ChiefsPlanet - Football Burfict suspended for hit on Antonio Brown

Page 11 of 11

« First

Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)

- Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)

- -

Burfict suspended for hit on Antonio Brown (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=297475)

Brock

01-12-2016 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lawrenceRaider (Post 12021749)

How was there not a penalty on the Steelers for Porter being out in the middle of the field, and in the Bengals faces?

He was shoved into a crowd of bengals by a bengal.

As for why was he even on the field? Probably for the same reason 8 bengals coaches were on the field when bernard went down.

ThaVirus

01-12-2016 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcfanXIII (Post 12021456)

Case in point, with about a minute to go in the first half of this same game, 36 for Cin hit 11 for Pit after 11 caught the ball over the middle. The defender led with his shoulder pad, and was flagged. It was a clean hit, except for the fact 11 lowered his head, which caused 36 to brush his facemask when he got tackled. There was a 15 yeard personal foul called. So, are defenders supposed to get out of the way and let a WR own the middle of the field? Not make the tackle and let the offense get a bigger play? What are a defenders options in that situation? It's absolute horseshit that that is considered a penalty...

The hit was just too high. Even if the defender doesn't lead with the crown of his helmet or actually hit the receiver in the head, they'll still call it PF every time.

Defenders will just have to start aiming for the waist. I don't understand why they already do so.

Brock

01-12-2016 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcfanXIII (Post 12021750)

Defender had total control of his body, the receiver was the one who didn't. Yet its still a penalty on the defense. The defender went low, the receiver caught the ball and took two full steps before crashing into the defender. This is my entire point. This can't all be on defenders because it gives way too much of an advantage to offense.

Are you ****ing kidding? A receiver is supposed to be looking for the ball, not the guy who's getting ready to plow him if he catches it. Brown barely got his feet back on the ground when that idiot took a planned shot at him that he was going to take whether brown caught it or not.

Dayze

01-12-2016 06:02 PM

I'm honestly surprised more defenders aren't just trying to crush a guys knees when a guy comes over the middle in lieu of the extinct big hit/intimidating hit.

I can't think of any in recent memory off the top of my head, but I would imagine it's going to suck when someone break a guys leg in half.

Rain Man

01-12-2016 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 12021746)

https://cdn3.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/-B5...rfictcam.0.gif

That's incredibly rude.

A Salt Weapon

01-12-2016 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 12022223)

That's incredibly rude.

Yeah, dude's a punk. No excuse for that whatsoever, just being disrespectful for the sake of being it.