ChiefsPlanet
Page 10 of 23 « First 6789 10 1112131420 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Jared Gaither (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=253348)

doomy3 12-06-2011 08:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 8174441)
He was cut from Baltimore. He was passed on by Oakland. They didn't cut him.

The Chiefs had him. The Chiefs offensive line SUCKS. They cut him and he is starting and playing well in SD 7 days after he was cut.

Given that Haley has continued to support and talk up Palko. Given that Haley let JC ride the bench and started LJ.

Then, we have Waters and Haley getting into it when he first arrived. Waters was let go this year.

Gaither is just another example of a player who is clearly more talented than a starter that was not given a chance.

Was he even cut by Baltimore? I thought they just let him walk in free agency. I'm thinking we're the only team that has actually cut him. But, not every team can be as set along the offensive line as we are.

BoneKrusher 12-06-2011 08:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 8174441)

Gaither is just another example of a player who is clearly more talented than a starter that was not given a chance.
and this has happened a lot since Haley's been here.
another example of why he's not qualified to be a HC.

Chiefnj2 12-06-2011 08:41 AM
Gaither has always been known to be a bit of a slacker and not the hardest worker in practice. A few years ago he was a very good tackle for the Ravens, but they grew tired of his work habits and constant "injuries".

He's kind of like Haynesworth, a player with natural talent to play well, but a guy who doesn't really love the game and all that comes with it.

I can't really fault KC for cutting a guy who has a known history of being really lazy and missing lots of practice time. Is he better than Richardson, yes - when he wants to be. This season is a waste anyway, so move on and don't reward a non-team player that might have a negative effect on Hudson or some other younger guys.

Nightfyre 12-06-2011 08:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 8174292)
Running backs are a dime a dozen.
Running backs also have some of the most volatile levels of production and some of the shortest shelf-lives in the NFL. Coupled with the fact that there are almost always some sleepers deeper in the draft, it doesn't make sense from a value perspective to draft a runningback really anywhere in the top 20 in my mind.

ChiefsCountry 12-06-2011 08:44 AM
Overreaction Planet again.

-King- 12-06-2011 09:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tooge (Post 8174437)
this is very simple. He didn't fit Haley and Piolis "way". Same as Bernard Pollard. That is my biggest beef with this front office and head coach, is that they will jettison a player if they don't think his attitude meshes completely with what they want, regardless of talent. It is the same model that Pitt has. Look at the players up there. If they don't give 100% all the time to the team "way", they aren't there.
Yeah, but Pollard sucks.
Posted via Mobile Device

-King- 12-06-2011 09:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoneKrusher (Post 8174451)
and this has happened a lot since Haley's been here.
another example of why he's not qualified to be a HC.
It has? Like when?
Posted via Mobile Device

BoneKrusher 12-06-2011 09:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by -King- (Post 8174520)
It has? Like when?
Posted via Mobile Device
three that come to mind:

starting LJ over Charles.

starting T Jones over Charles

starting Palko over Stanzi

Fansy the Famous Bard 12-06-2011 09:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoneKrusher (Post 8174528)
three that come to mind:

starting LJ over Charles.

starting T Jones over Charles

starting Palko over Stanzi
Starting Cassell over [Insert Name]

-King- 12-06-2011 09:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoneKrusher (Post 8174528)
three that come to mind:

starting LJ over Charles.

starting T Jones over Charles

starting Palko over Stanzi

Those are the only 3 that come to mind? Three instances (well 2 because the 2nd one is BS) constitutes as ” happening too much”?
Posted via Mobile Device

BoneKrusher 12-06-2011 09:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by -King- (Post 8174538)
Those are the only 3 that come to mind? Three instances (well 2 because the 2nd one is BS) constitutes as ” happening too much”?
Posted via Mobile Device
the OLine, i know there has to be better linemen on the Roster than BR

-King- 12-06-2011 09:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoneKrusher (Post 8174546)
the OLine, i know there has to be better linemen on the Roster than BR
There isn't.


Who knew that all you had to do to get chiefs planet to cream their shorts was to have an above average game against a 3rd stringer.
Posted via Mobile Device

BoneKrusher 12-06-2011 09:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by -King- (Post 8174569)
There isn't.
then there's a problem.

-King- 12-06-2011 09:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoneKrusher (Post 8174579)
then there's a problem.
Yeah and Gaither wasn't the solution to that problem.
Posted via Mobile Device

BoneKrusher 12-06-2011 09:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by -King- (Post 8174590)
Yeah and Gaither wasn't the solution to that problem.
Posted via Mobile Device
based on his play with the Chargers last night i beg to differ.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:27 AM.
Page 10 of 23 « First 6789 10 1112131420 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.