![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I think the "houston in coverage" thing is a little overblown. I just don't think he is productive on the opportunities he does get anymore.
|
9.5 sacks is a respectable year for a pass rusher. Especially a pass rusher with no help on the otherside, and who drops in coverage more than other OLB
|
Quote:
http://www.goerie.com/storyimage/PA/...-170119526.jpg |
Quote:
I mean think about it. The excuses made for JH being in coverage was because a lack of secondary talent. We just shipped out or best CB lol. This means JH is going to be even less used in pass rush with this logic right? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Dumb to not think it had anything to do with it. Get ****ed. |
I dont understand why this defensive scheme doesnt play to matchups. Everyone is always ****ing locked on "their" side of the field. Houston needs to play on whichever side of the line has a weak link. Him being on the right side was okay when Hali was still good. They need to get this guy over to the ****ing strong side once in a while, where the QB cant see him coming.
|
Quote:
$20 million per year good? |
Quote:
No. If Houston was terrible in coverage (which he was doing far too much this year and by no fault of his own) and he's not, or he was terrible in run support (which he's not,) perhaps then you'd have a point. Has he lost a step? I'd say he has. Is he still strong/athletic enough to toss a RT aside like a rag doll? Yup. He's a freak of nature. He has explosive power. He was minimized because our DC was using him to mask other weaknesses (and this I completely disagree with.) |
Quote:
Thank you for letting us all know you don't know what the **** you're talking about. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:23 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.