ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   Senior Bowl Week (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=255394)

Tribal Warfare 01-27-2012 03:27 PM

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Z5f8LoXPiUA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/OzoGQGlh9KI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

O.city 01-27-2012 04:03 PM

Why do KC reporters not get to ask the question we all wanna know? It's like the Chiefs run the KC media like the Nazi's ran Germany. Everyone is scared of Pioli.


Bring back Whitlock.

suds79 01-27-2012 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 8331430)
Why do KC reporters not get to ask the question we all wanna know? It's like the Chiefs run the KC media like the Nazi's ran Germany. Everyone is scared of Pioli.


Bring back Whitlock.

The organization sucks. They're never get an answer anyways.

Mr_Tomahawk 01-28-2012 08:57 PM

I was unable to watch this.

Did anyone watch it? How did the QBs look?

Anyone have their stats?

jd1020 01-28-2012 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 8333802)
I was unable to watch this.

Did anyone watch it? How did the QBs look?

Anyone have their stats?

http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/boxscore?gameId=320283144

I didn't get to watch it either but from the sounds of the thread in the Lounge, everyone but Foles and Cousins were trash.

Personally, I care more about the practices. There's too much chaos in the actual game for anyone to get any kind of rhythm.

ArrowheadMagic 01-28-2012 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 8330874)
What do you guys think about Joe Adams or Maze as a later round wr project?

Take Adams all day long.

Direckshun 01-28-2012 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 8333802)
I was unable to watch this.

Did anyone watch it? How did the QBs look?

Anyone have their stats?

The QBs were... spotty.

Kellen Moore and Ryan Lindley looked pretty stinking bad.

Weeden and Kirk Cousins looked pretty good. Weeden threw an atrocious interception, but otherwise he and Cousins looked like they were able to read the defense and make multiple reads. I'd give the MVP to Cousins.

Foles was... disappointing. I think it's possible it just takes him longer to adjust to brand new teammates than his QB brethren. He threw a solid touchdown to his Arizona teammate, so maybe he just gets better when he's more familiar, whereas guys like Weeden and Cousins take to new surroundings like a duck to water.

Quentin Coples is a man among children.

I finally saw Alameda Ta'amu as a true nose tackle. He looked great -- I don't have the acumen to identify if he's more of a one-gapper or two-gapper, but he's got the size for two-gap football.

Isaiah Pead and Vick Ballard were, by far, the most impressive runners. Ganaway from Baylor was shit.

One other QB... the kid from Wisconsin looked really good. But he's just too limited. He's a backup prospect, maybe a 6th or 7th rounder.

aturnis 01-28-2012 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 8333802)
I was unable to watch this.

Did anyone watch it? How did the QBs look?

Anyone have their stats?

Lindley looked like ass and Foles looked like a 3yr. project. Weeden looked like he might be able to transition, but is old of course. Kellen Moore and Kirk Cousins looked like the best QB's on the field.

Basically, stats aside, eyeball test only, I'd probably rank them(by tiers, players in this game only):

Tier 1:
Cousins
Moore
Weeden

Tier 2:
Foles

Tier 3:
Wilson
Lindley

aturnis 01-28-2012 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 8333918)
The QBs were... spotty.

Kellen Moore and Ryan Lindley looked pretty stinking bad.

Weeden and Kirk Cousins looked pretty good. Weeden threw an atrocious interception, but otherwise he and Cousins looked like they were able to read the defense and make multiple reads. I'd give the MVP to Cousins.

Foles was... disappointing. I think it's possible it just takes him longer to adjust to brand new teammates than his QB brethren. He threw a solid touchdown to his Arizona teammate, so maybe he just gets better when he's more familiar, whereas guys like Weeden and Cousins take to new surroundings like a duck to water.

Quentin Coples is a man among children.

I finally saw Alameda Ta'amu as a true nose tackle. He looked great -- I don't have the acumen to identify if he's more of a one-gapper or two-gapper, but he's got the size for two-gap football.

Isaiah Pead and Vick Ballard were, by far, the most impressive runners. Ganaway from Baylor was shit.

One other QB... the kid from Wisconsin looked really good. But he's just too limited. He's a backup prospect, maybe a 6th or 7th rounder.

Foles lost a LOT of points with me b/c he couldn't get into any rhythm with any non Arizona receiver. He completed some short passes to other receivers and runningbacks, but when he missed a couple receivers, he went to Criner, and only Criner. Even looked for him all day on one play, until pressure was in his face and tried to hit another guy quick only to have it fall incomplete.

I really didn't like that about him. Moore's STATS look like shit, but both McNutt and Posey dropped a TD pass on consecutive plays for him along with a few other drops and he actually went deep once in a while. I actually came away feeling a lot better about Moore. Seems like he really has the head for the game and his only real big flaw has been his arm.

aturnis 01-28-2012 10:21 PM

Wilson did not look good. He looked like ****ing Tim Tebow out there.

aturnis 01-28-2012 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArrowheadMagic (Post 8333838)
Take Adams all day long.

This.

Both of the Adams (Joe and Mike) looked great in this game. I would be happy if either one became a Chief.

Tribal Warfare 01-28-2012 10:41 PM

To me, there was a shit load of "meh" in comparison to other years. There wasn't a truly standout player outside of Coples.

aturnis 01-28-2012 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 8333996)
To me, there was a shit load of "meh" in comparison to other years. There wasn't a truly standout player outside of Coples.

I thought there was a lot of good O and D line play. No lbers or dbacks really stood out to me. Wr's and QB's were meh like you said. I did like some of the RB play though.

Tribal Warfare 01-28-2012 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 8334038)
I thought there was a lot of good O and D line play. No lbers or dbacks really stood out to me. Wr's and QB's were meh like you said. I did like some of the RB play though.


Alameda Ta'amu, quasi redeemed himself but that Baylor performance is still giving me a hesitation to give a full fledged endorsement in the first two maybe three rounds in selecting him. Its still my belief because Crennel is HC now that KC will pick a NT in either 1st or second round if they don't go for a starting caliber NT in FA.

O.city 01-28-2012 11:19 PM

I thought Pead looked like the best rb there along with the dude form Boise.

I wasn't overly impressed with any qb, but came away thinking Cousins is an interesting pick.

Mike Adams would immediately upgrade the RT spot immensely and Joe Adams would be a perfect slot and return guy.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.