ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Geno Smith vs Alex Smith - It's on. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=272597)

GordonGekko 08-14-2013 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lcarus (Post 9885955)
I get all of that and agree to an extent. On the other side, I don't know who else we could have acquired that would give us a better chance to win this year and next year with the nucleus of talent already present. I'm not a homer fool, but I think the possibility of Alex turning a corner with a new team and new coach is there. But like you said, lots of fans here are jaded with good reason and don't think that will happen. But hell, I'm gonna hang on to that hope and give Reid a shot with the guy he obviously thinks he can accomplish great things with.

This is the short-sighted question, who could we have gotten to of been as competitive right away if not Alex Smith? The answer is, no one, pretty much no one was going to make the Chiefs as competitive as they could be besides Alex Smith, so in this instance the Chiefs front office was correct.

The damning thing is, most Superbowl winning teams are winning those championships with Qb's they drafted and developed themselves. 12/15 previous Superbowl winning teams started Qb's in the game that they themselves developed from draft day to championship day (I'm counting Warner in this category as well). So the trend is definitely there, it's just that our front office likes to utilize 'band-aids' and not take the dive with an unknown Qb from the draft and just do their best developing them.

So, while the Chiefs front office can hope and pray that a Brees falls in their lap and gets the organization over the massive hump that is the 43 year drought, we will keep wallowing in mediocrity and watch other teams be victorious in February. Alex Smith is no ****ing Drew Brees, nowhere near that potential.

So there are some of us that want these changes to happen, and want a Qb drafted that the Chiefs have full intention of making a starter. Some love the 'band-aid' method (and while it works on occasion, the odds are against you with regards to the Lombardi).

Mav 08-14-2013 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GordonGekko (Post 9885972)
This is the short-sighted question, who could we have gotten to of been as competitive right away if not Alex Smith? The answer is, no one, pretty much no one was going to make the Chiefs as competitive as they could be besides Alex Smith, so in this instance the Chiefs front office was correct.

The damning thing is, most Superbowl winning teams are winning those championships with Qb's they drafted and developed themselves. 12/15 previous Superbowl winning teams started Qb's in the game that they themselves developed from draft day to championship day (I'm counting Warner in this category as well). So the trend is definitely there, it's just that our front office likes to utilize 'band-aids' and not take the dive with an unknown Qb from the draft and just do their best developing them.

So, while the Chiefs front office can hope and pray that a Brees falls in their lap and gets the organization over the massive hump that is the 43 year drought, we will keep wallowing in mediocrity and watch other teams be victorious in February. Alex Smith is no ****ing Drew Brees, nowhere near that potential.

So there are some of us that want these changes to happen, and want a Qb drafted that the Chiefs have full intention of making a starter. Some love the 'band-aid' method (and while it works on occasion, the odds are against you with regards to the Lombardi).

You are right about Alex not being Drew Brees.

But, his window to win a super bowl, is over. His 100 million dollar contract has led to them not being able to keep players that helped make that team a super bowl contender.

Where as Alex Smith, has a lot of talent around him. More so than I would say that is on the Saints at the moment.

Anything is possible.

lcarus 08-14-2013 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GordonGekko (Post 9885972)
This is the short-sighted question, who could we have gotten to of been as competitive right away if not Alex Smith? The answer is, no one, pretty much no one was going to make the Chiefs as competitive as they could be besides Alex Smith, so in this instance the Chiefs front office was correct.

The damning thing is, most Superbowl winning teams are winning those championships with Qb's they drafted and developed themselves. 12/15 previous Superbowl winning teams started Qb's in the game that they themselves developed from draft day to championship day (I'm counting Warner in this category as well). So the trend is definitely there, it's just that our front office likes to utilize 'band-aids' and not take the dive with an unknown Qb from the draft and just do their best developing them.

So, while the Chiefs front office can hope and pray that a Brees falls in their lap and gets the organization over the massive hump that is the 43 year drought, we will keep wallowing in mediocrity and watch other teams be victorious in February. Alex Smith is no ****ing Drew Brees, nowhere near that potential.

So there are some of us that want these changes to happen, and want a Qb drafted that the Chiefs have full intention of making a starter. Some love the 'band-aid' method (and while it works on occasion, the odds are against you with regards to the Lombardi).

Alex is no Brees, but maybe a Rich Gannon? I've always felt like this. Get your ****in bandaid, but draft someone in addition. But hey we got Bray. Who knows.

splatbass 08-14-2013 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9885291)
No, no, no. He, like Sanchez, must be a starter from day one! God forbid he be taken at 1.1 over an ALL IMPORTANT Tackle, and put behind a clipboard in a small market like KC with a decent coaching staff!

