpe has a better avg catching 20+ and even better 40+ catches then Gonzo. But Sharpe does not catch that many TD catches.

keg in kc
05-18-2004, 10:55 AM
Tony's best is still ahead of him, I think. If he remains healthy, his next 4 seasons will go down as the best consecutive string of years ever by a TE in NFL history. I'm talking 1000-1200 yards and 10-15 TDs a season, starting with what I believe will be a monster '04. I think Sharpe's records are safe, however, because I just don't see Gonzalez playing until he's 34 or 35.

Mile High Mania
05-18-2004, 10:59 AM
Stats broken down

Sharpe 7th round pick

3.99 catches pg
49.3 yards pg
.3 touchdowns pg
.67 20+ pg
2.31 first downs pg
17 40+
15.4 yards per catch highest

Started only two seasons all 16 games.
Started only 11 games but played in all 16 in first 2 years.

Gonzo 1st round pick

4.21 cpg
50.8 ypg
.42 tpg
.64 20+ pg
2.72 fdpg
4 40+
12.9 ypc highest

Played but not start all 16 games rookie year.
Has started 95 straight games since.
Has led his team in receiving 3 times in 99,01,03 (yards)

I do see Gonzo breaking the records. He is more consistent then Sharpe.

Some thing that have caught my eye is Sharpe has a better avg catching 20+ and even better 40+ catches then Gonzo. But Sharpe does not catch that many TD catches.

Another beauty about stats ... you can crunch them any way you like.

You say he started only two seasons all 16 games. His first few years, he played sparingly which is normal for a 7th round pick. However, there were only 3 seasons where he was active for less than 15 games. He missed 11 games in 99 when he was injured for the season.

You say that Gonzo is more consistent than Sharpe - I think that's rather subjective, when you are comparing 7 years to 14 years. Sharpe got off to a slow start and was hobbled by injuries for a couple of years, but since 1992, he has only dipped below 53 receptions 1 time - when he only played 5 games. And, since 1992, he's been over 60 receptions 11 years in a row.

Another thing that speaks to his consistency:
"One of four players to post 11 50-catch seasons, along with Jerry Rice (16), Andre Reed (13) and Cris Carter (11)."

Jerry Rice, Cris Carter, Andre Reed ... and Shannon Sharpe. That is some elite company.

+----------+-----+-------------------------+
| Year TM | G | Rec Yards Y/R TD |
+----------+-----+-------------------------+
| 1990 den | 16 | 7 99 14.1 1 |
| 1991 den | 16 | 22 322 14.6 1 |
| 1992 den | 16 | 53 640 12.1 2 |
| 1993 den | 16 | 81 995 12.3 9 |
| 1994 den | 15 | 87 1010 11.6 4 |
| 1995 den | 13 | 63 756 12.0 4 |
| 1996 den | 15 | 80 1062 13.3 10 |
| 1997 den | 16 | 72 1107 15.4 3 |
| 1998 den | 16 | 64 768 12.0 10 |
| 1999 den | 5 | 23 224 9.7 0 |
| 2000 bal | 15 | 67 810 12.1 5 |
| 2001 bal | 16 | 73 811 11.1 2 |
| 2002 den | 12 | 61 686 11.2 3 |
| 2003 den | 15 | 62 770 12.4 8 |
+----------+-----+-------------------------+
| TOTAL | 202 | 815 10060 12.3 62

His TDs are not off the charts and he only led Denver in receiving twice, but that's not the job of the TE is it? Not in Denver or most other cities. Rod Smith has led the team since 1997. Prior to that it was Anthony Miller for a couple of years.

The bottom line is that in the grand scheme of things, it is kinda silly to say one player is the greatest of all times when you're talking about a league that spans the better part of a century.

Sharpe is one of the greatest of all time - without question and barring injury, Gonzo will be there in due time.

Splitting statistical hairs is fun, though.

Mark M
05-18-2004, 11:04 AM
As much as I couldn't stand him because he was a Donk and had a mouth that wouldn't quit he was one hell of a FB player.

Couldn't agree more. I hated Sharpe for one reason:

He was a Donkey. If he'd been a Chief, I would be his biggest fan. But he wasn't, so good riddance.

MM
~~:)

KingPriest2
05-18-2004, 11:05 AM
It's possible...but not probable


Sharpes first 7 seasons.

1990 Denver Broncos 16 2 7 99 14.1 33 1 2 0 0
1991 Denver Broncos 16 9 22 322 14.6 37 1 7 0 0
1992 Denver Broncos 16 11 53 640 12.1 55 2 8 3 26
1993 Denver Broncos 16 12 81 995 12.3 63 9 12 3 49
1994 Denver Broncos 15 13 87 1010 11.6 44 4 14 2 51
1995 Denver Broncos 13 12 63 756 12.0 49 4 10 2 39
1996 Denver Broncos 15 15 80 1062 13.3 51 10 16 2 52


107 74 383 4884 12.7 31 69 12 217

3.5 cpg
45.6 ypg
.28 TDs pg
.64 20+ pg
2.02 FDs pg
12 40+

Compared to Tony G.s

TOTAL 111 95 468 5647 12.1 47 72 4 303

4.21 cpg
50.8 ypg
.42 tpg
.64 20+ pg
2.72 FDs pg
4 40+
12.9 ypc highest

Sharpes last 7 seasons (total of 14)

1997 Denver Broncos 16 16 72 1107 15.4 68 3 18 3 49
1998 Denver Broncos 16 16 64 768 12.0 38 10 10 0 45
1999 Denver Broncos 5 5 23 224 9.7 24 0 3 0 9
2000 Baltimore Ravens 16 15 67 810 12.1 59 5 12 1 36
2001 Baltimore Ravens 16 15 73 811 11.1 37 2 8 0 43
2002 Denver Broncos 13 13 61 686 11.2 82 3 5 1 32
2003 Denver Broncos 15 15 62 770 12.4 28 8 11 0 42



107 95 432 5176 11.9 31 67 5 256

4.0 cpg
48.3 ypg
.28 TDs pg
.62 20+ pg
2.39 FDs pg
5 40+

Tony G. has far better numbers then Sharpe had his first 7 seasons.
Tony G. has 85 more catches 763 more yards, 16 more TDs, 3 more 20+, 8 fewer 40+, and 82 more FD catches.

