Why would we take Milliner number 1 when we could get Rhodes/Amerson/Banks much later on and have the same player more/less?

Someone drafted at 1.1 does not want to sit. What's wrong is you immediately inject poison into the locker room if you did this.

We don't have a 2nd round pick. Rhodes, Amerson and Banks will be gone by the 3rd round.

I didn't realize competition is "poison." Leave it to the commies to believe that tripe.

You have no ****ing clue what the **** you're talking about.

Favre was in his mid 40's when they drafted Rodgers. LMAO

****ing moron.

WTF?

ROFL ROFL ROFL

Oh that's right....you're frankie.....

Geno Smith would be nice.

In terms of value, trading back would make a ton more sense than drafting Milliner with the number one pick.

You are a mental midget aren't you. Albert is getting paid big bucks and right ****ing tackles don't make Pro Bowls you idiot.

Is that all you do is come in here and try to disprove what others think? You post in threads calling people names and argue like a child. We don't talk about the jags in here or care about your opinion, you aren't even a Chiefs fan. Find something better to do.

Milliner is only possible in a trade down scenario and even then, I dont think they would take him.

Darius Slay in the 3rd.

Ideally, yes we trade back. If that doesn't happen, for whatever reason, Milliner wouldn't upset me.

I think Slay is a little overrated post-combine personally. JMO.

Honest question...

How would that one freak of nature from BYU or whatever fit in a 34?