But hey; we've got Chase Daniel!

VIVA LA AWESOME!

It would have been completely stupid to take him at 1.1 and our franchise, deservedly, would have been the laughing stock of the NFL if they had. No team even thought he was worth a first at all, much less 1.1.

Mav 08-14-2013 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lcarus (Post 9885980)
Alex is no Brees, but maybe a Rich Gannon? I've always felt like this. Get your ****in bandaid, but draft someone in addition. But hey we got Bray. Who knows.

I think he can be very similar to Rich Gannon. Their skill sets, are almost identical.

GordonGekko 08-14-2013 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lcarus (Post 9885980)
Alex is no Brees, but maybe a Rich Gannon? I've always felt like this. Get your ****in bandaid, but draft someone in addition. But hey we got Bray. Who knows.

He could be.

That's another thing, I feel like the Chiefs are deservingly cursed because we had one of the (potential) best Qb's in the NFL on our team (Gannon), and we chose some ex-49er biotch to start over him. We kind of deserve our penance because that was one of the worst moves in the history of the NFL.

I remember my dad being horrifically mad when they decided to start Grbac. It's like every fan knew the truth that Gannon was a king, except the people who mattered the most in this regard, management of the team.

And then they let Gannon go for not even a box of jelly doughnuts. What ****s.

lcarus 08-14-2013 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GordonGekko (Post 9885988)
He could be.

That's another thing, I feel like the Chiefs are deservingly cursed because we had one of the (potential) best Qb's in the NFL on our team (Gannon), and we chose some ex-49er biotch to start over him. We kind of deserve our penance because that was one of the worst moves in the history of the NFL.

I remember my dad being horrifically mad when they decided to start Grbac. It's like every fan knew the truth that Gannon was a king, except the people who mattered the most in this regard, management of the team.

And then they let Gannon go for not even a box of jelly doughnuts. What ****s.

Yeah it was a ****in travesty. Then he goes to Oakland of all places. I've always harped that the Chiefs are usually the stupidest team in the league. Hoping that all changes now.

GordonGekko 08-14-2013 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lcarus (Post 9885994)
...I've always harped that the Chiefs are usually the stupidest team in the league..

43 years since the last Superbowl appearance, the statistics are in your favor in this.

lcarus 08-14-2013 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GordonGekko (Post 9886002)
43 years since the last Superbowl appearance, the statistics are in your favor in this.

And its more than just dumbass front office moves. On the field too. DBs not turning their heads around, offsides on a 4th and 3 punt return formation. Celebrating a TD that was overturned excessively when it would have been 4th down...on MNF. Diving catches for 5 yard losses. Shit that amazes me.

Marcellus 08-14-2013 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gochiefs(exceptQB) (Post 9885637)
At least average.

I think he could be like Jay Cutler.

LMAO, your savior has a ceiling of average.

LMAO

Sweet Daddy Hate 08-14-2013 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9885358)
That would have happened wherever he went.

He is NOT NFL ready.

So now that you've seen him struggle a bit and know that he is in probably the worst situation possible, you're ready to put your cash on the table and "bet for bust"?

You sir, are a pussy lips.

lcarus 08-14-2013 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9886034)
LMAO, your savior has a ceiling of average.

LMAO

A labotomized, emotionless douchecicle with a fist magnet for a face and a WMD for an arm?

DaneMcCloud 08-14-2013 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9886071)
So now that you've seen him struggle a bit and know that he is in probably the worst situation possible, you're ready to put your cash on the table and "bet for bust"?

You sir, are a pussy lips.

I'm a "pussy lips", eh?

Mind explaining that one, Sport?

lcarus 08-14-2013 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9886114)
I'm a "pussy lips", eh?

Mind explaining that one, Sport?

He means like those wax pussy lips you used to get for Halloween.

Eleazar 08-14-2013 09:43 PM

Alex Smith has a better chance to ever win a Super Bowl than a 2nd round rookie who is going to spend his first few years with a dumpster fire of an organization. (not that ours is great either in recent years).

Smith isn't a Manning or a Brady of course, but he is the kind of guy who has shown he can play well on a team that is talented and otherwise ready to contend.

At this point in his career he is more or less an known quantity if he's healthy, which is not a great but an above average QB.

And before anybody says "Woohoo, true fan, happy with above average", I wasn't a fan of the compensation for him, but I think he was the best player of the available options this offseason. It's hard to argue that IMO

Hammock Parties 08-14-2013 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 9886172)
Alex Smith has a better chance to ever win a Super Bowl than a 2nd round rookie who is going to spend his first few years with a dumpster fire of an organization. (not that ours is great either in recent years).

Geno is a talented young QB with a good work ethic who had a lot of college production.

