ChiefsPlanet - Chiefs GIF'D UP Chiefs vs Packers AKA WOOOOOOO

Page 10 of 11

« First

Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)

- Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)

- -

GIF'D UP Chiefs vs Packers AKA WOOOOOOO (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=254079)

Amnorix

12-23-2011 06:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Three7s (Post 8229144)

But but but, the momentum! It's killer I tell you! /Amnorix

Not to be a dick, but seriously, if you watched the whole game, the Packers were doing diddly, and they would've had the ball at near the 20 anyway after the FG. There is no reason to believe they even get to mid-field.

And no, this wasn't directed towards you, dbosho, just using your post as an example.

You might be right, but in a defensive struggle there is a HELL of a big difference between up 2 points and up 5.

Amnorix

12-23-2011 06:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DonkyPuncher (Post 8230017)

To me it looked like he stepped out of bounds before he even crossed into the end zone and before he lost the ball, at the 2 or 3 yrd line I'd say

You know that he doesn't need to "lose" the ball as in cease all contact with it right? He only needs to lose control of it, which he had clearly done before his foot LANDS out of bounds. Sorry, but that is unquestionably a fumble. Look at GoChiefs' picture -- his foot is NOT down and the ball is clearly exiting stage left...

Dartgod

12-23-2011 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 8230037)

I don't believe the ball has to land completely in the end zone. Let's say he was in the middle of the field and somehow "fumbled" by winging the ball, clearly through the end zone, but with such force that it landed out of bounds.

I'm 99.9% sure that's still a touchback. The ball doesn't need to land "in" the end zone to be a touchback.

All it has to do is cross the plane of the goal line (which it did) and then go out of the end zone. He had clearly lost control of the ball before he stepped out of bounds.

philfree

12-23-2011 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dartgod (Post 8230051)

All it has to do is cross the plane of the goal line (which it did) and then go out of the end zone. He had clearly lost control of the ball before he stepped out of bounds.

To me I can't tell 100% of the ball goes inside or outside of the pylon. I don't think the call could be over turned.

BigMeatballDave

12-23-2011 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 8230037)

I'm not sure about that ruling, myself. I know in this instance, its would be difficult to overturn a call if the ball doesn't land in the EZ and to be certain that it broke the plane of the goalline.

DJ's left nut

12-23-2011 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 8230098)

To me I can't tell 100% of the ball goes inside or outside of the pylon. I don't think the call could over turned.

That would have been the question.

I honestly don't see any evidence that can establish whether or not the ball crossed inside or outside the pylon. As such, I don't see how they could've given possession to GB.

Ultimately, however, they'd have had to make a ruling on where to spot the football, so it would have been something of a blind guess either way.

I'm glad he didn't challenge, but I'm not entirely certain he'd have won it.

trndobrd

12-23-2011 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omega (Post 8229094)

Houston beasting. The last one is exquisite. His pressure forces Rodgers to retreat into Hali's waiting arms. Also, I love Gilberry with the assist. LMAO

http://uranus.ckt.net/~gochiefs/hougb3.gif

http://uranus.ckt.net/~gochiefs/hougb2.gif

http://uranus.ckt.net/~gochiefs/hougb1.gif

Nice work by Gilberry (first gif) and Bailey (2nd gif) sucking up double teams and getting a decent movement in the middle.

Amnorix

12-23-2011 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 8230098)

To me I can't tell 100% of the ball goes inside or outside of the pylon. I don't think the call could be over turned.

I guess from that angle you guys might be right. But momentum was heading out of bounds. Hard to believe that the ball didn't at least cross the pylon. I'd say it's like 99% probable that it did cross the goal line, but from the angle GoChiefs posted, you can't say for sure.

Otter

12-23-2011 10:12 AM

Tough to say whether he's overall better than Cassell in just one game but I think it's safe to say he's miles ahead of Palko.

Sofa King

12-23-2011 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omega (Post 8229094)

http://uranus.ckt.net/~gochiefs/hougb2.gif

LMAO @ Gilberry.

BigMeatballDave

12-23-2011 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Otter (Post 8230257)

Tough to say whether he's overall better than Cassell in just one game but I think it's safe to say he's miles ahead of Palko.

Huh? I think most of us thought he was better than Cassel. Its was confirmed Sunday and its not even close.

Dartgod

12-23-2011 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 8230098)

To me I can't tell 100% of the ball goes inside or outside of the pylon. I don't think the call could be over turned.

I thought there was an angle from the game that showed that it did go inside the pylon. I'm not sure though.

crazycoffey

12-23-2011 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sofa King (Post 8230264)

LMAO @ Gilberry.

that's how you take on two blockers,
good job bigman!

Amnorix

12-23-2011 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sofa King (Post 8230264)

LMAO @ Gilberry.

Is that the Chief committing the holding?

crazycoffey

12-23-2011 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 8230385)

Is that the Chief committing the holding?

it doesn't count when it's on your own team, you've taught us that!

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:47 PM.

Page 10 of 11

« First

Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page