Come on think about it if Tony G. keeps this up and he will he could smash the records.

TEX
05-18-2004, 11:05 AM
Playoff wins is more granular than SB wins... if you want to remove Pro Bowls and Super Bowls from the stats, feel free.

No, I don't want to do that. I just didn't understand your reasoning for including them.

TEX
05-18-2004, 11:07 AM
Sharpes first 7 seasons.

1990 Denver Broncos 16 2 7 99 14.1 33 1 2 0 0
1991 Denver Broncos 16 9 22 322 14.6 37 1 7 0 0
1992 Denver Broncos 16 11 53 640 12.1 55 2 8 3 26
1993 Denver Broncos 16 12 81 995 12.3 63 9 12 3 49
1994 Denver Broncos 15 13 87 1010 11.6 44 4 14 2 51
1995 Denver Broncos 13 12 63 756 12.0 49 4 10 2 39
1996 Denver Broncos 15 15 80 1062 13.3 51 10 16 2 52


107 74 383 4884 12.7 31 69 12 217

3.5 cpg
45.6 ypg
.28 TDs pg
.64 20+ pg
2.02 FDs pg
12 40+

Compared to Tony G.s

TOTAL 111 95 468 5647 12.1 47 72 4 303

4.21 cpg
50.8 ypg
.42 tpg
.64 20+ pg
2.72 FDs pg
4 40+
12.9 ypc highest

Sharpes last 7 seasons (total of 14)

1997 Denver Broncos 16 16 72 1107 15.4 68 3 18 3 49
1998 Denver Broncos 16 16 64 768 12.0 38 10 10 0 45
1999 Denver Broncos 5 5 23 224 9.7 24 0 3 0 9
2000 Baltimore Ravens 16 15 67 810 12.1 59 5 12 1 36
2001 Baltimore Ravens 16 15 73 811 11.1 37 2 8 0 43
2002 Denver Broncos 13 13 61 686 11.2 82 3 5 1 32
2003 Denver Broncos 15 15 62 770 12.4 28 8 11 0 42



107 95 432 5176 11.9 31 67 5 256

4.0 cpg
48.3 ypg
.28 TDs pg
.62 20+ pg
2.39 FDs pg
5 40+

Tony G. has far better numbers then Sharpe had his first 7 seasons.
Tony G. has 85 more catches 763 more yards, 16 more TDs, 3 more 20+, 8 fewer 40+, and 82 more FD catches.

Come on think about it if Tony G. keeps this up and he will he could smash the records.

That was my point but Garcia saw it otherwise. Don't really know how except that it might have been a case for only seeing what he wanted to see... :hmmm:

cdcox
05-18-2004, 11:11 AM
Gonzo's numbers already match up pretty closely with Kellen Winslow's. So a case could be made for the HOF even if he never played another down. Two more typical Gonzo years would make him a lock, IMO.

What Sharpe has done over a career is truely impressive. Glad he is gone.

Mile High Mania
05-18-2004, 11:13 AM
Sharpes first 7 seasons.

1990 Denver Broncos 16 2 7 99 14.1 33 1 2 0 0
1991 Denver Broncos 16 9 22 322 14.6 37 1 7 0 0
1992 Denver Broncos 16 11 53 640 12.1 55 2 8 3 26
1993 Denver Broncos 16 12 81 995 12.3 63 9 12 3 49
1994 Denver Broncos 15 13 87 1010 11.6 44 4 14 2 51
1995 Denver Broncos 13 12 63 756 12.0 49 4 10 2 39
1996 Denver Broncos 15 15 80 1062 13.3 51 10 16 2 52


107 74 383 4884 12.7 31 69 12 217

3.5 cpg
45.6 ypg
.28 TDs pg
.64 20+ pg
2.02 FDs pg
12 40+

Compared to Tony G.s

TOTAL 111 95 468 5647 12.1 47 72 4 303

4.21 cpg
50.8 ypg
.42 tpg
.64 20+ pg
2.72 FDs pg
4 40+
12.9 ypc highest

Sharpes last 7 seasons (total of 14)

1997 Denver Broncos 16 16 72 1107 15.4 68 3 18 3 49
1998 Denver Broncos 16 16 64 768 12.0 38 10 10 0 45
1999 Denver Broncos 5 5 23 224 9.7 24 0 3 0 9
2000 Baltimore Ravens 16 15 67 810 12.1 59 5 12 1 36
2001 Baltimore Ravens 16 15 73 811 11.1 37 2 8 0 43
2002 Denver Broncos 13 13 61 686 11.2 82 3 5 1 32
2003 Denver Broncos 15 15 62 770 12.4 28 8 11 0 42



107 95 432 5176 11.9 31 67 5 256

4.0 cpg
48.3 ypg
.28 TDs pg
.62 20+ pg
2.39 FDs pg
5 40+

Tony G. has far better numbers then Sharpe had his first 7 seasons.
Tony G. has 85 more catches 763 more yards, 16 more TDs, 3 more 20+, 8 fewer 40+, and 82 more FD catches.

Come on think about it if Tony G. keeps this up and he will he could smash the records.

Another fun way to work stats. Let's see how the next 7 years go.

Mile High Mania
05-18-2004, 11:17 AM
Gonzo's numbers already match up pretty closely with Kellen Winslow's. So a case could be made for the HOF even if he never played another down. Two more typical Gonzo years would make him a lock, IMO.

What Sharpe has done over a career is truely impressive. Glad he is gone.

While we're at it, let's talk about Terrell Davis and how his numbers stack up against the greats that are in the HOF.

TG doesn't have the longevity... only 1 - thousand yard season. Only top 10 in receptions 1 time - top 10 in TDs 3 times. He's been a great player for a short time at this point, he's on pace for total greatness without a doubt.

If Gonzo quit today or was sucked up by a twister... he would not warrant HOF induction.

Mile High Mania
05-18-2004, 11:20 AM
That was my point but Garcia saw it otherwise. Don't really know how except that it might have been a case for only seeing what he wanted to see... :hmmm:

TEX,

You either compare a total body of work to another total body of work or you quit trying. Just b/c TG has only played 7 years, you can't just say compare those 7 to Sharpe's first 7 or last 7. Hell, why not take the best 7 and see what happens.