I will take 10 of those for the next 100 years in KC before I ever take another retread game manager.

Eleazar 08-14-2013 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gochiefs(exceptQB) (Post 9886180)
Geno is a talented young QB with a good work ethic who had a lot of college production.

I will take 10 of those for the next 100 years in KC before I ever take another retread game manager.

Which is why in a QB-starved league, every team passed on him, some 2 or 3 times?

If it was just us, ok. But every GM in the league seemed to have the same read on him.

BigCatDaddy 08-14-2013 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 9886172)
Alex Smith has a better chance to ever win a Super Bowl than a 2nd round rookie who is going to spend his first few years with a dumpster fire of an organization. (not that ours is great either in recent years).

Smith isn't a Manning or a Brady of course, but he is the kind of guy who has shown he can play well on a team that is talented and otherwise ready to contend.

At this point in his career he is more or less an known quantity if he's healthy, which is not a great but an above average QB.

And before anybody says "Woohoo, true fan, happy with above average", I wasn't a fan of the compensation for him, but I think he was the best player of the available options this offseason. It's hard to argue that IMO

There are 32 teams so 16 would be "average". Jaws put Alice at #20. That's not above average.

Eleazar 08-14-2013 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 9886209)
There are 32 teams so 16 would be "average". Jaws put Alice at #20. That's not above average.

Jaws also used to wave around a "Super Bowl blueprint" with a Chiefs helmet on it.

BigCatDaddy 08-14-2013 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 9886216)
Jaws also used to wave around a "Super Bowl blueprint" with a Chiefs helmet on it.

Good point, but he's still the best IMO at evaluating QB's.

Hammock Parties 08-14-2013 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 9886203)
Which is why in a QB-starved league, every team passed on him, some 2 or 3 times?

If it was just us, ok. But every GM in the league seemed to have the same read on him.

Drew Brees, Aaron Rodgers, etc.

lcarus 08-14-2013 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 9886216)
Jaws also used to wave around a "Super Bowl blueprint" with a Chiefs helmet on it.

Yeah Jaws likes KC. Which is why it's kind of disheartening for him to rank him where he did. Doesn't mean shit though. I think even the Alex haters expect at least average production from him in this offense with everyone healthy.

lcarus 08-14-2013 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gochiefs(exceptQB) (Post 9886224)
Drew Brees, Aaron Rodgers, etc.

Those players are a lot more intelligent than Geno in my opinion.

Hammock Parties 08-14-2013 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lcarus (Post 9886235)
Those players are a lot more intelligent than Geno in my opinion.

Geno is extremely intelligent. He is known as a perfectionist.

http://www.ganggreennation.com/2013/...th-a-biography

Quote:

After taking an intelligence test early in his life, he was labelled 'Gifted'. So gifted that his mother was offered the option of skipping him a grade, she declined.

He was entered into a gifted program emphasizing creative arts. He was a good chess player early and took up drawing as a hobby, the thing about Geno, he always was and always will be a perfectionist.

hometeam 08-14-2013 10:30 PM

I was labeled 'gifted' as well, scored an IQ of over 135, and was put in special classes all through elementary and middle school. Look how that turned out~

edit: I'm, on Team Geno, I'm just sayin'

KCrockaholic 08-14-2013 10:31 PM

I've always liked football players who are good at chess. I've typically found if they're good at chess, they can be pretty good on the field.

splatbass 08-14-2013 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gochiefs(exceptQB) (Post 9886180)
Geno is a talented young QB with a good work ethic who had a lot of college production.

I will take 10 of those for the next 100 years in KC before I ever take another retread game manager.

Luckily for the Chiefs it isn't up to you.

KCrockaholic 08-14-2013 10:40 PM

I think we have one of the top 5 game managers of all time if we want to base it off the last 2 years.

Ok, not all-time. But best one right now.

NJChiefsFan 08-14-2013 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 9886272)
Luckily for the Chiefs it isn't up to you.

Yes, how lucky we were to get the GM's we did the past...ever....instead of somebody else. A monkey pressing buttons could have managed to put a roster together able to win us our first playoff game since the times when MLB didn't have a wild card and the X-Files was in it's first season. Eric Fisher was what, like 5 years old at the time.

splatbass 08-14-2013 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 9886277)
Yes, how lucky we were to get the GM's we did the past...ever....instead of somebody else. A monkey pressing buttons could have managed to put a roster together able to win us our first playoff game since the times when MLB didn't have a wild card and the X-Files was in it's first season. Eric Fisher was what, like 5 years old at the time.

We have no idea how the Chiefs will play this year. It is a little too early to pronounce this regime the same as the last. Stupid too.

