Okay. Point taken. Now I'll throw out another name - BILLICHICK. Wonder what would have happened if he wasn't given another chance after Cleveland? :hmmm:

That would depend on who is available in all three catagories, wouldn't?

And who was right? :hmmm:

isn't Ferentz an Ioweenie?


that kinda sucks



heh

It will be both B and C.

For every one of your Bill Belichik's I can name 3 Chan Gailey's.

Ultimately, I don't think Carl can resist the lure of once again trying to artificially recreate the Marty years.

I think our next head coach will likely be Herm Edwards or someone like him.

What happend to Stoops as "the" college coach for the Chiefs?

I think Sanders has the job so its a moot point.

I agree. We are actually in pretty good shape...much to my own surprise.

In the next 3 years we'll need a LT, a #1WR to replace Kennison, a young CB to replace Warfield, a DE to replace Hicks...and maybe, unfortunetly, a DT.

We also, of course, need a QBOTF or we'll have to roll the dice on another "Vet" like Green. Over 3 years that is all doable with smart drafts.

Bell and Surtain have 3+ years. DJ/Fujita/Fox have 3+ years. Wesley has 3+ years. LJ. Holcombe. Parker. Dante. Crap-ho. Wilson. Allen. Siavvi(??). Welbourne to replace Shields.

I realize CP doesn't like AS, but I hope AS gets the job. He isn't Vermeil. He is brilliant at using spare parts and scraps to whip the best defenses in the league. I'd like to keep that mind on our sideline. Gun can stay at DC and purge his shitty defensive coaches.

The same can be said of 1st round QB's.

And I wonder if the Rams would make a move for Saunders this year if Martz continues to be an underachiever. :hmmm:

that would be a disaster...makes me sick to think about it

I happen to like Herm Edwards.

But, we probably wouldn't be able to see eye to eye on a HC with a telescope... :p

Wow. You have no point. Everyone knew Cunningham was a Shottenheimer clone. You really haven't done your research if you think Saunders wouldn't bring something new to the table. Saunders is more of an in your face coach than Vermeil ever was. Saunders has taken the "Rams" offense, and tailor fitted it to KC's strength's. If you don't think Saunders can adapt, and bring something new, then your warped. Go to a Training Camp once and tell me Saunders is anything like Vermeil on the practice field.

Which basically means the Chiefs are screwed. Unless Carl Peterson gets hit by a bus.

Bell may or may not be constantly injured. Holcombe is 30. Welbourn's knee injury has turned out to hobble him quite a bit worse than they thought.

And then you have Fox, Parker, Craphonso, Wilson, and Siavii, all of which are AT BEST unproven and at worst busts.

Yes he is. So was Mike Martz. Or Brian Billick. Or Norv Turner. I realize it's not a popular position, but I've seen plenty from Saunders that suggest (to me) that he's SO GOOD at offense, that he wouldn't be able to see the forest through the trees as a head coach.

Just because you can't understand it, doesn't mean I don't have a point. Trying to suggest I haven't done my "research" says exactly where you stand.