Gonzo has been healthy through 7 years and he started early as a rookie - that's great for him. Sharpe did not start early as a rookie and injuries were a factor in a couple of years. So, compare the totals ... not various chapters.

cdcox
05-18-2004, 11:22 AM
The cases are similar. I think a case can be made for Davis, but he is not a shoe-in, and frankly I don't think he deserves it. Had he two more years of Davisesqe performance, then yeah, he'd be a lock.

Mile High Mania
05-18-2004, 11:23 AM
The cases are similar. I think a case can be made for Davis, but he is not a shoe-in, and frankly I don't think he deserves it. Had he two more years of Davisesqe performance, then yeah, he'd be a lock.

For the record, I don't think Davis should get in ... but I could build a case for it. :clap:

keg in kc
05-18-2004, 11:25 AM
Gonzo has been healthy through 7 years and he started early as a rookie I've only been here for 5 years and paid the Chiefs no mind at all before arriving, so I may be wrong about this, but I don't think Gonzalez started as a rookie.

Garcia Bronco
05-18-2004, 11:25 AM
Ok.....exactly when would the current marked be smashed? How many yards? TD's? No question Gonzo will smash that, but you have to wonder if he'll even be a Chief by then.

Mile High Mania
05-18-2004, 11:29 AM
I've only been here for 5 years and paid the Chiefs no mind at all before arriving, so I may be wrong about this, but I don't think Gonzalez started as a rookie.


| 1997 kan | 16 | 33 368 11.2 2 |
| 1998 kan | 16 | 59 621 10.5 2 |
| 1999 kan | 15 | 76 849 11.2 11 |
| 2000 kan | 15 | 93 1203 12.9 9 |
| 2001 kan | 16 | 73 917 12.6 6 |
| 2002 kan | 16 | 63 773 12.3 7 |
| 2003 kan | 16 | 71 915 12.9 10

I shouldn't have implied that he was the main starter... he saw as much action his first year as Sharpe did his first two years.

KingPriest2
05-18-2004, 11:29 AM
Here's the current Hall of Fame Tight Ends.

Modern Era: Tight Ends (6)

Dave Casper 1974-1984
Mike Ditka 1961-1972
John Mackey 1963-1972 Ozzie Newsome 1978-1990
Jackie Smith 1963-1978
Kellen Winslow 1979-1987


I threw TC in here as well.

Dave Casper 5 time PB

1974 oak | 14 | 4 26 6.5 3 |
| 1975 oak | 14 | 5 71 14.2 1 |
| 1976 oak | 13 | 53 691 13.0 10 |
| 1977 oak | 14 | 48 584 12.2 6 |
| 1978 oak | 16 | 62 852 13.7 9 |
| 1979 oak | 15 | 57 771 13.5 3 |
| 1980 hou | 10 | 34 526 15.5 3 |
| 1980 oak | 6 | 22 270 12.3 1 |
| 1981 hou | 16 | 33 572 17.3 8 |
| 1982 hou | 9 | 36 573 15.9 6 |
| 1983 min | 10 | 13 172 13.2 0 |
| 1983 hou | 3 | 7 79 11.3 0 |
| 1984 rai | 7 | 4 29 7.2 2 |
+----------+-----+-------------------------+
| TOTAL | 147 | 378 5216 13.8 52 |
+----------+-----+-------------------------+



MIke Ditka 5 time PB

1961 chi | 14 | 56 1076 19.2 12 |
| 1962 chi | 14 | 58 904 15.6 5 |
| 1963 chi | 14 | 59 794 13.5 8 |
| 1964 chi | 14 | 75 897 12.0 5 |
| 1965 chi | 14 | 36 454 12.6 2 |
| 1966 chi | 14 | 32 378 11.8 2 |
| 1967 phi | 9 | 26 274 10.5 2 |
| 1968 phi | 11 | 13 111 8.5 2 |
| 1969 dal | 12 | 17 268 15.8 3 |
| 1970 dal | 14 | 8 98 12.2 0 |
| 1971 dal | 14 | 30 360 12.0 1 |
| 1972 dal | 14 | 17 198 11.6 1 |
+----------+-----+-------------------------+
| TOTAL | 158 | 427 5812 13.6 43

Todd Christensen 5 time PB

1979 nyg | 1 | 0 0 0.0 0 |
| 1979 oak | 12 | 0 0 0.0 0 |
| 1980 oak | 16 | 0 0 0.0 0 |
| 1981 oak | 16 | 8 115 14.4 2 |
| 1982 rai | 9 | 42 510 12.1 4 |
| 1983 rai | 16 | 92 1247 13.6 12 |
| 1984 rai | 16 | 80 1007 12.6 7 |
| 1985 rai | 16 | 82 987 12.0 6 |
| 1986 rai | 16 | 95 1153 12.1 8 |
| 1987 rai | 12 | 47 663 14.1 2 |
| 1988 rai | 7 | 15 190 12.7 0 |
+----------+-----+-------------------------+
| TOTAL | 137 | 461 5872 12.7 41


John Mackey 5 time PB

1963 bal | 14 | 35 726 20.7 7 |
| 1964 bal | 14 | 22 406 18.5 2 |
| 1965 bal | 14 | 40 814 20.4 7 |
| 1966 bal | 14 | 50 829 16.6 9 |
| 1967 bal | 14 | 55 686 12.5 3 |
| 1968 bal | 14 | 45 644 14.3 5 |
| 1969 bal | 14 | 34 443 13.0 2 |
| 1970 bal | 14 | 28 435 15.5 3 |
| 1971 bal | 14 | 11 143 13.0 0 |
| 1972 sdg | 13 | 11 110 10.0 0 |
+----------+-----+-------------------------+
| TOTAL | 139 | 331 5236 15.8 38 |

Ozzie Newsome 3 time PB

1978 cle | 16 | 38 589 15.5 2 |
| 1979 cle | 16 | 55 781 14.2 9 |
| 1980 cle | 16 | 51 594 11.6 3 |
| 1981 cle | 16 | 69 1002 14.5 6 |
| 1982 cle | 9 | 49 633 12.9 3 |
| 1983 cle | 16 | 89 970 10.9 6 |
| 1984 cle | 16 | 89 1001 11.2 5 |
| 1985 cle | 16 | 62 711 11.5 5 |
| 1986 cle | 16 | 39 417 10.7 3 |
| 1987 cle | 13 | 34 375 11.0 0 |
| 1988 cle | 16 | 35 343 9.8 2 |
| 1989 cle | 16 | 29 324 11.2 1 |
| 1990 cle | 16 | 23 240 10.4 2 |
+----------+-----+-------------------------+
| TOTAL | 198 | 662 7980 12.1 47 |