NJChiefsFan 08-14-2013 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 9886289)
We have no idea how the Chiefs will play this year. It is a little too early to pronounce this regime the same as the last. Stupid too.

Saying that the Chiefs have dodged a bullet by not taking a different route at QB would also be a little too early to pronounce, wouldn't you say? It might even be a little stupid too. Follow your own advice.

splatbass 08-14-2013 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 9886291)
Saying that the Chiefs have dodged a bullet by not taking a different route at QB would also be a little too early to pronounce, wouldn't you say? It might even be a little stupid too. Follow your own advice.

I didn't say that. I've REPEATEDLY said we should wait and see before we decide if Smith was the right choice.

NJChiefsFan 08-14-2013 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 9886299)
I didn't say that. I've REPEATEDLY said we should wait and see before we decide if Smith was the right choice.

I took your most recent response to Clay as implying the Geno route is one we "luckily" didn't take.

splatbass 08-14-2013 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 9886302)
I took your most recent response to Clay as implying the Geno route is one we "luckily" didn't take.

I was referring to his idea that 10 Geno's over the next 100 years would be better than what we did.

Hammock Parties 08-14-2013 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 9886304)
I was referring to his idea that 10 Geno's over the next 100 years would be better than what we did.

I would be.

Guys like Alex Smith are a waste of time. This is proven. Not just in KC. Everywhere.

NJChiefsFan 08-14-2013 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 9886304)
I was referring to his idea that 10 Geno's over the next 100 years would be better than what we did.

I'm not really a fan of game managers. How can you be in today's NFL. Maybe not 10 actual Geno's, but I would certainly want my franchise to take 10 chances on a potential QB talent over taking a game manager. Especially if my goal is winning the "big one" once in a while.

splatbass 08-14-2013 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 9886312)
I'm not really a fan of game managers. How can you be in today's NFL. Maybe not 10 actual Geno's, but I would certainly want my franchise to take 10 chances on a potential QB talent over taking a game manager. Especially if my goal is winning the "big one" once in a while.

Good for you. I personally don't give a shit as long as we win. If we win with Alex Smith that is as good as winning with a drafted QB. Time will tell. It is you who want to limit them to only one way, short sighted at best.

DaneMcCloud 08-14-2013 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gochiefs(exceptQB) (Post 9886308)
I would be.

Guys like Alex Smith are a waste of time. This is proven. Not just in KC. Everywhere.

ROFL

Sweet Daddy Hate 08-14-2013 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 9886332)
Good for you. I personally don't give a shit as long as we win. If we win with Alex Smith that is as good as winning with a drafted QB. Time will tell. It is you who want to limit them to only one way, short sighted at best.

How far do you want that "winning" to go? 10-6? 13-3? 1-done?

Nice stop-gap, but no enchilada.

Hammock Parties 08-14-2013 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9886372)
Nice stop-gap, but no enchilada.

Alex Smith, the Doritos Locos Taco of NFL QBs.

Sweet Daddy Hate 08-14-2013 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gochiefs(exceptQB) (Post 9886375)
Alex Smith, the Doritos Locos Taco of NFL QBs.

LMAO He's more of a McDouble:

Something you would eat when the gas station sushi is the only other option.

Except he's been priced as a McAngus burger.

Andy Reid approves of these metaphors, by the way.

DaneMcCloud 08-14-2013 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gochiefs(exceptQB) (Post 9886375)
Alex Smith, the Doritos Locos Taco of NFL QBs.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9886379)
LMAO He's more of a McDouble:

It warms my heart when the morons play in the sandbox together

splatbass 08-15-2013 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9886372)
How far do you want that "winning" to go? 10-6? 13-3? 1-done?

Nice stop-gap, but no enchilada.

As far as they can. You guys still refuse to acknowledge that Alex Smith came OT away from the SB in SF. On the right team he can do it. Is this the right team? Too early to tell.

You guys are just pouting because you didn't get your way with Geno Smith.

Sweet Daddy Hate 08-15-2013 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 9886391)
As far as they can. You guys still refuse to acknowledge that Alex Smith came OT away from the SB in SF. On the right team he can do it. Is this the right team? Too early to tell.

You guys are just pouting because you didn't get your way with Geno Smith.

Geno, Jo Jo, or ****-o; this franchise is hell bent on drafting stupid and going with "proven to be useless in the modern league"-methods of addressing the QB position.

Is what it is. yay.

DaneMcCloud 08-15-2013 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 9886391)
You guys are just pouting because you didn't get your way with Geno Smith.

They both tried.

There are enough homoerotic posts about Geno to a fill an International Male catalog.

Sweet Daddy Hate 08-15-2013 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9886383)
It warms my heart when the morons play in the sandbox together

Goodnight, sweet douche.

