Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 10515205)

Then why don't you leave and stay gone this time.

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10515206)

You obviously don't have a clue.

I don't hate Eric Fisher. I don't have any feelings one way or another about Eric Fisher, actually.

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 10515207)

I know this Fisher hate is due to not taking a QB.

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 10515207)

I don't know, maybe all these years in futility have taken the emotions out of this for me. I just don't see the point in being constantly pissed off about this stuff. I just roll with it.

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 10515211)

ROFL

Dude you need to check your ****ing meds or something.

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 10515139)

Pretty much every LT tackle taken high in the draft last year started at RT.

They are all slated to be LT sooner than later.

This isn't a new idea, they aren't reinventing the wheel here.

This is hilarious, you guys were bitching we had a 1.1 at RT and now you are bitching he is going to be LT.

JFC

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10515212)

Wrong.



If you think there's any emotion in this for me, you'd be wrong.

This is a football DISCUSSION board. If everybody agreed, there'd be nothing to discuss.

So should we just shut down the server and scatter?

Originally Posted by ct (Post 10515217)

it is hilarious

boils down to those bitching that he was a bad pick, beit RT or LT, but who should we have taken? In my humble opinion, DT Richardson, RT/LT Fluker, and S Viccaro performed the best on the field over their rookie years, and there's no way we were taking Viccaro. that leaves Richardson and fluker, the #13 and #11 picks, respectively, that in our short evaluation period appear to be the best selections 1.1 so far. frankly, if they took a DT, the fan base may have stormed the stadium and burned it down. and at the time last year, nobody had fluker projected anywhere [b]except[\b] RT, so then they truly would have taken RT #1.

they chose the best upside in a downside talent pool. now they will play him where he was drafted to play.

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 10515223)

If there is no emotion, then why are you so averse to him at LT?

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10515203)

ROFL

Must be almost spring. The homers are out in full force.

Originally Posted by Pablo (Post 10515239)

The Fisher hate is due to the fact that we had our pick of literally any amateur football player, and he was it.

And he gargled hot opossum shit for most of his rookie year. He was oft injured and largely ineffective. Now he's being handed a job for the sake of keeping up appearances instead of having to compete for it. Because we all know competition is bad, right?

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10515230)

Because I think it's a bad move, based on watching him play.

It's called "logic".

(And no, before you go there, I'm not suggesting my logic is CORRECT)