Jackie Smith 5 time PB

1963 stl | 14 | 28 445 15.9 2 |
| 1964 stl | 14 | 47 657 14.0 4 |
| 1965 stl | 14 | 41 648 15.8 2 |
| 1966 stl | 14 | 45 810 18.0 3 |
| 1967 stl | 14 | 56 1205 21.5 9 |
| 1968 stl | 14 | 49 789 16.1 2 |
| 1969 stl | 14 | 43 561 13.0 1 |
| 1970 stl | 14 | 37 687 18.6 4 |
| 1971 stl | 9 | 21 379 18.0 4 |
| 1972 stl | 14 | 26 407 15.7 2 |
| 1973 stl | 14 | 41 600 14.6 1 |
| 1974 stl | 14 | 25 413 16.5 3 |
| 1975 stl | 9 | 13 246 18.9 2 |
| 1976 stl | 12 | 3 22 7.3 0 |
| 1977 stl | 14 | 5 49 9.8 1 |
| 1978 dal | 12 | 0 0 0.0 0 |
+----------+-----+-------------------------+
| TOTAL | 210 | 480 7918 16.5 40 |

Kellen Winslow 5 time PB

1979 sdg | 7 | 25 255 10.2 2 |
| 1980 sdg | 16 | 89 1290 14.5 9 |
| 1981 sdg | 16 | 88 1075 12.2 10 |
| 1982 sdg | 9 | 54 721 13.4 6 |
| 1983 sdg | 16 | 88 1172 13.3 8 |
| 1984 sdg | 7 | 55 663 12.1 2 |
| 1985 sdg | 10 | 25 318 12.7 0 |
| 1986 sdg | 16 | 64 728 11.4 5 |
| 1987 sdg | 12 | 53 519 9.8 3 |
+----------+-----+-------------------------+
| TOTAL | 109 | 541 6741 12.5 45 |

Mile High Mania
05-18-2004, 11:32 AM
I think that Gonzo is the product of a system....



....a system that employs and focuses on crappy receivers. :p

KingPriest2
05-18-2004, 11:33 AM
Ok.....exactly when would the current marked be smashed? How many yards? TD's? No question Gonzo will smash that, but you have to wonder if he'll even be a Chief by then.

Gonzo can break the TD record next year if he has a major year. Sharpe has it at 62. You do have to think the TE single season record is 12 done only 4 times.

KingPriest2
05-18-2004, 11:37 AM
I need to check on this but I think Gonzo has the best stats over the first 7 years then any tight end in history.

KingPriest2
05-18-2004, 11:38 AM
I think that Gonzo is the product of a system....



....a system that employs and focuses on crappy receivers. :p


You could say that Sharpe is a product of the system as well.

keg in kc
05-18-2004, 11:38 AM
I think that Gonzo is the product of a system....



....a system that employs and focuses on crappy receivers.I shudder to think of it, but he'd be even more dominant if we had better receivers. Right now he and Priest are the sole focus of defenses. Imagine what kind of havoc he could wreak if there was a legitimate threat (or, god forbid, threats) on the outside. No more being covered by #1 corners. A chance to find holes and seams in the middle of zones because he isn't bracketed on every play. It's really sad in a way. We saw a shadow of that in 2000, before DmiA went to shit.

KingPriest2
05-18-2004, 11:39 AM
I shudder to think of it, but he'd be even more dominant if we had better receivers. Right now he and Priest are the sole focus of defenses. Imagine what kind of havoc he could wreak if there was a legitimate threat (or, god forbid, threats) on the outside. No more being covered by #1 corners. A chance to find holes and seams in the middle of zones because he isn't bracketed on every play. It's really sad in a way. We saw a shadow of that in 2000, before DmiA went to shit.


How true this statement is.

Mile High Mania
05-18-2004, 11:40 AM
You could say that Sharpe is a product of the system as well.

I was being sarcastic. I do think that Gonzo has had one of if not the best first 7 years a TE has had. We'll see what happens.

Mile High Mania
05-18-2004, 11:46 AM
I shudder to think of it, but he'd be even more dominant if we had better receivers. Right now he and Priest are the sole focus of defenses. Imagine what kind of havoc he could wreak if there was a legitimate threat (or, god forbid, threats) on the outside. No more being covered by #1 corners. A chance to find holes and seams in the middle of zones because he isn't bracketed on every play. It's really sad in a way. We saw a shadow of that in 2000, before DmiA went to shit.

This is also the main reason to be concerned about injuries ... he's avoided them well, but the wear and tear is building up.

KCTitus
05-18-2004, 11:48 AM
This is also the main reason to be concerned about injuries ... he's avoided them well, but the wear and tear is building up.

feh...even I can admit he wasnt right until very late in the year and by then it was too late...

Mile High Mania
05-18-2004, 11:50 AM
feh...even I can admit he wasnt right until very late in the year and by then it was too late...

I think I missed this one ... what are you referring to? I wasn't trying to knock the guy. Let me know what I missed.

KCTitus
05-18-2004, 11:53 AM
I think I missed this one ... what are you referring to? I wasn't trying to knock the guy. Let me know what I missed.

I assumed you were referring to Priest...nevermind.

keg in kc
05-18-2004, 11:54 AM
Injuries are a concern for any NFL player. Personally, I think a lot of it is simply a matter of luck, being in the wrong place at the wrong time.

And Tony has been seriously hurt, it just happened to come in the final game of a season (knee injury in...2001, I think it was, on a hail mary). He would've been out for a while if that had happened earlier in the year.

KingPriest2
05-18-2004, 11:55 AM
I think I missed this one ... what are you referring to? I wasn't trying to knock the guy. Let me know what I missed.


I think this is what he meant but I don't know what he meant by it was to late. He started to come around the first Denver game. Gonzos knee got hurt in the preseason and I think that affected his play.