BossChief 08-15-2013 12:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9886396)
They both tried.

There are enough homoerotic posts about Geno to a fill an International Male catalog.

Same could be said about Sanchez when I first got here.

It will be interesting to follow the guys' career.

DaneMcCloud 08-15-2013 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9886402)
Same could be said about Sanchez when I first got here.

NO ONE was talking about Sanchez' genitalia, let alone in hundreds of posts.

NO ONE started threads about Sanchez versus Cassel nor did anyone spam the forum with Sanchez nonsense.

BossChief 08-15-2013 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9886406)
NO ONE was talking about Sanchez' genitalia, let alone in hundreds of posts.

NO ONE started threads about Sanchez versus Cassel nor did anyone spam the forum with Sanchez nonsense.

Hahhahaha

What?

There are LITERALLY THOUSANDS of threads centered around Sanchez on this board and half of them are debates about Cassel and him.

DaneMcCloud 08-15-2013 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9886409)
Hahhahaha

What?

There are LITERALLY THOUSANDS of threads centered around Sanchez on this board and half of them are debates about Cassel and him.

Thousands of threads about Sanchez versus Cassel?

Either my memory is faulty or your memory is faulty. And after a cursory look at my thread starters, I started one thread about Sanchez in January 2009 because he had just done an interview with LA ABC 7 about his plans to possibly enter the NFL.

After that, nothing that I could find. And I seriously doubt that OWTP58, ChiefsCountry or Hamas started threads about him, either, although I can't confirm it.

Hammock Parties 08-15-2013 12:45 AM

There were definitely thousands of POSTS.

Hammock Parties 08-15-2013 12:48 AM

Such as...

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...Sanchez+Cassel

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...Sanchez+Cassel

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...Sanchez+Cassel

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...Sanchez+Cassel

DaneMcCloud 08-15-2013 12:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gochiefs(exceptQB) (Post 9886411)
There were definitely thousands of POSTS.

Not every ****ing hour and day.

Some of tho threads are YEARS apart.

And no one talked about his penis.

AussieChiefsFan 08-15-2013 02:34 AM

Geno Smith suffers 'brutal' New York Jets practice

We might remember Wednesday as the day the New York Jets' quarterback competition came to an unceremonious conclusion.

Geno Smith suffered through his worst practice yet, throwing four interceptions in 11-on-11 and 7-on-7 drills. After practice, Jets coach Rex Ryan acknowledged it was a "possibility" that Smith's ankle might force the rookie to sit out the team's second preseason game Saturday.

"It was brutal. It was Geno's worst day. I think, and obviously, the ankle's part of it, but ... way too many picks and things. Did not look comfortable today," Ryan said, via the New York Daily News. "Obviously he has to come back from it, he will come back from it. It was a bad day. Everybody, we've seen it, guys have bad days. But this was a really bad day for Geno."

Ryan's candor seems to hint that the coach is ready to move forward -- for the time being anyway -- with Mark Sanchez as his starter. Smith's health plays a major part in that.

"I don't think he's at 100 percent. I don't believe he's close to 100 percent right now, but again, that doesn't mean we have a few more days, that it can't get a lot better," Ryan said. "We've seen these type of injuries get better in a hurry, so we'll see how it goes."

This all smacks of bad decision-making by the Jets, who rushed Smith back on the practice field after he suffered a sprained ankle in the preseason opener. Their haste tells you how much they want Smith to be the starter, but some situations can't -- and shouldn't -- be forced.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap100...-jets-practice

Rasputin 08-15-2013 06:26 AM

No excuses for Geno Smith to throw those INTs, but I think the Jets let him practice too soon after rolling his ankle. He had a bad day, but it shows he has a competitive spirit just to practice on a bum ankle. He wont get the benefit of doubt if he doesn't play in his next preseason game. The Jets will name Sanchez as starter just to get ready for the first game of the season. Sanchez will be on a short leash or until they feel Geno can step in and take over. It will be week to week and enough boos from the stadium then it will be Geno Smith turn.

If Rex Ryan wants to keep his job he will have to make the switch sooner than later imo.

Rasputin 08-15-2013 06:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 9886463)
No excuses for Geno Smith to throw those INTs, but I think the Jets let him practice too soon after rolling his ankle. He had a bad day, but it shows he has a competitive spirit just to practice on a bum ankle. He wont get the benefit of doubt if he doesn't play in his next preseason game. The Jets will name Sanchez as starter just to get ready for the first game of the season. Sanchez will be on a short leash or until they feel Geno can step in and take over. It will be week to week and enough boos from the stadium then it will be Geno Smith turn.

