ChiefsPlanet
Page 10 of 20 « First 6789 10 11121314 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft Bradford Please (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=199979)

Skip Towne 01-09-2009 09:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 5372218)
That has to be one of the dumbest critiques I've seen in some time. The coach has installed a system where the offense lines up, then a whole cadre of assistants relay signals from the sidelines regarding adjustments the staff wants based on how the D lines up against them. It's Bradford's JOB under this system to take in all those signals and update the offense. It's what he's SUPPOSED to do. And you spin it like he's some lost child looking to the sideline for his binky.
This

beach tribe 01-09-2009 09:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief Henry (Post 5372243)
Tebow is my type of player. Fire in his belly with alot of desire. It doesn't appear that he'd have many off the field problems either.

Detroit should pick him. That town is desperate for something to get excited about.

I would not mind seeing Tebow under center in KC. He's gritty and isn't made of glass like Brody Croyle.

I still wanted OU to win...but I was happy for Tebow. I'm also glad he doesn't have that
"THUG" mentality and style.

I still don't know if we need to pick a QB with our 1st pick. If Tebow is available I'd love to get him, but only if its him. I would like to see Thigpen receive another shot.
Tebow MIGHT be available with our 1st pick.ROFL

BigChiefFan 01-09-2009 09:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief Henry (Post 5372243)
Tebow is my type of player. Fire in his belly with alot of desire. It doesn't appear that he'd have many off the field problems either.

Detroit should pick him. That town is desperate for something to get excited about.

I would not mind seeing Tebow under center in KC. He's gritty and isn't made of glass like Brody Croyle.

I still wanted OU to win...but I was happy for Tebow. I'm also glad he doesn't have that
"THUG" mentality and style.

I still don't know if we need to pick a QB with our 1st pick. If Tebow is available I'd love to get him, but only if its him. I would like to see Thigpen receive another shot.
Tebow isn't a QB at the NFL level, sorry to burst your bubble.

banyon 01-09-2009 09:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief Henry (Post 5372243)
Tebow is my type of player. Fire in his belly with alot of desire. It doesn't appear that he'd have many off the field problems either.

Detroit should pick him. That town is desperate for something to get excited about.

I would not mind seeing Tebow under center in KC. He's gritty and isn't made of glass like Brody Croyle.

I still wanted OU to win...but I was happy for Tebow. I'm also glad he doesn't have that
"THUG" mentality and style.

I still don't know if we need to pick a QB with our 1st pick. If Tebow is available I'd love to get him, but only if its him. I would like to see Thigpen receive another shot.
ROFL

sparkky 01-09-2009 09:49 AM
I haven't seen a lot of college games this year but based upon just the bowl games, this is what I came away with.

Tebow, the best athlete. also the most intangibles and "it" factor.
Sanchez, the best quarterback in a traditional sense.
Stafford, the streakiest. when he's hot he's hot, when he's not, he's average.
Bradford, well he just didn't show me much. I was expecting a better showing. especially with the talent around him.

until the combine, I hate to say it, I'm leaning towards Tebow as my favorite.

BigChiefFan 01-09-2009 09:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sparkky (Post 5372376)
I haven't seen a lot of college games this year but based upon just the bowl games, this is what I came away with.

Tebow, the best athlete. also the most intangibles and "it" factor.
Sanchez, the best quarterback in a traditional sense.
Stafford, the streakiest. when he's hot he's hot, when he's not, he's average.
Bradford, well he just didn't show me much. I was expecting a better showing. especially with the talent around him.

until the combine, I hate to say it, I'm leaning towards Tebow as my favorite.
Don't quit your day job.:D

jspchief 01-09-2009 09:54 AM
Some NFL front office is likely going to take "Bustford" in the top 5. If only they knew what Chiefsplanet knows.

Personally, I don't think any of the 3 are overly exciting prospects as top 10 QB picks. There are legitimate question marks about everyone of them, and I feel like the closest thing to a "standout" among them is Sanchez.

cdcox 01-09-2009 09:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 5372218)
That has to be one of the dumbest critiques I've seen in some time. The coach has installed a system where the offense lines up, then a whole cadre of assistants relay signals from the sidelines regarding adjustments the staff wants based on how the D lines up against them. It's Bradford's JOB under this system to take in all those signals and update the offense. It's what he's SUPPOSED to do. And you spin it like he's some lost child looking to the sideline for his binky.
NFL QB need to be able to get a good pre-snap read on a defense. It is one of the things you look for in a college prospect. He essentially has zero training in that. He's 4 years behind the prospects who have that experience. And even with 4 years experience doing pre-snap reads in college, rookies are going to be pretty rough.

Chieftain58 01-09-2009 09:57 AM
I have never seen either of them play until last night and Tebow looked amazing and Bradford looked lost. Tebow looks bigger and stronger and has one hell of an attitude, If we could get him it would be a big upgrade.

Mr. Laz 01-09-2009 09:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 5371597)
TIM TEBOW!!!!!!
die


no ....... die, preferably in a fire


no wait ........ die, preferably in a fire while drinking antifreeze

jspchief 01-09-2009 09:59 AM
Please stop with the Tebow stuff. The guy is a god in college football, but what he does in college at QB does not translate to the NFL.

Brock 01-09-2009 09:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 5372392)
NFL QB need to be able to get a good pre-snap read on a defense. It is one of the things you look for in a college prospect. He essentially has zero training in that. He's 4 years behind the prospects who have that experience. And even with 4 years experience doing pre-snap reads in college, rookies are going to be pretty rough.
It appears that Sanchez and Stafford would be far ahead of these spread guys in that regard.

Baby Lee 01-09-2009 10:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 5372392)
NFL QB need to be able to get a good pre-snap read on a defense. It is one of the things you look for in a college prospect. He essentially has zero training in that. He's 4 years behind the prospects who have that experience. And even with 4 years experience doing pre-snap reads in college, rookies are going to be pretty rough.
It might be a question about him imposed by the system, but it's not a failure of his making.

CaliforniaChief 01-09-2009 10:02 AM
Maybe we can get a really good QB like Mark Sanchez in the 2nd, pick up another draft pick in an LJ trade and get a playmaker like Orakpo, Curry, Maulauga, or Crabtree with our first round pick. Bring in Rich Gannon as a QB coach and let him tutor Thigpen, bring in another FA QB but don't use the highest pick we've had on a position we already have potential in. Sorry if this is a duplicate opinion...i'm new here and am still figuring this out.

Chiefnj2 01-09-2009 10:02 AM
I can't believe people are saying they weren't impressed at all by Bradford last night. I understand he operates primarily out of the shotgun and his program requires him to get the calls from the sidelines. We don't know if he is capable or able to make reads and adjustments on his own. But aside from that, the kid threw a nice ball and was very accurate. His deep balls were on the money.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:20 PM.
Page 10 of 20 « First 6789 10 11121314 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.