GAMEDATE Opp RESULT GS Rec Yds Avg Lg TD Att Yds Avg Lg TD Fum Rec Yds TD
09/07 San Diego W 27-14 Yes 2 18 9.0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
09/14 Pittsburgh W 41-20 Yes 2 8 4.0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
09/21 @Houston W 42-14 Yes 3 52 17.3 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
09/28 @Baltimore W 17-10 Yes 3 13 4.3 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0



October Receiving Rushing Fumbles
GAMEDATE Opp RESULT GS Rec Yds Avg Lg TD Att Yds Avg Lg TD Fum Rec Yds TD
10/05 Denver W 24-23 Yes 3 47 15.7 23 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10/12 @Green Bay W 40-34 Yes 4 121 30.3 67 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10/20 @Oakland W 17-10 Yes 3 87 29.0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10/26 Buffalo W 38-5 Yes 6 65 10.8 26 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0



November Receiving Rushing Fumbles
GAMEDATE Opp RESULT GS Rec Yds Avg Lg TD Att Yds Avg Lg TD Fum Rec Yds TD
11/09 Cleveland W 41-20 Yes 7 70 10.0 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11/16 @Cincinnati L 19-24 Yes 7 86 12.3 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11/23 Oakland W 27-24 Yes 4 36 9.0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11/30 @San Diego W 28-24 Yes 4 28 7.0 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0



December Receiving Rushing Fumbles
GAMEDATE Opp RESULT GS Rec Yds Avg Lg TD Att Yds Avg Lg TD Fum Rec Yds TD
12/07 @Denver L 27-45 Yes 6 73 12.2 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12/14 Detroit W 45-17 Yes 6 93 15.5 32 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12/20 @Minnesota L 20-45 Yes 5 65 13.0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12/28 Chicago W 31-3 Yes 6 54 9.0 17 0

Mile High Mania
05-18-2004, 11:56 AM
Injuries are a concern for any NFL player. Personally, I think a lot of it is simply a matter of luck, being in the wrong place at the wrong time.

And Tony has been seriously hurt, it just happened to come in the final game of a season (knee injury in...2001, I think it was, on a hail mary). He would've been out for a while if that had happened earlier in the year.

That injury was part of the luck you mentioned - timing is everything.

keg in kc
05-18-2004, 11:57 AM
Exactly.

Both bad luck (the injury itself, on a frikkin hail mary of all things) and good (the timing).

KingPriest2
05-18-2004, 12:24 PM
Here is Ben Coates
1991 nwe | 16 | 10 95 9.5 1 |
| 1992 nwe | 16 | 20 171 8.6 3 |
| 1993 nwe | 16 | 53 659 12.4 8 |
| 1994 nwe | 16 | 96 1174 12.2 7 |
| 1995 nwe | 16 | 84 915 10.9 6 |
| 1996 nwe | 16 | 62 682 11.0 9 |
| 1997 nwe | 16 | 66 737 11.2 8 |
| 1998 nwe | 14 | 67 668 10.0 6 |
| 1999 nwe | 16 | 32 370 11.6 2 |
| 2000 bal | 8 | 9 84 9.3 0 |
+----------+-----+-------------------------+
| TOTAL | 150 | 499 5555 11.1 50 |
+----------+-----+-------------------------+


Seasons among the league's top 10

KingPriest2
05-18-2004, 12:26 PM
Here is Raymond Berry who is listed as a WIDE RECIEVER


1955 bal | 12 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 13 205 15.8 0 |
| 1956 bal | 12 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 37 601 16.2 2 |
| 1957 bal | 12 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 47 800 17.0 6 |
| 1958 bal | 12 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 56 794 14.2 9 |
| 1959 bal | 12 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 66 959 14.5 14 |
| 1960 bal | 12 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 74 1298 17.5 10 |
| 1961 bal | 12 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 75 873 11.6 0 |
| 1962 bal | 14 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 51 687 13.5 3 |
| 1963 bal | 9 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 44 703 16.0 3 |
| 1964 bal | 12 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 43 663 15.4 6 |
| 1965 bal | 14 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 58 739 12.7 7 |
| 1966 bal | 14 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 56 786 14.0 7 |
| 1967 bal | 7 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 11 167 15.2 1 |
+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+
| TOTAL | 154 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 631 9275 14.7 68 |

Deberg_1990
05-18-2004, 12:27 PM
Here is Raymond Berry who is listed as a WIDE RECIEVER


1955 bal | 12 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 13 205 15.8 0 |
| 1956 bal | 12 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 37 601 16.2 2 |
| 1957 bal | 12 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 47 800 17.0 6 |
| 1958 bal | 12 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 56 794 14.2 9 |
| 1959 bal | 12 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 66 959 14.5 14 |
| 1960 bal | 12 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 74 1298 17.5 10 |
| 1961 bal | 12 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 75 873 11.6 0 |
| 1962 bal | 14 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 51 687 13.5 3 |
| 1963 bal | 9 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 44 703 16.0 3 |
| 1964 bal | 12 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 43 663 15.4 6 |
| 1965 bal | 14 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 58 739 12.7 7 |
| 1966 bal | 14 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 56 786 14.0 7 |
| 1967 bal | 7 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 11 167 15.2 1 |
+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+
| TOTAL | 154 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 631 9275 14.7 68 |

Hmm..i thought he was a TE? my bad then.....what about Kellen Winslows stats?

kc rush
05-18-2004, 12:27 PM
Just think how impressive Tony's numbers would be if he had a decent QB for most of his career.

Also, Tony's numbers would be much better if he wasn't called for phantom offensive pass interference calls two games each year. ;)

KingPriest2
05-18-2004, 12:30 PM
Hmm..i thought he was a TE? my bad then.....what about Kellen Winslows stats?


That is cool

Look at post 37 I listed all the Hall of Fame tight ends and Todd Christensen.

Deberg_1990
05-18-2004, 12:36 PM
This kid has a shot too to break all the records:

Todd Heap

CAREER RECEIVING STATS
Year Team G Rec Yds Avg Lg TD
2001 BAL 12 16 206 12.9 24 1
2002 BAL 16 68 836 12.3 43 6
2003 BAL 16 57 693 12.2 33 3
Totals: 44 141 1735 12.3 43 10

KingPriest2
05-18-2004, 12:38 PM
Just think how impressive Tony's numbers would be if he had a decent QB for most of his career.