If Rex Ryan wants to keep his job he will have to make the switch sooner than later imo.

:facepalm: / DaneMcCloud





(just wanted get that out of the way)

Sweet Daddy Hate 08-15-2013 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9886415)
Not every ****ing hour and day.

Some of tho threads are YEARS apart.

And no one talked about his penis.

No, we just made dirty sanchez facial references.

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 9886464)
:facepalm: / DaneMcCloud







(just wanted get that out of the way)

ROFL

Marcellus 08-15-2013 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 9886463)
No excuses for Geno Smith to throw those INTs, but I think the Jets let him practice too soon after rolling his ankle. He had a bad day, but it shows he has a competitive spirit just to practice on a bum ankle. He wont get the benefit of doubt if he doesn't play in his next preseason game. The Jets will name Sanchez as starter just to get ready for the first game of the season. Sanchez will be on a short leash or until they feel Geno can step in and take over. It will be week to week and enough boos from the stadium then it will be Geno Smith turn.

If Rex Ryan wants to keep his job he will have to make the switch sooner than later imo
.

The only flaw with this theory is you are assuming Smith is better than Sanchez and there is no real evidence to support that.

Rasputin 08-15-2013 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9886643)
The only flaw with this theory is you are assuming Smith is better than Sanchez and there is no real evidence to support that.



Geno Smith is a rookie quarterback with plenty of time to improve his game. Why do people act like he has to be so great out of the box & he isn't nor should he be expected to be NFL ready as Andrew Luck.

Sweet Daddy Hate 08-15-2013 09:02 AM

Chase Daniel!

Mr_Tomahawk 08-15-2013 09:03 AM

Did Geno throw anymore picks last night while we are asleep...?

Halfcan 08-15-2013 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 9886657)
Did Geno throw anymore picks last night while we are asleep...?

ROFL

Marcellus 08-15-2013 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 9886650)
Geno Smith is a rookie quarterback with plenty of time to improve his game. Why do people act like he has to be so great out of the box & he isn't nor should he be expected to be NFL ready as Andrew Luck.

I am talking about ever. I don't think he will EVER be a good QB. He ended up not being that good in college by the end of the season. He got outplayed by Nassib in the bowl game.

Early in the season last year I was all on the Geno bandwagon, started watching him play when I could etc...

He progressively went down hill, played absolutely terrible at the end of the season, shit his pants in the bowl game, and had an underwhelming combine and pro day.

I was thoroughly unimpressed with him before it was draft time. Every time he had a chance to prove himself elite he did the opposite. I don't understand why anyone thinks he is going to be a good NFL QB except people that wont let go of the early hype.

BourbonMan 08-15-2013 09:16 AM

Sanchez chosen over Geno

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/n...jaguars-081513

DJ's left nut 08-15-2013 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gochiefs(exceptQB) (Post 9886180)
Geno is a talented young QB with a good work ethic who had a lot of college production.

I will take 10 of those for the next 100 years in KC before I ever take another retread game manager.

The Chiefs, in an very Un-Chief maneuver, managed to get both this year.

That's why I don't understand the Smith angst. We did exactly what so many of you are screaming we should've done - went out and snagged a high-value, high-potential rookie QB.

The problem has become that the Chiefs didn't take the one many of us preferred and in the end, that's just stupid. Sure, I'd have loved to see them get Smith; he was my favorite QB in the class. But Bray actually does have more long-term upside than Smith and I said that before the draft.

This is just shouting at the dark by many of you. The Chiefs got the best available option for a team that's a lot older than many of you want to accept (Hali, DJ and Charles are looking at 3 more high-end years at most, Flowers and Bowe won't be too far behind that). This isn't a team that can give sit back while a rookie QB develops for another 2 years, especially not with the anger that had built up in the fanbase.

They did a smart thing and got a QB that can get the franchise back on the road to respectability. They then did an even smarter thing and snagged a long-term developmental guy. Did they fall ass-backwards into Bray? Yeah, probably, but in the end they still got him.

This "I'd rather have a rookie over a retread" argument is just stupid - we got both and placed the latter in a very good position to succeed.

Sweet Daddy Hate 08-15-2013 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9886687)
The Chiefs, in an very Un-Chief maneuver, managed to get both this year.

That's why I don't understand the Smith angst. We did exactly what so many of you are screaming we should've done - went out and snagged a high-value, high-potential rookie QB.

The problem has become that the Chiefs didn't take the one many of us preferred and in the end, that's just stupid. Sure, I'd have loved to see them get Smith; he was my favorite QB in the class. But Bray actually does have more long-term upside than Smith and I said that before the draft.

