![]() |
I don't know which is worse, the Parsons deal or Mozgov getting 4/64 from the Lakers.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
At that point, the (presumably) Blazers don't even get an advantage of a long-term contract discount because it will go up with the cap. Like I said, at least Mozgov's deal will get progressively less shitty. Parson's would actually get worse. |
Lakers are essentially the Raiders from a few years ago, before they started drafting well. Can't get a good FA to come there, even with all that money.
They need Ingram to become a star. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Mozgov for sure. He reminds me of Slava Medvedenko. |
Quote:
|
Noah getting 4/72 from the Knicks is worse than Mozgov's contract.
Again, don't have an idiot son named Jimmy take the reigns of an NBA franchise. |
Quote:
|
You guys need to stop looking at the $$ of these contracts, as it was always going to be inflated. These moves can only be judged based on whether or not the team gets better. The money means nothing right now.
|
Quote:
That ain't saying much. My problem with Mozgov isn't the $$, it's the term. He's 30 years old with a 'failed' knee surgery on his resume. He's going to get real bad, real fast. And there will be a new crop of FAs every year. That $16 million won't matter this year because there was nobody that was willing to take the Lakers money right now. But next year? The year after? As Russell, Ingram, Randolph and Clarkson gel behind Walton (and I think all of them will show significant improvement over the next 2 years), the Lakers could become a nice place to look again. But alas, we'll have $16 million tied up in this slug through 2020. That sucks any way you look at it. I'd have rather brought Hibbert back on a 1-year deal and Hibbert is an absolute piece of shit. At least Hibbert would be off the books again next year and we could go again enter FA with a nice cap situation. |
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Free agent Chandler Parsons is nearing agreement on a four-year, $94M max deal with the Memphis Grizzlies, league sources tell <a href="https://twitter.com/TheVertical">@TheVertical</a>.</p>— Adrian Wojnarowski (@WojVerticalNBA) <a href="https://twitter.com/WojVerticalNBA/status/748958047704231937">July 1, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> I'm sure that will quickly be followed by Conley announcing he'll re-sign with the Grizz. Good team, but not Championship caliber. |
Some reports now that the Mozgov deal is actually 3/$48 with a team option. That's actually pretty palatable, then.
The Lakers don't have anyone up next year so it won't interfere with their 2017/18 salary structure and in the third year, you could always move that deal to a team as an expiring (with them declining the 4th year option). And if the cap keeps going up 20%/yr, even the team option might be palatable. Still not a good player, but the deal appears to not be quite the albatross it looked at at first glance, especially not with Parsons getting the max and rumors are that even Bazemore is looking at a deal at/near the max. Bottom line is that NBA contracts are going to be ****ing nuts this year - period. |
That Dellavedova contract...
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.