Also, Tony's numbers would be much better if he wasn't called for phantom offensive pass interference calls two games each year. ;)


Grbac was a great passer yardage wise that is. Green is a decent QB.

Just think this system really doe not work to Gonzos abilities. Just think about what he could do if he was in that type of system.

KingPriest2
05-18-2004, 12:48 PM
This kid has a shot too to break all the records:

Todd Heap

CAREER RECEIVING STATS
Year Team G Rec Yds Avg Lg TD
2001 BAL 12 16 206 12.9 24 1
2002 BAL 16 68 836 12.3 43 6
2003 BAL 16 57 693 12.2 33 3
Totals: 44 141 1735 12.3 43 10



1997 Kansas City Chiefs 16 0 33 368 11.2 30 2 5 0 21
1998 Kansas City Chiefs 16 16 59 621 10.5 32 2 6 0 33
1999 Kansas City Chiefs 15 15 76 849 11.2 73 11 8 1 47

47 31 168 1838 15 19 1 101

RECEIVING

Year Team G GS No Yards Avg Lg TD 20+ 40+ FD
2001 Baltimore Ravens 12 6 16 206 12.9 24 1 3 0 10
2002 Baltimore Ravens 16 16 68 836 12.3 43 6 13 2 44
2003 Baltimore Ravens 16 16 57 693 12.2 33 3 13 0 32
TOTAL 44 38 141 1735 12.3 43 10 29 2 86

Heap is behind Gonzos first 3 years but he does have a chance.

Deberg_1990
05-18-2004, 12:53 PM
Honestly..its waaay too early...but potentially, Winslow Jr. has all the "tools" to be a great one. Dude looks as smooth as a Wideout when he runs.

KingPriest2
05-18-2004, 12:55 PM
As much as it kills me this guy has great numbers in his first 2 years. He has far better numbers then Gonzo avg wise.


Year Team G GS No Yards Avg Lg TD 20+ 40+ FD
2002 New York Giants 15 14 74 894 12.1 30 2 16 0 49
2003 New York Giants 9 9 48 535 11.1 46 2 6 1 29
TOTAL 24 23 122 1429 11.7 46 4 22 1 78

KingPriest2
05-18-2004, 12:58 PM
Honestly..its waaay too early...but potentially, Winslow Jr. has all the "tools" to be a great one. Dude looks as smooth as a Wideout when he runs.


You are right about that. .

Deberg_1990
05-18-2004, 12:59 PM
As much as it kills me this guy has great numbers in his first 2 years. He has far better numbers then Gonzo avg wise.


Year Team G GS No Yards Avg Lg TD 20+ 40+ FD
2002 New York Giants 15 14 74 894 12.1 30 2 16 0 49
2003 New York Giants 9 9 48 535 11.1 46 2 6 1 29
TOTAL 24 23 122 1429 11.7 46 4 22 1 78

This is Shockey right? Ill admit...hes a talent..and better after the catch than Gonzo. Has a 2 cent head though.

KingPriest2
05-18-2004, 01:03 PM
This is Shockey right? Ill admit...hes a talent..and better after the catch than Gonzo. Has a 2 cent head though.


Yes as much as it hurts it is him.

Deberg_1990
05-18-2004, 01:14 PM
Alot could go into this argument. Is this just based on pass catching ability? Or do we look at the total package, including blocking ability?

Garcia Bronco
05-18-2004, 01:16 PM
Sharpe has blocked for 7 or 8 1000 yard backs.

Deberg_1990
05-18-2004, 01:17 PM
Sharpe has blocked for 7 or 8 1000 yard backs.

Good point Garcia

Garcia Bronco
05-18-2004, 01:22 PM
Don't get me wrong...Sharpe ain't the best blocking TE out there...but he got the job done. TG can block better IMO, but what does that mean in the end whenh you don't win the Super Bowl.

Deberg_1990
05-18-2004, 01:23 PM
Don't get me wrong...Sharpe ain't the best blocking TE out there...but he got the job done. TG can block better IMO, but what does that mean in the end whenh you don't win the Super Bowl.

Not Tony G's fault we should have gone to the Super Bow last year. Unfortunately, he cant tackle and play defense. God, if only we would have hired Gunther a year ago!

Mile High Mania
05-18-2004, 01:28 PM
It's a fun debate. Sharpe grew into being a better than average blocking TE. He didn't know much his first few years, but really grew into the position.

The TE position is definitely getting better from a quality standpoint, for the longest time it's really maybe been 3-4 tier 1 TEs. Now you have KWII and the two guys named Ben that were just drafted. Add them to the likes of Gonzo, Shockey, Heap and a couple of guys that are improving in the league like Franks, Pollard and a couple of others.

There are a number of potentially great young TEs out there waiting to burst onto the scene.

Mile High Mania
05-18-2004, 01:29 PM
Not Tony G's fault we should have gone to the Super Bow last year. Unfortunately, he cant tackle and play defense. God, if only we would have hired Gunther a year ago!

Well, we will soon find out if it was GRob's system or the players...

Deberg_1990
05-18-2004, 01:31 PM
Well, we will soon find out if it was GRob's system or the players...

Exactly! you should know how bad GRobs system is though. He got fired there as well did he not?

Braincase
05-18-2004, 01:33 PM
The one thing Gonzo has going for him is Romanowski's retirement...

Mile High Mania
05-18-2004, 01:45 PM
Exactly! you should know how bad GRobs system is though. He got fired there as well did he not?

Right - but during his tenure, the team did buy into his system. The final year, the defensive rankings dropped into the 20's, but prior to that he had some nice defensive players and they were ranked in the top 12 of the league. During the SB years - the defense was top 12 and higher.

Deberg_1990
05-18-2004, 01:51 PM
Right - but during his tenure, the team did buy into his system. The final year, the defensive rankings dropped into the 20's, but prior to that he had some nice defensive players and they were ranked in the top 12 of the league. During the SB years - the defense was top 12 and higher.

You are right...but i remember even in their Super Bowl years..even though they were ranked high statistically, I always thought they were a little soft to be honest....probably just a reflection of GRob himself.