This is just shouting at the dark by many of you. The Chiefs got the best available option for a team that's a lot older than many of you want to accept (Hali, DJ and Charles are looking at 3 more high-end years at most, Flowers and Bowe won't be too far behind that). This isn't a team that can give sit back while a rookie QB develops for another 2 years, especially not with the anger that had built up in the fanbase.

They did a smart thing and got a QB that can get the franchise back on the road to respectability. They then did an even smarter thing and snagged a long-term developmental guy. Did they fall ass-backwards into Bray? Yeah, probably, but in the end they still got him.

This "I'd rather have a rookie over a retread" argument is just stupid - we got both and placed the latter in a very good position to succeed.

Fate/Ass over-teakettle with Bray.

But I'll take it.

jd1020 08-15-2013 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9886687)
The Chiefs, in an very Un-Chief maneuver, managed to get both this year.

That's why I don't understand the Smith angst. We did exactly what so many of you are screaming we should've done - went out and snagged a high-value, high-potential rookie QB.

The problem has become that the Chiefs didn't take the one many of us preferred and in the end, that's just stupid. Sure, I'd have loved to see them get Smith; he was my favorite QB in the class. But Bray actually does have more long-term upside than Smith and I said that before the draft.

This is just shouting at the dark by many of you. The Chiefs got the best available option for a team that's a lot older than many of you want to accept (Hali, DJ and Charles are looking at 3 more high-end years at most, Flowers and Bowe won't be too far behind that). This isn't a team that can give sit back while a rookie QB develops for another 2 years, especially not with the anger that had built up in the fanbase.

They did a smart thing and got a QB that can get the franchise back on the road to respectability. They then did an even smarter thing and snagged a long-term developmental guy. Did they fall ass-backwards into Bray? Yeah, probably, but in the end they still got him.

This "I'd rather have a rookie over a retread" argument is just stupid - we got both and placed the latter in a very good position to succeed.

We'll see how it works out. I'm not holding my breath that Bray ever amounts to anything more than any other Chiefs drafted QB in the last 30 years. I'll also wait to see what kind of extension Alex Smith gets.

DJ's left nut 08-15-2013 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9886689)
Fate/Ass over-teakettle with Bray.

But I'll take it.

Sure doesn't sound like it.

It sounds like you're going to keep bitching about Alex Smith instead.

At this point I'm beyond caring about how we got an incredibly talented young QB on this roster - the bottom line is that we got him here.

So I'm going to enjoy the next couple of years with a QB that can go out there and give us 13-14 good football games/season with the knowledge that Bray's going all Aaron Rodgers on us behind him and in 2015 should be able to kick some ass and take some names for us at the ripe old age of twenty-three.

Patience, children. This team sucked something awful last year and has sucked something awful for most of the last 15 years. It's going to be a good football team in 2013 (better than it would've been with Geno under center) and it may well be ready to be a damn good football in a couple of seasons.

DJ's left nut 08-15-2013 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9886694)
We'll see how it works out. I'm not holding my breath that Bray ever amounts to anything more than any other Chiefs drafted QB in the last 30 years. I'll also wait to see what kind of extension Alex Smith gets.

His odds of being a true franchise QB are no worse than Geno's, IMO. I wouldn't be holding my breath on him either, were I you.

The difference in Bray/Geno is little more than their respective floors. If Geno doesn't develop, I think you'll have a below average starter for your troubles; someone like Weeden springs to mind. Whereas if Bray doesn't develop he's simply out of the league.

Well who gives a shit? Who cares if Geno has a better chance to turn into the leagues next Alex Smith than Tyler Bray? Most of you folks are shouting that that's not good enough, so why do we give a damn?

If it's nothing but ceiling, then the Chiefs did this absolutely right. They got themselves a guy that's presently better than Geno by a fairly significant amount in Smith and they got a guy in Bray that has every bit the long-term upside of Geno.

Halfcan 08-15-2013 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9886704)
Sure doesn't sound like it.

It sounds like you're going to keep bitching about Alex Smith instead.

At this point I'm beyond caring about how we got an incredibly talented young QB on this roster - the bottom line is that we got him here.

So I'm going to enjoy the next couple of years with a QB that can go out there and give us 13-14 good football games/season with the knowledge that Bray's going all Aaron Rodgers on us behind him and in 2015 should be able to kick some ass and take some names for us at the ripe old age of twenty-three.

Patience, children. This team sucked something awful last year and has sucked something awful for most of the last 15 years. It's going to be a good football team in 2013 (better than it would've been with Geno under center) and it may well be ready to be a damn good football in a couple of seasons.

:clap:

Rausch 08-15-2013 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9886694)
We'll see how it works out. I'm not holding my breath that Bray ever amounts to anything more than any other Chiefs drafted QB in the last 30 years. I'll also wait to see what kind of extension Alex Smith gets.

