![]() |
Well, I did say "If he completely shits his pants in the playoffs..." and that's exactly what he did. I'd venture that you just move on from Darnold at this point. It'd be nice if he had tag and trade value but I don't think a team would offer anything.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But when the answer to completely gutting you is 'zero coverage, full send' and you just absolutely melt down, you're not a starting QB. It's been a really rough couple of weeks for Sam but it has to change the way Minnesota approaches the off-season. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm just floored by how poorly Darnold handled that the last 2 weeks. It was just spamming an easy button and he had no earthly idea what to do with it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Had he performed admirably these last couple weeks and earned a payday, they would’ve regretted it. He did them a favor. |
Quote:
They need to keep taking shots at QB while they play McCarthy. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Because ultimately I think he'd probably get nearer $25 million on the open market, if that. So if you tag him, you're starting $15 million or so underwater on his market value. Now maybe some team wants him as a short term stop gap but they aren't giving up a 2nd for that. You might get a 3rd for him at this point with that tag attached. In the meantime, you have a massive cap hold as FA opens. Additionally, you have the risk that NOBODY wants him at that figure and you're stuck with that cap hit. He was just too damn bad the last two weeks and in a way that's easily replicable. One game of inaccuracy is one thing. Consecutive playoff style games where the same thing absolutely destroyed him twice in a row and that thing isn't difficult to duplicate...that's just a disaster. I don't think you tag him at this point. Let him walk, hope he signs a deal that nets you a comp pick at some point. These last two weeks just couldn't have gone any worse for the Vikings. |
Quote:
|
Let him walk, tag and trade whatever.
We all talk about these things like they're gonna end up mattering, I guess to keep up occupied during down time but......the league is the same as it's always been. The NFL is the have and the have nots. Do you have an elite level QB? If so, you'll atleast be in the divisional round basically every year. Maybe you hit a time when you have a stacked team around a game manager and a legit coach and you happen to hit a time in your conference when there's not other high level QB's (the current NFC) and you get a good little run. All the mental masturbating we do to talk about this stuff when if you don't have Pat, or Josh Allen, or Burrow or Lamar or Matt Stafford....you're drawing dead. You know it. I know it. |
Quote:
The difference between mediocre and bad at QB in the NFL can be a 5 game difference. It's MASSIVE. Just look at how much different the Panthers looked at the beginning of the season when Young was a mess to the 2nd half when he looked mediocre. They were suddenly a credible team. Not good, but not a weekly embarrassment. There IS a justification for paying mediocre. But the worry is whether Darnold is actually mediocre at this point. |
Quote:
The difference is contending for a playoff spot and flirting with 5-12. Owners like playoff contention. It keeps fans from flying planes over the stadium. |
Mediocre is fine. Honestly, more teams should shoot for and be fine with that.
I can't believe Dallas didn't bring back McCarthy, a guy who has shown he can get the best out of Dak and win 12 games a year. But, no. Lets shoot for "we've gotta win SB's this is unacceptable". You don't have one of the top QB's who win SB's. You won't win. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.