Mile High Mania
05-18-2004, 01:54 PM
Sharpe says "THANK YOU KANSAS CITY ... I'LL MISS YOU"

Dec. 9, 1990:
After catching just three passes in the first 12 games of his career, Sharpe matches that total in a game at Arrowhead Stadium, while also scoring the first touchdown of his career. A week later in a home game against the San Diego Chargers, Sharpe makes the first start of his NFL career.

Sharpe's first TD was against KC and thanks to that performance, he got his first start the following week. That rules. :thumb:

Mile High Mania
05-18-2004, 01:55 PM
Damn ... no wonder you guys hate Sharpe as much as Elway, the guy has always loved playing KC.

Oct. 4, 1992:
For the first time, Sharpe goes over the 100-yard mark in a single game, snagging nine passes for 118 yards in a 20-19, comeback win over the Chiefs.

Mile High Mania
05-18-2004, 01:56 PM
Damn ... they just keep coming.

Dec. 12, 1993
During the first three seasons of his NFL career, Sharpe scored four touchdowns. In one game against the Kansas City Chiefs, he scores three times, leading the Broncos to a 27-21 win over Kansas City at Mile High Stadium.

Mile High Mania
05-18-2004, 01:57 PM
Ok, really ... this is the last one.

Oct. 20, 2002:
Sharpe sets a league record for tight ends, amassing 214 yards on 12 receptions to lead Denver to a 37-34 overtime win at Kansas City. Eighty-two of the yards come on a third-quarter touchdown catch-and-run from Brian Griese, during which he outran the entire Kansas City defense towards the end zone. "I've lost a step, trust me," Sharpe insisted after the game. "I was hurting. But Brian hit me in the seam, and it was just a full race between me and the safety. It is his longest reception as a member of the Broncos.

Deberg_1990
05-18-2004, 01:58 PM
You are right...but i remember even in their Super Bowl years..even though they were ranked high statistically, I always thought they were a little soft to be honest....probably just a reflection of GRob himself.

Case in point..wasnt GRob the D coach the year you guys got bounced from the playoffs at home to the Jags? 1996 I believe?

Mile High Mania
05-18-2004, 01:59 PM
Case in point..wasnt GRob the D coach the year you guys got bounced from the playoffs at home to the Jags? 1996 I believe?

Ok, but I blame Michael Dean Perry's FAT ASS more than anything for not hustling off the field.

And, I believe there was a blocked punt stolen off the toe of Rouen that was run back for a TD.

Deberg_1990
05-18-2004, 02:12 PM
Ok, but I blame Michael Dean Perry's FAT ASS more than anything for not hustling off the field.

And, I believe there was a blocked punt stolen off the toe of Rouen that was run back for a TD.


I blame Mark Brunell and Natrone Means for letting them run all over your team. Man i loved that game!

Mile High Mania
05-18-2004, 02:16 PM
I blame Mark Brunell and Natrone Means for letting them run all over your team. Man i loved that game!

Yeah that did suck ... but they were still in it despite Means.

(that's a name I haven't heard in forever, by the way)

I still blame Michael Dean Perry ... he royally screwed up. That blocked punt did not help either.

Back to your wanting to pin this one on GRob ... I never said his tenure in Denver was without error. The defense wasn't ready for Means.

Deberg_1990
05-18-2004, 02:18 PM
Yeah that did suck ... but they were still in it despite Means.

(that's a name I haven't heard in forever, by the way)

I still blame Michael Dean Perry ... he royally screwed up. That blocked punt did not help either.

Back to your wanting to pin this one on GRob ... I never said his tenure in Denver was without error. The defense wasn't ready for Means.

Yep...i would agree with you there. He caught them off guard.....Ill give your team props though. They fixed whatever problems they had...overcame them.....and went on to win the next 2 Super Bowls.

Mile High Mania
05-18-2004, 02:20 PM
Yep...i would agree with you there. He caught them off guard.....Ill give your team props though. They fixed whatever problems they had...overcame them.....and went on to win the next 2 Super Bowls.

Should have been 3 ... DAMN YOU MICHAEL DEAN PERRY!!

Thanks Deberg ... thanks for bringing up memories that I have buried for almost a decade. :cuss:

Deberg_1990
05-18-2004, 02:23 PM
Should have been 3 ... DAMN YOU MICHAEL DEAN PERRY!!

Thanks Deberg ... thanks for bringing up memories that I have buried for almost a decade. :cuss:

hahaha..no problem...that was Natrone Means last great performance too....haha..you will be dreaming about that guy in your sleep tonight! LOL I feel your pain....I have the same nightmares about Terrell Davis and Clinton Portis..

Mile High Mania
05-18-2004, 02:23 PM
Ok - thought you might like this one. Found it on NFL.com and the caption mentioned this was at Arrowhead after the 97 playoff game.

http://www.denverbroncos.com/resources/custom/Galleries/2004/sharpe/sharpe5_051704.jpg

Deberg_1990
05-18-2004, 02:24 PM
Ok - thought you might like this one. Found it on NFL.com and the caption mentioned this was at Arrowhead after the 97 playoff game.

http://www.denverbroncos.com/resources/custom/Galleries/2004/sharpe/sharpe5_051704.jpg


Mmmmm..makes me grit my teeth seeing that pic! I couldnt stand him and TD doing that! Or when they did the Neil Smith Home Run swing...man that used to make me soo mad! hahah

Mile High Mania
05-18-2004, 02:25 PM
I owed ya ... ok, later.

Deberg_1990
05-18-2004, 02:31 PM
I owed ya ... ok, later.
no problem

Natrone "Means" Business!

TEX
05-18-2004, 03:54 PM
Ok - thought you might like this one. Found it on NFL.com and the caption mentioned this was at Arrowhead after the 97 playoff game.

http://www.denverbroncos.com/resources/custom/Galleries/2004/sharpe/sharpe5_051704.jpg


I have a couple of D.T. swinging him around ny his face mask? ;)

Mile High Mania
05-18-2004, 04:46 PM
I have a couple of D.T. swinging him around ny his face mask? ;)

Ahhh ... evidence of cheating, nice.

TEX
05-18-2004, 04:51 PM
Ahhh ... evidence of cheating, nice.