This.

Halfcan 08-15-2013 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BourbonMan (Post 9886685)

And people wanted us to draft him 1.1- :rolleyes::shake:

Marcellus 08-15-2013 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 9886715)
And people wanted us to draft him 1.1- :rolleyes::shake:


The most NFL ready QB in the draft cant beat out Buttfumble.

jd1020 08-15-2013 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9886708)
His odds of being a true franchise QB are no worse than Geno's, IMO. I wouldn't be holding my breath on him either, were I you.

The difference in Bray/Geno is little more than their respective floors. If Geno doesn't develop, I think you'll have a below average starter for your troubles; someone like Weeden springs to mind. Whereas if Bray doesn't develop he's simply out of the league.

Well who gives a shit? Who cares if Geno has a better chance to turn into the leagues next Alex Smith than Tyler Bray? Most of you folks are shouting that that's not good enough, so why do we give a damn?

If it's nothing but ceiling, then the Chiefs did this absolutely right. They got themselves a guy that's presently better than Geno by a fairly significant amount in Smith and they got a guy in Bray that has every bit the long-term upside of Geno.

I guess I don't see any other QB starting for the Chiefs in the foreseeable future other than Alex Smith.

Reid loves the guy, they are both from Utah, and there's no way the Chiefs traded what they did for a game manager to throw him out after next season.

I don't think this is going to be a Favre/Rodgers situation because 1) Bray isn't Rodgers and 2) Favre was wearing out his welcome with all his bullshit retirement crap. The way Reid works you are likely to see Bray become a preseason hero and be traded to some team who thinks he's legit and become the next Kolb or [insert Eagles backup here].

Rasputin 08-15-2013 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9886671)
I am talking about ever. I don't think he will EVER be a good QB. He ended up not being that good in college by the end of the season. He got outplayed by Nassib in the bowl game.

Early in the season last year I was all on the Geno bandwagon, started watching him play when I could etc...

He progressively went down hill, played absolutely terrible at the end of the season, shit his pants in the bowl game, and had an underwhelming combine and pro day.

I was thoroughly unimpressed with him before it was draft time. Every time he had a chance to prove himself elite he did the opposite. I don't understand why anyone thinks he is going to be a good NFL QB except people that wont let go of the early hype.


I don't know how Geno Smith is going turn out he could bust or he could do great in the league? I just think it would have been more fun to find out if he were a Chief. Also I've said I wanted draft a quarterback this year and next year with a high round pick. I think this franchise can draft a few years in a row and create competition and trade bait as well. We have neglected the QB position from the draft for so long I'd really like to see them step up and take somebody. I want them to invest in a guy early in the draft and in practice to make him better. I want the QB to get to start as a rookie quarterback and that is something we haven't seen for a long time. At least it wouldn't be a retread and have to root for another teams trash.

Rausch 08-15-2013 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9886717)
The most NFL ready QB in the draft cant beat out Buttfumble.

I thought buttfumble was playing 2nd team this game...

Marcellus 08-15-2013 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9886726)
I thought buttfumble was playing 2nd team this game...

Quote:

The team announced Thursday that Sanchez will start over rookie Geno Smith for the preseason home game against the Jacksonville Jaguars on Saturday night.
.

Rausch 08-15-2013 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9886733)
.

My bad.

I stand corrected...

DJ's left nut 08-15-2013 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9886719)
I guess I don't see any other QB starting for the Chiefs in the foreseeable future other than Alex Smith.

Reid loves the guy, they are both from Utah, and there's no way the Chiefs traded what they did for a game manager to throw him out after next season.

I don't think this is going to be a Favre/Rodgers situation because 1) Bray isn't Rodgers and 2) Favre was wearing out his welcome with all his bullshit retirement crap. The way Reid works you are likely to see Bray become a preseason hero and be traded to some team who thinks he's legit and become the next Kolb or [insert Eagles backup here].

Reid cut McNabb loose when he had to and Reid loved that guy like a son.

Unless Smith takes us to consecutive AFC championship games, Reid will never have the bond with Smith that he had with McNabb. Even if Smith is that good, Reid didn't take Smith with his first ever draft pick and groom his straight out of college. There are a myriad of reasons why Reid won't ever be as loyal to Smith as he was with McNabb and he still moved on from McNabb after Donovan had a Pro-Bowl season in 2009.

If Smith is nothing more than the 8 win QB you believe him to be and Bray continues to develop into a potential replacement, Reid will absolutely move on from him.

BigCatDaddy 08-15-2013 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BourbonMan (Post 9886685)

To start a pre-season game. Nice misleading lead in though.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.