Cheating? How do you figure? Cheating is done to gain an advantage. How can wanting to rip someone's head off and trying it, be cheating? ;)

alpha_omega
05-18-2004, 05:37 PM
Ok, really ... this is the last one.

Oct. 20, 2002:
Sharpe sets a league record for tight ends, amassing 214 yards on 12 receptions to lead Denver to a 37-34 overtime win at Kansas City. Eighty-two of the yards come on a third-quarter touchdown catch-and-run from Brian Griese, during which he outran the entire Kansas City defense towards the end zone. "I've lost a step, trust me," Sharpe insisted after the game. "I was hurting. But Brian hit me in the seam, and it was just a full race between me and the safety. It is his longest reception as a member of the Broncos.

This one was the worst of all!!!

TEX
05-18-2004, 05:50 PM
This one was the worst of all!!!

Yeah, but he did it TWICE against the SAME defensive allignment. :cuss:

Deberg_1990
05-18-2004, 05:57 PM
Yeah, but he did it TWICE against the SAME defensive allignment. :cuss:


That was just the frustration of a bad season coming to a boil. Ill never forget the "Monday Night Meltdown" That was the beginning of the end for Marty in KC. To think, everyone thought we would go undefeated that season! hahahahahah

TEX
05-18-2004, 06:04 PM
That was just the frustration of a bad season coming to a boil. Ill never forget the "Monday Night Meltdown" That was the beginning of the end for Marty in KC. To think, everyone thought we would go undefeated that season! hahahahahah

No. Shannon set the record against the CHIEFS 2 years ago at ARROWHEAD. The DeTARD had the Chiefs defend the play the same way and it worked again for the DONX. The deal was they had all of halftime to make adjustments. :cuss:

Deberg_1990
05-18-2004, 06:11 PM
No. Shannon set the record against the CHIEFS 2 years ago at ARROWHEAD. The DeTARD had the Chiefs defend the play the same way and it worked again for the DONX. The deal was they had all of halftime to make adjustments. :cuss:

Yeah..i remember that game too......your right....GRob is a retard! I meant the Monday Night Meltdown game was the one where DT grabbed Sharpe's Facemask.

TEX
05-18-2004, 06:24 PM
Yeah..i remember that game too......your right....GRob is a retard! I meant the Monday Night Meltdown game was the one where DT grabbed Sharpe's Facemask.

Oh. Well you're right in that D.T. had TWICE the fun when he grabbed Sharpe's facemask 2 times. I mean why exert outstanding effort only once, right? :p

Mile High Mania
05-18-2004, 06:38 PM
The great thing about all these battles is that if you were to ask Sharpe ... he'd tell you that he had the greatest respect for DT.

While we're tripping down memory lane... I liked it when Neil Smith traded in his red and gold band-aid for a predominantly orange and blue band-aid. I'll never forget the clip of Elway smacking Neil on the pads on the sidelines saying "Welcome to the good side"....

Damn, that seems like such a damn long time ago... and it's still odd for me to see footage of Neil Smith as a Bronco.

Deberg_1990
05-18-2004, 06:47 PM
The great thing about all these battles is that if you were to ask Sharpe ... he'd tell you that he had the greatest respect for DT.

While we're tripping down memory lane... I liked it when Neil Smith traded in his red and gold band-aid for a predominantly orange and blue band-aid. I'll never forget the clip of Elway smacking Neil on the pads on the sidelines saying "Welcome to the good side"....

Damn, that seems like such a damn long time ago... and it's still odd for me to see footage of Neil Smith as a Bronco.

Neil was NEVER truly a Bronco...he will always be a Chief in my book. He just rode that gravy train to get a SB ring. Can you believe that Sharpe was a Raven once??

TEX
05-18-2004, 06:53 PM
The great thing about all these battles is that if you were to ask Sharpe ... he'd tell you that he had the greatest respect for DT.

While we're tripping down memory lane... I liked it when Neil Smith traded in his red and gold band-aid for a predominantly orange and blue band-aid. I'll never forget the clip of Elway smacking Neil on the pads on the sidelines saying "Welcome to the good side"....

Damn, that seems like such a damn long time ago... and it's still odd for me to see footage of Neil Smith as a Bronco.

That really HURT my parts that Neil went to the DONX. The thing is he did EVERYTHING in his power to STAY in KC.

A story I liked much better is when the DONX "stole" Dale Carter! ROFL

Mile High Mania
05-18-2004, 07:30 PM
That really HURT my parts that Neil went to the DONX. The thing is he did EVERYTHING in his power to STAY in KC.

A story I liked much better is when the DONX "stole" Dale Carter! ROFL

I have no recollection of this Carter character.

But, I would like to thank KC for the likes of Neil Smith, Alex Gibbs ... didn't Traylor come over from KC? And, thanks for picking GRob off the street... as well as Brister.

TEX
05-18-2004, 07:44 PM
I have no recollection of this Carter character.

But, I would like to thank KC for the likes of Neil Smith, Alex Gibbs ... didn't Traylor come over from KC? And, thanks for picking GRob off the street... as well as Brister.


Alex Gibbs was a loss that you might know all about soon enough.

You guys drafted Traylor, but we made him into a DT so he was just coming home.

Now the GRob thing was RETARDED from day 1 as he more than anyone KILLED the CHIEFS for the past 3 seaons, especially the last 2. There is NO RESPONSE for that move. That is one hell of a TRUMP card! :cuss:

Brister was a NON FACTOR as he didn't even make a regular season roster.

Mile High Mania
05-19-2004, 05:12 AM
Alex Gibbs was a loss that you might know all about soon enough.

You guys drafted Traylor, but we made him into a DT so he was just coming home.

Now the GRob thing was RETARDED from day 1 as he more than anyone KILLED the CHIEFS for the past 3 seaons, especially the last 2. There is NO RESPONSE for that move. That is one hell of a TRUMP card! :cuss:

Brister was a NON FACTOR as he didn't even make a regular season roster.

Yeah - I knew we originally drafted him, I just couldn't recall at the time if he had come back to Denver via KC.

Regarding Gibbs, we essentially lost him 3 years ago. Dennison has been calling the shots for the last few years - Alex was a part time consultant.

KingPriest2
12-02-2004, 01:58 PM
Bump this is not including this season

beavis
12-02-2004, 01:59 PM
This looks oddly familiar.